Registered user login:

Tony Blair - a penitent Catholic

Sholto Byrnes

Published 02 August 2007

We have had a Jewish prime minister in Disraeli, a Methodist in Thatcher, but still not a Catholic

"This is Sholto. He's a Catholic." Thus, at the age of 13, was I introduced to Robert Runcie in the deanery of Canterbury Cathedral. "Oh," said the then archbishop, "we don't mind that kind of thing any more." It was a typically gracious comment from Runcie. But was it true? For as Tony Blair begins his role in a region long marked by religious conflict, the question of his own beliefs still hangs in the air. Leaving his expected conversion to Catholicism until after his departure from No 10 suggests that, actually, we - or at least some of us - still mind "that kind of thing" very much. Why else would a leader who proclaimed that we were best when we were boldest signally fail, during his time in office, to confront a constitutionally entrenched prejudice against a faith followed by roughly five million Britons?

Catholicism is the only religion discriminated against in law in the UK. By the Act of Settlement 1701, a future monarch can wed a Muslim or a Buddhist, but marrying a Catholic bars him or her from the succession. The Anglican Primate of Ireland, Alan Harper, has called for this ab surdly anachronistic legislation to be repealed. It is certainly something that Gordon Brown should not forget in his plans to reform our constitution, not least because his much-discussed ideas of national identity cannot be allowed to imply, in however small a way, that Catholics are somehow less British than others.

There may be no legal bar to a Catholic being prime minister, but worries about such a sce nario remain, and are not entirely unfounded. There is no doubt that Catholicism requires far more of its followers - mandatory attendance at Mass and regular confession being only the most obvious manifestations of duty - than the genteelly declining Anglicanism in which Blair was raised. Catholic priests have used their pulpits to tell parishioners to write to MPs urging them to support pro-life measures. The sneaking suspicion lingers that, on Northern Ireland, faith schools and many other issues, a Catholic PM would be unduly influenced by Rome.

This has never been put to the test, as we have had a Jewish prime minister in Disraeli, a Methodist in Thatcher (there has never been any problem with "chapel"), but still not a Catholic. The one-time Tory hopeful Chris Patten was about as close as we have ever come; and even then Patten's faith raised eyebrows. So it has been expedient for Blair to leave conversion until after he left office - but not, perhaps, right. Some may think he should have sought instruction to be received as a Catholic the moment he became convinced that it was the true Church. If we cannot put a precise date to this revelation, we do know that stories about our former prime minister's attachment to Catholicism are nothing new.

In 1996, the Sunday Telegraph reported that Blair had been taking communion at the Catholic church in Islington his family attended; the disclosure led Cardinal Basil Hume to write a letter asking him to desist. Once Blair took office, spe culation about conversion continued. More recently, the parish priest at Chequers, Father Timothy Russ, said Blair discussed the possibility of his becoming a Catholic deacon three years ago.

Now that the issue is back on the agenda, press coverage of Blair's path to Rome has been curiously benign. It's almost as though he had taken up some mildly eccentric but harmless pastime. This is strange, given that the only ideological underpinning Blair has ever appeared to possess comes from Christianity. Pace Alastair Campbell, Blair has always "done" God. Catholics could be forgiven for feeling that Blair spent his entire premiership denying this very important truth about himself.

The philosopher Sir Anthony Kenny, a laicised Catholic priest, offers a possible precedent for delay. "The Emperor Theodosius was refused communion by the Bishop of Milan until he had done public penance for a massacre for which he was responsible. It is rumoured that in their farewell audience Pope Benedict rebuked Blair for his part in the invasion of Iraq. Perhaps his appointment as the quartet's [UN, US, EU, Russian] ambassador [to the Middle East] is meant to be his public penance. If so, we must hope that it has a favourable outcome." People of different faiths and of none can all say "Amen" to that.

