Return to: Home | Life & Society | Religion

The strange allure of our 'exes'

Ziauddin Sardar

Published 18 September 2008

To declare that you are an ex-fanatic or ex-Muslim is now the shortest route to fame and fortune

It has become quite fashionable, in certain Muslim circles, to be an ex. We have a number of ex-fundamentalists and ex-fanatics, such as Ed Husain, promoting themselves as experts on fanaticism and terrorism and advising various branches of the government. We have a group calling itself the Council of Ex-Muslims of Britain, which specialises in denouncing all things Islamic. We even have an odd ex-terrorist or two seeking book deals.

I have nothing against people who want to make a new identity for themselves. That is their right. But it does seem strange to me that those who want to distance themselves from a certain kind of Islam, or Islam itself, still use Islam to describe their new identity. We don't have reformed criminals calling themselves ex-criminals. Indeed, we don't even have ex-atheists. So why ex-Muslims or ex-Islamists?

The answer tells us a great deal about contemporary Britain. When it comes to Islam we are ready to believe anything and everything. Anything that seems to help us fight fundamentalism is deserving of uncritical support. The exes also enable us to perform a neat con-trick. By embracing them and their call for "Islamic reform", we appear to demonstrate our support for the Muslim community - thus drawing attention away from the fact that we continue to discriminate against, and marginalise, the majority.

The uncritical embrace of exes is justified by the assertion that they bring insider knowledge. They have been there, so they know what it's like to be a fanatic, an Islamist, or a puritan Muslim. They are thus in a good position to provide useful insights into fighting the nasty Muslims and stopping their nefarious plans. This is a rather odd argument. How can someone who didn't have the intellectual or spiritual capability to resist being brainwashed lecture other Muslims on how to avoid such traps?

The exes themselves have realised that they are on to a good thing. To stand up and declare that you are an ex-fanatic or an ex-Muslim is now the shortest route to fame and fortune. One of the first to realise this was Tawfik Hamid, a former member of the Egyptian terrorist group Gama'a al-Islamiyya, who now lives in the US. Just over two years ago, he declared himself an ex-terrorist and instantly found himself on Fox News and CNN. Offers for confessional stories and books flooded in. He became an expert on "terrorism" and "Islamic reformation" for the neoconservative Hudson Institute.

The exes in Britain have followed similar trajectories. Who had heard of Ed Husain, now jetting around the globe advising all and sundry about reforming Islam, a few years ago? Or of Maryam Namazie, the "voice" of the Council of Ex-Muslims of Britain? Has no one noticed that the Council consists largely of Iranian exiles, card-carrying members of Mujahedin-e-Khalq, the revolutionary Trots who fought the shah? They were hardly Muslims in the first place.

I have nothing against these folk (though I think those who take them seriously ought to be put in a straitjacket). Indeed, I am going to take a leaf from their book. This will be my last column for the New Statesman and I am therefore establishing a Council of Ex-Columnists. But I plan to parade my knowledge in longer articles for this magazine and elsewhere, thus enhancing my considerable fame and fortune.

Post this article to

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • newsvine
  • Reddit

8 comments from readers

Sharif
18 September 2008 at 12:12

I am not sure how you can get famous by claiming that you are ex Muslim. On the contrary, your life is in danger. There are nuts around looking for such people. Hirsi Ali is one hiding. I am a pakistani born in a Muslim family and slowly distanced myself from this faith. How did it come about. Well, as y young man, I considered myself a liberal Muslim, until I was told by my friend that there is no such thing. If you do not fast in ramadan, you go straight hell. If you do not pray five times a day, you take a similar route. It goes on. Then I read the book 'Why I am not a Muslim' and then The God delusion and the End of faith. Now I am what you conveniently call an ex Muslim. I am not famous, I cannot confess my views with my family and Muslim friends. Your version is meant for western ears. Good for you; West needs people like you to convince others that Islam is a not that bad a religion. Unfortunately, it changes nothing. there is nothing in Islam which is accepted by a majority of Muslims.

