Registered user login:

How immigrants are revitalising London

Darcus Howe

Published 29 November 2007

The one-sided view of immigrants as leeches that worm their way through the indigenous population is laying the basis for social conflict

Not a day passes without a storm of anti-immigrant propaganda in the press. The leading exponent of this mischief is the Daily Mail. As I write, it announces a "Polish baby boom: fears for NHS and schools as a thousand Polish children are born every month". It goes on: "On current trends, there will be more than 13,000 such births this year," while "240,000 eastern European children have arrived in Britain's schools".

Yet the parents of these children pay taxes, too. And it takes no more than two months in their first class for them to catch up with local children and progressively bypass them.

I took a minicab from Waterloo to Camberwell last week. The driver apologised profusely because he had to pick up his daughter from school along the way. As soon as she got in, she started to read the billboards we passed. Here was an agile mind, a natural leader who will bring her English classmates in her wake. She is no burden, more an asset to her school. I confirmed as much from teachers in my community. The children of Polish immigrants overtake the locals in the twinkling of an eye.

These cries of crisis in British hospitals and schools have little material basis. They simply are attempts to get extra funds from the Treasury by exploiting anti-immigrant sentiment.

I live in a south London community, stretching from Streatham to Norbury, where many eastern Europeans have settled. The men are largely in the building trade; the women find work in the service sector. They live in houses bought for letting. "Buy to let" is an expanding business in these parts, and the rents are exorbitant. Neighbourhoods have been rescued from oblivion by the presence of eastern European immigrants, who have joined Indians, Pakistanis, Africans and West Indians.

Many of these eastern Europeans are single men. They work from sun-up to sundown, whatever the weather, supplying skilled labour for roadworks and building sites. They have broken the monopoly not only of the British plumber, but of building trades from carpentry to decoration. The costs of refurbishing homes and building new ones have fallen spectacularly.

Many of the young women are domestic workers, with skills from child-minding to window cleaning, who lessen the burden of middle-class working women. Others have helped to rein vigorate the fading high streets of old England. The cheap labour provided by eastern European women can be seen in small restaurants, dry-cleaners, cosmetics shops and bars. This is a young, healthy population that costs the health service little. They are largely law-abiding, costing little by way of police, courts and prisons.

Their contribution to the revenue of the UK government far outstrips any cost to the Treasury. The Polish builder conceived in a Polish womb in Poland was delivered in a Polish hospital. He attended Polish primary and secondary schools. He was trained at technical colleges in Poland. All this costs the Treasury not one penny. The worker just turns up on our shores ready for exploitation.

Yet the one-sided view of immigrants as leeches that worm their way through the indigenous population is laying the basis for social conflict. And these half-truths are spread throughout the press for political ends. The Conservatives never let up and Labour is drawn along.

Mrs Howe and I, both of immigrant stock, go out of our way to embrace these new additions to our society. There is much to learn from the Poles, the Lithuanians, the Czechs, the Slovaks and the rest of them. And we must fend off that malign spirit which generates the xenophobia that is so native to the UK.

Post this article to

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • newsvine
  • NowPublic
  • Reddit

19 comments from readers

Carl Jones
29 November 2007 at 16:46

Darcus, its not that immigrants are leeches with some sort of self-determination. Sure, they came here, but in reality they have been "snared".

They have been brought here to dilute the corporate cost base, forcing wages down, increasing house prices through buy to let and a real terms fall in public spending.

The majority of people in Britain haven`t seen a real pay rise for 20 years....when you realise the inflation numbers have been fixed for the best part of 10 years.

