Why we must all do God
Religion has never mattered more to the world than it does now, says the former prime minister, laun
By Tony Blair Published 19 March 2009
My faith has always been an important part of my politics. While in office, it was best, in my view, not to shout that too loudly from the rooftops, lest it be thought that I was trying to claim some kind of moral superiority for myself or my party. On the rare occasions when I did talk about religion, it tended to be misrepresented to suit the political purposes of others. That was the reason why “we did not do God”.
Out of office, seeking to make a contribution to important public and policy debates in a different way, I feel no such restraints. Indeed, as the years of my premiership passed, one fact struck me with increasing force: that failure to understand the power of religion meant failure to understand the modern world. In western Europe this may sound counter-intuitive. Almost everywhere else, it stares you in the face.
Briefly, consider the statistics: more than two billion Christians worldwide, almost 1.5 billion Muslims, more than 900 million Hindus, 400 million Buddhists, 24 million Sikhs, 13 million Jews. And these figures exclude adherents of other faiths. In most places these numbers are growing. In Africa, for example, there were ten million Christians in 1900; by 2000, there were 360 million, the largest quantitative change ever. And people of different faiths are being brought closer and closer together. Walk down many UK high streets and you see a microcosm of the world’s faiths in a few yards.
In this globalised world, we are more than ever interconnected, but we are also more uncertain. What were firm boundaries of race, culture and identity are becoming fluid. In such a world the involvement of religion becomes ever more crucial. It can either play a positive role, helping to deepen understanding and working for the common good, or it can be exploited to become destructive, emphasising difference and reinforcing distrust of the “other”.
Religious faith and how it develops could be of the same significance to the 21st century as political ideology was to the 20th. It could help guide and sustain the era of globalisation, lending it values, and, in bringing faiths and cultures to a greater understanding of each other, could foster peaceful coexistence. Or it could be a reactionary force, pulling people apart just as globalisation pushes people together. Whichever route develops, it does mean that all leaders, whether of religious faith themselves or not, have to “do God”.
I set up the Tony Blair Faith Foundation with the aim of promoting greater respect and understanding between the major religions, to make the case for religion as a force for good, and to show this in action by encouraging interfaith initiatives to tackle global poverty and conflict. We hope to show the relevance of faith to the challenges of the 21st century and its ability to bring people together, not force them further apart.
We are focusing on five main projects initially, working with partners in the six main faiths.
First, we have developed Faith Acts Together, a programme already involving supporters in more than 30 countries on six continents. We are working across religious divides towards a common goal – ending the scandal of deaths from malaria, and thus contributing to the Millennium Development Goals. We shall work initially in selected countries in Africa, bringing different faith communities together to distribute bed nets and offer training in their use, the most effective and the cheapest way to eliminate the preventable death toll from malaria. And, initially in the UK, US and Canada, we are appointing 30 Faith Act fellows, young leaders who will build grass-roots campaigns and coalitions across all the main faiths to support the work in Africa on the ground.
Second, we have established Face to Faith, an interfaith schools programme to counter intolerance and extremism. This will link classrooms around the world through structured and facilitated video conferences. Children of one faith and culture will have the chance to interact with children of another, getting a real sense of each other’s lived experience. The syllabus will focus on leading contemporary topics, such as the environment, exploring what the great faith traditions have to contribute on the issues. The programme is being piloted now in five countries on three continents.
Third, we are developing a deeper intellectual understanding of the dynamics of faith and globalisation. My foundation and Yale University have developed a course on this, which I co-taught last term. Our aim is to build a global conversation between a dozen world-class universities on these issues. We are now discussing with three others how they will take up the course, with more to follow. Each university will bring its own intellectual traditions and regional perspective, but all will explore the relations between religion and economics, politics and society, and how the great faiths might do more to humanise a globalised world.
As part of this we are also exploring the issue of values and the financial system in the light of the financial crisis, examining how our financial systems might be reconnected with some basic values from which they have become largely detached. We have contributed to the global debate, at President Sarkozy’s Paris conference and at the World Economic Forum; we are now exploring ways of translating the debate into concrete action.
Finally, we are working with the Coexist Foundation and Cambridge University to develop the concept of Abraham House. This will be a world-class place of encounter for the three Abrahamic faiths in London, but also open to all of any faith or none. It will provide a national and international focus for a movement of creative thinking and exploration, leading to new action and deeper understanding.
The 21st century will be poorer in spirit and ambition, less focused on social justice, less sensitive to conscience and the common good, without a full and proper recognition of the role that the great faiths can and do play. I hope my foundation, in its own way, can work with others in those faiths to help harness their full power to transform our world for the better.
