When chaos can kill
What causes sudden cardiac arrest?
By Michael Brooks Published 03 May 2012
Young athletes seem to be dropping like the rain. Happily, Bolton Wanderers’ Fabrice Muamba is making a full recovery after his heart stopped during a match in March. The Italian footballer Piermario Morosini was not so lucky; he died on the pitch in Pescara last month. We don’t yet know for sure what killed him – nor the London Marathon runner Claire Squires. But it seems likely that the foibles of the human heart are to blame – in the UK alone, 12 people under the age of 35 succumb to “sudden cardiac death” every week.
The heart beats because of co-ordinated pulses of electricity that work their way through its cells in a wave, causing muscle to contract in a tightly synchronised dance that creates a highly efficient pumping mechanism. Under stress, this rhythm can break down. The organ falls into what physicists know as chaos.
In general, chaos has a strange beauty. Watching a chaotic pendulum swing is entrancing. Some of the movements look so tiny that you think the pendulum must be about to stop – and then it doesn’t. A chaotic system never repeats its movements, giving it unpredictable qualities. That is why a butterfly flapping its wings in Brazil really can cause a tornado in Texas.
A chaotic arrhythmia in the heart is equally disastrous. When the heart’s muscles contract in never-repeating patterns, the organ becomes a seething, pulsating mess of tissue rather than a pump. The defibrillators that stop this do not give a random jolt of electricity: the pulse is carefully designed to take the chaos into account and provide the electrical current patterns and pulses that will halt the quivering. Only then can the heart re-establish its proper beat.
As marvellous an invention as the defibrillator is, it would be much better to identify those whose hearts are prone to slipping into chaos. This has proved a surprisingly contentious task.
Two recent reviews of the scientific literature published in the same journal (Progress in Cardiovascular Disease) came to almost opposite conclusions. One suggests that an electrocardiogram is the only effective means of detecting a latent problem. The other says ECGs “have not been demonstrated to be effective in decreasing the inherent risk of athletic sudden death”.
Warning signs
A consensus is growing, however, that ECG screening does help. Fifa and Uefa both require that all professional footballers undergo ECG tests but Muamba’s case has provoked questions about whether the tests are being done often enough – or well enough. The FA’s medical committee will meet on 3 May to dissect the incident, and Premier League team doctors are getting together a week later to examine Muamba’s medical records to see whether any warning signs were missed.
For all the concern over professionals, it is amateur athletes who drop dead far too frequently. It is difficult to deal with the problem because many of these deaths are recorded as unexplained; post-mortem, many intricacies and weaknesses of a heart are undetectable. What is known is that one in 300 people has some kind of heart defect.
Those doing sport are at nearly three times greater risk of sudden cardiac death, which is why the European Society of Cardiology and the International Olympic Committee have recommended that any young person taking part in competitive sport should undergo precautionary screening. However, generally there is very limited access to such facilities. The charity Cardiac Risk in the Young has enlisted a few famous faces (David Walliams, Pixie Lott and James Cracknell) to help change that. But cardiac chaos will claim many more lives in the foreseeable future.
For a list of ECG screening clinics for young people, visit c-r-y.org.uk
Latest tweets
More from New Statesman
- Online writers:
- Steven Baxter
- Rowenna Davis
- David Allen Green
- Mehdi Hasan
- Nelson Jones
- Gavin Kelly
- Helen Lewis
- Laurie Penny
- The V Spot
- Alex Hern
- Martha Gill
- Alan White
- Samira Shackle
- Alex Andreou
- Nicky Woolf in America
- Bim Adewunmi
- Glosswitch
- Kate Mossman on pop
- Ryan Gilbey on Film
- Martin Robbins
- Rafael Behr
- Eleanor Margolis
- Tools and services:
- Polls
- Predictions
- Archive
- Magazine
- PDF edition
- RSS feeds
- Advertising
- Subscribe
- Special supplements
- Stockists


10 comments
Once again we are being told about technology in the Civilian Sector that has been in existance within the military sector, 10 to 20 years before it has been openly publicized, within the civilian sector. We are talking about the UKUSA agreement and TTCP agreements, Porton Down (QinetiQ - DSTL - DERA), RSRE (Worcestershire), and DARPA, NASA and CIA-DST. This technology is way passed its' study/experimental stage, and is in full implementation, being used activily on a procedural level, with consent and without consent. If you refer to some of the illegal programs that were being occustrated in the 50s, 60s and 70s, under ARTICHOKE, MKULTRA stemming from 'Operation PaperClip', you can gain an insight to the level of depravity that the medicial, scientific research, intelligence and military establishments were willing to go to, and how there is a huge deception on how these technologies and programs are now being presented to the public audience: William Sargant, St Thomas's Hospital, Donald Ewan Cameron, Harry Bailey and Galbraith, amongs others ... The Radio Telemetry Laboratory, and Military Radiations Signals Intelligence, Neural Oscillations, and the Central Nervous System, with ELF or VLF manipulation; under the subject heading Brain Computer Interface (BCI), Remote Neural Monitoring (RNM) and Synthetic Telepathy. Nano-Medicines have hugely allowed this early pioneering 'torture' experimentation to be unimaginably enhanced beyond all scientific expectations, for manipulation of test subjects/live subjects, 'Unethical Human Experimentation' - in the ten of thousands (every living organism has a unique 'Bioelectric Field').