One day there will be more Muslims and they will be wanting Sharia laws or a separate Islamic republic in UK and Europe. I will luckily not live that day.

Farzad
18 September 2008 at 23:06

To declare that one has left Islam is of significance in this age. It requires valour and vision, in particular, if one leaves Islam from a humane point of view, to keep the light of non-conformism, spirit of resistance and human dignity, in the face of Islamic dictatorship.

Ziauddin Sardar would have been taken more seriously and intellectually respected, had he bothered to read the manifesto of those leaving Islam. Alas too much to expect from defenders of Islam. Incidentally his reference to Mojahedin Khalg and the Council of ex-Muslims in Britain shows his poverty of knowledge of contemporary Iran.

He should also note that criticism of Islam is a matter of life and death for many. Since, to bring about the slightest improvement in the life of millions in Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Saudi-Arabia and Iran is impossible without socially and intellectually criticising the whole of the condition imposed by the Islam and its political machinery in the Middle East, North Africa and parts of Europe.

Apostasy and leaving one’s religion, therefore is respected, as it is a pre-condition of any improvement of the condition of life of millions of people. To deny this, however, is equivalent to moral shabbiness.

Ziauddin Sardar sounds like those who cry conspiracy!! Conspiracy!! and fearful of the fall of the dictatorships.

Maryam Namazie
19 September 2008 at 04:47

Ziauddin Sardar has strange ideas about fame and fortune. If death threats and intimidation are what he is alluding to, then let him rest assured that there are better ways of getting there – most of them kowtowing to religion and Islam not the other way round.

Clearly, having an ‘ex’ in front of your name doesn’t make you one and the same with every other person or group using the prefix. There are also ex-servicemen, ex-political prisoner organisations and even Sardar’s newly founded Council of ex-Columnists and I am pretty sure they all have different aims and objectives from the Council of Ex-Muslims of Britain (CEMB). Just as the aims of the ex-Islamists are different.

As I have said in a New Statesman column a while back, publicly saying one is an ex-Muslim is important in a day and age when Islam has political power. Similarly, the right to criticise Islam – political Islam’s banner - is vital. Saying you are an ex-Christian or poking fun at Jesus and the pope today when Christianity has been reigned in by an enlightenment is not the same as doing and saying so during an inquisition.

Religion or the lack thereof is a private matter but not when you are killed for it. Then a public renunciation and criticism becomes a historical necessity and task. It is an important way of breaking taboos and paving the way for others to do so if they choose. While Sardar makes light of this, public renunciations and criticism involve serious risks for many across the world, including in Britain.

But that is not all that the CEMB stands for. It is also about challenging political Islam, and demanding the right to religion and atheism as a private affair, citizenship rights, humanity without labels, universal rights, an end to religion’s intervention in people lives, and secularism.

And the CEMB is not about creating a new ‘ex-Muslim’ identity as Sardar alludes. In fact, it is opposed to identity politics that creates imagined communities, segregates and ghettoises citizens so that the state can shrug off its responsibilities and hand over masses of people with culturally relative rights to regressive Islamic organisations and their so-called community leaders. Nor are we calling for an ‘Islamic reformation;’ if you ask me, religion can only be ‘reformed’ when and if it loses political power.

The fact that a majority of the founding CEMB members (though not existing members) are ‘Iranian exiles’ or that I am a worker-communist (err, not the Nationalist-Islamic Mujahedin-e-Khalq but I will leave the Iranian history lesson for another time) is beside the point. Suffice it to say that this and many other battles led by people like myself, including against Sharia law in Canada, for refugee and women’s rights, for a third camp against US militarism and Islamic terrorism, for secularism, against child veiling and honour killings and so on are a reflection of the specific conditions in Iran and the left-leaning and secular battle raging there against an Islamic regime.

Finally, in the end, society measures organisations according to their aims and actions and their relevance to people’s lives. Undoubtedly, it is our unequivocal defence of human values and 21st century humanity that are the reasons behind our resounding success not the prefix in our name or any ‘insider information.’

