Return to: Home | Life & Society | Religion

Forced marriages disgrace Islam

Ziauddin Sardar

Published 27 March 2008

The first step to dealing with honour killings in the UK is to criminalise forced marriage.

According to official figures, up to 17,000 women in Britain are subjected to honour-related kidnapping, sexual assault, beatings and murder every year. A new report by the Centre for Social Cohesion suggests these figures underestimate the true extent of honour-based violence. And what is even more worrying is that this crime is not limited to older, first- generation immigrants. Honour killings are now also being perpetrated, according to the report, by second and third generations of immigrants. Parents are passing on the customs they brought with them to their children.

Most cases of honour killing in Britain, such as the murder of Banaz Mahmod, involve Muslims. Twenty-year-old Banaz was killed because she refused to abide by a forced marriage. Her body was discovered in Birmingham in 2006; she had been raped and tortured by men hired by her uncle to kill her. Her father, who had unsuccessfully tried to kill her earlier, her uncle and one of her killers were sentenced to 60 years in total for her murder. Before Banaz, there was the case of Sha filea Ahmed, murdered in 2003, and before her a string of other unfortunates. Hardly surprising that, in the minds of some, honour killing and Islam go together.

In reality, honour killings are a direct outcome of forced marriage and have nothing to do with Islam. Indeed, one of the first acts of the Prophet Muhammad was to condemn and forbid such practices. In Islam, honour is connected with virtue, with righteous behaviour, obligations to one's parents and the elderly, good works and community development. It is all about human dignity and how that dignity should be upheld.

For many Muslims, however, Islamic ideals are often subservient to tribal custom. Honour killings and forced marriages are tribal practices. Among certain tribes in Asia, honour is asso ciated with women: izzat, as honour is called in Urdu, is quite literally located on the female body. Thus, women have to be guarded, protected and passed on to another member of the tribe. A woman dishonours her family and tribe if her body is violated - even by force. The shame can be cleansed only by killing the body in question.

Such primitively brutal ideas are not uncommon among British Muslims hailing from tribal areas of India, Pakistan and the Middle East. Brit ish Asians perpetuate tribal customs through what is known as the biradari system. This system, much in evidence in Asian communities in the Midlands, combines caste and honour with notions of blind loyalty to the clan. To guard the honour of a clan, marriages take place strictly within a biradari. These are not marriages of arrangement by mutual consent, but forced marriages where one partner is coerced into a union - sometimes both.

The first step to dealing with honour killings is to criminalise forced marriage. The Home Office is supposed to be drawing up an action plan to tackle these killings and improve police response, but before anything else we need to prevent victims from becoming victims. Making forced marriage illegal will send a strong message to those who maintain this obnoxious tribal custom that it has no place in contemporary Britain. It will also encourage potential victims to come forward and report the crime.

There is equally a need, I think, for a national strategy to identify potential victims. Schools, for example, ought to be able to recognise which girls are most likely to be victims of forced marriage by their background. Airport staff should be able to spot girls who are being forcibly carted off to India, Pakistan or Bangladesh to be married off to biradari cousins. The police must be able to offer potential victims adequate protection from any retribution.

Ultimately, honour killing is a conceptual phenomenon, and to beat this loathsome practice we need to undermine the very concept of tribal honour. The notion that honour has anything to do with the female body should be erased by the basic education of every Briton of Asian or Middle Eastern heritage. Tribal practices associated with honour bring not honour to biradari, clan, family and Islam, but disgrace.

Post this article to

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • newsvine
  • Reddit

22 comments from readers

ERS
27 March 2008 at 21:22

I am very much for criminalizing forced marriage, which is too often a trigger for dishonor killings.

