Return to: Home | Life & Society | Society

Chávez and the students

Kennedy and Markovits

Published 15 November 2007

Observations on Venezuela

Skirmishes in major Venezuelan cities in recent weeks have culminated in a shoot-out in Caracas at the Central University on 7 November, leaving nine people injured.

The violence follows a series of student-led protests, which have ranged from calm to brutally violent in the run-up to a referendum due to be held on 2 December on President Hugo Chávez's constitutional reforms. Under these, the president can stand for indefinite re-election.

Startling footage from the scene showed masked bikers wielding shotguns, students in gas masks hurling Molotov cocktails through clouds of tear-gas, and general chaos as terrified groups scattered at the piercing cracks of semi-automatic gunfire.

Fighting broke out after students returned from a peaceful march to the Supreme Court, where they had been calling for the referendum to be delayed to allow more time for discussion on the reforms. The courts are unlikely to grant that demand.

What happened next depends on whom you talk to - or which television station you watch.

Globovisión, the only public access channel to remain critical of the government after the forced closure of Radio Caracas TV in April this year, blamed pro-Chávez troublemakers for instigating the violence. It reported that a bus full of students was pulled over, emptied and then torched by "Bolivarian Circles" - Chavista loyalists, who the opposition has branded a "militia" armed by the government, a charge denied by the president.

Globovisión went on to report that the Bolivarians entered the campus on motorbikes and opened fire on students, who retaliated in "self-defence". Venezuelan newspapers, which are generally hostile towards Chávez, reported similar stories.

News channels sympathetic to the government, which now make up the majority of broadcasters, reported that "fascist" students attempted to "lynch" an innocent group of Chavista loyalists holed up in the social studies faculty - the only pro-government stronghold on a campus hostile to Chávez.

Zarida Seijar, a 25-year-old pro-Chávez student who was among those trapped inside the building, maintained that the anti-Chávez protesters were the aggressors. "They were shouting that all Chavistas were going to die; we were terrified. When we realised the police weren't going to come, we started texting our friends who came with guns to save us," she said.

Whatever the precise sequence, it is clear the student movement has become the most powerful and well-co-ordinated resistance group against President Chávez. Born during the closure of Radio Caracas TV and spurred on by the defection of the former defence minister Raú Baduel, the angry students have no single figurehead or well-defined agenda. But their increasing militancy and the strong-arm measures taken to quell them is taking their message of defiance to an international audience.

Speaking to Latin American leaders at a summit held in Chile two days after the protests, Chávez claimed that the students are part of a "fascist offensive" under direct control from Washington. "The United States organised the 2002 coup and now it is doing the same in Caracas, supported by the media and CNN," he said, which was denied by the US embassy in Caracas. Brandishing copies of newspapers portraying his supporters as the instigators of 7 November violence, Chávez insisted: "It's the other way round; it was the rich kids [who where responsible]."

By the time Chávez delivered these words, an eerie calm had descended amid the charred detritus around the campus. But feelings still run high. Those who oppose the reforms - which would grant yet more powers to the executive and president - see this as their final opportunity to thwart Chávez's ambitions before Venezuela undergoes irrevocable change.

"We don't know what we will do after this; it really could be our last chance. These reforms centralise all control," said 19-year-old Veronica Brito. "Universities have always been places where federal politics have been off the table. Under this new constitution, they would lose their autonomy."

Other controversial measures include granting the president direct control over the Central Bank, eliminating freedom of information in "exceptional" circumstances, and a loosening of the state's obligation to adhere to human-rights legislation. Intellectual property would be abolished, monopolies prohibited, and the president would assume the right to appoint regional vice-presidents, reducing elected governors to ceremonial positions. The military would be redefined as an "anti-imperialist popular entity", and the threshold number of signatures necessary to trigger further referenda or elections would be raised across the board.

But support for the proposals remains strong; around 60 per cent according to one newspaper survey - thanks mainly to grass-roots loyalty and the inclusion of popular measures such as a six-hour working day and more welfare support for workers. Significantly, 5 per cent of state revenues will be set aside for a new "popular power" fund to finance projects such as Chávez's much-vaunted communal councils. The councils, expected to total around 50,000 by the end of the year, have been hailed as an innovative mechanism for devolving state power and funding.

Even though the student movement is aiming to ratchet up the pressure with further rallies, Chávez still looks set to maintain his clean sheet of electoral victories. Only a nationwide outburst of mass opposition could interrupt Venezuela's inexorable socialist metamorphosis.

Post this article to

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • newsvine
  • Reddit

8 comments from readers

john green
17 November 2007 at 13:17

We've seen these scenarios so often before, in Chile, in Nicaragua etc - rogue gunmen attack a demonstration and the left, in this case Chavez, gets the blame. But who is really behind such attacks. Just ask yourself who gains from the anger, mayhem and fear that ensues.

Chavez might not be Mr. perfect, but the last thing he needs is gangs of hoodlums shooting at students to further his cause. As for those demonstrating agsint him - why don't they just vote 'No' in the referendum. If the majority opposes it, it wil, fall. That's democracy!

Richard Cheeseman
18 November 2007 at 04:22

Proof, if any more was needed, of the propensity of the right-wing media to lie in support of right-wing violence.

The government and its supporters expect to win what they want through the ballot box, so violence, this incident included, does not serve their interests. The Globovision version of the incident which makes it a government aggression does not deserve the credibility which Messrs Kennedy and Markovitz give it (or pretend to give it) here.

marie2trees
19 November 2007 at 12:58

Why do you refer to the protests organised by the rich students - a fantastic tool used by the opposition to get the foreign media to write its agenda- and not refer to the many massive marches organised by the Bolivarian students in support of the constitutional reforms? Thye are not "the" student movement as stated in the article but just one student movement.

