Teaching kids to fear maths will harm Britain's chances in the global economy
The prospect of learning maths scares us, but actually doing the proper stuff is rather enjoyable.
By Michael Brooks Published 22 November 2012 12:38
If someone were to give you a maths textbook, what would your reaction be? What about if you were faced with a set of sums to do? Or told you cannot graduate until you have taken a certain number of maths classes?
If these scenarios make you feel nauseous, you are probably an HMA – someone with a high level of maths anxiety. For some people, the threat of a maths test is equivalent to the prospect of walking down a dark alley in an unfamiliar city. People with extremely high levels of mathematics anxiety even experience physical pain.
We know this thanks to a study published, appropriately enough, on Hallowe’en. The research involved recruiting volunteers who rated high and low in maths anxiety. They were put into a magnetic resonance imaging scanner and given a range of tasks to do. Some involved maths quizzes; some tested verbal skills.
In the most illuminating part of the study, the volunteers were told whether it was maths or language tests coming up. The prospect of having their verbal skills tested provoked nothing remarkable in the brain scans. For those who were highly maths-anxious, the signal that a maths test was coming up created a surge of activity in the bilateral dorso-posterior insula. This is a region of the brain associated with the presence of physical pain and the reaction is the same as to a physical threat – you experience the urge to get the hell out of there.
Though many papers reported the research as justification for a fear of maths, it goes far deeper than that. The most important finding from the study is that when the volunteers started to do maths, all that anxiety and pain went away. The prospect of maths scares and sometimes pains us; doing maths is strangely enjoyable. Proper maths, that is – not the endless repetition of learned techniques such as multiplying fractions or ploughing through long division.
The way we teach mathematics is leaving many people mentally scarred. Allow students to develop a feel for numbers by letting them solve puzzles, and everything changes. The message from the Computer-Based Math™ Education summit held at the Royal Institution in London this month goes even further. Allow children to learn maths by using computers to solve problems and not only does the subject get easier, but they leave education ready to work in a world increasingly dominated by digital technology.
This idea is anathema to traditionalists, but something has to change. Just under half of the adult population can’t complete even primary-school maths problems. Adults with poor numeracy skills are twice as likely to be unable to find work; it’s no wonder they are also twice as likely to suffer from depression. Innumeracy leads to poor money management and problems with debt. On 7 November, the charity National Numeracy launched a partnership with the Nationwide Building Society to help people develop numeracy skills to manage their finances.
Economy class
Innumeracy will affect Britain’s ability to compete in a global economy, too. At the beginning of October, the Royal Academy of Engineering announced that the UK can maintain its industrial output only if British universities produce 10,000 more science, technology, engineering and maths graduates every year.
It’s not clear where they are going to come from, because each one will need to leave school with decent maths skills.
If things carry on as they are, we can abandon hope of a role on the world economic stage in the future, all because we’re inflicting pain in maths class. As a doctor might say, if it hurts that much, you’re probably doing it wrong.
Michael Brooks’s “The Secret Anarchy of Science” is published by Profile Books (£8.99)
Latest tweets
More from New Statesman
- Online writers:
- Steven Baxter
- Rowenna Davis
- David Allen Green
- Mehdi Hasan
- Nelson Jones
- Gavin Kelly
- Helen Lewis
- Laurie Penny
- The V Spot
- Alex Hern
- Martha Gill
- Alan White
- Samira Shackle
- Alex Andreou
- Nicky Woolf in America
- Bim Adewunmi
- Glosswitch
- Kate Mossman on pop
- Ryan Gilbey on Film
- Martin Robbins
- Rafael Behr
- Eleanor Margolis
- Tools and services:
- Polls
- Predictions
- Archive
- Magazine
- PDF edition
- RSS feeds
- Advertising
- Subscribe
- Special supplements
- Stockists





















4 comments
"Just under half of the adult population can’t complete even primary-school maths problems. "
I assume that this has not always been the case and that some time in the past most adults and indeed most primary-school children could complete primary-school maths problems. Have people become much less intelligent or has the teaching of the subject become ineffective?
An author iis absolutely right. And what about science? I had no idea that science can be so facinating until after a hight school. Yes math is hard and it is should be continue to be considered a tough subject (easy is actually an indication of limited learning process).
There are ways to make it interesting - making a game out of way to solve it.
My 5 year old has a concept of "good hard" and "bad hard"; the trick is to transfer math from a bad hard to a good hard territory.
At least you are lucky with your reading. Back in Soviet Union, I was one of many who end up hating Russian literature. I thought it is almost all terrible - the reason is that everything was interpreted through psychopathic socialism prism.
An interesting article. It reminds me of a friend who seemed to fall ill before or during every single maths test we had at high school. These were always head aches or sometimes, she would claim - the onset of a fever (?!) It was pretty serious and at first I thought she must have been joking. But she wasn't and I could literally see the colour drain from her face at times.
She wasn't even that bad at it.
I was interested in the article's initial premise, as I work with many children who have low confidence with maths when they first arrive at the Kumon Centre I run.
My concern, however, is that if children by-pass the need to become fluent in the core skills (especially addition, subtraction, multiplication and division), their future levels of maths anxiety are likely to increase rather than be reduced. Indeed, I would argue that it is the reduction in time spent in recent years mastering these basic skills that has contributed to the struggles that many of our young people experience in the UK, compared with other countries.
Perhaps a comparison with computerised spell-checkers is appropriate. Has their use increased or decreased the ability of young people to write independently in coherent and intelligent ways?