Registered user login:

This not so green land

Tom Wall

Published 31 January 2008

The UK is near the bottom of the renewable energy league in Europe

One of the Prime Minister's principal advisers on the environment has accused him of frustrating efforts to reduce Britain's carbon footprint.

Jonathon Porritt, chair of the Sustainable Development Commission, believes Gordon Brown's old Labour roots make him suspicious of green issues. "Old Labour still thinks the environment is an agenda for middle-class, muesli-munching Guardian readers. And that's still a bit of Brown," says Porritt. "He's got this sort of latent contempt for anyone who chooses to put the environment at the top of their list of things that need to get sorted."

Brown's negative attitudes may have been influenced by political rivalry with Tony Blair, Porritt believes: "When Blair was in power strutting his stuff about climate change, Brown came to the quite proper pragmatic conclusion that if he's out there doing that then I'm not going to do it."

As a result, Brown put "no serious money" into energy efficiency and renewable power while Chancellor. "The Treasury under Brown never really understood sustainability," Porritt says. "Many of the reasons why the Labour record on sustainability after ten years is less good than it should be, go back to the Treasury."

The UK, with just over 1 per cent of total energy supply coming from renewable sources like wind and wave power, is near the bottom of the renewable energy league in Europe; only Luxembourg and Malta produce less clean energy.

Porritt also criticises Labour's record on fuel poverty. The latest figures show that 4.4 million British households - the highest number for almost a decade - are spending more than 10 per cent of their income on gas and electricity. Porritt says it is "completely scandalous" that Brown has not prioritised the issue and reveals that ministers are considering lowering targets to eradicate fuel poverty: "Millions of people are living in outrageously bad housing conditions. And, because funding is going down not up, the target will disappear."

Porritt believes that the Tories are making progress on green issues. Of Conservative leader David Cameron, he says: "His quality of life commission produced an extraordinary report. This has helped focus the minds of people in government that they are going to have an opposition taking this agenda much more seriously than has happened in the Tory party for decades."

Porritt is critical of Brown's decision to back nuclear energy stations and believes the terrorist threat has not been adequately thought through. "Brown said the nuclear power programme wouldn't come on stream until 2020. Everything, everything, this country needs to do to hit the 60 per cent reduction in CO2 by 2050 needs either to be in place or very nearly in place by 2020," he says.

"It's a miracle that terrorists have not found a way of harnessing . . . nuclear materials," Porritt says. "But there will be a nuclear terrorist related outrage in the not too distant future. At which point belief in nuclear power will come to a juddering halt."

A longer version of this interview appears in the current issue of "Environmental Health News"

Post this article to

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • newsvine
  • Reddit

2 comments from readers

Joe Wilson
04 February 2008 at 10:29

I think that the destruction of our environment should be top listed up there with stock rates and the g8 summit, climate change goes way beyond what the government are educating the british public. with an open mind , relisation that us humans are extremily similer in what we need from this world as the same as most animals. Go into a pet store and look at the exotic animals, spiders,snakes lizards all of them living under a hot light, this is beacause they need the warmth to survive. Humans are the same, we need shelter,food,warmth, clothing. I dont belive the public relise that all these things come from out environment with out it we are an exotic snake in the windy unshelterd region of the fens, impossisble to suvive in such a climate.??

Pat T
06 February 2008 at 16:10

And because the economy became freer and freer society was able to innovate and create newer and better and less costly methods of providing shelter, food, warmth, clothing.

Post your comment

Please note: you will need to login or register before your comment is displayed on the website

We want to encourage people to comment on our content and to exchange views with other readers and hope this will be done on a courteous basis. However, if you encounter posts which are offensive please let us know by emailing comments@newstatesman.co.uk and we will take swift action where necessary.

Read More

Vote!

Are your savings now safe?