Registered user login:

Pakistan must cure itself of the Taliban

Ziauddin Sardar

Published 24 July 2008

Many believe the Talibanisation of Pakistan is well under way and impossible to reverse

The Taliban have given an ultimatum to Pakistan: leave Peshawar within five days or face the consequences. That a band of terrorists can tell a democratically elected government to quit its own territory says a great deal about the power of the Taliban. Far from being beaten and on the run, as we are constantly being told, the Taliban are stronger than ever.

The ultimatum was issued this past week by Baitullah Mehsud, a prominent leader of the Taliban. Mehsud's men are already in Peshawar, the largest city of the North-West Frontier Province (NWFP) and birthplace of al-Qaeda. Peshawar is also the administrative centre for the Federally Administered Tribal Areas (Fata) of Pakistan. The Taliban have been in total control of Fata for almost a decade. Peshawar will be the jewel in their crown. And if Peshawar goes, the rest of Pakistan would not be far away.

The NWFP government rejected the "five-day ultimatum" and is now bracing itself for the consequences. The city, my friends tell me, looks like a garrison town. Armoured vehicles belonging to the Pakistan Frontier Corps occupy key positions. Paramilitary forces and anti-terror units patrol the streets. Nevertheless, Taliban warlords freely roam the city in pick-up trucks. Abductions and hit-and-run raids have become routine facts of life.

I fear for Pakistan. Commentators in Islamabad are talking openly about losing Peshawar. Many believe the Talibanisation of Pakistan is well under way and impossible to reverse.

The problem is that Islamabad has no coherent policy towards the Taliban. It has tried to appease them, to buy their loyalty, has bombed their villages and schools and, when required, used them as its proxy. Even peace treaties, such as the one made in September 2006, have been half-hearted. During the election campaign, both the People's Party and the Muslim League emphasised the Taliban problem required a political rather than a military solution. After the elections, politics was abandoned in favour of military operations. The newly elected government of Prime Minister Yousuf Raza Gilani seems too preoccupied with internal political feuding to realise that it has a full-blown rebellion on its hands.

Pakistan's predicament is that of the war on terror. The only secure solution must deal with the totality of the social conditions underpinning the problem. There is no military solution that does not exacerbate social problems, thus fuelling the instability in which the Taliban can thrive. The war on terror has merely extended the agony it was meant to obliterate.

The Taliban may look invincible, but they are nothing more than a marauding band of zealous puritans. A typical "Taliban commander" is a warlord with fewer than a hundred armed men. He pays them with money earned from drugs or extortion. He takes over an area, ruthlessly imposes taxes, administers summary and brutal justice, and declares himself the ruler. He murders his opponents and kidnaps others for ransom. Any Pakistani soldiers captured are slaughtered in the most barbaric way.

There are roughly 500 Taliban commanders, every one of whom is known to the Pakistani authorities. The reason that they have not been captured is simple: Islamabad believes it can use them for its own purposes. This illusion has now become dangerously obsolete.

It is not sufficient, however, merely to defeat the Taliban. Candidates to replace them will not be hard to find in territory that has never been equitably incorporated into the nation state. And as a nation, Pakistan, having diverted so much aid and development to the military Establishment, has little to offer the Fata territories. This is the underlying conundrum that makes not only crushing the Taliban, but also sustaining Pakistan so difficult.

The Taliban are a Pakistani problem, created and nourished by Pakistan itself. To defeat the Taliban and defeat them truly, Pakistan must find a way to cure itself.

Post this article to

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • newsvine
  • Reddit

17 comments from readers

Carl Jones
24 July 2008 at 11:56

Obama will attack Pakistan, I think the only way to resolve this situation, would be to ask the CIA and MI6 to stop meddling in Pakistan....some hope.LOL

Sharif
24 July 2008 at 16:16

I agree that Taliban can be defeated in pakistan, but there is a big 'if'.

The obsession with Islam is so predominant that most of Pakistanis believe that 'Muslims killing Muslims' make no sense. Really? Analyze this: This is a Jihadi mentality. When you say 'we Muslims must not kill other Muslims, it implies that killing infidels is acceptable. I know Pakistan's Peoples Party (PPP) is supporting the fight against terrorists, but most of the other parties, particularly Muslim League (Nawaz) group is seeking popularity by playing the religious card. If PPP sticks to its guns, it's popularity is going to get a deep fall. That is what I mean by IF. If terrorists are classified as terrorists and not Muslims, the fight can be won. When Lal mosque was cleansed from idiotic clergy last year from the crazy faithfuls, the whole country blamed Musharaf for daring to hit a mosque. How primitive can you get? Or put it in another way, how primitive is this religion that allows killing infidels, but refuses to face the Islamic violent threat.

gnuneo
24 July 2008 at 17:05

religious fanatics who have the black/white mindset are incredibly hard to unseat once they have control over something, as they polarise opinion completely. As Ziauddin says, the enormous spending upon the military, encouraged to a shameful extent by the Western powers (presumably to threaten India, and force the economically and socially debilitating arms race we have have seen), has prevented Pakistan from putting in place the social development measures that counter the growth of such extremism.

