Return to: Home | Life & Society | Society

The peculiar solution

Helena Smith

Published 28 February 2008

Observations on Cyprus

Two days before he became the communist president of one of the most entrepreneurial countries in the world, Demetris Christofias - Soviet-educated leader of Cyprus's Akel party, football lover and the man who could reunite the divided island - had a tantrum.

Perhaps my question caught him off-guard as he entered his party offices in Nicosia. Or perhaps it was the strain of competing in the most bitter elections fought since Cyprus won independence from the British in 1960.

"How could you?" he fumed. "How could you ask if I am a communist? I'm no Castro of the Mediterranean. I'm not having this conversation. I'm going," he bellowed, heading for the lifts.

"But sir," I implored, "you must come back. This is the question everyone in Europe will want answered." Whereupon Comrade Christofias turned on his heels, arms outstretched in embrace, chubby cheeks trembling, silver helmet of hair bobbing, eyes wide open. "Your question is highly provocative," he gasped. "But my child, let me kiss you. Let me explain. My party, you have to know, is a peculiar party, that's what it is. Peculiar. Peculiar."

And therein lies the paradox of a victory that makes Cyprus the first EU member to be led by a man who speaks Russian better than English and keeps busts of Lenin at party headquarters, yet wants nothing more than to embrace the west's robust capitalist system.

The 61-year-old builder's son once described Britain as an "evil demon" responsible for Cyprus's woes, and the collapse of the Soviet Union as "a crime against humanity". But he is also an artful pragmatist, bent on reunifying his war-partitioned country. Raising the hammer and sickle over the presidential palace won't, say commentators, be part of his agenda. Akel, they insist, is more "old Labour" than "old Brezhnev".

"He is a communist leader more in name whose party has a Marxist-Leninist ideology but whose policies are distinctly social democratic," says Michalis Papapetrou, a former government spokesman and a moderate voice on the Cypriot political scene. "He will be careful not to give the impression he is changing the social system and definitely, in his international relations, will be much more constructive than [his predecessor] Tassos Papadopoulos."

Christofias's election as the sixth president of Cyprus marks the end of what many have called a "dark age" under the firebrand, Turk-hating Papadopoulos, who tearfully appealed to Greek Cypriots to reject a UN reunification plan in 2004, after which Cyprus drifted into international isolation. "He had absolute control over the media and ruled like an autocrat," says Papapetrou.

The ousting of Papadopoulos and the ascent of Comrade Christofias underline just how much Greek Cypriots want a second chance to resolve a problem that has defied international mediation since the Turkish army marched in and seized the island's northern third in 1974. More than any other Greek Cypriot politician, Christofias and his "peculiar" party renew hopes of a settlement.

Within minutes of Christofias's victory, the Turkish Cypriot leader and fellow leftist Mehmet Ali Talat called to congratulate him and urge a meeting. Keen to be the man who pulls off the seemingly impossible feat of uniting the two sides in a "bizonal, bicommunal federation", Christofias extended a "hand of friendship" to Turkish Cypriots in his victory speech.

Veteran Cyprus observers talk of a deal before the end of the year.

Post this article to

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • newsvine
  • Reddit

6 comments from readers

K BLACK
28 February 2008 at 11:59

Cypriots deserve a fair , lasting and just deal!Their time has come !Despite extensive media coverage saying that |Greek Cypriots donot reunification, The opposite is true , as shown by this election result.The Greek Cypriots rejected the Annan plan purly on the basis that it was so watered down and biased towards the Turkish side , that it was unacceptable to them.They want reunification but not at any price.Now that they are in the European Union , the solution must be based on EU values which will provide a better framework for peace in security within this region!

Larry
28 February 2008 at 13:29

I think is is deeply unfair to say that the Turkish army "marched in and seized the northern third". Prior to 1974 there were over 20 UN resolutions against the rising ethnic violence on the island, Turkey had previously asked the UK to intervine, but the UK prefered intervention through the UN.

Critically we forget how many innocent Turkish Cypriots were killed, or ethnically cleansed. In no way does that lessen the suffering of the Greek Cypriots, but if we forget the truth, if we deny the Turkish Cypriots right to remember, we are not going to ever reconcile the island.

Please remeber the works of Niko Sampson "If Turkey had not invaded, not only would I have declared Enosis, I would have anahilated the Turkish Cypriots"

Harris
28 February 2008 at 14:16

Larry asks us to remember the words of Mr Sampson. He forgets that he was placed there illegally by an illegal regime that got ousted following the Turkish invasion. He also forgets the machinations of the so called Grey Wolves who had the same feelings towards the Greek Cypriots.

