Welcome to the New Statesman website. Please sign in or register to participate in the conversation.

The NS Interview: Jonathan Sacks, Chief Rabbi

"Blogs are the best disseminators of paranoia yet created"

In 2009, you published a book called Future Tense: a Vision for Jews and Judaism in the Global Culture. Why "tense"?
Because there are tensions in the Jewish community. People are feeling and sensing a return of anti-Semitism - even in Europe, which, seventy years after the Holocaust, is a very scary thing. I think they are feeling that Israel is very isolated and doesn't always get what they see as fair treatment in the European media.

Do you think Israel gets a fair treatment in the media?
I honestly can't answer that question because I don't watch television, but I'm reporting on their feelings and I accept those feelings . . . What I wanted to do in Future Tense is to say, "Let that not be our definition of what it is to be a Jew." We once defined ourselves as a people loved by God. Let's not define ourselves as a people hated by Gentiles.

You've described anti-Zionism as a "mutant form" of anti-Semitism. What does that mean?
Anti-Semitism always mutates, because the body politic develops an immunity. A virus must mutate. The new anti-Semitism takes
the form of focusing on Jews as a nation rather than Jews as individuals, focuses on Israel rather than diaspora communities, and focuses on the language of human rights rather than the language of race or, in the Middle Ages, on the language of theology.

How do you draw a line between legitimate criticism of Israel and anti-Semitism?
Criticism of Israel in terms of policy of a given government is clearly part of the normal cut and thrust of democratic debate . . . It begins to get anti-Semitic when people deny that Israel has a right to exist and when that is given some kind of theological or mythological dimension. It replicates some of the classic themes of anti-Semitism - the blood libel and The Protocol of the Elders of Zion are bestsellers in some parts
of the world.

In the book, you appear to imply that the virus of anti-Semitism has penetrated the United Nations . . .
In terms of condemnation by the Security Council, Israel has been condemned out of all proportion to all other states put together. That's
a documented phenomenon.

Are Islamophobia and anti-Semitism two sides of the same coin?
I don't know. Islamophobia is a complex phenomenon.

How should the Israeli/Palestinian problem be resolved?
A two-state solution. [Religious leaders] can shape an environment conducive to peace and we certainly have a role to play in protecting each other's access to holy places, but beyond that, politics should be left to politicians.

A leading Palestinian negotiator said Israeli settlement-building and a two-state solution are "mutually exclusive". Do you agree?
All I know, having spoken first to Tony Blair, then to Dennis Ross, then to Bill Clinton himself, is that the talks that Clinton convened at Camp David in 2000 and early 2001 came very, very close to agreement. At the end, many of the Palestinian delegation wanted to accept Ehud Barak's proposed offer. So I have never despaired of a two-state solution.

Do you have sympathy with the people camped outside St Paul's Cathedral?
If the whole system has no ethical dimension, it's going to give rise to problems that the system itself cannot solve. The market economy is very good at wealth creation but not perfect at all about wealth distribution.

So, the protesters should be allowed to stay?
I wouldn't comment at all about the protesters outside St Paul's. I would continue to insist that there are ethical imperatives that have to shape the way we conduct a market economy.

Has the internet coarsened public life?
Yes and no. The internet has made serious education possible in ways that were never possible before, so I tend to think that the good vastly outweighs the bad. [But] the internet through email lists and blogs is, unfortunately, the best disseminator of paranoia we have yet created, and it does tend to segregate people into sects of the like-minded.

Do you vote?
I do, but even my wife doesn't know how I vote.

Is there anything you would life to forget?
Everything. I only look forward.

Is there a plan?
Yes. God has written a script; it's just that He only lets us watch it episode by episode.

Are we all doomed?
Afraid not. There's always hope. You can lose everything else in the world, but Jews never lose hope.

Defining Moments

1948 Born Jonathan Henry Sacks in London
1981 PhD from King's College London
1991 Becomes Chief Rabbi, the sixth since the role was formalised in 1845
1995 Wins Jerusalem Prize for contribution to the Jewish diaspora
2001 Gains doctorate of divinity, conferred by the Archbishop of Canterbury
2005 Knighted in Queen's Birthday Honours List

Jonathan Sacks will speak in the Ebor Lecture series on Wednesday 30 November

Tags: Judaism  Religion

16 comments

Parkour Pete's picture

The problem is that for some people the 'moral imperative' to criticise Israel isn't balanced by criticism of other countries whose actions are vastly worse. It's in this imbalance you see the difference between unbiased, rational anaylsis and what Rabbi Sacks is talking about.

