Return to: Home | Life & Society | Society

The people's en-suite

Hal Weitzman

Published 02 April 2007

Observations on Venezuela

I arrived in Caracas to find my hotel being nationalised. The Hilton occupies a vast complex in the centre of town, now a somewhat unsavoury area. The government, which owns the lease, has told the company to leave by May.

It felt comically apt. The fate of the Hilton encapsulates perfectly what is going on in Venezuela: Hugo Chávez's revolution has moved up a gear. All around Caracas, giant red posters remind people of the "five motors" of the revolution. Images of Chávez are everywhere, from the ubiquitous graffiti to the "21st-century socialism" wristwatches on sale in the street markets.

For much of his eight years in power, the bombastic comandante has battled for survival. His opponents tried to unseat him militarily (in 2002), economically (via an oil-sector strike and lock-out in 2002-2003) and politically (with a recall referendum in 2004).

The state and Chávez have morphed into one. Congress, entirely made up of representatives of pro-government parties, has effectively neutered itself by giving the president the right to rule by decree. By May, by extending government control over facilities in the Orinoco basin, Chávez will have complete power over the oil sector. The telecoms and electricity sectors are the next targets for nationalisation. He has removed his vice-president and finance minister from office, both seen as independent-minded, and is turning his attention to the legislature.

With Congress reduced to rubber-stamping, the country's most important policy platform has become Aló Presidente, Chávez's radio and television broadcasts, nightly on radio and weekly on television. Even this overexposure seems not to damage him, and watching has become the only way to track the twists and turns in presidential thinking.

Chávez's championing of the poor and underprivileged, and his verbal attacks on the wealthy "who are more committed to Miami than Venezuela", has heightened tension in a city that already had a serious crime problem. Yet, ironically, there is a boom in conspicuous consumption among the rich, fuelled by entrepreneurs who have moved into selling construction services and security and military equipment to the government. In restaurants in upmarket districts, customers spend money like water and property prices are soaring.

In Caracas, people either love Chávez or hate him. But outside the city, there is less ideological fervour. On the Caribbean coast, in the small town of La Vela del Coro, I met Wilfredo Medina, an industrious mayor who has pioneered what is now one of Chávez's favourite themes: the "explosion of popular power". I watched local representatives discussing problems of health, education and security. One activist, a dedicated young Chávista, told me that his loyalty was to the community first and only then to el comandante.

"But when you criticise Chávez, even a little, you're accused of being unpatriotic and disloyal to the cause," he also confided.

Post this article to

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • newsvine
  • Reddit

1 comment from readers

P.Black
02 April 2007 at 15:49

This article like several before is supposed to be about Venezuela. In reality it seems to be simply about giving New Statesman readers further tiresome,uninteresting, prejudiced and uninformed views of events in Venezuela.

Is the New Statesman singularly incapable of publishing a genuinely informartive and intelligent article about the ongoing, monumental and exciting events in Venezuela, by any other writer other than outstanding and healthily critical John Pilger?

Such events are simply referred to in a glib short hand manner,lacking any context which would allow for necessary deeper understanding and greater insight.

Such apparent lack of detail and context in the above article is particularly notable with reference to the 'opposition'.The opposition are controlled by the obscenely rich and wealthy and deeply corrupt Oligarchy, who l to all intents and purposes run and still control the means of production and the majority of the capitalist mass media within Venezuela.

Perhaps it might be helpful if the writer could inform readers about the history, power and nature of the opposition and their US CIA connections and fundings,past and present.

The article is singularly lacking any mention of US imperialist involvement in 'recent' events nevermind past records.

The failed US-backed military coup of 2002, which was defeated by the Venezuelan people.

The months long and potentially hugely damaging and destabilsing US-backed Business Strike,which again was defeated by the solidarity of those Venezuelan oil wokers who kept the oil industry working.

The US-backed Opposition's attempt to bring to an end the historic and monumental events taking place in Venezuela were again resoundly defeated by a huge majority by the Venezuelan people in favour of Chavez and the Bolivarian Revolution in the democratic recall referendum of 2004.

There is a complete absence of anything positive taking place in Venezuela in the article.Just the usual smear and innuendo

Does the writer not have eyes to see and ears to listen with? What about some mention of the many important and vital achievements in terms of poverty eradication, with the free provision of Cuban assisted health care, the incredible expansion of and greater access to education and higher education, the massive democratic participation of millions of Venezuelans in local and national decision making,the vital leaps in economic and regional (Latin America and beyond) development and food self sufficiency, based on the necessary and timely redistribution of Venezuela's vast wealth and resources.These events are are unprecedented!

New Statesman readers deserve much better than this now regular repetitive dull Chavez bashing tirade,which is an insult to the Venezuelan people and their ongoing Bolivarian revolutionairy process, which is spreading great hope and solidarity throughout Latin America and beyond.

Post your comment

Please note: you will need to login or register before you can comment on the website

Read More

Newsletter

Enter your email address here to receive updates from the team

Vote!

Will the Iraq inquiry be a 'whitewash'?

Suggest a question

View comments

© New Statesman 1913 - 2009

Tracker