Return to: Home | Life & Society | Society

Kosovo was not the issue

Kim Bytyci

Published 07 February 2008

In the wake of the Serbian election Kim Bytyci argues Kosovo was not the issue in this crucial poll

Taxi drivers in Serbia tell you things as they are. They know they will probably never see you again.

"Trust me, we are very tired," said the man who drove me from the airport to the city on the eve of the elections. Looking indeed tired and casually dressed, he could easily be mistaken for a "radical" voter. But keeping the radicals out was his motivation for Sunday 3 February. "No more return to the past. We've had enough of wars and nationalism of the Nineties."

The re-election of President Boris Tadic will have pleased him - and most of those I spoke to on the day before the election. It had been widely seen as a referendum for or against the European Union, a choice between future and past, the west and Russia. Tadic based his campaign on a European platform. His rival, Tomislav Nikolic, looked towards Russia, stressing the importance of relations with the "historic friend".

The shadow hanging over this election was Kosovo. After the failure of the extended talks between Serbs and Kosovans last December, the declaration of independence by Kosovar Albanians was widely seen by the international community as the only way towards solving the issue of Kosovo's status.

But with the Serbian presidential elections a month away, Kosovar Albanians were asked not to rush into a decision.

The narrow (2 per cent) victory by the pro-western Tadic can be seen as something of a warning to him and to Brussels. For the people I spoke to in Belgrade, however, the election had nothing to do with Kosovo or the EU. For them, Kosovo is the "distant past" and the EU a distant dream. What they want in the immediate future is "European standards" - in other words, a better life, more employment and less corruption and organised crime. To travel without a visa would be nice but one still needs money to do it.

Experts agree. The choice "EU or isolation" and "Kosovo or not" was false, they told me. Speaking on election night, a representative of the Centre for Free Elections and Democracy stressed that a "better life" was a clear priority for 75 per cent of voters. "Kosovo was a priority for politicians," he said.

A recent poll in Serbia showed 75 per cent of people want integration with the EU, while more than 80 per cent see it as "something positive". Goran Svilanovic, former foreign minister of Serbia in the post-Milosevic government, thinks this election was more an assessment by the voters of the past seven years of the democratic coalition government that has ruled Serbia since the overthrow of Slobodan Milosevic in 2000. The two million or so who voted for Nikolic should not be seen as extreme nationalists and haters of other nationalities. Most of them are unhappy with what has been happening since 2000, he said.

Now the focus turns to Kosovo. A declaration of independence is expected within weeks and the US and most of the EU are likely to recognise it quickly. Both Tadic and Prime Minister Vojislav Kostunica oppose independence but differ on how to respond to the demand for it. Having secured a new mandate without Kostunica's support, President Tadic is in a strong position.

The future of the government is uncertain. Much depends on what happens in the coming weeks and months, especially in relation to the interim agreement with the EU, which was due to be signed on 7 February. If Tadic fails to get Kostunica's support, regardless of Kosovo, new elections may be called in Serbia.

Whether this will mean another delay for Kosovo remains to be seen. But also waiting will be the people of Serbia. They voted for change and they want change. As my taxi driver put it: "They keep scaring us with the loss of Kosovo, which for years has not been ours. All we want is a better life."

Post this article to

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • newsvine
  • Reddit

7 comments from readers

Truth
07 February 2008 at 17:12

There was Mr. Bytici in the heart of Serbia speaking to a taxi driver and he lives to write this article. If this had taken place in Pristina he would more then likely be dead by now. Ask the Bulgarian aid worker who was killed in the street for speaking Serbian

Zunaira Ansari
07 February 2008 at 17:39

The article is an honest assessment of the issues that mattered most in these elections. It is important to know how the 'ordinary' public feels about these things instead of reading statistics based on polls all the time.

Bob Petrovich
07 February 2008 at 19:04

A beautiful piece of taxi driver journalism. As expected for this genre, it replaces facts with writer's wishes and assumptions, not mentioning the real issue and the facts needed to understand it.

The key issue is EU's intent to send a mission to Serbian province without Serbia's consent, in clear violation of UN Charter, and UNSEC Resolution 1244. Even more dangerous is the plan of some EU members (UK being a cheerleader) to recognize the second Albanian state, this time on on Serbian soil, in violation of Helsinki Charter and UN Charter.

Disregard for the international law may seem shocking, having in mind EU's penchant for legalism (Dairy Chocolate, anyone?) One is safe to assume that they hoped they could dupe Serbia to relinquish her territory before the mission is let out.

Now, when this did not happen and the bluff has been called, EU is faced with the real problem how to justify an illegal activity.

brian
08 February 2008 at 01:12

the auther is albanian, article is pure propaganda. what taxi driver in eastern europe speaks english?

sorry Kim just cause you dicided to marry an albanian doesnt make it right to lie, Kosovo is and always will be Serbian no-matter the demographic changes.

DJGB Popadich
08 February 2008 at 02:14

Good servants, bad masters they say, and the haze is ugly – indeed ugly. Set to buy it? The deep into many books, is it dangerous, ...? - Yet, the one stands out: the ‘book’ with subversive aim below the risk-free title.

