Registered user login:

Class psychology

Sandra Jovchelovitch

Published 01 October 2007

The psychology underlying the British class system is what makes it unique, explains Sandra Jovchelovitch

I have been living in Britain for 16 years and during this period have acquired that kind of outsider/insider perspective that anthropologists describe as a mix of estrangement and familiarity. You become part of the place and yet not quite. I have learnt how to enjoy gardening and the best winter puddings in the world, but if there is something I still find intriguing and peculiar about Britain is the class issue.

The force of class here is very striking. Certainly stronger than in any other comparable industrialised Western society. Social and cultural psychologists around Europe refer to it jokingly as the “British hang-up”.

Indeed what makes class in Britain so unique is not so much the reality of the class system, but the psychology that lies beneath it. Class is central to the collective psyche of this country. Here there is awareness of class, talk about class, jokes about class, and embarrassed glances about class.

Accents, manners, intonation, food, impression and expression management are all subtle and pervasive markers that establish from the very beginning who you are and where you belong. Class here is an attitude, something you believe in or you do not, something you argue passionately about, something you feel in your gut and you understand as well as the language you speak.

Quite apart from different positions people occupy in the class system and the different experiences they have in relation to it there is widespread and immediately recognisable shared knowledge about class. Opinions may vary but everyone knows the terms of the debate and what class is about: it has a place at the very core of the collective consciousness of this country.

Such an ingrained way of thinking and behaving around a notion is part of what social psychologists and historians call mentalities. Mentalities are powerful and sticky ideas that run in history, get handed down through generations, are cemented in all kinds of social institutions and ultimately in the behaviour and psychological make up of individuals. Mentalities are made of beliefs and deep-rooted in behaviour; they are difficult to change and tend to survive long after social structures are gone.

As part of the British mentality, class is resistant to change and difficult to transform because it is deeply entrenched in the way Brits speak – and language is the single most important symbolic system shaping any human community - and in the disciplining of bodies, one of the most powerful psychological mechanisms for socialising the young and reproducing social orders. Every time someone speaks and moves it starts all over again.

Ironically whereas the mentality about class in Britain is unique, its reality is not. The UK situation is not altogether dissimilar from other comparable European countries.

Across the board class still matters, as the strong correlation between educational achievement and family background demonstrates. But there has been tremendous social mobility in the post-war years, which might be slowing down considerably, but not completely.

It would be plainly wrong, and indeed politically undesirable, to state that material distinctions are gone, but the old differences between the upper, middle and working classes have been displaced by more complex scenarios, where diversity of lifestyles and use of income, multiculturalism and new global cultural references complicate distinctions and unsettle the ways in which identities are defined and group affiliations take shape.

The hard consequences of class are real enough for the many people who are at the sharp end of the class system. But these should not overshadow the reality and potential of the many new routes for socialisation and identity that are opening and challenging the social frameworks of class in contemporary Britain.

Today people cross borders and seek identity in ways that were unimagined and indeed almost impossible just a few decades ago. There are new sociabilities in the scene, new ways of organising communities and of establishing social solidarities. This should wake us up to what is new ahead. Britain’s old psychology of class needs to catch up.

Post this article to

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • newsvine
  • NowPublic
  • Reddit

6 comments from readers

Robert Powell
01 October 2007 at 16:04

The whole problem can be summed up as follows:

"'The working class can kiss my arse, I've got the foreman's job at last."

Jenny Webb
01 October 2007 at 16:51

Come on! The French are obsessed with class, so are the Spanish, so are the Americans. What's a much more interesting point is the way we see education over here! Being clever or aspirational is regarded as at best uncool and at worst a betrayal! There are whole sections of British society which have failed to benefit from the leg-up of a good education. That's been compounded by the fact we've expanded universities (ha, ha), cut grants and given places to a generation of pretty stupid middle class kids...

Pencils
02 October 2007 at 00:50

That was a bit of a template for a generic left liberal mag article on class - could have done with filling in the template with some examples.

How about this - the English (especially socialists) feel that no-one who earns less than them has a right to speak except in monosyllabic grunts, and resent listening to anyone who earns more than them, so communication is restricted to grunts about football or hanging the poor.

Or can you imagine a 'builder' doing 'that thing' with their 'fingers' to suggest 'quotation marks' indicating 'irony' ? Builders don't do irony!

Bachelor_of_Law
02 October 2007 at 10:38

It is interesting how psychologists always like to label issues and place them away in their filing cabinet in the delusional belief that they have indeed found a problem and made a suggestion that will make the world a better place.

Psychology is not an exact science it is all based on theories and supported by so called trends and correlations. Talking about theories, trends and correlation there was a time when people thought the world was flat and the majority of the world concurred on this issue providing the relevant trend and correlation. However Christopher Columbus did not fall off the edge!

Britain has social divisions like any other country in the world and the only reason this maybe more explicit in England is because politically speaking the country is Conservative in nature.

Who's to say that being conservative is not the way forward? I mean for instance the greatest lessons can be learned from history as they are tried and tested and the outcome and its repercussions have been witnessed.

Going on this principle the only time humanity had no problems such as war, weapons of mass destruction, etc was in the prehistoric caveman days. Change made an innocent civilisation a self harming race which is also depleting the worlds resources and polluting it in process of its continual strive for change and bettering itself.

I myself am not a conservative however I believe that people deserve the right to decide what political persuasion they are after all that’s democracy, is it not.

Why should Britain change because other countries are changing? If it works for England; why not?

By Nazar Shakir

naz196@hotmail.com

PlanetStarbucks
02 October 2007 at 13:37

Bachelor_of_Law,

Sounds like you have anarcho-primitivism tendencies. Got to say I have as well, at least it’s an anarchist doctrine that could actually happen and doesn’t assume any idealised human nature (as such).

Pencils is right, this article is just a standard analysis of the class system that adds nothing to the debate. The problem with class debate is that it is the middle-class doing the debating (on the whole). Having come from a background where my family doesn't watch the news "I can't do anything about it, so why watch it", I am acutely aware of the problems in getting the working class motivated into any sort of political entity. Then again i'm also aware that a lot of these middle-class self style philanthropists soon forget the left when their career needs boosting (Blair, Brown or even journalists like Nick Cohen).

It seems unless you have a vested interest in the left (you were born poor, an immigrant, some other “undesirable”), eventually you will stop caring as the right wing offers you a tax break for your child’s public school fees. Cynical perhaps, but I see documentaries on the CND, etc. from the 60’s and wonder where all these activists went. Oh yeah, they discovered egalitarianism doesn’t pay as well as a multi-national.

aassddff
06 October 2007 at 17:07

very thoughtful piece!

Post your comment

Please note: you will need to login or register before your comment is displayed on the website

We want to encourage people to comment on our content and to exchange views with other readers and hope this will be done on a courteous basis. However, if you encounter posts which are offensive please let us know by emailing comments@newstatesman.co.uk and we will take swift action where necessary.

About the writer

Sandra Jovchelovitch is Head of the Institute of Social Psychology at the London School of Economics, where she also directs the Masters Programme in Social and Cultural Psychology. Her research interests are in the social psychology of community and public spheres, the making of belief systems, and inter-cultural dialogue. Her new book “Knowledge in Context: Representations, community and culture”, about the impact of socio-cultural contexts on the development of knowledge, is out now with Routledge.

Read More

Vote!

Is capitalism finished?