Post this article to

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • newsvine
  • Reddit

14 comments from readers

otto449
02 August 2007 at 13:13

The Pope may not like the "invasion of Iraq", however that is not really his job. it is much more likely he scolded TB for his continuing support of the abortion holocaust in England. Now that is really something to say Amen to.

jessesgirl23
02 August 2007 at 13:16

iraq? how about all the politicallly correct nonsensical legislation blair forced thru into law in the uk which favors homosexuality at the expense of true free speech and that is trying to silence the church and many people who in conscience do not condemn homosexuals but acknowledge the destructive and anti-life realities of a homosexual lifetstyle - blair u need real conversion buddy, not just the superficial kind ur acting out for us

myaslan
02 August 2007 at 19:58

Amen to the above 2 comments!

Cybertiger
03 August 2007 at 15:12

@jessesgirl23

" ... trying to silence the church and many people who in conscience do not condemn homosexuals but acknowledge the destructive and anti-life realities of a homosexual lifetstyle ..."

Yer avin a larf Jesse!

There are just too many people on this planet, too many Catholics and vermin are running amok in Texas. In reality, the homosexual lifestyle is very much pro-life. Go get a life, Jesse!

PS. I am of the opinion that the Catholics, Jews and Americans represent a 'fatal triangle' that may yet save the world.

PPS. I understand to be 'pro-life' is to be 'pro-death' penalty - and not only in Texas.

EssexBoy
03 August 2007 at 16:48

If he were to convert, then that would mean The Pope would come between him and God. Why would he want anything to get in the way of that cosy relationship? :)

taghioff.info
06 August 2007 at 22:53

Since Row versus Wade in the states (the decisive case allowing mothers abortions when they chose it) the urban crime rate has crashed, including a marked decrease in homicide rates.

Forcing people to keep unwanted children has a massive human cost. Whilst not as immediately emotive as pictures of developing infants, young lives shot down in the streets years later are, nonetheless, tragedies.

On the subject of queer, would one declare to a homosexual hedgehog that it's desires are "unnatural"? Whilst hedgehogs admittedly lack the power of speech, they include homosexual members in their community, which is perhaps a less prickly subject for them. So why do humans find it so difficult? Should one hate a person because they display a natural sexual variation?

I don't think the posters are doing themselves any favors: whilst the author is appealing for tolerance of Catholics, they seem to be saying "string em up!"

john
08 August 2007 at 17:00

Brits = Hypocrisy

Ur medieval country has raised up by blind people,

while all europe were covered by knowledge,

When a wise man points finger to moon,

u r starring his finger,

Wake up!!!!

U care about omosexual when u don't provide a proper family to your sons, you lift the age of driving licence when people stab at 14 yo in ur school, u accuse the tv for trash content when u give to media the power to upbring your child,

u ban smokers when the industrial revolution came from that country,

Brits u blame US when we gave u a name for all the things around u , included your town name.

U deserve to drawn floaded and now u claim money from Europe for the damage, plz shut up

GideonPolya
09 August 2007 at 10:41

Of course the really shocking thing about Blair and Catholicism is that if he publicly promoted or publicly confessed to use of condoms he would presumably be excommunicated – yet notwithstanding the alleged secret rebuke from Pope Benedict over Iraq, Blair is up to his armpits in blood associated with the Bush–Blair War on Terror. But Blair (as yet) is hardly penitent.

The latest medical literature (The Lancet) and UN Population Division data indicate that post-invasion excess deaths in Occupied Iraq and Occupied Afghanistan total 1.0 million and 2.4 million, respectively (as of March 2007), these being consonant with quite independent estimates of post-invasion under-5 infant deaths totaling 0.5 million and 1.9 million, respectively (90% avoidable and due to war criminal US-UK Coalition refusal to supply life-sustaining requisites unequivocally demanded of occupiers by the Geneva Convention) (see “The Cost of War”: http://mwcnews.net/content/view/13099/26/ and “Body Count. Global avoidable mortality since 1950” [copy in the British Library]: http://globalbodycount.blogspot.com/ ).

