Registered user login:

If words could kill me

Ed Husain

Published 14 June 2007

Unless we stem the rising tide of radical Islamist rhetoric, a prelude to jihadism, in Britain the carnage of Baghdad may well erupt in Bradford and Birmingham.

I thought Britain was a free and civilised country where I would no longer hear talk of public executions - I used to live in Saudi Arabia, where weekly, public beheadings are the norm. I was wrong. There is an unchallenged, unreported Islamist underworld in the UK in which talk of jihad, bombings, stabbings, killings and executions is usual. Rhetoric is an indication of a certain mindset and, I believe, the prelude to terror.

In my book, The Islamist, I try to reclaim Islam from Islamism and separate the ancient spiritual path from a post-colonial political ideology. Condemnation of the book, mainly by Islamists, has not ceased for over a month.

In Manchester in April, Hassan Butt, a one-time jihadist who is now opposed to extremism, was stabbed and beaten for speaking out against fanaticism. He now lives in hiding. Why was this not reported in the mainstream media?

The Islamist underworld is assisted greatly by cyberspace - from Baghdad to Birmingham, Islamists and their jihadist twin brothers exchange information and coded messages on the web. Before Hassan's stabbing, his interview with an American media outlet condemning terrorism had been circulated on the web.

In internet chatrooms and discussion threads the Islamists break news of beheadings in Iraq, the downing of US helicopters and discuss who is next on their agenda of killing and destruction. The mainstream media is bewilderingly unaware of this fast-moving, influential underworld.

But things took an uglier turn recently. Showkat Ali, a member of Hizb ut-Tahrir, who is training in Birmingham to become a schoolteacher, wrote a rap-like poem and posted it on several prominent Muslim websites. He wrote that his poem "was inspired by several Muslims who have betrayed Islam and the Ummah and are now openly working for the Crusader West in its losing battle against Political Islam". Purporting to speak my mind and likening me to Judas, he wrote:

No ifs no Butts [Hassan Butt]
Some people after me
To stab me in the heart
Like they did Hassan in Manchester

I dread the return of the Caliphate
Who will apply to extradite me
Put me on trial
And then execute me
As a traitor.

I believe the above lines are a coded call for my death, written in the first-person narrative to absolve Ali and his organisation from any responsibility.

I was once involved with Hizb ut-Tahrir and know from first hand the games it plays. The Hizb raise the political temperature, manipulate violent rhetoric and then create the climate for others to pull the trigger. I saw this happen on my college campus in Newham in 1995, when Ayotunde Obunabi was killed as a result of the supremacist, jihadist, racist milieu the Hizb fostered on campus. Soon, on a larger scale, the Hizb gave birth to al-Muhajiroun, whose members and associates bombed Tel Aviv in 2003, London in 2005 and plan other atrocities that the security services continue to monitor. How much longer will we tolerate the rhetoric of jihadism in our midst?

In my experiences of living in Saudi Arabia in the aftermath of the 2004 and 2005 terrorist attacks in Riyadh and Jeddah, the most powerful weapon against Islamists and jihadists is to create public spaces in which former extremists can discuss why they entered Islamist networks and why they left. This removes the impenetrable mystique of these networks. It opens up their underworld. On Saudi television, former Islamists and jihadists recounted in detail why they abandoned the jihadist wing of Wahhabism, or al-Qaeda.

This scrutiny of extremism gives the public a better understanding of radicalisation, terror and its ideological underpinnings. More importantly, it gives people hope that we can together defeat this cancer in our midst. It also prevents a new generation of young Muslims from trying to walk the path that I traversed.

When courageous young men like Butt are stabbed and the media and authorities remain silent, it gives the wrong signal to those inside extremist organisations who are considering leaving. The rhetoric of "betrayal" also silences moderate Muslims who fear reprisals for speaking out, one reason that Muslim condemnation of extremism in Britain has been relatively low key. When coded death threats appear on popular Muslim websites, it prevents the emergence of a robust public space in which former Islamists can demolish the psychological confidence of extremists. To speak out against Islamism is not betrayal, it is fidelity to Islam and humanity. In the Quran, God refers to ennobling bani adam, or humanity. Ours is not a tribal religion. To condemn and dissociate from Islamism in all its forms is a religious duty, as illustrated by the words and actions of the majority of the world's Muslim scholars, from al-Azhar in Egypt to Deoband in India.

