Return to: Home | Life & Society | Religion

Why we must all do God

Tony Blair

Published 19 March 2009

Religion has never mattered more to the world than it does now, says the former prime minister, launching our new occasional column on faith

Blair on the role he believes faith can play in the 21st century

My faith has always been an important part of my politics. While in office, it was best, in my view, not to shout that too loudly from the rooftops, lest it be thought that I was trying to claim some kind of moral superiority for myself or my party. On the rare occasions when I did talk about religion, it tended to be misrepresented to suit the political purposes of others. That was the reason why “we did not do God”.

Out of office, seeking to make a contribution to important public and policy debates in a different way, I feel no such restraints. Indeed, as the years of my premiership passed, one fact struck me with increasing force: that failure to understand the power of religion meant failure to understand the modern world. In western Europe this may sound counter-intuitive. Almost everywhere else, it stares you in the face.

Briefly, consider the statistics: more than two billion Christians worldwide, almost 1.5 billion Muslims, more than 900 million Hindus, 400 million Buddhists, 24 million Sikhs, 13 million Jews. And these figures exclude adherents of other faiths. In most places these numbers are growing. In Africa, for example, there were ten million Christians in 1900; by 2000, there were 360 million, the largest quantitative change ever. And people of different faiths are being brought closer and closer together. Walk down many UK high streets and you see a microcosm of the world’s faiths in a few yards.

In this globalised world, we are more than ever interconnected, but we are also more uncertain. What were firm boundaries of race, culture and identity are becoming fluid. In such a world the involvement of religion becomes ever more crucial. It can either play a positive role, helping to deepen understanding and working for the common good, or it can be exploited to become destructive, emphasising difference and reinforcing distrust of the “other”.

Religious faith and how it develops could be of the same significance to the 21st century as political ideology was to the 20th. It could help guide and sustain the era of globalisation, lending it values, and, in bringing faiths and cultures to a greater understanding of each other, could foster peaceful coexistence. Or it could be a reactionary force, pulling people apart just as globalisation pushes people together. Whichever route develops, it does mean that all leaders, whether of religious faith themselves or not, have to “do God”.

I set up the Tony Blair Faith Foundation with the aim of promoting greater respect and understanding between the major religions, to make the case for religion as a force for good, and to show this in action by encouraging interfaith initiatives to tackle global poverty and conflict. We hope to show the relevance of faith to the challenges of the 21st century and its ability to bring people together, not force them further apart.

We are focusing on five main projects initially, working with partners in the six main faiths.

First, we have developed Faith Acts Together, a programme already involving supporters in more than 30 countries on six continents. We are working across religious divides towards a common goal – ending the scandal of deaths from malaria, and thus contributing to the Millennium Development Goals. We shall work initially in selected countries in Africa, bringing different faith communities together to distribute bed nets and offer training in their use, the most effective and the cheapest way to eliminate the preventable death toll from malaria. And, initially in the UK, US and Canada, we are appointing 30 Faith Act fellows, young leaders who will build grass-roots campaigns and coalitions across all the main faiths to support the work in Africa on the ground.

Second, we have established Face to Faith, an interfaith schools programme to counter intolerance and extremism. This will link classrooms around the world through structured and facilitated video conferences. Children of one faith and culture will have the chance to interact with children of another, getting a real sense of each other’s lived experience. The syllabus will focus on leading contemporary topics, such as the environment, exploring what the great faith traditions have to contribute on the issues. The programme is being piloted now in five countries on three continents.

Third, we are developing a deeper intellectual understanding of the dynamics of faith and globalisation. My foundation and Yale University have developed a course on this, which I co-taught last term. Our aim is to build a global conversation between a dozen world-class universities on these issues. We are now discussing with three others how they will take up the course, with more to follow. Each university will bring its own intellectual traditions and regional perspective, but all will explore the relations between religion and economics, politics and society, and how the great faiths might do more to humanise a globalised world.

 

As part of this we are also exploring the issue of values and the financial system in the light of the financial crisis, examining how our financial systems might be reconnected with some basic values from which they have become largely detached. We have contributed to the global debate, at President Sarkozy’s Paris conference and at the World Economic Forum; we are now exploring ways of translating the debate into concrete action.

Finally, we are working with the Coexist Foundation and Cambridge University to develop the concept of Abraham House. This will be a world-class place of encounter for the three Abrahamic faiths in London, but also open to all of any faith or none. It will provide a national and international focus for a movement of creative thinking and exploration, leading to new action and deeper understanding.