It has nothing to do with "xenophobia"! But it does have everything to do with low wage paying employers....minimum wage...blah, blah, blah!lol

BTW, I`m white and I live in Central London, my neighbours come from all over the world and the same can be said for my work and to be quite frank, I prefer them to my native Brits. But that doesn`t hide the social economic scam which is being played out on all of us all, to varying degrees.

radius
29 November 2007 at 20:23

I must say I don't read the Daily Mail, just the Independent, Guardian, Observer, Statesman - so this piece kind of reinforces the one-sided view i get: 'jobs we don't want to do', enriches us, nice people etc etc. It isn't personal (tho' it's always nice to be nice) it's economic; it isn't the jobs that the unemployed brits don't want, it's the pittance the bosses want them to do the job for. It isn't cultural enrichment they want, it's financial enrichment from low-wage economics, and everything that poorer countries can offer; it isn't a tradesperson's monopoly that's been 'broken', but the trade union movement.. If bosses had to pay migrants a decent wage, they wouldn't 'need' them - it's the cheap labour they need. The people who you'd expect to explain these things and defend the working conditions of the workforce, whoever they are, are too busy reading the Daily Mail and showing off how personally broad-minded they are, while availing themselves of a few cheap au-pairs and plumbers.

Iftikhar
29 November 2007 at 20:35

Salaam

Migrants are the life blood of the British society since the second world war. With out migrants the British economy will bleed to death.

UrbanOspreys
29 November 2007 at 22:55

Immigration saves cultures. Before immigration we were burning witches. Without the civilising consciousness of close cultural difference people end up head-first in all sorts of inward-looking madness, like honour killing - it's the burning vacuum of insularity. It should be more than an economic equation though, working here and walking the same streets.

Tabish Khair
30 November 2007 at 14:25

It is hypocritical to keep claiming that immigrants lower the salary level, play into the hands of capitalists etc -- even though it is probably true in many instances. The fact is that first world countries enjoy and thrive on the benefits of capitalism, a system that effects people GLOBALLY. If you do not have a global remedy (and no one is even seeking one anymore), then at least BE HONEST and let international labour compete on equal basis with international capital -- which is what capitalism is supposed to be doing. And in that case, there is no option but to let immigrants in EVERYWHERE. You cannot have 'socialism' in your house and 'capitalism' on the streets!

lguerrrr
30 November 2007 at 14:37

Brilliant article. It fascinates me how people claim they would like to narrow the gap between the rich and the poor. But when someone is willing to work for $8/hr instead of their $20/hr, it doesn't strike them that this is the beginning of a redistribution of wealth and that yes, to some, the fellow making $20/hr is rich.

A Mexican immigrant in Canada.

Carl Jones
30 November 2007 at 14:43

Tabish

"Internationl labor compete on equal basis with international capital"...if you hadn`t noticed, most capital is located in "hot-spots" and "human resources", because thats all they are, "a resource", are shipped in....ask the people of Cornwall if capitalism has helped them?lol

radius
30 November 2007 at 16:24

"The fact is that first world countries enjoy and thrive on the benefits of capitalism". Exactly. And imperialistic exploitation is sadly evident in Darcus's comments about how great it is that poorer countries have trained these people, so it's even cheaper for 'us'. This world shouldn't be run for the benefit of first world consumers, and no injustice can be dismissed because there is no easy "global remedy". This 'personal attitude' consumer approach to exploitation and profit is exactly what the bosses (who are in charge of who goes where) and all those opposed to workers' rights want. It is only a tiny proportion of people from poor countries who can and do benefit; and it is capital that should be redistributed, not people. Else the entire population of Mexico should be transferred to the USA - in itself not something i'd have any problem whatsoever with, but not something that the bosses will support - 'migrant labour' is strictly on their terms.

There *is* a global remedy, it involves the workers of the world uniting.

Roger
02 December 2007 at 14:15

The British people are at war. The British government and the British politicians are conducting a war against their own people. You may vote lib/lab/con – it does not matter. They are all hell-bent on destructing Great Britain.

