Islam can do without Simon Cowell
Cowell may or may not convert but all Muslims need to confront the ban too many countries place on apostasy.
By Mehdi Hasan Published 02 April 2010
Is Simon Cowell about to convert to Islam? The family of his fiancée, Mezhgan Hussainy, apparently wants the billionaire music mogul to become a Muslim if the couple are to marry. "They're very westernised, but no one in their family has ever married a non-Muslim - and they're not willing for their youngest daughter to become the first," a "source" is reported to have said of Hussainy's Afghan-born parents.
So will Simon become Suleiman? "Don't convert to Islam, Simon. Don't do it," says the right-wing US pundit Debbie Schlussel on her blog. For once, I can't help but agree. What do Muslims gain from the conversion of Cowell? New tunes? It frustrates me how my co-religionists get so excited at the prospect of people converting to Islam, especially celebrities. Last year, I was inundated with emails claiming Michael Jackson had been on the verge of a deathbed conversion to Islam. Heaven forbid.
“Islam is the fastest-growing religion on earth," Muslim friends say with glee. Indeed, but I don't know how adding to the world's Muslim population helps reduce the theological, political, cultural and socio-economic problems blighting its communities. I sympathise with the senior Indian Muslim cleric who revealed to me his (private) advice to Hindus considering converting: "Don't bother. Not until we Muslims get our house in order."
One-way ticket
Then there are those who convert to Islam only to bring it into disrepute. They shouldn't bother. Take Colleen LaRose, aka Jihad Jane, the 46-year-old blonde American convert from Pennsylvania who was accused in March of plotting to murder a Swedish cartoonist. She is the latest in a long line of western converts to radical Islam, including John Walker Lindh ("American Talib"), Richard Reid ("Shoe Bomber") and José Padilla ("Dirty Bomber").
However, the bigger issue that many Muslims choose to ignore is how Islam has become a one-way street. Non-Muslims are encouraged to convert to Islam, but Muslims are forbidden from converting away from Islam. The sharia (or Islamic law), it is claimed, sanctions the death penalty for any adult Muslim who chooses to leave the faith, or apostatise. This is an intellectually, morally and, perhaps above all, theologically unsustainable position.
Intellectually, it makes no sense to seek converts to Islam while laws backed by capital punishment curtail conversions the other way. In Kuwait in 1996, amid a row over the conversion of a businessman to Christianity, one cleric argued: "We always remind those who want to convert to Islam that they enter through a door but that there is no way out." Yet what of those who were born Muslims? And how do you stop people changing their minds?
Morally, communities throughout the world believe that human dignity depends on freedom of thought and conscience, as enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, ratified in 1948. This right, states Article 18, "includes freedom to change his religion or belief". Muslims often forget that, while the puritanical Saudi government opposed the document, the bulk of Muslim-majority nations signed up. The then Pakistani foreign minister, Muhammad Zafarullah Khan, wrote: "Belief is a matter of conscience, and conscience cannot be compelled." Yet various Middle Eastern states, including Saudi Arabia, Iran and Sudan, retain the death penalty for apostates, and at least 14 Muslim-majority countries make conversion away from Islam illegal.
Theologically, however, there is no justification for such punishment. As India's leading Muslim reformist scholar Asghar Ali Engineer has pointed out: "If some ulama [Islamic jurists] insist on death sentence for apostasy, it is not only a crime against freedom of conscience and democratic rights, but also a serious disservice against Islam." I, for one, refuse to worship a God who is so weak and needy that he compels Muslims to worship him.
Nowhere in the Quran is it suggested that a Muslim who renounces the faith should be given the death penalty - or any penalty. Indeed, Islam's holy book proclaims, "Let there be no compulsion in religion", and elsewhere that "Those who believe then disbelieve, again believe and again disbelieve, then increase in disbelief, Allah will never forgive them nor guide them to the Way." This verse suggests only a heavenly punishment, not a worldly one.
Freedom fighters
The claim that apostasy is a capital offence results from medieval Muslim jurists' conflation of apostasy with treason. Treason remains a capital offence in some secular, western countries, including the US, as it does within Islamic law. But the Prophet Muhammad never had anyone executed for apostasy alone. In one case, in which a Bedouin man cancelled his pledge of allegiance to Islam and left Medina, the Prophet only remarked that "Medina is like a pair of bellows: it expels its impurities and brightens and clears its good."
Muslim reformers are often delighted to discover that the foundations for religious freedom lie in their own faith traditions. And the fight for religious freedom in Muslim societies goes hand in hand with the fight for political freedom. How can Muslims be expected to exercise freedom of speech or assembly, if they cannot be guaranteed freedom of thought and conscience? There are grounds for optimism.
“Even in conservative societies, Muslims are beginning to realise that faith is a matter of personal responsibility and not a consequence of authoritarian decree," wrote the US physicist and Muslim reformist Hasan Zillur Rahim in 2006. "The days of religious leaders thundering: 'I am right, you are dead' will soon, let us pray, be over once and for all."
Latest tweets
More from New Statesman
- Online writers:
- Steven Baxter
- Rowenna Davis
- David Allen Green
- Mehdi Hasan
- Nelson Jones
- Gavin Kelly
- Helen Lewis
- Laurie Penny
- The V Spot
- Alex Hern
- Martha Gill
- Alan White
- Samira Shackle
- Alex Andreou
- Nicky Woolf in America
- Bim Adewunmi
- Glosswitch
- Kate Mossman on pop
- Ryan Gilbey on Film
- Martin Robbins
- Rafael Behr
- Eleanor Margolis
- Tools and services:
- Polls
- Predictions
- Archive
- Magazine
- PDF edition
- RSS feeds
- Advertising
- Subscribe
- Special supplements
- Stockists


24 comments
you gotta be kidding or are you stupid? this whore has been living with this guy all throughout their relationship and now he dumped her in the garbage where she belongs...that is very Islamic, her lifestyle..