Ellen R. Sheeley, Author

"Reclaiming Honor in Jordan"

Iftikhar
28 March 2008 at 16:38

Honour Killing

Honour killing and female infanticide come from Pagan-Hindu-Judeo-Christian traditions. Hindus idolise women as Goddesses on one hand, while downgrading them on the sly at the same time. There is nothing in the Holy Quran and the Hadiths that may encourage people to kill their daughters. Infact, Islam came to abolish the dark ages of Pagan- Hindu –Judeo- Christian traditions. Islam is a matter of choice and there is no compulsion at all. It is a misconception that forced marriage and honour killing are part of Muslim culture. Forced marriage, honour killing and genital mutilation are rare practices among migrant communities. Muslim migrants are worried about institutional racism, binge drinking, drug addiction, incivility, gun and knife crimes, high rate of abortions and teen age pregnancies. An average of 20 English girls under the age of 16 falls pregnant every day. Muslim parents do not want their children to be integrated into such barbarity. Muslim women feel torn between two cultures, thanks to the British education system with non-Muslim monolingual teachers. It makes their lives very confusing.

The tragedy of forced marriage and honour killing could have been avoided if the poor girls were educated in a single sex state funded Muslim schools by female Muslim teachers. Educational attainment rises quite significantly if boys and girls are educated separately. The tragedies are an eye opener for all those Muslim parents who send their children to state schools where they are exposed to non-Muslim teachers who have no respect for Islamic faith and Muslim community and do not understand the needs and demands of the Muslim children. Muslim schools are crucial for Muslim children because western education makes a man/woman stupid. The hypocrisy of the Western society is clearly seen whereas an Australian Judge failed to jail nine males who admitted gang-raping a 10-year old aborigine girl in 2005, saying the victim probably agreed to have sex with them and a UNICEF Photo of the year shows, a bridegroom, 40, with his 11-year old bride in Afghanistan. In my opinion, a UNICEF photo of the year must show a nine year British girl having a baby and another photo showing a gang of teenage girls with anti-social behaviour and vomiting out side a pub, thanks to binge drinking. Muslim children need state funded Muslim schools with Muslim teachers as role models during their developmental periods. Muslim schools are the solutions and not a problem. They help to strengthen community cohesion, not undermine it. Muslim schools stand as shining beacons of light, serving as one of the most crucial factors which protect Muslim children from the onslaught of Eurocentricism, homosexuality, racism and secular values and traditions. They need to be well versed in Standard English to follow the National Curriculum and go for higher studies and research to serve humanity. At the same time they need to be well versed in Arabic, Urdu and other community languages to keep in touch with their cultural roots and enjoy the beauty of their literature and poetry. Muslim schools are not only faith schools but also bilingual schools. Infact, bilingualism is an asset and not a problem as perceived by the British education system. There is a positive co-relation between language and culture. English language is associated with western culture.

The silent majority of Muslim parents would like to send their children to Muslim schools but there are not enough schools to go by. The only alternative left is either British Government should introduce voucher system for parents to choose the school of their choice or designate all those state schools as Muslim community schools where Muslim pupils are in majority. There are hundreds of state schools where Muslims are in majority. Such schools may be handed over to Muslim educational Trusts or charities for their management. They are in a better position to educate Muslim children in accordance with their needs and demands. This demand is in accordance with the law of the land because there are state schools already managed by private companies. Muslim community is not asking for a favour. It is their legal right.

Iftikhar Ahmad

www.londonschoolofislamics.org.uk

info@londonschoolofislamics.org.uk

nawawimohamad
30 March 2008 at 05:35

In Islam there is no such thing as forced marriages. It is only through consent.

The so-called forced marriages are only the customs, I repeat customs of the Asians(Muslims, Christians, Hindus etc) from the Indian sub continent.

So Mr. Ziauddin Sardar, please be more pertinent in your writings!

Adam Tjaavk
31 March 2008 at 00:07

All those nasty un-Islamic practices so prevalent in Muslim societies - why aren't they as rare as eating pork?

Ophelia Benson
31 March 2008 at 00:25

That comment by Iftikhar Ahmad isn't a comment, it's an article that's been kicking around the web for months. Here for instance -

http://richarddawkins.net/article,2149,Honour-Killings,Iftik...