The Holy Father may yet have to be more public in his condemnation. These figures indicate that the Bush-Blair War on Terror is in horrible actuality a War on Women and Children, or more specifically a War on Asian Women and Children, a War on Arab Women and Children, a War on Muslim Women and Children and a War on non-European Women and Children. Indeed outstanding British Jewish writer Nobel Laureate Harold Pinter has demanded arraignment of Bush and Blair before the International Criminal Court (see: http://www.countercurrents.org/arts-pinter081205.htm ) , stating: “How many people do you have to kill before you qualify to be described as a mass murderer and a war criminal? One hundred thousand? More than enough, I would have thought.” 3.4 million people? 2.2 million infants? More than enough, I would have thought.

antipodean
11 August 2007 at 02:27

I assume the comment from "John" is not serious. ..it must be an unkind parody of this kind of attitude. Surely no one who really reads the "Statesman" expresses himself at this level.

Rod Diplock
18 August 2007 at 12:47

A message to Harry with reference to his criticism about the excellent John Pilger article. Dear Harry if only you could show me a true communist state, past or present ... I will show you an ignoramous.

jamesbt20
18 August 2007 at 23:54

Bless me Father for I have sinned I can't remember how long it is since my last confession but I told lies and misled everyone including house of commons and the UN and because of my lies approx 1 million Iraqis have lost thier lives..............

jamesbt20
19 August 2007 at 00:09

Sorry Tony!!

Converting to Catholicism is cheap and contrived even for someone as shallow and fake as a Barrister Turned Actor like yourself.. So like u just convert and just confess and thats it??.Sorry Tony!......

You must burn in Hell for....hmmm? eternity..old bean!!

And not a day to much I'll say!

john
19 August 2007 at 19:18

Antipodes, I'm so sorry for ur and ur buddy ignorance about history.

At the moment what I can say is extreme but truth.

Gay represent the biological solution to the overpopulation of our world, in fact in the past war and disease were able to balance the natural equilibrium, but after the 20 century, that life expectection has grown the only way to stop to have children is a homosexual orientation which lead people to not increase the child birth.

Regarding the child u don't have any concern and trust in family or other principles which inspire the catholic nations, and then ur loop of misery will never end. u sell ur country to any culture religion and people to raise ur financial power but as it is said in the bible, babele tower fallen and after the twin tower, u will be the next, because what u call freedom in fact is adressable with libertine.

I accuse ur nation because in the name of the mother u deny a proper life to ur sons and to non european sons but the flood and other plagues will bring u back on a track.

And in the name of ur queen and ur pride u don't accept to open ur eyes on ur corrupted society.

I accuse ur legal system to not be codificated but it works on the habit "that's the way it is"

I accuse every single british of complicy to not say anythingh and does anythingh, and I saw mandela, gandhi, and many others which life has been taken from ur flag for saying truth and to ask respect of human rights.

colm
28 August 2007 at 18:09

I doubt the Pope had much to say about the 'invasion of Iraq'. Maybe the post-war reconstruction, but not the invasion. If anything, the Pope would have said that ol'Tone needs to make a good confession for (a) advancing abortion, (b) advancing the homosexual agenda against the Catholic Church, and (c) generally being a piss-pot poor public Christian.

But it's an interesting discussion nevertheless - that Catholicism is apparently now the last acceptable prejudice, even legally in Britain. In age in which we are supposed to be all buying into a public philosophy of unbridled enthusiastic multi-culturalism and 'hey you're okay'-ism, we still room to hate the Papists. Damn them, we say, for being the largest global charity; for founding schools, hospitals and universities; for caring for the children, the poor, the forgotten and the disabled. Let's all give three cheers for progress and throw some oranges at the Crucifix.

Post your comment

Please note: you will need to login or register before your comment is displayed on the website

You may enter up to 2000 characters (about 300-350 words)

Characters left:

We want to encourage people to comment on our content and to exchange views with other readers and hope this will be done on a courteous basis. However, if you encounter posts which are offensive please let us know by emailing comments@newstatesman.co.uk and we will take swift action where necessary.

About the writer

Sholto Byrnes

Sholto Byrnes is a contributing editor of the New Statesman and the jazz critic of the Independent. Previously he was diary editor, chief interviewer and senior feature writer at both Independent titles. He is a judge for this year's Paul Hamlyn Foundation awards for composers.

Read More

Vote!

Should Darling have been bolder with the 45% tax rate?