Registered user login:

Sign of the times

Becky Hogge

Published 05 March 2007

E-petitions are just the first step. Becky Hogge has some advice for aspiring campaigners

I didn't sign the e-petition against road pricing last month (I ride a bike), but I did sign the one against biometric ID cards. This also closed in the past week and though it was signed by a mere 27,985 people, it still warranted a "personal" response from Tony Blair. Unlike his riposte to Britain's angry motorists, it was not appeasing in tone. I should not be surprised - after all, what are civil liberties compared to the right of my parents' generation to pollute the air their grandchildren will choke on?

But I digress. When the e-petition on road pricing closed at midnight on 20 February it had nearly 1.8 million signatures. Campaigning lore (into which, thanks to my work with the Open Rights Group, I am fast being initiated) states that on any particular issue, it takes six letters of protest to land on an MP's doormat before he or she will take the matter further. Had each of my fellow signatories chosen to write to their local MP instead, each member of parliament would have received seven times that figure. Had the motorists done the same, each MP would have received nearly 3,000 letters.

When you ask people who think about such things what makes geeks volunteer hour upon hour of their spare time to contribute to free and open-source software projects such as the Linux operating system or the Firefox web browser, they will give you several replies. Among them will be the observation that people like doing things when they can see, directly, the effects of their actions. The same also carries for Wikipedians - so engaging is it to see your minor alteration to the entry on a rare wild flower fast-track its way to posterity, that you are soon hooked.

The online environment is the perfect setting for this process of contribution and reward. Assuming the congestion charge put them off coming to London to protest against the invasion of Iraq in 2003, most of the 1.8 million who signed the petition against road pricing will not have engaged in civic action before. Blair's letter, and the "full and frank debate" it promises, are rewards for their small contribution to democracy.

Perhaps next time they will employ WriteToThem.com, an equally user-friendly website designed by mySociety, to direct their complaints to their local representatives. Pretty soon, they might be subscribing to receive email updates from TheyWorkForYou.com (also mySociety's) to keep tabs on each time their MP speaks in parliament, or a particular issue they care about is raised.

Some might argue that neither my co-signatories nor our 1.8 million driver chums have made any contribution to democracy with our petitions. But I disagree. Whether the government likes it or not, our leaders are no longer broadcasting their policies to a silent electorate. Like the media before them, they will have to start getting used to the audience talking back.

Post this article to

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • newsvine
  • Reddit

1 comment from readers

gionav
05 March 2007 at 11:01

Hi Becky, thanks for the article, I agree with you in many parts. Especially with the suggestions to write to MPs. I guess the best thing would be to have a software that does it together: so I sign a petition on the Downing Street website, then I put my address and the software can automatically link my name and my address with my local MP, hence it will send to that MP as many copies of the petitions as are the residents of his cotituency that have signed the petition. Tom Steinberg should look into that. However on the e-petition, I am not sure what will happen, yet for the time being, what seems to be beyond doubt is that the opinions hitherto unheard of 1.8 million people have suddenly become the focus of a wide public debate, and it has forced the Prime Minister himself to take stance publicly in regard to it. This certainly cannot be a bad thing for democracy. On the other hand, it should neither push us to be naïve: being heard and having an impact on politics are by no means synonymous. Nonetheless, I would like to remark that the experiment of the e-petition website supported by n. 10 Downing Street - what ever the original reasons behind this choice might have been - could have unexpected and interesting consequences. After all, we should not forget that the whole history of the internet and its main applications (emails and World Wide Web) is a history of unintentional triumph and unforeseen consequences. That is to say that the impact of these inventions has often exceeded the expectations of their creators. Hence, I would not be surprised if this was the case of the e-petition website. I wonder though what would happen if millions of people start signing petitions every day on every issue or policy that government attempts to propose, will then Mr. Blair or who ever reside after him at n. 10 Downing Street be so condescending? Or what else?

Ciao

Giovanni Navarria

Centre for the Study of Democracy,

University of Westminster

Post your comment

Please note: you will need to login or register before your comment is displayed on the website

You may enter up to 2000 characters (about 300-350 words)

Characters left:

We want to encourage people to comment on our content and to exchange views with other readers and hope this will be done on a courteous basis. However, if you encounter posts which are offensive please let us know by emailing comments@newstatesman.co.uk and we will take swift action where necessary.

About the writer

Becky Hogge

Formerly technology director of award-winning current affairs website openDemocracy.net, Becky Hogge is Executive Director of the Open Rights Group, a grassroots digital civil liberties campaigning organisation.

Also by Becky Hogge

Read More

Vote!

Should Darling have been bolder with the 45% tax rate?