You can read the CEMB’s manifesto and find out more information about the organisation and an international conference it is organising in London on October 10 entitled ‘Political Islam, Sharia Law and Civil Society’ on our website: www.ex-muslim.org.uk.

Safe Saif
19 September 2008 at 10:10

hmmm looks like the comments have been orchestrated by the CEMB.

IndigoJo
19 September 2008 at 11:07

Small correction: Maryam Namazie and her cabal are members of the Worker-Communist Party of Iran/Iraq. They have a number of front groups, such as the "Organisation of Women's Freedom (sic) in Iraq", but I have never heard of them being a front for the so-called People's Muhahideen; in fact, my impression is that there were a "Muslim" faction and a Marxist faction of the PM, and that the group which is active now is the "Muslim" faction.

Sharif
20 September 2008 at 08:35

IndigoJo : I suppose you are aiming for a character assassination of Maryam. She had something to say and she did it well. You take it or leave it.

kayanarrazi
10 October 2008 at 15:46

It's perfectly valid for those of us who no longer truly believe to call identify ourselves as ex-Muslims.

After all, our identities are established in youth and in Muslim communities, Islam is an integral and powerful player. It will continue to play powerful role in our lives, in our families and social relations, in our values and understanding of the world, so yes, to be a British ex-Muslim is a very apt descriptor for many people.

Br Ziauddin, there are a great many young Muslims in the UK who grew up reading, imbibing and believing in pro-Islamic books such as you have written. It is rather petulant to now complain that those same Muslims who have a problem with Islam should be ignored when they criticize. 'Exes' can offer a perspective which is equally as valid as those Muslims who are unwilling to challenge their beliefs.

klevius
14 October 2008 at 15:35

kayanarrazi & others, you're absolutely right abt the necessity of ex-muslims & their work for still-muslims. That's the one of the main pillars against Saudi's & co spreading of oil-fueled & dangerous islam-propaganda (prisons, streets, mosques, schools etc). The other being me & co (thinking secularists leaning on negative human rights) & my analyze of basic islam as a parasitic "rapetivism" dead end formula (infidel slavery-reproduction-apostasy ban) originally & now benefitting from sex- & other segregation. see e.g. Islam, the worst crime ever

http://kleviusnews.blogspot.com/

or Origin of mosque

http://klevius.blogspot.com/search?updated-min=2008-01-01T00...

When you realize the sophisticated non-productive but reproductive original islam formula (on an old Jewish framework) with a growing crowd of young sex hungry jihadists running & emptying one oasis after the other, you might see the pattern for islams initial "success". They could hardly feed the growing crowd before they arrived to & sponged on civilizations. Also consider that the Saudis stole most of the Arabian peninsula with some handfuls of men, & now are spreading Wahhabi islamofascism by the help of the wealth Western tech brought to them without themselves moving a finger!

Also consider the long term effects of islamic slavery. In Roots Guide (a book publishers don't dare to touch) I connect Great Zimbabwe in the south with the Vikings in the north & the Khmeres in the East, with the help of islamic sex (& "ordinary") slavery. How many know, for example, that the Roma people are descendants of islamic slaves? And that Swahili is an African islamic slave trade language in the wide interface between the East-African coastal area & the inland? A rethinking of ethnicity seems appropriate.

Moreover, what makes islam special is that it's "got stuck in the Koran" (as the Pope said) & its due slavery past. Can't be reformed!

Post your comment

Please note: you will need to login or register before you can comment on the website

About the writer

Ziauddin Sardar

Ziauddin Sardar, writer and broadcaster, describes himself as a ‘critical polymath’. He is the author of over 40 books, including the highly acclaimed ‘Desperately Seeking Paradise’. He is Visiting Professor, School of Arts, the City University, London and editor of ‘Futures’, the monthly journal of planning, policy and futures studies.

Read More

Vote!

Will Baroness Ashton be an effective EU foreign minister?

Suggest a question

View comments

© New Statesman 1913 – 2009

Tracker