The government adds the metal iron to all our food.
Iron builds in the heart and causes arrythmia.
They have shown by targeting iron they are able to limit heart attacks.
"Elevated cardiac iron leads to diastolic dysfunction, arrhythmias and dilated cardiomyopathy"
Iron reduction is accomplished by phlebotomy.
"Phlebotomy successfully terminated haemoptysis in ten CCHD patients".
yup as heart is the base of life so we should take care of it, as using alot of medicines is also not good , so instead of using tablets we should take part in sports like activities like i have bought barcelona football Tickets .
Being called by Leveson might stop a few tickers among our elite!
A butterfly flapping its wings half way round the world can no more cause a tornado than my sneezing can. This is a common misunderstanding of Edward Lorenz's 1972 talk. The chaotic nature of weather means that a butterfly flapping its wings might be sufficient to change where or when a tornado occurs, not to actually cause a tornado. A tornado is generated, as is most of our weather, by the immense amounts of energy radiated by the Sun and converted to thermal currents.
Hi Sir, You are really good writer.
It is really helpful article about the topic of . I so much interest about your article. I know it is not any simple information. This is very nice post! I will bookmark this blog as I have My Live Expert is a website that matches 'experts' with customers who then communicate on the site with high quality audio/video about on tutors, life coaches, therapist, psychic, counselors reading tarot. We offer live chat between experts and customers.
Thank You Very Much For a Nice & Cool Article.
Unfortunately, your best chance of being diagnosed with a condition that may lead to sudden cardiac death is at autopsy. Alternatively you may be offered screening for it following such a death in a relative, if there is a potentially hereditary element to it.
There's no indication for screening the public for these rare conditions. Many conditions have no symptoms. Many won't be picked up on ECG. Some of these conditions can be diagnosed before death but only by invasive angiography, microscopic examination of myocardial muscle or genetic testing for mutations in the genes that code for sarcomere proteins and ion channels. And even then knowing you've got a condition may not stop it killing you.
There is no good evidence on the benefits of heart screening and given the incredibly low level of deaths it is unlikely to ever be a really good study as the studies would have to be oiver a very long period of time and includ every diverse populations however the fact that death rates in countries with and without screening are very similar and the fact that despite the article the death rate from heart attacks are lower amongst those doing sport than those not suggests that tests are not worthwhile. Some references are:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=21392644
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20580680
Mandating testing is not cost free it will be money spent that could be spent elsewhere for a bigger health impact, it will inhibit sporting activity and because interpretting ECG results is difficult and subjective it risks a culture where healthy children are made 'ill'.
There is a general problem with the way risk and safety is discussed and managed. Media 'friendly' small risks are given undue promineance compared to more significant but less publicised (because they are commoner?) risks. There is very limitted appreciation that complete elimination of risks is impossible and that risk reduction has to be balanced against costs. The most extreme example of completely false risk perception remains nuclear power with by far the best safety record of any power source and low impact from rare catastrophic events yet the perception as the most dangerous source of energy.
Fraziel has a point and from "Those doing sport are at nearly three times greater risk of sudden cardiac death..." we have to accept that gentle exercise is what we need, stopping for a fag now and then.
Often tests will not show up a heart defect and a peson might collapse and die anyway. The numbers are very small though and there would appear to be little we can do about it. Precautionary screening is expensive and who will pay for it? What is the point if it often picks up nothing anyway? I know what my doctor would say if i turned up asking for a heart check up, with no prior symptoms, on the off chance that during exercise i was worried i might collapse. He would tell me to stop being paranoid and to bugger off.