Mount, do you reckon Ronin would have understood the article even if he had read it? It's rather ironic to read Ronin's comment immediately following an article which tries to warn of the dangerous consequences of misunderstanding what is written. Still, that's human nature for you ... wouldn't be surprised if I misunderstood the entire article.
By the way, Mehdi, why should that which is wrong in heaven not also be wrong on earth? Will God show leniency for those who have been killed for apostasy? If not, then how can you demonstrate that God really considers them to have been wronged? If God does not consider them to have been wronged, then who are we to say that they have been wronged?
One may ask who is speaking for whom? Muslim
religious taxonomy is tortuous, but it is what goes
bang that gets the attention.
And what goes bang may be exemplified by the
writings of Sayyid Qutb the leading intellectual of the
Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood; part of the Sunni trans-
national movement. His views may be expressed by
the following:
He maintained that to restore the sovereignty of Allah
to humanity, the Ummah (the community of truly
believing Muslims) must overcome Jahiliyya; defined
by Qutb as the “state of ignorance of the guidance of
God.” And that today, as in the time of Muhammad,
there could never be any place for Christians or Jews
within the world of Islam save as Dhimmis (a complex
second class status, restricted, sanctioned and
theoretically protected but practically very much un-
protected and to western eyes a status of slavery).
There is no room at all for the apostasy of atheism; the
sentence for apostasy is death; the sentence for
homosexuality and adultery is death; the sentence for
blasphemy is death. He maintained that compromise
is impossible between the worlds of Jahiliyya and
Islam and to overcome Jahiliyya he called for practical
and eventually violent action, since those who deviate
from Islam are the enemies of mankind. True
freedom can exist only in a polity governed by Shari’a.
It may be observed that one of the Arabic words for
dialogue with unbelievers (that is we, the notorious
Kuffar) is Takyyah which in Arabic means religiously
sanctioned dissimulation. There is no real
engagement with non-Muslim thought.
In perspective, Qutb’s essentially puritanical moral
outlook appears to some orthodox Christian eyes
superficially attractive. To some of the political left, his
authoritarianism, his rejection of materialism and the
sublimation of the individual to the tribe, finds a fellow
traveller. But since many authorities find his ideas
strongly reminiscent of European fascism, his writings
should carry a severe health warning.
Thank you Mehdi for a well reasoned article on a subject that is relevant for all muslims.Hardly a "rant" or a display of "naivety" but then some are always determined to object to any attempt to show a more enlightened image of Islam.
An interesting article.
I agree with you Mehdi that some Muslim countries still uphold some draconian laws such as the death penalty for an apostasy, although I think you could have done a better job in explaining the origins of the law and how it should not apply now.
During a period of time in the Prophets life when Islam was growing, large groups of non-Muslims had decided to disingenuously convert to Islam and then pretend to leave the religion soon after their apparent conversion, to spread great confusion amongst Muslims. This is shown in the Quran:
[3:72] A section of the People of the Book say: "Believe in the morning what is revealed to the believers, but reject it at the end of the day; perchance they (Muslims) may (themselves) Turn back;
To prevent this from occuring, it was said that anyone who chose to convert away from Islam should either leave the city or stay quiet - otherwise (unless I am mistaken) the death penalty was assigned for it.
Of course, this circumstance only applied at the time and so I fail to understand how some Muslim countries try and apply it now.
Muslims do need to get their houses in order, however, it is somewhat hypocritical of Western governments to claim some sort of moral highground when they will often stay quiet about some of these dictatorships and continue to support them, since it is not in their commercial interests to speak out (eg http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/court-condemns-blair-for-h...).
As a Muslim, It is also somewhat non-sensical to discourage converts to Islam because of the actions of some so-called Muslim dictatorships. Its almost like saying don't convert to Christianity because of the actions of George Bush and America. Or don't become a Jew because of Israel.
Furthermore, the number of people who convert to Islam to bring it into disrepute are negligeable - so to be honest I don't see what you hoped to achieve from that Mehdi.
Good Lord Simon, will you button up your shit?
What is with British people and insisting on exposing
middle-aged chests - while in a suit??
Never more than one button undone. Never!
"Intellectually, it makes no sense to seek converts to Islam while laws backed by capital punishment curtail
conversions the other way. "
Um, yes it does, if you believe Islam is the true religion. I don't myself, but I'm pretty sure that is the basis for the whole thing they got going on over there.
Mehdi - thank you for this excellent article on the issue of apostasy. I think your approach is intelligent, compassionate and cogent.
Welcome back, Mr Hasan! You've written here an article on the senselessness of religion without an exit.
I'd like to add: religion is more than just a title on an identity card. It is principally a person's belief. Similarly, a religion does not attain strength from the mere number of followers, but the number of devotees. A person who wants to convert has in fact already converted, for he has accepted a different way of life. It becomes very silly for governments to force you to retain the then meaningless title of "Muslim".
For once, I was lost for words. Where do you start? I thought.
But then I read RJD's comment. Actually he says it all and I agree with every word.
Apostasy is an abomination from another age and another place. It has no place in the Modern world and is just another reminder of the horrors religion can bring to Human society if allowed to take over.
Simon Cowel must be either mad or terribly in love to convert. (but isn't the same thing?).