It's tacky to use comment pages as a way to self-publish articles. (I know: I edit a website and people self-publish stuff on my Letters page.)

nawawimohamad
31 March 2008 at 11:02

Please Mr. Adam Tjaavk, forced marriages are not prevalent in the Muslim societies, only in the India subcontinent, India, Pakistan, Bangladesh and Afghanistan. It is of a culture (custom) and not religion. It has got nothing to do with Islam. I think Mr. Ziauddin Sardar has to take the responsibility to rectify the error in his article!

Adam Tjaavk
31 March 2008 at 11:26

Certain words and phrases come screamingly to mind when considering these matters - such as hegemonic influence and priorities.

Jonny Mac
31 March 2008 at 17:27

Great article Mr Sardar. Adam @11.26 - what are you on about?

Adam Tjaavk
31 March 2008 at 17:50

Tribal custom? - nothing to do with religion?

Islam 'submission' - the faith requiring complete submission to the will of Allah and covering every aspect of life at every level of society. By their ranking of aspects ye shall know them.

Adam Tjaavk
31 March 2008 at 18:05

Responding to respondents

- not the article.

Do keep up!

Elizabeth H. St.Clair
03 April 2008 at 11:13

It might help if the relevent authorities took this issue far more seriously and treated 'honour' related crimes such as forced marriage and 'honour' killings as murder and abuse of human rights instead of just a 'community' issue. Too many times these crimes are allowed to be perpetrated not only in the name of Islam but in the name of political correctness in which, fearful of upsetting community relations, the relevant authorities do not intervene until too late. Banaz Mahmod died because nobody took her repeated claims that she was in mortal danger seriously - the police officers involved are now being investigated and prosecuted.

How many more women will have to be abused in this way before something changes? It appears that some are more deserving of equal treatment in the eyes of the law than others.

DavidWilkins
04 April 2008 at 21:34

Forced marriage is illegal in britain, the maximum sentance is 6 months! how much of a deterrent is this!

The association of chief police officers believed it would make no effect and i believe unless there are more draconian messures introduced people will not care about such a silly peice of legislation, especially as other offences such as assult, kipnap sexual offences all carry harsher penalties.

I believe it is very sad that these families cannot see through there small mindedness and have this distorted view of honour, espcially as most men from these familes can do whatever they want. there needs to be a shift in ways to deal with this.

Ms St. clair is correct about the Political correctness aspect, im sorry but peoples lives are at stake, im sure people can get over being told that they need to change the way in which some practices are conducted in the UK.

malaysian sister
07 April 2008 at 03:44

yes indeed, you must criminalised forced marriage. When the British law is just, then there is no need for Shariah since it already suit the Islamic purpose.

yogeshsnehi
08 April 2008 at 02:53

Forced marriages and honour killings are not merely limited to Islam. In Indian subcontinent almost every state and province has one or other story, every other day, detailing justification for honour killings. In North Indian villages caste endogamy and 'gotra' exogamy cut across religious lines in enforcing marriages strictly according to clan/caste customary rules. For a detailed perspective on 'crimes of honour', refer Lynn Welchman and Sara Hossain. (eds.) Honour: Crimes. Paradigms and Violence against Women. New Delhi: Zubaan. 2006.

TheTwainWill Meet
11 May 2008 at 10:38

Honour killingsare far from being a Muslim phenomenon alone, or an Asian one, for that matter - they were condoned even in some "Christian" societies. They were of course punishable by law, but the same law used to show lenience and "understanding" towards the killers. Italy only removed a special proviso for leniency from its body of laws in 1981 - before then, a honour killing would entail as little as 3 to 7 years inprisonment. Gabriel Garcia Marquez's masterly "Chronicle of a Death Foretold" also revolves around the efforts of two Colombian brothers to kill the man who "dishonoured" their sister.

A wonderful film on the subject of the female body, tribal codes of behaviour and allegiance, and honour is "Yol" by Turkish film director Yilmaz Guney, 1982.

