Leader: Methodism, not Marxism
A secular state is essential but faith still has an important role to play in the public sphere.
By Staff blogger Published 01 April 2010This magazine has been resolutely secular since its first issue in 1913. Yet our annual "God" issue often proves to be our most popular. Proof, perhaps, that as Harold Wilson recognised, social democracy in Britain always owed more to Methodism than it did to Marx.
For us, secularism has always meant a secular state, not a secular society. A belief in a state that does not act on the basis of religious considerations is perfectly compatible with a recognition that faith has an important role to play in the public sphere. However, acknowledging that doesn't mean we are indifferent to the depredations of organised religion - far from it, as is shown by John Cornwell's report (see page 22) on the crisis engulfing the Roman Catholic Church.
Religious observance in Britain is, with a few exceptions, in steep decline, but interest in science, metaphysics and epistemology has perhaps never been stronger. David Lewis-Williams (see page 53) is right when he says that the human appetite for belief is hard-wired. We hope this issue goes some way to sating your hunger.
Latest tweets
More from New Statesman
- Online writers:
- Steven Baxter
- Rowenna Davis
- David Allen Green
- Mehdi Hasan
- Nelson Jones
- Gavin Kelly
- Helen Lewis
- Laurie Penny
- The V Spot
- Alex Hern
- Martha Gill
- Alan White
- Samira Shackle
- Alex Andreou
- Nicky Woolf in America
- Bim Adewunmi
- Glosswitch
- Kate Mossman on pop
- Ryan Gilbey on Film
- Martin Robbins
- Rafael Behr
- Eleanor Margolis
- Tools and services:
- Polls
- Predictions
- Archive
- Magazine
- PDF edition
- RSS feeds
- Advertising
- Subscribe
- Special supplements
- Stockists

2 comments
And what exactly is this "important role" religious faith has to play in a secular state? Are we supposed to take NS on faith regarding this?
You say David Lewis-Williams is "right" to claim belief is hardwired, yet as you note religious observance is in steep decline in most of the UK. There seems an obvious contradiction here that you fail to mention let alone address.
Your aside that "interest in science, metaphysics and epistemology has perhaps never been stronger" seems to imply these are somehow just another form of faith like like religious faith. Surely not, that would be absurd.
The NS seems to spend a great deal of time contemplating Darwin's navel. It really is about time you
handed an edition over to Quantum Physicists. And watch evolutionary biologists squirm.