Fabled ‘Black Hand’ did not deliver it. The CEIP coercive “Report Four” of the spring 1914, and the reprint of May 1993 ( 419 + 16 pages ) did it. Put up by the long list of the say-so in 1914, it waited a good eighty years for a few more ‘grains of salt’: fixed by MEA and a serene, ageing professor – late GFK. I had them read both at the time and could not fail by which to sicken.

It begins with “Amazing charges of BL outrages attributed to the King of Greece” (July 1913) and ends with the Professor’s recipe for military intervention over S dominions (1995 - 2000). To put it simply, I was not the witness of the war but my father – the cadet and later a military aviator – 1912-18, was the participant. He told me the story of the friendly man who like him in early twenties was very fond of aeroplanes and racing cars. It appeared the person’s name was Baron d’Estournelles, E head CEIP Commissioner (1913).

In the sixties the Pro steps up: already a famed writer of 6K wire, he came to B for a fine and final shot. At the time they use to say that feeble S preludes majestic Y, and everyone pepped up – a Professor taken by surprise. In fact, S got utterly weak for sure, and Y forlorn, as we may observe.

Yet, who could dare dispute the caesar’s plan, and else – whatever fit into that: the ice-cream parlour named Y, or M – that jumped overtime. Supplies never fell short and all got the fill up: make people lief and palmy. On anyone lips stood the new dream, the great destinations, the way of doing the things with foreign money ($ 40B).

* - *

His lordship’ the faithful servant, L took a tour some two hundred years ago (1807). Ten thousand weeks in the past, one may say, he cris crossed the belly of E, in the midst of then total the N wars. In search of good servants, he found “a colony of A bandits”: who “suffer no travellers to pass unmolested, unless they go in a sufficient number to command respect,” he wrote in the report.

“ ... We know from the experience that it is a thousand times easier to reconstruct the facts of an era than its spiritual atmosphere. Its traces are not to be found in official events, but ... in the small, personal episodes ...” Z writes in our time (1941-2). True or false – hidden or open, L would vouch if still alive. All the same, it might have been the ‘RR’ and its creator, the prominent historian, were too busy to touch the subject later (1993).

One fact stands: behind the clean facade and use, the ‘RR’ had a dual role: one for the public eye and the other – the next door wall-to-wall adjacent and ‘void’ – to unknown friends of Y and M. The second floor plan and its outlook did not match the first one in size. On the other Y and M existed until recently, when erased from the face of the earth and reset to the newest lot in P.

Be as it may, the query still stand. What a change has occurred within a psyche of “a colony of A banditry” more than two hundred years later? I suspect none, but the perennial one – that gives them more chance if they keep away from churches and others’ properties, and behave at first as the civilized E people?

DJGBP

(Grad Eng Arch)

london
09 February 2008 at 16:21

Mr Brian, how did you know that author is albanian and they spoke english? Kosovo belongs to inhabitants who live in Kosovo, it isn't serbian nor albanian.

Inhabitanst of Belgrade

Sumar
29 July 2008 at 17:59

@ london

Actually, Brian never said she was Albanian by blood, he said she MARRIED an Albanian, hence her last name.

And way to live in Belgrade, Mr.London

No one who lives there calls it "Belgrade"

Kosovo belongs primarily to the people of its home country, Serbia.

It is mostly NATO and countries under the sway of NATO power that have recognized Kosovo

The word Kosovo has roots in the Serbian language, just as Sue stated. The word Kosova also has roots in the Serbian language pertaining to the bird "Kos".

Ancient history of who was there first has little to do with actual reality, or else the Native Americans would have claim to the total area of USA and Canada. This obviously isn't going to happen.

The only possible claim of separation the people of Kosovo might have, is if they had a referendum in which all citizens of Serbia were allowed to vote, this is the legal way.

This did not happen, the Kosovo parliament made the decision for all the people in Serbia, that Serbia can do without Kosovo. Illegal.

This is the reality, not some pseudo-nationalistic view of the world where every tiny group of people can pick and choose what territory belongs to them.

If the 'State of Kosovo' cannot separate legally, then it should be ready to do it by way of war, and to retain the sovereignty of its borders ON ITS OWN after the war. Unfortunately they cannot do this and rely on the protection of NATO, which does not make them an 'Independent State', it makes them a NATO base in Europe.

I say tiny because there are cities with bigger populations, and the police forces in these cities can defeat Kosovo and annex it. Its really not self sustaining.

Post your comment

Please note: you will need to login or register before your comment is displayed on the website

You may enter up to 2000 characters (about 300-350 words)

Characters left:

We want to encourage people to comment on our content and to exchange views with other readers and hope this will be done on a courteous basis. However, if you encounter posts which are offensive please let us know by emailing comments@newstatesman.co.uk and we will take swift action where necessary.

Read More

Vote!

Will China rule the world?

Suggest a question

View comments

© New Statesman 1913 – 2009

Tracker