In Britain, the differences between Islamism and Islam have been blurred to the extent that many Muslims fail to draw the distinction, as do large numbers of us on the left. Mistakenly, we sympathise with those who articulate anti-American, anti-war, pro-Palestinian grievances, without realising that Islamists of the entryist school are not allies of the left, but sworn enemies with a long history of terrorism against leftists in, among other countries, Algeria, Palestine and Bangladesh. We should know our Muslim from our Islamist. Just as we don't talk to the BNP to understand white, working-class grievances, we need not engage with Islamists to comprehend Muslim suffering.

Islam, with its history of plurality and spirituality, has a natural home in Britain. Islamism, a political ideology set up to confront the west, does not. Today, it is talk of execution of moderate Muslims; unless we stem the rising tide of radical Islamist rhetoric in Britain, a prelude to jihadism, then the carnage of Baghdad may well erupt in Bradford and Birmingham.

Ed Husain is author of "The Islamist", published by Penguin

For more on this debate:

Comment is Free: Seeing the light?

Post this article to

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • newsvine
  • NowPublic
  • Reddit

22 comments from readers

JamesBate
14 June 2007 at 13:04

Mate you got a book to sell. I have seen your various other articles on every mainstream news papers starting from Guardian. Your agenda is to promote your book vis-ŕ-vis Hizb Tahrir by mentioning it again and again. Either you live in your own fantasy world or you are on payroll from those who want to take our civil liberties away.

Wasu
14 June 2007 at 13:33

I think ED should start his journey from dishonesty to honesty,Insincerity to Sincerity ,as he is keep on twisting the truth with falsehood and trying to make things look as if all the problem in the UK exist by the existance of Political Islam.There is no new angels in ED's writing it is old rehtoric, he is trying to make a point as the US and UK together doing for the last 2 year that HT is conveyer belt for terrorism.If Mr Ed is Sincere why dont he invite "islamist" to open debate.

gambit
14 June 2007 at 15:05

Aside from already being exposed in 2 lies in recent interviews i.e. the NY Times one where he says "shaikh Hamza allows for Muslim women to marry non Muslim men" and the second repeated lie that HT was responsible for the murder of a nigerian student in the early 1990s (which has already been clarified on many websites that he was murdered in a drugs related issue), there is now the classic "I am the victim" card. The more you open your mouth the more stupid and foolish you sound and the more your lies start contradicting themselves openly.

Mrs Hafezi
14 June 2007 at 17:40

Mr Ed i would sincerly be interested to know how much money you earn for selling your akhirah? perhaps this is a fast approaching tradition emerging.... It has been very evident in the past 2 years that HT are a non violent political organisation, if you really know their game then why is it you are hiding behind the media, have an open dialogue and share your grievences, rather than using false and cheap assumptions which carry no factual evidences....

Nourah
14 June 2007 at 18:08

Interesting how Husain is always lecturing on the dangers of islamists always drawing for us the dotted lines between their supposed links to the jihads etc etc. I have yet to hear him shout even equally as loud if he cannot muster shouting out louder about the War on Iraq (no dotted lines here connecting foreign policy to Muslims being killed) or unfair treatment of Muslims by police. I suppose he sees all this as the fault of the Muslims...oops I mean Islamists......too.

miabhai
14 June 2007 at 21:39

"Ed" Husain. Your arguments in your book about islam and Islamism seem to have been drawn up by the neo-cons. The call for the caliphate is as traditional as fighting wordly desires. Many scholars in the past have spoken about the centrality of the caliphate to Islam. I believe that you are a man being used in a political game. If you know it then you are evil. If you dont, then you are lacking intelligence.

miabhai
14 June 2007 at 21:42

Your argument about Islam/Islamism, tradional Islam/political Islam seems to have been drafted by the neocons. The caliphate is central to traditional Islam as has been documented over the centuries by various tradional scholars. It seems you are being used. If you are aware of this, then you are an evil boy. If you dont then you naaive and in need of help

gambit
14 June 2007 at 23:36

"If you give a stupid fool enough rope, he will hang himself"