The 21st century will be poorer in spirit and ambition, less focused on social justice, less sensitive to conscience and the common good, without a full and proper recognition of the role that the great faiths can and do play. I hope my foundation, in its own way, can work with others in those faiths to help harness their full power to transform our world for the better.

Post this article to

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • newsvine
  • Reddit

36 comments from readers

samb_uk
19 March 2009 at 14:18

The only reason why the world isn't embroiled in total conflict is because a significant portion of the world - certainly Western Europe, China, etc - are not influenced by religious garbage.

If we seek sanity, calm and peace in the world, we must - without hesitation - demand that religion be kept out of rational debate.

Religious people continue to be the main barrier in efforts to combat gender-inequality and homophobia; they stand in the way of concrete attempts to deal with global warming e.g. population control; they object to stem cell research which is a promising area for modern medicine; religion makes otherwise solvable situation e.g. the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, impossibly difficult to deal with and etc.

Rob Atkins
19 March 2009 at 20:08

"Why we must all do God"

I preferred the prequel - why we must all do Iraq. It had a catchier dossier to explain the nuances.

Rob Atkins
19 March 2009 at 20:09

Come back Mr Blair - your country needs you.

Charlie Kiss
19 March 2009 at 20:21

What needs to be most significant of the 21st Century is worship of the planet in order to save humanity!

Not continue to muddle along and fight about which God exists.

Religion is a diversion from current reality. It may be a comfort but it's a false one.

God (if he

Ardinarishwar
19 March 2009 at 20:44

Organised religion has a proven track record of sowing discord, intolerance and war. The root cause of this is monotheism - the belief that there is only one true God and that is MY god, not yours!

The current Pope demonstrates very well how religious dogma perpetuates ignorance and intolerance - every week he demonises a minority group or issues guidance which will harm people: e.g. saying gay and transgender people are more of a threat than environmental issues, excommunicating the doctors who helped a nine-year-old rape victim, stereotyping women (the washing machine comment), suggesting that the use of condoms will increase the spread of AIDS in Africa, reinstating excommunicated fascist bishops, insulting other faiths etc.

What this world needs is less unquestioning religious faith and more personal responsibility and spirituality. Unquestioning adherence to religious dogma is lazy and irresponsible. Empowering oneself, taking responsibility for the wellbeing of oneself, one's neighbours and the environment is what spirituality is about.

The last thing we need is more religion in politics!

Gideon Polya
20 March 2009 at 01:44

The examples of religious right, imperialist war-makers George Bush, Tony Blair

and now Barack Obama surely demonstrate the immense potential for evil from organized religion.

Thus on the 6th anniversary of the Bush-Blair invasion of Iraq, UN Population Division and medical data indicate that in the Occupied Palestinian, Iraqi and Afghan Territories post-invasion non-violent excess deaths total 0.3 million, 1 million and 4 million, respectively; post-invasion violent deaths total about 10,000, 1.3 million and possibly 2 million, respectively (if the violent/non-violent post-invasion excess deaths ratio in Occupied Afghanistan is half that in Occupied Iraq); post-invasion under-5 infant deaths total 0.2 million, 0.6 million and 2.1million; and refugees total 7 million, 6 million and 4 million, respectively - a Palestinian Genocide, Iraqi Genocide and Afghan Genocide as defined by Article 2 of the UN Genocide Convention.

The Churches as well as the mainstream media and politicians are silent over this carnage. Indeed the world #1on the Web for saying "thou shalt not kill children" is an agnostic, Humanist Australian scientist (see" Children of Lesser God. Thou shalt not kill children": http://mwcnews.net/content/view/19454/42/ ).

Further, while religious right Obama could stop all 3 major conflicts NOW in the Bush (now Obama) War on Terror (aka the war on Arab, Muslim, Asian and non-European Women and Children) , "yes we can" clearly doesn't extend to cessation of the active and passive mass murder of Arab, Muslim, Asian, non-European infants in the Occupied Palestinian, Iraqi and Afghan Territories.

Indeed, so far, in the first 2 months of the Obama presidency, non-violent Indigenous Asian excess deaths and under-5 infant deaths in the Occupied Palestinian, Iraqi and Afghan Territories total about 100,000 and 70,000, respectively (see: http://bellaciao.org/en/spip.php?article18519 ) - enough to make you want to believe in divine retribution.