And now it is hard to see how this nation, crippled by its own military's costs, by its lack of any social vision to inspire its people, by its lack of meaningful internal democracy, by its antiquated feudal and tribal structures, and threatened by the very extremists it set up to expand its influence over the region, can now deal with the problems it is facing.

there can be little doubt that Pakistan's problems are viewed with much glee and rejoicing in the very Halls of Power in Washington and London, who are claiming in public to be against al-Qaeda, a network of terrorist religious extremists they themselves created and funded.

as a point of reference as to how hard it is to get rid of extremists once entrenched, regardez the neo-cons and religious right in the US.

BegbiesEvilTwin
25 July 2008 at 01:54

Are you denying the existence of the Taliban in Peshwar? Most of the serious news media have already reported about the Taliban's diktat to the NWFP so I see no particular reason to make Ziauddin the focus of your criticism.

knave
25 July 2008 at 09:35

many of these problems go back to the seventies and eighties, when the west backed Zia. He set up the religious schools and whole generation of fanatics were created.

Khan is right , secular education is the only solution.

I would also say that is Isreal's problem, only 3 schools in the whole country are secular and mixed.

nawawimohamad
25 July 2008 at 10:51

I do agree with most of what has been written by Mr. Sardar on military spending, no funding for the NWF and political feuding but "That a band of terrorists can tell a democratically elected government to quit its own territory...." part of his article reminds me of the fate of the FIS in Algeria, whereby the democratically elected party was overunned by the military govennment. Please Mr. Sardar, do not use the word "democratically elected" in trying to highlight the conflicts where the US has its hands in the matter, I feel like vomitting.

Neither democracy nor a corrupt regime will resolve the issues in Pakistan. Pakistan needs a true leader, a statesman, that can unite the country and free from US interventions. No, of course not a puppet like Karzai of Afghanistan. I do not know who, but Pakistan must find one.

Sharif
25 July 2008 at 15:50

I am surprised that Knave above blames USA for the mess in Pakistan Are Pakistanis not grown up enough to make their own decision? Or do they need some other power to do it for them? Wrong argument. If USA wants something it is because they look after 'their' interest'. If Pakistan does not look after its interests, it is nobody else's fault but ourr own. It is that simple. Now naawawinohamad has another story to tell us. We need a 'great' leader. Is that the problem? Nations are ruled, or should be ruled, by people: The parliament approves the laws. This concept of one man show is purely an Islamic concept. It does not work today. If it did, Islamic countries would not be ruled by ruthless dictators and they would not be the most backward. Democracy must prevail and talking of Islamic guidance day in and out does nothing but wasting our energies. Only this week some fanatics have threatened Najam Sethi, who owns three very liberal papers, Like Daily Times, The Friday Times and AAj Kal is being threatened by fanatics for expressing liberal views. A new leader will help? I think the only thing that can help is teaching Mullahs and school teachers to preach tolerance and accepting other faiths and getting along with them. Improving the status of women will make the remming trick.

gnuneo
25 July 2008 at 17:59

Sharif: Islamic nations are not "the most backward", that honour falls to those People's and Nations that were ruled directly by Western Imperialism - after being decimated by centuries of slavers stealing their human resources. Yes, there is still a way for Islamic nations to develop, but that is also true of most of the West, the US is a stark example of just how backward 'we' also are.

Funnily enough, it is pretty much the same people who are hindering development in Western societies, who are also interfering and hindering development in Pakistan - along with much of the rest of the World. This is part of the negative 'hidden hand' of Globalisation.

having said all that - yes, the People's of Pakistan need to put their own house in order, they have let their leaders get away with behaving like a Great Power themselves, creating and funding extremists to destabilise surrounding nations, pouring abhorrent amounts of money into the bloated military machine, and maintaining feudal social practices.

all, ironically enough, going against the precepts of Islam.

BegbiesEvilTwin
25 July 2008 at 18:45

knave: Agreed.

Sharif/sajid: Sardar's merely rearticulating the prevailing orthodoxy that regional specialists have been expressing for quite some time. If you think otherwise that isn't a problem but it would be useful if you could supply us with some form of reason for your assertions.

Douglas Chalmers
25 July 2008 at 23:30

Quote Ziauddin Sardar:"The problem is that Islamabad has no coherent policy towards the Taliban..... There are roughly 500 Taliban commanders, every one of whom is known to the Pakistani authorities..."

Oh, the Pakistani authorities (Musharraf's boys' club, military + judiciary) do have "a coherent policy" on the Taliban - and they know who they are, alright. Some are even in the military, too.

Making money out of the $$billions of US military aid has been the key objectivein Pakistan and pandering to the USA by still funding the Taliban after the Russians left Afghanistan has been very profitable.

