Registered user login:

Drunk girls - it's no big deal

Kira Cochrane

Published 10 January 2008

Over the years, alcohol has brought me many things, including headaches and embarrassment

Who'd be a drunk girl? Well, occasionally me, for one (though, since I turned 30, "drunk woman" is more appropriate). Over the years, alcohol has brought me many things, including headaches and embarrassment - never more so than when I recognised an author at a party, struggled for an opening gambit, and plumped for: "Wow, your eyes are really far apart."

But primarily, it's brought me fun, excitement and a huge sense of freedom. To sit on the beach with a friend, a bottle of wine and two plastic cups, not knowing where the night will take you, but that it'll probably involve dancing, meeting new people and, most of all, laughing like a drain, is one of the best feelings there is.

Which is why it pains me that drunk girls are currently so reviled. I say "currently": unless you've been propping up the bar 24/7 for a long, long while, you are likely to have noticed how the moral panic around women and drinking has been growing for years, though you might have seen it not as a moral panic, but basic good sense. You are also likely to have noticed that stories about binge drinking in the general population are almost always illustrated with a photograph of a scantily clad young woman, often passed out on a park bench. (These images crop up so regularly now that I'm always surprised when I find a park bench that doesn't have an inebriated woman draped over it. Then I remember that, despite living in cities my entire adult life, I have never come across a woman in said situation.)

One of the keenest purveyors of stories about the binge drinking, low morals and high hemlines of the nation's women is the Daily Mail, and as the new year loomed it was at it again. On New Year's Eve, the paper's front-page headline blared: "New Year bingers' abortion legacy", followed by the definite statement that "drunken one-night stands over New Year will bring a record number of abortions". New Year hadn't even happened yet, but it was being stated - not speculated, suggested, or expected - that there would be more "binge drinking and unprotected casual sex" that night than ever. Sometimes it's almost as though the people who work at the Mail want such things to happen just so they can have their prejudices confirmed . . .

The paper was at it again early last year, when it ran a story headlined "Office girls are twice as likely to die from drink", the first sentence of which stated: "A growing ladette culture means young women who work in offices are twice as likely to drink themselves to death as the rest of the population."

Now, I have read the Office for National Statistics report on which this story is based, and the reality it presents is quite different. What it found was "more than twice as many [alcohol-related] deaths among men as among women" between 2001 and 2005 - a pretty important fact, I'd say. And while a slightly higher proportion of deaths among women who work in offices (than, say, deaths among women who work as educational assistants) is due to alcohol, what that statistic does not tell you is that office workers are hardy beings who have such a low death rate in the age group covered by the study (20-64) that, as the study makes clear, their "alcohol-related mortality is actually lower than for women in England and Wales as a whole".

Not only that, but one of the report's main findings was that "employment appears to have a protective effect for women against alcohol- related mortality". Yep, having a career actually decreases a woman's chances of drinking herself to death - not something you'd have been likely to surmise from that headline, would you?

Yet if men are killing themselves through drink at twice the rate of women (and an ONS report in 2006 found not only that alcohol-related death rates are much higher for males than for females, but that the gap between the sexes has actually widened in recent years), why aren't dishevelled young men being used to illustrate binge drinking reports? Why wasn't the fact that "twice as many men as women die from alcohol-related causes" headline news last year? Does no one care about men's well-being?

The answer, it seems, is that what spurs these stories isn't concern for anyone's health, but a wish to scare women into submission. The drunk girl - loud, wild and free - represents everything that traditionalists hate in a woman. She isn't concerned with being a moral role model for the community; she's much too busy having fun for that. How dreadful.

"What about rape?" you say. "Aren't drunk wo men more likely to be raped?" Well, yes, there certainly is evidence that opportunist rapists target drunk women, and no doubt we should all look out for each other accordingly. The main problem here clearly isn't the behaviour of women, however - it's the behaviour of rapists, stupid. In fact, along with those health statistics, all this suggests is that if anyone should be encouraged to stay indoors knitting, it's men.

Post this article to

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • newsvine
  • Reddit

6 comments from readers

anon11
11 January 2008 at 16:00

Face the facts , both sexes need to set a better example for the youth today and drinking is one of the biggest negatives facing society. The traditional view of well spoken , etiquetted women has been thrown out of the window with women becoming more and more like men which as a man/boy myself , makes them more unattractive and more yobbish.I myself do not drink much and don't believe that everyone should have to resort to drink to have a good time or is everyone that sad in life that they can't do anything else ?

gnuneo
12 January 2008 at 15:52

well yes, anan11, certainly female yobbish loutishness is no more to be appreciated than male yobbish loutishness, but that is hardly the point of the article.

rather it is the use of this image as a scare tactic to drive women back into the traditionalists view of Kinder, Kirche Kuche, and attempt to turn back the wave of gender egalitarianism that is sweeping the UK (and the world).

the ultimate hypocrisy however, is that the very same media outlets are undoubtedly also bleating on about the second-class role of women in Islam, to justify their xenophobia and war-lusts!