Elizabeth H. St.Clair
18 June 2008 at 20:28

I don't care where the crimes originate or in whose community, that is just splitting hairs and not addressing the problem and in fact serves to obscure what is happening. All of the practises named above by various contributors are illegal, immoral and should be punished harshly to send the message that it is completely unacceptable behaviour in the United Kingdom.

redtakesy
25 June 2008 at 16:34

Iftikhar: I'm not sure you've quite covered all your bases; are you not aware of the Jain-Baha'i-Sikh-Raelian-Scientologist-Buddhist-Flying-Spaghetti-Monsterist origins of honour killings? I don't mean to be facetious, but insisting all your problems come from outside is not terribly mature. It would be like blaming binge drinking on "all the foreigners, etc etc".

PS: Good thing Muslim children will be kept safe from homosexuality, right and secular ideas? After all, we all know that's a problem on a par with racism. And your solution: so quintessentially Conservative! If only you could both overcome your fear and dislike for outsiders and reach across the cultural gap between you, and realise how much right-wing lunatics around the world and across cultures have in common!

redtakesy
25 June 2008 at 16:35

By the above, I hasten to add, I'm talking about not blaming cultural factors that lead to honour killings; I don't mean to imply that Islam is a cause of honour killings

Denis
30 June 2008 at 17:35

Anne Elizabeth Meyer, in her excellent book Islam and Human Rights made the point that it's not a matter of saying 'Islam doesn't preach this or that', but asking 'why, down the centuries, have Muslim clerics and jurisprudents done nothing about it'. There ARE Islamic reasons behind many of these abuses (starting with the downgrading of female status in shari'a law), and brushing the problem under the carpet rather than tackling the issue helps no-one. When the Shaykh al-Azhar al-Tahtawi spoke out against female 'circumcision' he was met with a torrent of abuse from other ulama. By taking an approach that says 'Muslims never do anything wrong, Islam is a perfect religion, Muslim society is irreproachable, it's all the fault of the kuffar, the burden of Islamophobia is too much, Islam is a religion of peace, Muhammad was the perfect human being' and so on, you trap Muslims in permanent backwardness. The Islamic world is a mess from end to end. The main culprits have been the mindless ulama who want to control everything. One hundred ytears ago, progressive Muslims rose up and called for the abolition of Muslim schools and did their best to claw their way free of the clerics. Now, the tide has turned and there are men like Iftikhar Ahmad who think the solution lies in throwing away all the advances that were made. It's very, very sad.

ANTISTATE
08 September 2008 at 19:13

Will people please stop talking about "Honour Killings" Murder is Murder so thats what it should be called

HelpTheGurka
19 January 2009 at 04:55

Iftikhar,

'Muslim parents do not want their children to be integrated into such barbarity. Muslim women feel torn between two cultures, thanks to the British education system with non-Muslim monolingual teachers. It makes their lives very confusing.'

I don't want to sound like a Daily Mail-esque hyperracist, but why did they come here in the first place if they don't want to use English in daily life? If I were to up sticks and move to Iran, I would damn sure not be able to have my kids speak English with their tutors.

In the rest of your piece, you are just rehashing the dogmatic denials (customarily without any kind of material to back it up with) of every anti-christian hate monger on the net. The fact is that Islam is responsible for the largest loss of innocent life on US soil since the civil war, London's worst terrorist attacks since the troubles and one third of all political murders ever comitted in the Netherlands. Say what you will about these 'pagan' religions, but I'll take the peace that is preached AND practiced in Buddhism every day.

nasha
29 January 2009 at 21:21

I am A victim of a forced marriage in Islam, i have been brutally beaten up by my father, brother,and mother for the PAST 10 years.can't they see that I can't live with that thing of a man. islam is

Post your comment

Please note: you will need to login or register before you can comment on the website

About the writer

Ziauddin Sardar

Ziauddin Sardar, writer and broadcaster, describes himself as a ‘critical polymath’. He is the author of over 40 books, including the highly acclaimed ‘Desperately Seeking Paradise’. He is Visiting Professor, School of Arts, the City University, London and editor of ‘Futures’, the monthly journal of planning, policy and futures studies.

Read More

Vote!

Was the government wrong to sack David Nutt?

Suggest a question

View comments

© New Statesman 1913 – 2009

Tracker