Registered user login:

Creeping Islamisation

Sholto Byrnes

Published 06 September 2007

Observations on Malaysia

Fireworks exploded above Kuala Lumpur on 31 August to mark the 50th anniversary of Malaysia's independence from the British. Tens of thousands gathered to watch the festive displays in front of Prime Minister Abdullah Badawi, the country's king and queen, and foreign dignitaries including the Sultan of Brunei and the Duke of York. "We will hold true to the concept of justice and fairness for all our citizens," said Abdullah in his speech. "We must take care of our unity."

But that unity is under threat. Malaysia's status as a model of a moderate Muslim democracy is being called into question by a creeping Islamisation, eroding the compromises that have enabled the mainly non-Muslim Chinese and Indian minorities (who make up 40 per cent of the population) to live peaceably alongside the Muslim Malay majority.

The attorney general, Abdul Gani Patail, recently suggested that the country's legal system be changed to take Islamic rather than English common law as its basis. Non-Muslims worry that this is already happening. In May, Lina Joy, a Christian convert, lost a court battle to remove the word "Muslim" from her identification card, even though the constitution guarantees freedom of religion. The previous month, a Hindu man was forcibly separated from his Muslim wife of 21 years and their six children after religious officials ruled their marriage invalid. All female police officers are now required to wear the tudung (headscarf) at official functions, regardless of their faith. Last November, religious enforcement officers even raided the apartment of an elderly American couple on the holiday island of Langkawi, accusing them of committing khalwat (close proximity between unmarried men and women), although as Christians they were not subject to Islamic law.

It didn't used to be like this. A few weeks ago Tengku Razaleigh Hamzah, the ex-finance minister who nearly unseated the long-standing premier Mahathir Mohamad in 1987, spoke at a wedding anniversary dinner attended by politicians and one of the country's nine sultans at the Mines resort on the outskirts of Kuala Lumpur. Most of the women were uncovered, and none of the good Muslims present batted an eyelid as the wine flowed. "Don't you know that it is haram [forbidden] for Muslims to drink water in this country?" joked a leading lawyer as a waitress proffered an Evian bottle. "We must have red wine, and lots of it."

That tolerant attitude was common among the generations that founded and then built the country. Malaysia's first prime minister, Tunku Abdul Rahman, was fondly known as a whisky-loving playboy, while the private lives of many of the sultans scarcely reflected the values of the religion they head in their states.

But today the government, dominated by Umno (United Malays National Organisation), increasingly panders to a resurgent conservative Islam, not least to fend off the challenge from the main opposition, the fundamentalist Pan Malaysian Islamic Party (PAS). "Government ministers are so afraid of attracting the ire of the religious right, there are hardly any with the courage to say anything more progressive," says Dr Mahathir's daughter Marina, a prominent Aids and women's rights activist.

Since Abdullah took office in 2003, he has attempted to bridge the gap between religious conservatives and those who wish to maintain the country's secular principles with his theory of Islam Hadhari (civilisational Islam). Not everyone is convinced. "What's the difference between a lift and an elevator?" asks a former minister. "It doesn't mean anything at all."

The west may have seen Dr Mahathir as a repressive dictator - especially after his sacking and subsequent imprisonment of his deputy Anwar Ibrahim on trumped-up charges - but he was firm in opposing religious hardliners. "He always worked to make the state pluralist, secular and Islamic," says Abdullah Ahmad, a former Malaysian special envo y to the UN. While Anwar, now released from prison, is still portrayed abroad as a liberal reformer, he offers no hope to those worried about creeping Islamisation. His party has fought elections in alliance with PAS, which has introduced strict sharia law in the states it controls; one of its leaders recently issued a fatwa declaring followers of Islam Hadhari to be infidels.

Malaysia is a very long way from being a theocratic state, but the western-dressed youths who throng the malls and bars of modern Kuala Lumpur fear for the future. "Make sure you keep your home abroad," was the advice given to one Malay woman contemplating moving back to Malaysia, "so you've got somewhere to go if the extremists take over."