Keir H
13 January 2008 at 11:29

The tone of this article is flippant beyond believe. Yes I understand you’re trying to look at the lighter side of having a laugh, whether this is boys or girls, alcohol can make a difference when interacting with other people. Whether the issue is portraying one group of society with a drink problem against the rest you may have a valid point. But it applies in equal measure to the rest of the drinking nation.

As the majority of us know it brings about a joyous feeling that can take away all our worries. But can we all be so inadequate socially that we all have consume a drug, for that’s what it is, to become more friendly or agreeable.

This is the problem alcohol is socially acceptable, but as with everything in life taken to excess it can be the ruin of somebody’s life. Whether it’s young girls or any other stereotyped person, getting drunk to the point of not knowing what’s happening is irresponsible. You might point out that this is the view of a boring person who never has been drunk before, but you’re wrong on numerous occasions I have drunk one too many, regretted my foolish behaviour and woke up with a terrible hangover.

In the light of day we all responsible human beings, but who has said “I’ll only have a few, I know my limits”, but once the drinks are flowing, the laughter, the relaxed atmosphere and the host who keeps filling your glass with the line “oh have another one it won’t matter” it’s difficult to say no and be that boring person at a party or any other social event. This is why alcohol – however you dress it up – shouldn’t be treated lightly because it is the cause of many social problems today.

There are many people’s lives that have been ruined, not just by alcohol, but by other drugs as well. The whole of society treats getting drunk as acceptable as long as it’s behind closed doors in your own home, but when it’s young people rolling about on the street late at night especially on the News, it becomes a different story.

Again - it’s not about “who” is being irresponsible when getting drunk, it’s the attitude people take towards alcohol that matters.

Aliya
20 January 2008 at 21:03

I usually really enjoy this column but vehemently disagree with this article. This is not about female drunkenness vs male drunkenness - the fact remains that as a feminist, I find the idea that alcohol liberates women abhorrent. On the contrary, any situation where anyone isn't in control is dangerous.

It's obvious that irresponsible drinking leads to higher levels of rape, social problems and teen pregnancy. If you're too pissed to know what you're doing, how can you control what your actions.

Britain is the only country where it's becoming more and more acceptable to be drunk. On the continent, people drink because they enjoy alcohol but here's it's only to be completely off your face.

What on earth is liberating about not being able to use your brain?

Aliya
20 January 2008 at 21:09

On an additional note: drunk men are responsible for not knowing what they're doing so becoming rapists, but if women were responsible they would be able to better protect themselves if they didn't put themselves in a vulnerable situation.

It's the same as anything else - if I leave my house unlocked, I'm taking the risk that I might be robbed. Of course, if it is, then the thief is the one who did something wrong, but surely if I'd left it locked I'd reduce the risks of it being broken into?

JackSparrow
26 January 2008 at 09:58

I have to agree with Keir H especially and secondly Aliyah.

@Aliyah: Your second comment is slightly incomplete, as a determined predator will attempt to violate someone (i.e. break in) regardless of whether the defenses are put up. Ideally, that is why laws are in place to deter and punish potential offenders. But again the real problem lies with the so called "freedom" that the author of this article believes comes with the night out on the town. Go where the night takes you, but to expect that a potential unwanted situation will not arise is pretty much on par with gambling one's safety.

Was this a study conducted in the UK? Granted, I'm an American who's visitied the UK twice and it doesn't seem as if the women there are any different from women in other countires, aside from those women in certain third world countries who are still treated as though they lived in medieval times. Then again, all women must deal with the problem of existing as an object of intense scrutiny. It may be argued that men are scrutinized to a lesser extent, but it is a moot point. You'll just end up getting everyone wrapped up an argument that will always come up a stalemate, but work it out in writing if you need to by all means because there are always new ways to look at the situation. As for the getting drunk part, it certainly can't all be bad news (in vino veritas), and I've certainly enjoyed hearing many people blurt out their deepest machinations or what have you when they were plastered.

Post your comment

Please note: you will need to login or register before your comment is displayed on the website

You may enter up to 2000 characters (about 300-350 words)

Characters left:

We want to encourage people to comment on our content and to exchange views with other readers and hope this will be done on a courteous basis. However, if you encounter posts which are offensive please let us know by emailing comments@newstatesman.co.uk and we will take swift action where necessary.

About the writer

Kira Cochrane

Kira Cochrane is the women's editor for the Guardian and writes a regular column in the New Statesman.

Read More

Vote!

Should Darling have been bolder with the 45% tax rate?