Registered user login:

Celebrate new immigrants

Darcus Howe

Published 01 May 2008

On International Workers' Day, we need to extend our hands across nations, instead of greeting the new immigrants with fists and hobnail boots

Anniversary celebrations abound. Enoch Powell's xenophobic speech of 40 years ago was recalled by the press and the British National Party, some aiming to convince that his alarm about the consequences of postwar mass immigration was justified.

Fears have been stirred that we are in a similar position today. There have been scares about being overwhelmed by Eastern Europeans, about the pressure on social services at large, and more, much more. A House of Lords committee conjured up some voodoo economics to convince the nation that each immigrant contributed 58p to the gross domestic product - that we offer little or nothing to benefit society as a whole.

At one swoop, it attempted to eliminate a simple truth articulated by James Callaghan as he addressed the Commons, long before he became prime minister, on 19 June 1946. "In a few years we will be faced with a shortage of labour - not with a shortage of jobs," he argued. "We should break away from this artificial segregation of nation from nation . . . Who is going to pay for the old-age pensions and social services unless we have an addition to our population, which only immigration can provide in the years to come?"

Callaghan's warning against the danger of xenophobia rings true with the rise of hostility against Poles and eastern Europeans. "Wogs begin at Calais" has returned with a vengeance.

But the corrective to this vulgar nationalism is at hand as we celebrate International Workers' Day. Immigrants from Europe began arriving in the UK in large numbers in the late Sixties and early Seventies. In 1971 alone, the Home Office issued 43,100 work permits to European immigrant workers to perform menial tasks, often in hotels, for up to 60 hours per week. Within two years, in the last six months of 1973, the Grand Metropolitan hotel group, owned by Maxwell Joseph, declared profits of £50m. The European workers banded together to seek parity with their British peers wherever they could.

The movement grew at breakneck speed as the workers went on strike from hotel to hotel in London. Eventually the Transport and General Workers' Union formed an international section to incorporate the new workers. In other areas of the economy, Asian workers struck repeatedly in factories up and down the country. On 1 May 1974, Asians struck spontaneously to bring work at Imperial Typewriters in Leicester to a halt and demanded they be treated equally with others. The strikes of the past week may yet trigger a movement across nations, races and religions.

Here in my local community, the proletarian Poles work from sun-up to sundown in the building trade. As local councils promise affordable housing, it is the Poles and other European workers who will be called upon to bring their immense talents to the task.

We have got them on the cheap. After all, the Pole who stands at the immigration desk was born in a hospital in Poland. He was educated there before venturing to our shores, ready and willing. He costs the social services and our educational institutions not one blind penny. We get this fully trained and healthy workforce at no cost to the state. On International Workers' Day, we need to extend our hands across nations, instead of greeting the new immigrants with fists and hobnail boots.

Post this article to

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • newsvine
  • Reddit

5 comments from readers

terryuno
01 May 2008 at 14:23

I agree totally with Darcus Howe's comments about East European workers. The sad thing is that a lot of the hostility is coming from ethnic minorities and the so called liberal left, because these migrants are white. Darcus needs to be commended for the stance he's taking.

johannine
03 May 2008 at 12:50

One must agree with the sentiment ,but it hides other problems ,im fine with bringing in others from any nation but its being done for ultiror reasons.

Perhaps its because immigrants dont know their rights ,or they are educated and trained by a system that regognises the value of training and educating people ,or they are more obediant , expect less, are prepared to do any job ,but then their children are raised into our broken systems and a new lot needs to be brought in .

Its our system of haves and have nots [no doudt docters like the docters shortage they helped to create [thus the need to bring in more docters ,but also because to train a docter the western way creates an arogant spoiled 'docter' not willing to serve in an understaffed hospital for 16 hours a day [or treat the great unwashed]

That specialists are being brought in is beyond dispute , but by the same token those willing to do as they are told [to serve] we need to look at the why of it , whats broken here that isnt broken over there .

Its too easy to say we need more [thus not explain why it is we need more ,the grouping of these new britons [or whatever term is country appropriate] are all willing to accept less , it is enough they are allowed in [for them] thus they stay loyal, and vote the 'right way' or work no matter how sick they are , the thing is govt dosnt bother to explain[and is never forced to admit because our media is hand picked not to ask]

Any way to those new to the common wealth welcome ,

know without you we the common people , wouldnt have half the service we now have ,

please know we like unions ,that represent the workers [and not just serving the boss and when voting you are free to vote for who-ever you chose [not just who your husband tells you].

welcome to the land of plenty [but know your own children will be complaining about the next generation of immigrants [just like this generation complains about you] its nothing personal ,its about having the freedom to say so [we blame anyone but ourselves] ok this time its you [but next time it will be something else]

rovert
04 May 2008 at 14:18

There was a time when a minority of British people said that if immigrants did not like the UK then they could always leave - this is obviously small minded and offensive. However, for Rageh Omar to suggest in his conclusion of part 3 of Immigration the Inconvenient Truth, that if the British born population did not like the UK anymore, then they could always get on a plane to another country is outrageous and equally if not more offensive.

To get a healthy and sustainable community, just look at successfull immigration policies of other countries such as New Zealand, Australia, the Carribean, Middle East etc - limit numbers and professions to requirements, a confirmed job offer is a requirement of entry, operate a points system, in many countries jobs are only offered to none nationals where it is proven that the post cannot be filled by a national, the post is readvertised every year or so to enable nationals to apply for the post etc etc. An open door, uncontroled and unrestricted policy that the UK operates is unhealthy and chaotic and encourages an unstable floating population with differing expectations and at odds with itself. This is unstable for all sectors of the community. Rageh Omar missed the big picture with a misguided and weak conclusion. Better solutions exist for everyone as proven by other countries, but unfortuneately not in the UK.

emmagold
05 May 2008 at 01:20

Why SHOULD non-nationals be less entitled to jobs or anything else? No one has any control over where he/she was born or what sort of country it was (rich or poor, human-rights-abusing or not, etc). If rovert had been born (through no fault of his/her own) in a poor, and/or human-rights-abusing, country would he/she be content to spend the whole of his/her life there simply in order to please people born into richer and non-human-rights abusing countries? Why on earth should he/she?

If the argument for restricting immigration is lack of room, resources, etc. surely this also applies to British people having large families. Why is it acceptable for some families to have numbers of children in double figures (taking up room and using up resources), simply because they were born here, but not for people to come here from abroad?

Jonny Mac
07 May 2008 at 16:21

"fists and hobnail boots" indeed. This country has been extraordinariliy tolerant of the massive, unasked for immigration from eastern Europe. Just once, Darcus, stop looking for victims and racism where there are none, and write about people without referring to their race and immigrant status. Oh, that's right, you can't, can you, because you'd have nothing at all to say. I'm increasingly of the view that the "anti-racist" Howe is actually a divisive, stirring figure who has done and continues to do much more harm than good.

Post your comment

Please note: you will need to login or register before your comment is displayed on the website

You may enter up to 2000 characters (about 300-350 words)

Characters left:

We want to encourage people to comment on our content and to exchange views with other readers and hope this will be done on a courteous basis. However, if you encounter posts which are offensive please let us know by emailing comments@newstatesman.co.uk and we will take swift action where necessary.

About the writer

Darcus Howe

Darcus Howe is an outspoken writer, broadcaster and social commentator. His TV work includes ‘White Tribe’ in which he put Anglo-Saxon Britain under the spotlight. He also fronted a series called Devil’s Advocate.

Read More

Vote!

Should Darling have been bolder with the 45% tax rate?