Why we must all do God

Religion has never mattered more to the world than it does now, says the former prime minister, laun

My faith has always been an important part of my politics. While in office, it was best, in my view, not to shout that too loudly from the rooftops, lest it be thought that I was trying to claim some kind of moral superiority for myself or my party. On the rare occasions when I did talk about religion, it tended to be misrepresented to suit the political purposes of others. That was the reason why “we did not do God”.

Out of office, seeking to make a contribution to important public and policy debates in a different way, I feel no such restraints. Indeed, as the years of my premiership passed, one fact struck me with increasing force: that failure to understand the power of religion meant failure to understand the modern world. In western Europe this may sound counter-intuitive. Almost everywhere else, it stares you in the face.

Briefly, consider the statistics: more than two billion Christians worldwide, almost 1.5 billion Muslims, more than 900 million Hindus, 400 million Buddhists, 24 million Sikhs, 13 million Jews. And these figures exclude adherents of other faiths. In most places these numbers are growing. In Africa, for example, there were ten million Christians in 1900; by 2000, there were 360 million, the largest quantitative change ever. And people of different faiths are being brought closer and closer together. Walk down many UK high streets and you see a microcosm of the world’s faiths in a few yards.

In this globalised world, we are more than ever interconnected, but we are also more uncertain. What were firm boundaries of race, culture and identity are becoming fluid. In such a world the involvement of religion becomes ever more crucial. It can either play a positive role, helping to deepen understanding and working for the common good, or it can be exploited to become destructive, emphasising difference and reinforcing distrust of the “other”.

Religious faith and how it develops could be of the same significance to the 21st century as political ideology was to the 20th. It could help guide and sustain the era of globalisation, lending it values, and, in bringing faiths and cultures to a greater understanding of each other, could foster peaceful coexistence. Or it could be a reactionary force, pulling people apart just as globalisation pushes people together. Whichever route develops, it does mean that all leaders, whether of religious faith themselves or not, have to “do God”.

I set up the Tony Blair Faith Foundation with the aim of promoting greater respect and understanding between the major religions, to make the case for religion as a force for good, and to show this in action by encouraging interfaith initiatives to tackle global poverty and conflict. We hope to show the relevance of faith to the challenges of the 21st century and its ability to bring people together, not force them further apart.

We are focusing on five main projects initially, working with partners in the six main faiths.

First, we have developed Faith Acts Together, a programme already involving supporters in more than 30 countries on six continents. We are working across religious divides towards a common goal – ending the scandal of deaths from malaria, and thus contributing to the Millennium Development Goals. We shall work initially in selected countries in Africa, bringing different faith communities together to distribute bed nets and offer training in their use, the most effective and the cheapest way to eliminate the preventable death toll from malaria. And, initially in the UK, US and Canada, we are appointing 30 Faith Act fellows, young leaders who will build grass-roots campaigns and coalitions across all the main faiths to support the work in Africa on the ground.

Second, we have established Face to Faith, an interfaith schools programme to counter intolerance and extremism. This will link classrooms around the world through structured and facilitated video conferences. Children of one faith and culture will have the chance to interact with children of another, getting a real sense of each other’s lived experience. The syllabus will focus on leading contemporary topics, such as the environment, exploring what the great faith traditions have to contribute on the issues. The programme is being piloted now in five countries on three continents.

Third, we are developing a deeper intellectual understanding of the dynamics of faith and globalisation. My foundation and Yale University have developed a course on this, which I co-taught last term. Our aim is to build a global conversation between a dozen world-class universities on these issues. We are now discussing with three others how they will take up the course, with more to follow. Each university will bring its own intellectual traditions and regional perspective, but all will explore the relations between religion and economics, politics and society, and how the great faiths might do more to humanise a globalised world.

 

As part of this we are also exploring the issue of values and the financial system in the light of the financial crisis, examining how our financial systems might be reconnected with some basic values from which they have become largely detached. We have contributed to the global debate, at President Sarkozy’s Paris conference and at the World Economic Forum; we are now exploring ways of translating the debate into concrete action.

Finally, we are working with the Coexist Foundation and Cambridge University to develop the concept of Abraham House. This will be a world-class place of encounter for the three Abrahamic faiths in London, but also open to all of any faith or none. It will provide a national and international focus for a movement of creative thinking and exploration, leading to new action and deeper understanding.

The 21st century will be poorer in spirit and ambition, less focused on social justice, less sensitive to conscience and the common good, without a full and proper recognition of the role that the great faiths can and do play. I hope my foundation, in its own way, can work with others in those faiths to help harness their full power to transform our world for the better.