Don't worry "Ed"/Muhammed/John Doe about anyone wanting to silence you, you will be silenced by your benefactors as soon as your contradictory statements/lies become too obvious to ignore and will outweigh whatever usefulness your handlers thought they could get out of you. So keep on talking mate,, writing, whoring yourself out to anyone that wants to 'spend' time with you, eventually all good things do come to an end

sahar
15 June 2007 at 01:45

I wonder what branch of islam, uses words such as islamism, hmm as far as i know none. oh apart from the branch that the homeoffice has created and maybe your new version of 'moderate' islam... the kind which denies islam and politics are the same thing. Shame on you.

FlagBearer
15 June 2007 at 02:00

You sad, sad man 'Ed'. A shameful disgrace to the Muslims. Hey, I have an idea! Why don't you join Tableeghi Jamaat and then do the whole "Oh look at me, I'm a victim" thing all over again. After all, you're going to need some more ammo for your next book. Get over it 'Ed'. We have.

Mrs Hafezi
15 June 2007 at 11:13

I suppose its very easy for one to recognise the cheap publicity stunt Ed is playing, clearly to sell his book! But it should leave one rather worried that media outlets including newstatesman can actually give such publicity time and space! it just proves how gutter journalism is on the horizon. . . shame, shame!

abunuha
15 June 2007 at 14:13

Heres a verse from another recent poem written by the same showkat ali, titled "Exams stress"

My final exams are nigh

End of an era

But my mind is full of terror

Grade eleven

Final year

Have to do well

A few A*'s and maybe

A couple of A's

That is If I’m lucky

If not how do I tell my family

That I failed miserably?

So this 'trainee teacher' who is taking his GCSE's is also writing coded death calls. Newstatement have you become like the tabloids?

DNA Archipelago
16 June 2007 at 07:40

Interesting...I am afraid Ed Husain does not convince me at all. What do you exactly mean by 'Islamist rhetoric'? Can you give an example?

You sound like a AEI neocon stuttering "Islamofascism".

Reset, relax.

Cyberspace 'underground'...?!

Where do you exactly expect people to speak their mind? Surely not on the pages of the Daily Mail, Guardian, Newsgroup and the lot...

A platform for the 'moderate'? Ahh.. you want The Sun to launch a 'page-4 special'...

Good luck.

P.S. real moderates have their DNA samples taken through false arrests and put on the W-list

Brown-good-news
17 June 2007 at 09:05

We can all welcome this new initiative (engaging with masses) provided it is a genuine attempt to improve things. The moderate element should be genuinely moderate. That is, someone who is prepared to criticise both sides of the argument. The soviet-style propaganda is bound to failure. Americans, whose average IQ of 80 is mixed up with 300 Kilos of fat, religiously believe in advertising: ‘the more you look, the more you like’ goes one commercial.

It may not be a universal solution.

gadfly
17 June 2007 at 15:38

The belligerent, name-calling comments above only serve to prove Ed Husain right. No one has refuted any of his points, they have merely accused him of working for the US and UK - thereby impugning that he is 'betraying Islam' - PRECISELY what Husain writes that Islamists say about Muslims who criticize them.

Interestingly, there is no mention of what happened to Hassan Butt, no facts-based refutations of Husain's claims of what happened to him...only cheap accusations of Husain being a publicity-seeker, neo-con, liar, etc. etc. Do any of his critics have anything reasonable to say, or any way of backing up their accusations that doesn't involve yet more empty, hostile rhetoric?

For example, Abunuha, including lines from ANOTHER poem written by Showkat Ali doesn't prove that he didn't write the poem Husain mentions.

All the the commentators assume that the West is an evil force that should perhaps be replaced by a caliphate (e.g., Miabhai) and Husain is a liar and enemy because he doesn't quite see things that way.

Islamist threat indeed.

gambit
17 June 2007 at 16:37

On the contrary, I for one would LOVE for "Ed"/ "Mahbub" to KEEP SPEAKING. Like i've said before, the more he opens his mouth the more it is harder to cover up the blatant inconsistencies that keep coming up. Moreover, from any of his handlers/promoters/fellow lackeys, please give detailed responses to the following if you can:

1. His claim in a NY Times interview that Hamza Yusuf supports Muslim women marrying non Muslim men.

2. Documentation of any kind that the murder fo the nigerian student he claims "awakened" him was not something that was a gang/drugs related issue at the time (i have spoken to witnesses who were there when it happened who say it had nothing to do with religion but a drug deal gone bad).