This rich student movement has been doing everything it can to provoke violence so that it can get coverage in the foreign press, but the Venezulan authorities know exactly what they are up to and refuse to oblige despite massive provocations.

The pro-reformers have nothing to gain and everything to lose by using violence so we can be pretty sure that the student you talked to, Zarida Seijar, was telling the truth.

All these proposals are going to a referendum of the Venezuelan people, who we must remember have many abilities to recall legislation and even the president if they want to.

This will be the 14th national vote in Venezuela since Chavez's election in 1998, all of which have gone Chavez's way because he is delivering on his promises to help the poor. It's no wonder the opposition spend their efforts trying to convince the foreign media as they have completely lost credibility in Venezuela itself.

Now that it was overheard at the recent OPEC meeting that it is Iran and Venezuela that want to diversify the payment of oil from dollars, we can. no doubt, expect more and more stories against these two countries.

I just wish there was some print media in the UK that would not fall for the manipulations of the very media savvy opposition in Venezuela - one wonders where they are getting this sophistication from, it certainly wasn't there at the time of the coup in 2002.

marie2trees
19 November 2007 at 14:33

Very interesting that the motorcyclists pictured in your piece are exactly the same as the ones pictured by a similar anti-Chavez piece in the Economist. Assuming that the motorcyclists who actually caused the violence would not have wanted to be photographed, one wonders who these vaguely menacing looking individuals are?

One can assume that they are pro-Chavez supporters as the Economist says as they are pretty dark-skinned whilst anti -Chavez supporters are practically all light-skinned. Were these particular individuals seen to be violent at any time? They don't seem to be carrying guns. How come both publications happen to have pictures of the same individuals? Where did these pictures come from?

Why were these pictures chosen and what exactly are the readers supposed to infer from them?

I would really like some answers to this.

Sofia from Venezuela
19 November 2007 at 21:01

I live in Venezuela and I'm journalist... I think this article reflects very well what's going on here: One violent and sadly divided society... Pres. Chavez isn't the devil but his plans aren't clear at least to fix one of the most importants things here: The murders between the population rises up to more than 14000 only this year (yes fourteen thousand)... Each weekend dies in robberies about 60 people only in Caracas capitol city ... The venezuelan people needs now jobs, policial security, hospitals, not a constitutional reform. The actual Constitution (promoted by pres. Chavez) is from 1999 and its articles aren't being observed. As a young women I have to say that you all should try to rise kids here in Venezuela where we haven't milk, sugar, eggs and beans in markets because gov. adjust prices under the production costs for those foods... Well just an opinion of a progressive 27 years old young lady...

Feel free to contact me: sofilu77@yahoo.com

P.Black
21 November 2007 at 18:27

Unfortunately the report on Venezuela in the New Statesman conforms to the usual poorly researched and sloppy journalism that sadly is becoming the norm in the magazine regarding Venezuela.

Why dont the 'journalists' actually inform the readership of what the proposed reforms are exactly? Morover, there is no real context presented in order to help readers who know little about the situation in Venezuela understand better and more fully.

Hardly anything is properly researched, things are mentioned by 'implication' ,misinformation and distortion, as is the case with most of the dominant hysterical right wing and reactionary press both here in the UK, the US and in Venezuela, that Chavez is attempting to set himself up for 'indefinite election'.....implying dictatorship........................yawn!.

This is pathetic!

Chavez has a much deeper and more powerful democratic mandate from the majority of Venezuelans than any other politician or head of state in the World.

What the reforms are are aiming to do in this respect is to remove the present restriction on standing for President for more than two terms of office. In much of Europe and in the UK there is no such restriction, so Gordon Brown could stand for Prime minister for any number of terms of office, equally Angela Merckel in Germany and Sarkozy in France........let's hope not!

At the end of the day it is for the people to decide.

I refer any interested readers to the books by Eva Gollinger about the coup and attempted coup in 2002.(Well documented by Eva Gollinger in her book 'The Chavez code: cracking US intervention in Venezuela' and other more recent writings)

Attempts by the CIA and US funded and backed organisations to 'destabilise' Venezuela are ongoing, in the run up to the December 2nd vote on the Constitutional reforms.

Such "destabilisation" by the CIA and the US backed rich wealthy and wholly corrupt Venezuelan ruling class and the on going activities of the right wing elite 'section' of the student movement is a case in point .

No mention has been made in the article of the massive demonstrations involving huge numbers of students which are occurring throughtout Venezuela in support of these reforms which forms part of the vital advance of the Bolivarian Revolution and the struggle for Socialism.

Other interesting reading about the present ongoing situation in Venezuela is an article by James Petras called 'Between ballots and bullets'

For up to date and reliable information on Venezuela go to Venezuela analysis.com

Ian Crause
16 December 2007 at 15:12

As the previous poster writes, The Chavez Code by Eva Golinger is an eye opener of a book.

I saw someone on the net criticising it as misrepresenting itself by apparently claiming to use 'classified' US govt. documentation as the basis for a large part of the book.

Ironically, the damning evidence in the book is from declassified documents.God alone knows what it would have been like had she had access to classified ones.

Well worth reading.

And of course the same School of America violent and organised substructures that have evolved in Caracas against Chavez are now evolving in Santa Cruz, Bolivia.

Same story.

Travel_Boy
18 January 2008 at 16:48

Not a fan of Venezuala's Chavez, who continue's to give voice (even actively support) to neighbouring Colombia's FARC rebels. It's not beyond the realms of belief that Venezuala might soon be labelled a "state sponsor of terrorism" if Chavez continues on this path.

link

Post your comment

Please note: you will need to login or register before you can comment on the website

Read More

Vote!

Was the government wrong to sack David Nutt?

Suggest a question

View comments

© New Statesman 1913 – 2009

Tracker