Nilsey105
20 March 2009 at 10:45

religion like your propaganda is phoney

Pencils
20 March 2009 at 11:04

" My faith has always been an important part of my politics..."

Yes, like faith that the Americans would fake up some WMD in Iraq? LOL.

The substance of this piece is characteristacally thin - I can talk about my faith now I'm not in office, look at all the different religions in the high st, religion could steer globalisation in a positive direction, or it could do the opposite... Or it could do neither - so what?

This is how some people make a living.

Religious faith and how it develops could be of the same significance to the 21st century as political ideology was to the 20th. It could help guide and sustain the era of globalisation, lending it values, and, in bringing faiths and cultures to a greater understanding of each other, could foster peaceful coexistence. Or it could be a reactionary force, pulling people apart just as globalisation pushes people together. Whichever route develops, it does mean that all leaders, whether of religious faith themselves or not, have to “do God”.

homo ludens
20 March 2009 at 12:39

Is TB's appearance here due to the mysterious workings of the 'guest' editor who seems intent temporarily on turning the NS into the Daily Sport?

Surely TB's faith shone through much of his premiership such as when Bush waggishly assured him that Iraq was stuffed to the gunnels with WMD. TB's new Catholicism at least leaves him the chance to wash himself clean in the confessional....

greed
20 March 2009 at 12:40

so was it your 'moral superiority ' that took us into war

until we as a people can ask where are you from

what do you beleive in

and the answer we get is I am from earth and I beleive in humanity

these lines we have drawn in the sand and called them different countries and killed and died if someone crossed the line

these books PEOPLE not gods have written have to be followed to the letter

peace will only come when we carry no banners

Helen Heenan
20 March 2009 at 13:09

Oh dear. Another disappointing development in the New Statesman. Why do we need an occasional article on religion? Especially if this one by Tony Blair is to set the standard. I feel subscription cancellation coming on....

Richard
20 March 2009 at 13:20

Everytime Blair mentions faith I cannot believe that his intent is anything other than to discredit Christianity. Perhaps he thinks the nineth commandment "Thou shalt not bear false witness" needs to be updated. Whatever his true reasoning, he's a terrible advert for religion.

Stuffy
20 March 2009 at 17:40

Moneyless real socialism, as explained on the worldsocialism website, will bring and keep people together. Religions will always end up driving and keeping people apart, as their various leaders squabble over power and wealth.

FH
20 March 2009 at 19:37

Women believing in mainstream (patriarchal) religion is much too close to turkeys voting for Christmas. Why should we support a system that proclaims that we are not "children of God" in at all the same sense as men are, only fit for minor posts, plainly and obviously inferior. I reject religious claptrap, and I assert that I owe no duty, no lip-service or other mark of respect to anyone who believes that I am subhuman.

A particularly breathtaking piece of hypocrisy from the "high" end of the Christian Church is the argument that a woman may not officiate at an altar because men may be sexually distracted, apparently unforgiveable on her part and no fault of theirs.

I hope Mr Blair in his role as peace envoy in the Middle East does not think it his duty to promote the lethal grip of religious leaders there.

ted shrader
21 March 2009 at 01:16

"What this world needs is less unquestioning religious

faith and more personal responsibility and spirituality."

I agree with that portion of the post of Ardinarishwar

"Unquestioning adherence to religious dogma is lazy

and irresponsible. Empowering oneself, taking

responsibility for the wellbeing of oneself, one's

neighbours and the environment is what spirituality is

about." For a bit more on such moral & religious

attitudes check the Bill Moyers interview with Karen

Armstrong , at http://www.pbs.org/moyers/journal/03132009/watch.ht

ml. Might also search last century's lectures of

Agnostic Robert G. Ingersoll. We can find There ARE

rules to this game of life and serious consequences

for ignoring them.

The Old Man
21 March 2009 at 09:39

Faith without fact is disastrous for a prime minister, Mr Blair proved that.

upbeatskeptic
21 March 2009 at 14:55

I find it a source of endless amusement that people seek to urge the abolishment of religion by an appeal to history, with the suggestion that religion has only ever wrought destruction and discontent, without ever also going on to acknowledge that those socities that have attempted to live without religion have been just as, if not more, brutal. I often wonder if it is not this sort of ideological blindness that produces the same sort of fundamentalist (though this time atheistic/secularist) prejudices for which those with a religious faith are ridiculed for.