Now, whose advantage is it to have the Taliban still in existence? Having a "war" to fight means that the USA's military-industrial complex is kept occupied and that is profitable business. Thus the Taliban are very useful as a token "enemy".

Just as with Osama Bin Laden, who the Americans want to have brought before a Nuremberg-style war crimes tribunal now, ha ha (McCain's latest garbage). He is also very useful and the myth that he is still alive is being perpetrated for all that it is worth by obedient politicians in the USA and elsewhere that the Neocons have influence.

No wonder, then, that BB (Ms. Benazir Bhutto), God rest her soul, was assassinated as a kind of inconvenience recently. She had already stated that OBL was murdered in 2001-02 in her interview with David Frost on the BBC last year. That part of the interview was subsequently censored on their website. See http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f1uLdmct8_E

nawawimohamad
27 July 2008 at 04:28

"Nations are ruled, or should be ruled, by people: The parliament approves the laws" Sharif, this is the most stupid statement I have come across today. Shariff must be living in another planet.

The present world leaders are not ruling their countries neither are the people. They are plundering them. They are not doing what they promised to their people but rather do things at their whimps and fancies.

BegbiesEvilTwin
28 July 2008 at 00:56

Douglas Chalmers: Mind if I enquire if you are Doug Chalmers from Democratic Left Scotland?

proudlyleft
28 July 2008 at 09:42

One problem that Pakistan will have to face is the problem of redefining itself as 'Muslim' and secular rather than Islamic. It is here that it loses ground to Taliban and assorted religious hoodlums. But this will call for a lot of vision, and attacking Pakistan will not help promote the climate for the creation of such a debate. But as long as Pakistan sees itself (or its national leaders do) as basically a nation of Islam, it can only have a love and hate relationship with the Taliban.

proudlyleft
28 July 2008 at 09:51

By the way, the point Douglas Chalmers makes (see above) about proxy wars and the American (well, actually, 'Western', as France, UK etc are into it is subsidiary capacities too) industrail-military complex is also vital. Without discounting Taliban of fundamentalisms, the fact remains that the industrial-military complex gains from low-key, endles wars in various regions.... There is good reason to suppose that a complex of politicians, industrialists, media people are, knowingly or unknowingly, willing to let such conflicts, and organisations like the Taliban, drag on..., or at least drag on until new enemies are found. One can trace this tendency all the way back to the Cold War, for that matter. It has been quite consistent, and not discussed much by the mainstream media. One thing that would definitely help Pakistan would be to make the Western industrial-military complex more democratically accountable...

Serosch
28 July 2008 at 13:54

Nationalism is not something I would normally advocate, but Pakistan needs a serious dose of this.

Most Pakistanis see themselves as Muslim shia/sunni/punjabi/balochi e.t.c. and then as Pakistani. Religious and tribal/provincial loyalties must be made to take a back seat, and the idea that all are Pakistanis first must be pushed by politicians.

Pakistan also needs to rid itself of US and Saudi influence, Pakistan needs an independent foreign policy, a policy that is beneficial for Pakistan and not the US or Saudi.

Douglas Chalmers
30 July 2008 at 11:42

#BegbiesEvilTwin - 28July:Mind if I enquire if you are Doug Chalmers from.."

Democratic Left? Marxist far right? Who, huh? Ha ha, no, there are 200,000+ Doug Chalmers' if you Google. Try again.....

#proudlyleft - 28 July: "...make the Western industrial-military complex more democratically accountable..."

Great Scott, 'proudlyleft', what happened when the BAE/Saudi Arabia arms scandal was exposed in the English parliament? Blair lost his job, the government had to apologise to the Saudis and "lick their own spit" whilst the Saudis got away with it all - as well as their princes shipping drugs by the ton from S.Americato Europe in private jets under diplomatic immunity.

Best to read the news on the net before blogging:- “Now we know where we are..... a supposedly independent prosecutor can do nothing to resist a threat made by someone abroad if the UK government claims that the threat endangers national security.....

The unscrupulous who have friends in high places overseas willing to make such threats now have a ‘Get Out of Jail Free’ card – and there is nothing the public can do to hold the government to account if it abuses its national security powers..." http://www.telegraph.co.uk/money/main.jhtml?xml=/money/2008/...

BegbiesEvilTwin
08 August 2008 at 01:27

Ooh touchy. It was an entirely innocent enquiry.

Post your comment

Please note: you will need to login or register before your comment is displayed on the website

We want to encourage people to comment on our content and to exchange views with other readers and hope this will be done on a courteous basis. However, if you encounter posts which are offensive please let us know by emailing comments@newstatesman.co.uk and we will take swift action where necessary.

About the writer

Ziauddin Sardar

Ziauddin Sardar, writer and broadcaster, describes himself as a ‘critical polymath’. He is the author of over 40 books, including the highly acclaimed ‘Desperately Seeking Paradise’. He is Visiting Professor, School of Arts, the City University, London and editor of ‘Futures’, the monthly journal of planning, policy and futures studies.

Read More

Vote!

Is capitalism finished?