PLEASE check out www.iamanenglishman.com.

terryuno
03 December 2007 at 20:55

East Europeans are avoiding areas with a large ethnic population because these areas are the least hospitable. Its a pity Magda Pniewska didn't.

terryuno
03 December 2007 at 21:23

Magda Pniewska came here from poland for a better life. She got a job helping children with special needs. She got caught in the crossfire of black gangsters in broad daylight and was killed. Is this the hospitality Darcus is talking about.

patriotni
05 December 2007 at 00:57

The only reason employers and the media propaganda machine""welcome" multiculturalism and mass immigration is a simple economic one.Immigration on a large scale drives down labour costs.Trade unions side with employers on this issue when they should be protecting the british workforce from exploitation

gnuneo
05 December 2007 at 15:24

there WOULD BE NO exploitation if our economic system was fully capitalist, and all companies owned by the people working in them. People from other nations would be welcomed as they would bring not only a different perspective and potential efficiencies, but also because they would be a link for exports to their origins.

immigration is a 'problem' precisely because we have a pre-capitalist exploitative system, where workers and owners are distinct, leading to the possibility of driving down wages as more people enter the job market.

but even leaving that aside, one of the greatest cultural achievements of England is its music scene - but where would we be without the influence of the Caribbean, of Africa, of the ME, of India? Immigration *already* defines many elements of what it is to be 'English', indeed, the label 'English' came FROM a bunch of immigrants!

this whole faux-debate has been cooked up by those who wish the majority to blame a minority for their own exploitative behaviour over us, blaming immigrants for shortfalls in the NHS and housing - how lucky for them they allowed the Polish etc in, to cover up their own theft, corruption and outright incompetence.

i have many danish friends, and one of them told me that despite denmark also taking in a % of immigrants from europe, their economy is booming, and has absorbed all the immigrants - and yet has the lowest unemployment rate in recent decades!

blame not the immigrants, blame instead those who exploit us all.

terryuno
05 December 2007 at 20:46

The black community don't like being policed by white people. Don't like their children being taught by white people. Sounds like xenophobia to me.

terryuno
09 December 2007 at 09:03

I welcome all peaceful hardworking people coming to london.But certain sections of the black community have turned parts of London into dangerous places for all communities. People from the Polish,Turkish, Asian, White and Black communities have all been killed by black violence. Until people like Darcus admit this reality then life won't improve for anybody.

samassibrook
17 December 2007 at 15:32

terryuno, your comments seem to be a little accusive towards the black community. the hammering of your point appears to neglect the fact that crime is apparent in almost all immigrant societies, and is wholly not esclusive to the black community. And as for your comment;

"The black community don't like being policed by white people. Don't like their children being taught by white people."

this MASSIVE generalisation just demonstrates your woeful intellect and proves that your comments should not be take seriously.

terryuno
18 December 2007 at 19:44

Samassibrook, I wasn't trying to stereotype the whole black community because I know the majority are decent people. I was just countering Darcus Howe's buck passing and crude stereotypes of the white community. If you really want your intelligence taken seriously, then maybe you ought to look at your grammer and spelling.

caut_baia
01 January 2008 at 18:00

hi everyone , i see you all have some different points of view regarding the immigration and it seems you all know what you are talking about . i just want to ask where should i think about going in the uk having in mind to search for work and a place to stay without having so many problmes with the authorities about me not having a work licence or the necessary legal papers required . i heard the everyone turns your back and that this great country has the most unhospitable people . at least that's the gossip that circulates in my country. so , if someone was in my place , please tell me what should i do to follow your steps in finding a place to work in a really shor time considering that i don't know anyone resident in brittain and for the first time i arrive there i may need to sleep on benches in the parks or even worse in the bushes

Londoner51
29 February 2008 at 19:22

There are reasons for and against immigration. But when it gets to the point where the Londoners are a minority within their own city, you know its time to reconsider the policy

Post your comment

Please note: you will need to login or register before your comment is displayed on the website

We want to encourage people to comment on our content and to exchange views with other readers and hope this will be done on a courteous basis. However, if you encounter posts which are offensive please let us know by emailing comments@newstatesman.co.uk and we will take swift action where necessary.

About the writer

Darcus Howe is an outspoken writer, broadcaster and social commentator. His TV work includes ‘White Tribe’ in which he put Anglo-Saxon Britain under the spotlight. He also fronted a series called Devil’s Advocate.

Read More

Vote!

Is this the worst economic situation for 60 years?