It would take a very revisionary and, indeed, almost dishonest view of history to say that religion has only ever been a negative influence, and an even more fantastical view to say that the lack of it would lead to a harmonious society (at least if historical precedent is anything to go by - the regimes of China and Eastern Europe, to take the examples of the first poster, were as brutal as any, perhaps more so). On this one, I go with Chesterton: 'the problem with atheists is not that they believe nothing, but that they'll believe anything'.

writeon
21 March 2009 at 19:53

Blair isn't really a Christian at all. He doesn't understand a thing a about Christianity. His 'faith' is just a convinient label to further his career. Blair represents everything that Christianity isn't. Averice, hypocracy and overweeing pride and self-love. The only commandment that means much is, thou shalt not kill, Blair's broken that one more than enough for a thousand lives.

Tadeusz598
22 March 2009 at 01:19

What a disaster religion is!

It seems to encourage the most incredible arrogance, violence, and cruelty.

We need athiesm, lots of it.

taghioff.info
22 March 2009 at 03:13

Rapley will tell delegates that the Earth's population is now rising at a rate of around 80 million a year. "That is roughly the same as the number of unwanted pregnancies across the world," he said. "If we can prevent unwanted pregnancies, we can halt this spiral in our numbers."

To do that, contraception will have to become universally available - and political and *religious* opposition to birth control removed. If that happened, the world's population could be stabilised to around 8 billion by 2050, added Rapley.

taghioff.info
22 March 2009 at 14:32

I have heard confession and repentance is important in Catholicism Mr Blair. Is there anything you feel you need to say...

RJD
22 March 2009 at 15:56

I don’t object to hearing from Blair but it is disappointing that NS has given Blair a platform to discuss God in politics. Where would Frost be if, having finally cornered Nixon, he spent his entire interview discussing his penchant for double breasted suits? The only article I want to see from Blair is an outline of his legal defense in the event that he is called to answer war crimes charges in an international (or national) criminal court.

Integrity means wholeness. It means a complete integration of one’s values with one’s actions, in and out of office. That he deemed it fit to hide his religious light under a bushel during the entire term of his office only to preach from the mountain tops the day after he left office is testimony to the man’s complete lack of integrity, political and otherwise.

And as expected from a preacher of faith, the arguments were shoddily bolted together with weak premises and inappropriate conclusions. Look at the statistics he says. We need to follow them. But one can either be delighted by these statistics or concerned about them. Which attitude you take is a product of the degree to which you acknowledge the barbarism and ignorance propagated in the name of organized religion - including his in Iraq. A globalised world has made us all more uncertain, he claims. Really? Uncertain of what precisely? A globalised world has certainly had impacts but you would think that a leader of his calibre with a privileged global vantage point would have been able to spell out that impact a little more clearly. But no. Effectively he says “We’re all not quite sure any more. But religion will make us more sure.” Absurd when you distill it this way but that’s exactly what he’s said. Should we be surprised by this coming from the man who only does the vision thing and God? How can religion “deepen understanding” when it is essentially the process by which humans seek to understand the unknown using the unknown as the first point of reference?

baldyeric
23 March 2009 at 17:24

This is a Spoof article,right?

Tony banging on about God-he must have a guilty concsience about his actions.

jeff
23 March 2009 at 17:54

The only values we require in the age of globalisation are: social progress, equality and diversity, and social cohesion. The very values the religious consistently fail to recognise. Trust me. Religion needs to be understood in terms of our evolutionary psychological development in that it provided a means to conceptualise of a reality beyond our immediate senses. This evolution will continue to a point where religion is defunct. Progress can not be halted. Trust me.

mungo
24 March 2009 at 00:37

As Alister Mcgrath wrote in "The Twilight of Atheism", the great irony of the 20th century is that the greatest pain and suffering was caused by those who thought that religion brought the greatest pain and suffering. It's convenient to blame religion for the world's problems because it elevates atheism and helps us feel good about ourselves. Unfortunately it ignores the fact that humans don't need religion to treat one another abominably.

Irfan
24 March 2009 at 09:42

What is the world coming to when Tony Blair, responsible for the atrocious situation in Iraq and the death of thousands, is telling us why WE should do God!? The only God he bowed to during his time in office was Bush.

h20man
24 March 2009 at 14:54

It is remarkable how many devisive remarks have been posted about someone who is, now at least, trying to generate greater understanding in the world.

