Return to: Home | Life & Society | Society

Obama has angered millions of blacks

Darcus Howe

Published 31 July 2008

Who says that the white middle-class family is a norm to be aimed at? It is a rickety form against which middle-class white women are in full rebellion

Barack Obama is pretty close to the tape. But beneath the mass adulation he received in Berlin, the politesse in Israel and his quietude in England lies a haunting mass of black people in the US whom he cannot take for granted. A slip could lead to a momentous slide.

His is the dance of the wolves. On the one hand rest the expectations of black people in the United States who, for the first time in their history, in the alliance with progressive whites, seek to make real the fact that a black shoeshine boy can be president. Around the world, expect ations are rising, resembling the hope of millions who, in the postwar world, demanded an end to colonialism.

Obama is feeling his way. Before setting off on his world tour, he turned up at a conference of the National Association for the Advancement of Coloured People, the moderate wing of the black movement in the United States.

Obama missed a step, and let fly in a rhetorical flourish his hostility to absent black fathers as the major source of the pain and suffering of the black communities in the US. Hardly any attention directed, so far, to the racism heaped upon American blacks from slavery to this day, and which accounts for the ceaseless revolt of black people internationally. I suppose he is being cautious not to alienate the white vote.

This is nothing new in the national politics of America. Every modern president has played it this way. This tendency received intellectual legitimacy as far back as 1965 in the Daniel Moynihan report, which charged black men with the failure to create a black family. There was much condemnation of this report in the black community. Martin Luther King gave his partial support, saying: "Nothing is so much needed as a secure family life for a people to pull themselves out of poverty and backwardness." But he offered criticism, too: "The fact is that problems will be attributed to innate Negro weaknesses and used to neglect and rationalise oppression."

Toni Morrison, much later, expressed her opposition to Moynihan's report. "The black family we have is the one created in the revolt against brutal slave conditions. Who is to say," she asked, "that we have to replicate the family structure of slave-owners?"

The issue resurfaced in 1995, when Louis Farrakhan organised the Million Man March, which mobilised 900,000 black men to correct the burdens heaped on black women for the failure of fathers to participate in the lives of our children.

Obama angered millions of blacks, I am sure, most of whom displayed a mature and tactical political awareness by their silence. An open microphone revealed Jesse Jackson's desire to de-ball Obama. Jackson apologised and postponed a hot debate for another day in order not to injure Obama's chances in the presidential race.

Reverberations spilled over to the UK. David Cameron, the consummate opportunist, jumped in for a free ride, repeating Obama's attack on absent black fathers in the UK. They are responsible, he says, for black-on-black knife crime in the inner cities. Within days, he trotted out his only black card, Shaun Bailey, who praised him to high heaven for making this argument.

I have listened to Bailey's recent television interviews and read his article in the Sunday Times, which reads like an official release from the Conservative Party.

It is all political mischief. Cameron and his cohorts know that his follow-the-leader comments will have little or no impact on black men in the UK, particularly since his own father packed him off to Eton for others to bring up. And who says that the white middle-class family is a norm to be aimed at? It is a rickety form against which middle-class white women are in full rebellion. It is on its way out.

Old social relations are in the throes of death as we search for the new. The Moynihan report must remain where it belongs - in the dustbin of history.

Post this article to

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • newsvine
  • Reddit

8 comments from readers

dossevi
31 July 2008 at 16:11

And so, it should be that black men should be encouraged to remain AWOL of their families?

Congratulations for a truly inspiring and empowering message!

williamdavies
17 August 2008 at 18:15

I was labouring under the illusion that a large number of black men were simply skedaddling once their ladyfriends were knocked up. Having read Mr. Howe's article, of course, I now see that these chaps are in the vanguard of a "search for new social relations."

rosebud
18 August 2008 at 17:42

So if the white middle-class family isn't necessarily the norm, then the alternative would be 1 unwed mother, 2,3,4, absentee fathers and numerous bastard children living on public assistance. What a country!!!!

williamdavies
19 August 2008 at 11:18

The fact that some slave owners lived in monogamous, lasting family groups hardly makes such things defnitively the 'family structure of slave owners.' Some slave owners presumably wiped thier backsides. Do you wipe yours while frettng that you are emulating the rectal-cleansing practices of slave owners?

gnuneo
12 September 2008 at 14:50

endemic poverty and racism are both excuses... and reasons.

don't just look at one aspect and ignore the other.