What he should remember is the feelings of the vast majority, like me, who grew up with the troubles but also had many friends that were Turkish Cypriots (one of them we had to help back to his home following the invasion so that neither of the fanatical sides were able to catch him. We abhored the Junta and abhored the coup and actually lost many good friends during that time.

Although the actions that led to the invasion were unexcusable and by the way the signs were clear that the Sampson puppetry would not last, it was just as inexcusable for Turkey to invade, initially with very little success, but also contavine the cease fire that was set up (post Sampson) and permanently take a foot hold.

Everything since then can be blames on fanatical groups on both sides from Mr Denktash and his associates to all the EOKA B knuckleheads.

One should feel sorry for all the lives lost on both sides but also the loss of so many that were displaced, lost all their property and having to witness so many greedy, selfish and inexcusable individuals who have, without due dilligence (and that will come and bite them if they are not careful) "bought" thier property. Now they wonder why all these Cypriots are knocking on their doors asking to have their land back.

Does anyone realise that most of the land in Cyprus is handed over geration to generation and is part of thier family heirloom? That is why feelings are so high. Compensation is not always the answer.

Larry
28 February 2008 at 16:00

Harris,

Certianly I do not seek to belittle the very real suffering that many Greek Cypriots tragically went through, no do I defend the actions of the Turkish army during the invasion. But generally we ignore what happened to the Turkish Cypriots in the run up to 74.

For example you very correctly point out that land issues. There are signifigant amounst of Turkish Cypriot land in the south which has been used for development (It had too, as any infastructure projects can not be built around a small patch of land). Similar projects in the north draw fire from the south.

Similarly according to some scholars if you take privatly held land, land belonging to Turkish communitiy organisations (schools, Mosques etc) and divide government held land by the relative population size in 1960, that consituted around 35% of the property in Cyprus.

It seems that if that is correct the Greek Cypriot land claims are based on de facto positions in the late 1960's when thousands of Turkish Cypriots have been forced out or fled.

I assume that the 1960 land registary documents will be accurate.

The isloation of the Turkish Cypriots started in 1963 when they were forced from government, that is when the killings started, by 1964 20,000 Turkish Cypriots had been forced from their homes (equally 3000 Christians, had been forced out from Turkish areas).

The current punishment of the Turkish Cypriot community most of whom were born after 74 and voted for reunificatin, can not be sustained, already we are seeing the OIC call for their end, Syria start a ferry route, votes in the German parliment. The embargoes will not survive another failure like the Annan plan.

Helen
28 February 2008 at 22:20

Roughly 800 Turkish cypriots died between 1958 and 1968. It must be remembered that some of these people were turkish trade unionist and leftists killed by turkish extremists. Slightly more Greek Cypriots were killed in this period. While roughly 6000 Greek Cypriots were killed in 1974 almost all after the cease fire. Think of what was necessary to ethnically cleanse every last person out of somewhere like Kyrenia which was roughly 85 % greek cypriot. Larry's figures regarding land ownership are incorrect. In the Kyrenia district for example, only 8% of legal titles are held by Turkish Cypriots. The other thing I would like to stress is that the Annanistan plan as a legal document is a REAL Politik farce. It was essentially based on institutionalising ethnic cleansing in other words legalising a patent breach of the provisions of the Geneva convention prohibiting changing ethnic demographics by force. If you think it is so wonderful you should employ as the constitution of your country. I am sure there are more than 800 deaths based on hate crimes in your country. A solution should not be experimental. As a Cypriot I want a democratic constitution which has been tried and tested. I want your constitution. You can take the Annanistan constitution.

JimmyJames
07 March 2008 at 22:29

The real problem with the Annan plan was that it would have allowed thousands of Turkish troops to stay in Cyprus almost indefinitely in violation of UN resolutions. Which self-respecting country (never mind an EU country) would allow that? But many 'western' media sources simply parroted the views of their foreign ministries by condemning the argument that Turkish troops must be withdrawn as part of a settlement

Post your comment

Please note: you will need to login or register before your comment is displayed on the website

You may enter up to 2000 characters (about 300-350 words)

Characters left:

We want to encourage people to comment on our content and to exchange views with other readers and hope this will be done on a courteous basis. However, if you encounter posts which are offensive please let us know by emailing comments@newstatesman.co.uk and we will take swift action where necessary.

Read More

Vote!

Will China rule the world?

Suggest a question

View comments

© New Statesman 1913 – 2009

Tracker