Olivia Jackson
24 March 2009 at 16:10

Plenty of intolerance to religion itself in these comments, it seems! It amazes me that so many people fail to see the good that religion has also done.

The basis of most world religions leans towards tolerance and acceptance of others, not war or oppression. Cultural misinterpretations have led to horrific acts and harmful traditions, it is true, but any organisation can be used for harm: look at global economic systems or energy suppliers and the good and bad resulting from them. Should we exclude them from discussion too? The problem is base human nature, not religion itself: we can all oppress, discriminate etc, with or without faith.

Most international law is based on a Judeo-Christian worldview, as are most Western justice systems. Laws which protect our human rights - my right as a woman not to face violence because of my gender, for instance - are reflected in the major religions. Where are these critics when the same law prosecutes murderers, rapists, etc?

Religion is key to the majority of the world's population. We cannot continue to be scepto-centric and expect the threats we face to disappear: the way to reach people of faith is through faith. Regardless of the right/ wrong of past actions (yes, I marched in protest of the war in Iraq), I believe that Tony Blair's current work can, alongside others, lead the way forward in tackling many of the challenges of the modern world: certainly the Abrahamic faiths have plenty to say on poverty, social justice and human rights, war and peace, immigration, equality, the environment, economic integrity etc etc etc...

Neale Adams
24 March 2009 at 17:33

I wish Mr. Blair had been a bit more specific as to what

values religion might "lend" to globalization. Perhaps

he can elaborate on this. Which ones besides those

jeff mentions (social progress, equality and diversity,

social cohesion) which, a religious person must

admit, are not particularly tied to religious faith as

proclaimed or practiced.

Divine
24 March 2009 at 20:44

Tony is correct when he says that faith in God is a

central part of people's lives outside of Western

Europe.

There are far more people who believe in God and

practice religion than those who do not. Tony's

initiatives in bringing together other faiths must be

commended as they are undoubtably a force for

peace.

In Britain many of us have abandoned organised

religion but we don't seem to know exactly where to

turn to. We could say we don't need to turn anywhere

and we just do the right thing.

How do we find the right thing? Err we ask ourselves...

and a voice comes and tells us. Just like Tony did.

James Dickins
25 March 2009 at 08:46

No other British politician has found it necessary to 'hide' their religious beliefs in the way that Tony Blair claims to have done when he was Prime MInister. Jack Straw, for example, is a member of the Synod of the Church of England. All this article tells us about Mr. Blair is what a slippery character he is.

MarkBin
25 March 2009 at 08:50

But your foundation will never be able to work with other faiths, at least not Islam, because you are rightly or wrongly seen around the world as a persecutor of muslims. No amount pleading to the contrary will global opinion. The damage is done. For ever.

Camus
25 March 2009 at 18:59

May be it is useful to have a set of rules that

distinguish right frm wrong and tell us how we should

act in certain situations. the ten commandments were

not a had set of rules, were they? Pity that two of the

basic guidelines of christianity seem to have got lost

somewhere along the Blair lifeline: 'Love thy

neighbour' and don't hoard riches because of that

needle-eye you have to go throught one fine day.

Camus
25 March 2009 at 19:00

Agnostics pray to 'Whom it may concern.'

Mohad Kala
26 March 2009 at 11:12

Actually Tony Blair is held in the highest esteem

amongst many of my Muslim friends. They see him as

a man of the highest integrity, intelligence and ability.

All good Muslims want peace in the world. Muslim

respect the faith of Christains and Jews... their

prophets are also our prophets. We are all from

Abraham.

I believe that Tony Blair has the ability the lead the

world into a peaceful co-existence, to Zion. He has

brought peace to Northern Ireland, now he will

overcome the Palestine dispute. He knows that that is

his destiny, and I and all of my friends wish him well.

Tony Blair will be remembered as one of the world's

greatest statesmen. Good luck and God bless.

TCM
16 April 2009 at 12:37

As an atheist, I was pleased by that article. I welcome

Tony's efforts to reduce the divisions caused by faith.

Post your comment

Please note: you will need to login or register before you can comment on the website

Read More

Vote!

Was the government wrong to sack David Nutt?

Suggest a question

View comments

© New Statesman 1913 – 2009

Tracker