DH: obama was a "shoe-shine boy"?? News to me, i didn't realise in the US shoe-shine boys get sent to the most exclusive schools. Wow, that ol US is just a meritocracy miracle!

no-where
18 September 2008 at 03:43

Never, never try to critize a Black Man, in the Uk. End of lesson. Lets look at Zimbabwe now. Why not keep this place as it is as an example of Africa for the starving Africans! Whoops broke my own rule.

no-where
18 September 2008 at 03:48

I would prefer Prince or the Artist known as Symbol for the top job in the US. Anybody who can write a song like Raspberry Beret, and look so pretty, gets my vote! The post colonial hybrid half black glass full ,darling of the left, amuses me. The New Economist cheerfully writes "Obama attended a muslim school in Indonesia, " infering by stealth that they would allow a confessed christian to attend a muslim school in Indonesia , and that he was never a muslim, ever not even for five minutes.

Rana Severin
15 October 2008 at 10:43

The platform from where you belt out a very intellectual and academically correct text book format comment, The new Statesman, is in itself a product of white middle class.

I find that ironic. Secondly, you mention "a slip" referring to Mr Obama's addressing the issue of missing fathers in the US black community. Your slip is far more significant: You couldn't have read Mr Obama's book "Dreams from my father", let alone done some basic research into his educational background. He is very well educated (Columbia, Harvard) and his father before him, Dr Obama.

He is a far cry from being a black shoeshine boy. He is a product of both black and white culture and I believe this is why he has such a broad appeal to both camps. He is a black man embracing and acknowledging the best of white culture and yet displaying a deep felt empathy and genuine love for black people and its culture.

This is the reason why it disturbs me that you seem bent on tripping Mr Obama up in a case of misplaced loyalty. You are suggesting that he is a careful not to alienate the white vote by ripping open wounds from the dark shadow of past slavery and rather has a go at absent black fathers in the community. I honestly fail to comprehend how you could negate this conclusion, which- by the way- is a relevant issue amongst UK black fathers too. It does, however, not mean that the slavery issue is less prominent and significant in terms of collective damage to black people

in general and that is a never ending topic as long as the power balance of the world continues to lean on colonial perceptions of access to resources and subsequently wealth.

Mr Obama is obviously aware of this. He is also aware of how the world works and how to have a say and be heard. He is sophisticated but not a phony or a 'bounty" who've reached the top and suddenly bends over backwards to appear as "white" as possible. He knows that "white is not always right", but he is not a fool either that blindly rejects white culture just because it is white.

The uprooting and dissolve of the traditional family in general and within the black US or UK community in particular really is of major concern, which must be addressed and dealt with face on.

Denial will lead no where. A strong black community cannot be upheld solely by "strong black women", who are overloaded with responsibilities reaching far beyond reason. Look at the state of our communities with its fragments of scattered existences, scrambling to make sense of a society that fails to nurture basic ethics and values such as the family. The children are the real victims here, not black men who feels offended by the boundaries and demands that are requested of them to create strong and healthy communities by being fathers and husbands.

Mr Obama with his hard earned educational background, his black wife and children and his continuous public praise of family values, practices what he preaches and thus becomes a shining example himself of the ultimate black success story.

By RANA, editor The Daily Educator

Post your comment

Please note: you will need to login or register before you can comment on the website

About the writer

Darcus Howe

Darcus Howe is an outspoken writer, broadcaster and social commentator. His TV work includes ‘White Tribe’ in which he put Anglo-Saxon Britain under the spotlight. He also fronted a series called Devil’s Advocate.

Read More

Vote!

Will Baroness Ashton be an effective EU foreign minister?

Suggest a question

View comments

© New Statesman 1913 – 2009

Tracker