36 comments

ted shrader's picture

"What this world needs is less unquestioning religious
faith and more personal responsibility and spirituality."
I agree with that portion of the post of Ardinarishwar
"Unquestioning adherence to religious dogma is lazy
and irresponsible. Empowering oneself, taking
responsibility for the wellbeing of oneself, one's
neighbours and the environment is what spirituality is
about." For a bit more on such moral & religious
attitudes check the Bill Moyers interview with Karen
Armstrong , at http://www.pbs.org/moyers/journal/03132009/watch.ht
ml. Might also search last century's lectures of
Agnostic Robert G. Ingersoll. We can find There ARE
rules to this game of life and serious consequences
for ignoring them.

The Old Man's picture

Faith without fact is disastrous for a prime minister, Mr Blair proved that.

upbeatskeptic's picture

I find it a source of endless amusement that people seek to urge the abolishment of religion by an appeal to history, with the suggestion that religion has only ever wrought destruction and discontent, without ever also going on to acknowledge that those socities that have attempted to live without religion have been just as, if not more, brutal. I often wonder if it is not this sort of ideological blindness that produces the same sort of fundamentalist (though this time atheistic/secularist) prejudices for which those with a religious faith are ridiculed for.

It would take a very revisionary and, indeed, almost dishonest view of history to say that religion has only ever been a negative influence, and an even more fantastical view to say that the lack of it would lead to a harmonious society (at least if historical precedent is anything to go by - the regimes of China and Eastern Europe, to take the examples of the first poster, were as brutal as any, perhaps more so). On this one, I go with Chesterton: 'the problem with atheists is not that they believe nothing, but that they'll believe anything'.

writeon's picture

Blair isn't really a Christian at all. He doesn't understand a thing a about Christianity. His 'faith' is just a convinient label to further his career. Blair represents everything that Christianity isn't. Averice, hypocracy and overweeing pride and self-love. The only commandment that means much is, thou shalt not kill, Blair's broken that one more than enough for a thousand lives.

Tadeusz598's picture

What a disaster religion is!

It seems to encourage the most incredible arrogance, violence, and cruelty.

We need athiesm, lots of it.

taghioff.info's picture

Rapley will tell delegates that the Earth's population is now rising at a rate of around 80 million a year. "That is roughly the same as the number of unwanted pregnancies across the world," he said. "If we can prevent unwanted pregnancies, we can halt this spiral in our numbers."

To do that, contraception will have to become universally available - and political and *religious* opposition to birth control removed. If that happened, the world's population could be stabilised to around 8 billion by 2050, added Rapley.

TCM's picture

As an atheist, I was pleased by that article. I welcome
Tony's efforts to reduce the divisions caused by faith.

taghioff.info's picture

I have heard confession and repentance is important in Catholicism Mr Blair. Is there anything you feel you need to say...

RJD's picture

I don’t object to hearing from Blair but it is disappointing that NS has given Blair a platform to discuss God in politics. Where would Frost be if, having finally cornered Nixon, he spent his entire interview discussing his penchant for double breasted suits? The only article I want to see from Blair is an outline of his legal defense in the event that he is called to answer war crimes charges in an international (or national) criminal court.
Integrity means wholeness. It means a complete integration of one’s values with one’s actions, in and out of office. That he deemed it fit to hide his religious light under a bushel during the entire term of his office only to preach from the mountain tops the day after he left office is testimony to the man’s complete lack of integrity, political and otherwise.
And as expected from a preacher of faith, the arguments were shoddily bolted together with weak premises and inappropriate conclusions. Look at the statistics he says. We need to follow them. But one can either be delighted by these statistics or concerned about them. Which attitude you take is a product of the degree to which you acknowledge the barbarism and ignorance propagated in the name of organized religion - including his in Iraq. A globalised world has made us all more uncertain, he claims. Really? Uncertain of what precisely? A globalised world has certainly had impacts but you would think that a leader of his calibre with a privileged global vantage point would have been able to spell out that impact a little more clearly. But no. Effectively he says “We’re all not quite sure any more. But religion will make us more sure.” Absurd when you distill it this way but that’s exactly what he’s said. Should we be surprised by this coming from the man who only does the vision thing and God? How can religion “deepen understanding” when it is essentially the process by which humans seek to understand the unknown using the unknown as the first point of reference?

baldyeric's picture

This is a Spoof article,right?
Tony banging on about God-he must have a guilty concsience about his actions.

Latest tweets