3. His claim that a sign of "fundamentalism" and "radicalisation" was that "every girl started wearing the hijab" due solely to his prosletyzing. Are his powers so miraculous that Muslim girls choose the headscarf due to his words and not what they believe themselves? If so, where is the proof.

EITHER PUT UP OR SHUT UP!

gadfly
18 June 2007 at 14:56

Gambit, this article has nothing to do with whether Hamza Yusuf supports marriage between Muslim women and non-Muslim men, or any of the other points you raised.

It is about the nature of Islamist groups in contemporary British society, including Hizb ut-Tahrir and al-Muhajiroun; and the intimidation that they use to silence dissidents, including the beating of Hassan Butt. So even if you were indeed right about all of the points you raised, you still have not proved that Husain's argument in THIS article is false.

If you are convinced that everything that Husain says and writes is de facto false, just because he says it, that is fallacious. Otherwise, it's time to refute the claims made in THIS article, namely about:

- the attitudes and aspirations of political Islamist groups in Britain.

- whether Hassan Butt was really beaten up by members of these groups, or with their encouragement

- ultimately, whether there has or has not been a growth of extremist and violent Islamist ideology in Britain.

Are these claims true or false? Ed Husain has insider evidence that they are true. What evidence do you have to support your claim that he is lying?

Faisal Haque
19 June 2007 at 01:02

The many inaccuracies and errors in Husain's writings have been pointed our on numerous occasions. As someone who was a HT activist in the early 1990s with Husain, I know that much of his account is melodramatic and exaggerated.

As for Butt, he has not been stabbed or beaten up - this is just pure lies. He is carrying on as normal in Manchester and is by no means living undercover. Although he has said that his family have disowned him, I know for a fact that he remains on good terms with his family, including his brothers Umar and Usman.

As someone who was a HT activist, I do not buy the claim that they attempt to "silent dissidents" - they may be stubborn about certain things and we may disagree with them, but Husain's claims are pure fantasy.

Ed Husain has written his own personal story - I wouldn't lose sleep over his largely irrelevant and outdated contribution to the debate.

http://theislamist.wordpress.com

Faisal Haque
19 June 2007 at 01:11

Sorry, just one more point: If Hassan Butt has funded terrorism, why has he not been arrested - Ed holds Butt up as some sort of hero - if he has done the crime, why does he not do the time? Just because he has had a sudden change of heart and is now writing a “kiss and tell” book, surely this does not exonerate him before the law. Or does Ed believe that writing "kiss and tell" books wipes away the past?

http://theislamist.wordpress.com/2007/05/23/if-he-funded-ter...

Abu Inaya
25 June 2007 at 11:55

Nobody seems to be asking what the motive is behind all this call to ban this group and that group. if we live in a society that believes in you are innocent until proven guilty, then any individual or organisation needs to be given the right to explain themselves in light of any accusations. Especially the ones being brought forward by the likes of Ed Hussain. the implications of Ed's views being accepted would mean the loss of basic rights such as the right to criticise injustices around the world or the right to address civil liberties being violated.

Robert
29 May 2008 at 23:20

God almighty....soo many haters.

I think Ed is right when he talks about people trying to silence him.

The commentators here are trying a little character assassination because they are scared Ed will be heard.

Go for it no problem!

javK
29 June 2008 at 18:35

Ed Hussain's narratives resemble those of the recently discredit Hasan Butt, who under police pressure disclosed he had made most of his Islamist stories up - maybe the police should interview Husain.

There's a good academic refutation of Husain et al on

www.islamic-considerations.blogspot.com

Post your comment

Please note: you will need to login or register before your comment is displayed on the website

We want to encourage people to comment on our content and to exchange views with other readers and hope this will be done on a courteous basis. However, if you encounter posts which are offensive please let us know by emailing comments@newstatesman.co.uk and we will take swift action where necessary.

Read More

Vote!

Is this the worst economic situation for 60 years?