Latest tweets
More from New Statesman
- Online writers:
- Steven Baxter
- Rowenna Davis
- David Allen Green
- Mehdi Hasan
- Nelson Jones
- Gavin Kelly
- Helen Lewis
- Laurie Penny
- The V Spot
- Alex Hern
- Martha Gill
- Alan White
- Samira Shackle
- Alex Andreou
- Nicky Woolf in America
- Bim Adewunmi
- Glosswitch
- Kate Mossman on pop
- Ryan Gilbey on Film
- Martin Robbins
- Rafael Behr
- Eleanor Margolis
- Tools and services:
- Polls
- Predictions
- Archive
- Magazine
- PDF edition
- RSS feeds
- Advertising
- Subscribe
- Special supplements
- Stockists


36 comments
The only values we require in the age of globalisation are: social progress, equality and diversity, and social cohesion. The very values the religious consistently fail to recognise. Trust me. Religion needs to be understood in terms of our evolutionary psychological development in that it provided a means to conceptualise of a reality beyond our immediate senses. This evolution will continue to a point where religion is defunct. Progress can not be halted. Trust me.
As Alister Mcgrath wrote in "The Twilight of Atheism", the great irony of the 20th century is that the greatest pain and suffering was caused by those who thought that religion brought the greatest pain and suffering. It's convenient to blame religion for the world's problems because it elevates atheism and helps us feel good about ourselves. Unfortunately it ignores the fact that humans don't need religion to treat one another abominably.
What is the world coming to when Tony Blair, responsible for the atrocious situation in Iraq and the death of thousands, is telling us why WE should do God!? The only God he bowed to during his time in office was Bush.
It is remarkable how many devisive remarks have been posted about someone who is, now at least, trying to generate greater understanding in the world.
Plenty of intolerance to religion itself in these comments, it seems! It amazes me that so many people fail to see the good that religion has also done.
The basis of most world religions leans towards tolerance and acceptance of others, not war or oppression. Cultural misinterpretations have led to horrific acts and harmful traditions, it is true, but any organisation can be used for harm: look at global economic systems or energy suppliers and the good and bad resulting from them. Should we exclude them from discussion too? The problem is base human nature, not religion itself: we can all oppress, discriminate etc, with or without faith.
Most international law is based on a Judeo-Christian worldview, as are most Western justice systems. Laws which protect our human rights - my right as a woman not to face violence because of my gender, for instance - are reflected in the major religions. Where are these critics when the same law prosecutes murderers, rapists, etc?
Religion is key to the majority of the world's population. We cannot continue to be scepto-centric and expect the threats we face to disappear: the way to reach people of faith is through faith. Regardless of the right/ wrong of past actions (yes, I marched in protest of the war in Iraq), I believe that Tony Blair's current work can, alongside others, lead the way forward in tackling many of the challenges of the modern world: certainly the Abrahamic faiths have plenty to say on poverty, social justice and human rights, war and peace, immigration, equality, the environment, economic integrity etc etc etc...
I wish Mr. Blair had been a bit more specific as to what
values religion might "lend" to globalization. Perhaps
he can elaborate on this. Which ones besides those
jeff mentions (social progress, equality and diversity,
social cohesion) which, a religious person must
admit, are not particularly tied to religious faith as
proclaimed or practiced.
Tony is correct when he says that faith in God is a
central part of people's lives outside of Western
Europe.
There are far more people who believe in God and
practice religion than those who do not. Tony's
initiatives in bringing together other faiths must be
commended as they are undoubtably a force for
peace.
In Britain many of us have abandoned organised
religion but we don't seem to know exactly where to
turn to. We could say we don't need to turn anywhere
and we just do the right thing.
How do we find the right thing? Err we ask ourselves...
and a voice comes and tells us. Just like Tony did.
No other British politician has found it necessary to 'hide' their religious beliefs in the way that Tony Blair claims to have done when he was Prime MInister. Jack Straw, for example, is a member of the Synod of the Church of England. All this article tells us about Mr. Blair is what a slippery character he is.
But your foundation will never be able to work with other faiths, at least not Islam, because you are rightly or wrongly seen around the world as a persecutor of muslims. No amount pleading to the contrary will global opinion. The damage is done. For ever.
May be it is useful to have a set of rules that
distinguish right frm wrong and tell us how we should
act in certain situations. the ten commandments were
not a had set of rules, were they? Pity that two of the
basic guidelines of christianity seem to have got lost
somewhere along the Blair lifeline: 'Love thy
neighbour' and don't hoard riches because of that
needle-eye you have to go throught one fine day.