Post this article to

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • newsvine
  • Reddit

4 comments from readers

normal
12 September 2007 at 15:45

just wanted to say, the creeping islamisation of the world is a growing concern for more & more people that have no wish or intent to become muslims.

is the world on a path to loose its rich culture by being slowley absorbed into shariah law by means of islamic religion seeing its self as a superior race ?.

i also ask my self why can all the worlds religions live in cooperative peace........apart from islam ?.

shariah law has a lot in common with nazi germany !!!.

if the world is going to stop this creeping islamisation we are going to have to do more than just talk about it.

how long will it be befor london is called londonistan ? & europe is called eurostan ?.

i dont like the idea of ethnic cleansing, but what other choice is islam giving the world of non believers.

the quran clearly states that infidels & non believers are better of dead by the sword of islam !!!!.

& just latley osama binladen has called for the west to embrace islam.................................how powerful will the world allow islam to get befor the world rises up against islam & say enough is enough ?????.

i cherish my freedom, dont you ?.

lizg
15 September 2007 at 01:33

I agree with Normal. During the last decade (at the least) Islamisism in Britain has grown to a shocking degree where there is a demand for prayer areas in the work place, teenage girls wear veils as a social statement in the same way the punks (for example) did in the 70s and even hospitals are issuing Islamic stype hospital gowns. The most sinister demand from some Muslim organisations is the introduction of Shariah law for muslim areas of Britain. A two-tier system of law (of any religious or secular nature) would be a total disaster and cause many divisions and resentments in the countryl. However, nothing today's politicians do would surprise me, after all Blair & Brown have been instrumental in increasing the numbers of religious schools, which is set to increase this year. No matter what legislation there is to ensure these schools are open to children of other religions, this will still be a greatly divisive schooling system....by any other name ...apartheid is still apartheid. Who would have thought that we would now be demanding that children are brought up in isolation of other faiths, have we learnt nothing from Northern Ireland?! The only way to ensure understanding and integration between faiths, cultures, nationalities is to educate them together not apart! The way forward is to establish secularism in the country, this would treat people of all faiths or Non-faiths equally. However, I fear our politicians are too sophisticated to see what is plainly evident to others.

Please, let us not go back to the religious conflicts of previous centuries, it would take so long to restore

a well-balanced and rational society!

Brandino
16 September 2007 at 10:40

"the first prime minister a whisky drinking playboy.." , the example of basement-level morals banded about by western "freedom", going from the justification of unbound greed, commercial, personal, to the flood of incitement to consumption, down to pornographic offerings available on every magazine shop; is it any surprise if a system based on high ethics wins over some of the more thinking parts of a young and vulnerable country? Is it any surprise if, confronted by the overwhelming power of our western society bease on money, some of these individuals resort to fanaticism? Is it possible that we never, ever, ask ourselves what are the causes of what is happening in the world? Why it is that muslim women suddenly are adopting the veil or at least the headscarf? Do we really believe that they have been drugged into islamic submission by the fundamentalists through some magic potion infused in their morning tea?? When will we start looking onto ourselves for the causes of our evils? We just may, then, start to find their resolution. But be assured, we are so far gone, it will take a long, long time.

liquid modernity
16 September 2007 at 23:51

Thank you for your enlightening contribution lizg, so now we know where the real problem stems from: punk rock revolution. Although in my punk days, we never wore veils, unless we were doing the local post office over.

Post your comment

Please note: you will need to login or register before your comment is displayed on the website

You may enter up to 2000 characters (about 300-350 words)

Characters left:

We want to encourage people to comment on our content and to exchange views with other readers and hope this will be done on a courteous basis. However, if you encounter posts which are offensive please let us know by emailing comments@newstatesman.co.uk and we will take swift action where necessary.

About the writer

Sholto Byrnes

Sholto Byrnes is a contributing editor of the New Statesman and the jazz critic of the Independent. Previously he was diary editor, chief interviewer and senior feature writer at both Independent titles. He is a judge for this year's Paul Hamlyn Foundation awards for composers.

Read More

Vote!

Should Darling have been bolder with the 45% tax rate?