Peter Thatchell (for example) has been a vociferous critic of Israel but I wouldn't describe him as an anti-semite; he's rails against injustice. as he sees it, wherever it might be.

postman earnest's picture

'Anti Semitism is unacceptable. Criticism of Israel is a moral imperative'. Dear Kev Con
That you can't see the irony at the heart of your contradictory comment is very telling , a moral imperative eh, you gotta larf!!

jankaas's picture

"That you can't see the irony at the heart of your contradictory comment is very telling"

ok, must admit i didn't detect any irony, nor did i notice a contradiction. pls can you explain what you mean?

thanks.

jankaas's picture

"I/P coverage is presented as a humanitarian issue - are the lives of Palestinians worth more than those of the people of Indonesia, Darfur, Congo?"

indeed this is the uncomfortable truth we are stuck with. so what's going on?

the vast majority of Israelis are immigrants or 1 or 2 generations at best from immigrant stock. in the last 60 years has seen Russian, US, European, and people with a Jewish heritage settle in Israel. they all tend to have strong roots with where they came from.

none of this applies to Indonesia, East Timor, Darfur or whatever other location you have been drawing comparisons to.

this is what makes the Israeli situation unique, but yes we (the west) are very selective with our concerns.

"Maybe compassion for human suffering has nothing to do with it.."

like most complex situations, it's not one thing or another. another factor is strategic location of course. it's thought to be essential to have an ally in the Muslim Middle East. and that may be out foreign policy error.

Agoodword's picture

The idea that anti zionism is really a mutated form of anti semitism is preposterous and rabbi sacks should be ashamed of making such a ridiculous claim.

He too is afflicted by the notion that the Jewish "people", some how have a special role and place in history. Hatred for Jews, according to this narrative, is uniquely different to all other prejudices, it is a timeless, irrational hatred, which, like a virus, mutates depending on the political climate.

Rabbi Sacks would like us all to believe that any resentment towards Israel is an inherent prejudice on our part, its the primordial hatred for Jews which we are afflicted with. It cant be because Israel is a brutal occupying regime, it cant be because Israel has bombed seiged and killed thousands of Palestinian civilians. It cant be because Israel continues to ethnically cleanse Palestinians and confiscate their land. It cant be because, Israel runs an apartheid regime in the occupied territory and denies Palestinians rights to their own water, which Israel steals to provide swimming pools for settler communities.

No No No. it cant be because of all that, its our chronic hatred for Jews. It is us, we have a pathological problem not Israel.

Tell that to that International Court of Justice and its 16 judges who all unanimously condemned Israel as an occupying, colonial force. I guess you also want us to think that they too, including two Jews amongst them, are afflicted by Jewish hatred.

Maybe, you rabbi sacs, have pathological need to blame the rest of the world for Israels occupation, Israels crimes and its failures.

J Unit CYP UK's picture

Your an incredible man. Britain must never abandon Israel and the Jewish people under any circumstance

J Unit CYP UK's picture

Agoodword. Fatah and Hamas are murderous barbarians who want to kill all Jews and demolish the Western Wall. Do not defend them.

Kev Con's picture

Parkour pete - I agree in principle with you.

The difficult is that some - myself included, are often ignorant of the wrong doing of many states. I know little of Indonesias persecution of the Timoreans, but have followed much of the ongoing issues in the middle east.

For me personally the behaviour of Israel is particularly lamentable because it is nation founded by a people almost persecuted out of existence. I would have hoped they might be more understanding to the palestinians and others that they have displaced.

Freeman2's picture

'It begins to get anti-Semitic when people deny that Israel has a right to exist and when that is given some kind of theological or mythological dimension.'

Unlike, of course, the theological and mythological dimension for the existence of the Greater Israel.

jankaas's picture

@ Parkour

"The problem is that for some people the 'moral imperative' to criticise Israel isn't balanced by criticism of other countries whose actions are vastly worse."

funny that i can't remember a time when Rabbi Sacks criticised Israeli policy. well, not in this article, and certainly not since he sort of did in 2002. (that got him into sooooo much trouble with many Jewish groups)

should you not demand the same balance from him as you appear to demand from others?

Post new comment

By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.

Latest tweets