Registered user login:

Close encounters of the fourth kind

Ziauddin Sardar

Published 30 August 2007

In the age of the internet and instant communications, aliens have become irrelevant

It has been a bad summer for aliens. The last UFO sighting in Britain (the only one this year) was in April, in Guernsey, and - alas - it was not a real UFO. But it's not only here. The United States accounts for more than 99 per cent of all UFO sightings. Yet, while fence-building has failed to staunch the flow of illegal immigrants from Mexico, the department of homeland security has somehow managed to deter illegal aliens of the intergalactic kind.

Maybe the visitors have been put off by the increasing number and ferocity of hurricanes. Whatever the reason, UFO sightings in the US have almost disappeared.

My friend Kevin Fitzpatrick, who spends a great deal of time thinking about these things, says there is a simple answer. He suggests an exact parallel between the rise in the use of the internet and the fall in UFO sightings. Logical: the amount of time spent staring at the sky must be in inverse proportion to the amount of time available to stare at a computer screen.

But Kevin, a philosopher-cum-psychologist from Cardiff University, has a more elaborate explanation for it. He thinks aliens are a projection of our inner irrationalities, anxieties and fears. The spaceships arrived as a cultural device for making sense of things incomprehensible to ordinary folks. Now we have a new, all-encompassing tool. So, instead of projecting our fears of the inexplicable on to outer space, we project them into cyberspace.

This is a major shift in our cultural references for explaining the "inexplicable" in our lives. Belief in aliens emerged during the Cold War and the early days of space travel. Before that, at the end of the 19th and beginning of the 20th centuries, the cultural references available to people were steeped in religious belief. It was quite natural for people then to explain their "inexplicable" experiences in religious terms. Visions of the Virgin Mary were common.

However, with the rise of science and the decline of Christianity, the advent of science fiction about travel to the moon and then the actuality of moon travel, it became more culturally relevant for people to couch their strange experiences in terms of science and UFOs. So, mass sightings of aliens replaced mass sightings of the apparition of the Virgin Mary.

Something similar is happening now, says Kevin. Instant global communications have changed our cultural reference points. Now, our hallucinations are located in cyberspace. People seek to explain the inexplicable through the internet - by developing virtual communities, in chat rooms, through exploring virtual worlds and playing games where they can actually take on the persona of visiting aliens. With the internet, we have become self-absorbed and inward-looking. UFOs have become irrelevant.

Last autumn, the French television channel ARTE produced Cosmic Connexion, a special programme designed to persuade the aliens back. It was broadcast to Errai, a star located in the Big Dipper, some 45 light years away. Presented by two naked hosts, the show tried to explain the mysteries of the human body and humanity to its target alien audience. ARTE also asked viewers to submit messages to be beamed into space. Replies are due around 2096.

I hope I'll still be around. I believe we are not alone and I pine for First Contact, like in Star Trek. Where are Vulcans when you need them? Mr Spock, in his logical way, was a great deal more humane, compassionate and opposed to the arrogance of human self-absorption than that model of pan-galactic paranoia and the American Way, Captain Kirk. Maybe there's more to learn than just about ourselves - out there among the stars.

Post this article to

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • newsvine
  • Reddit

23 comments from readers

openminds
30 August 2007 at 09:21

I am amazed someone so learned could write such innacurate article! No offence intended. I am 100% serious. It takes 10 seconds to enter 'UFO sighting' into google and find out that far from 'disappearing' - UFO reports have hit an all time high in frequency and magnitude. With respect, it seems the author may have had a pre existing agenda and wrote the article around that, rather than research the facts of the case first. For a 'non nutty' UFO update on things ET, perhaps the author should have been open-minded to visit www.openmindsforum.com , first.

Flabbeytoad
30 August 2007 at 11:52

How inncacurate indeed ,check out http://supernaturalblog.com

The front page has a straght line of lists of sighting in this last month alone.

They are being captured on mobile phone cameras world wide, being sighted in merseyside on a number of occassions in the last two weeks, leeds, and so on..The MOD s latest statements of "We only investigate if its a threat to British airpace` is a joke.

Have they spoke to these long time visitors and got assurances that they are no threat so as to issue such statements.

Venus and swamp gas has been placed with the latest nonsense of chinese lanterns for explaining these sightings.

The old nonsense of they would have to travel at faster than the speed of light to get here also has no weight when they are probably inter/multi - dimensional , meaning sometimes same space diffirent vibration and so on.

A skeptic is one who remains open minded, though its meaning like lots of thing in this modern day have been twisted to mean quite the oppsosite. Bit like 1984 really isnt it.

No one is asking you to believe learned sir , just to not poo poo anything either.

I know what ive seen , and then believing to knowing is a very subtle change.

Timothy Good
30 August 2007 at 12:07

Ziauddin Sardar knows nothing about UFOs. The sighting reported by two airline pilots near Guernsey in April, for example, has NOT been explained, as the case file on the Ministry of Defence website makes clear.

Most governments concede that up to 95% (not 99%)of reports can be explained. That still leaves many thousands of unexplained cases, including encounters reported by military and civilian pilots, naval officers and astronauts.

As I have also revealed in my latest book, "Need to Know: UFOs, the Military and Intelligence", thousands of declassified intelligence papers (many Secret and Top Secret) prove how seriously the matter is taken behind the scenes.

Timothy Good (NUJ)

TJ
30 August 2007 at 14:32

Mr. Sardar, you call yourself a journalist, but on what grounds? What hard research have you done towards this highly coveted subject? Your article made me cringe, and is what can only be called bogus in it's entirety.

If you spent as much time really researching the latest 'waves' happening up and down the U.K., including the Guernsey case, as you do getting nonfactive advice from your new age guru coffee buddies, reason would only stare you in the face and perhaps some real journalism would come out of you.

As previous comments have clearly pointed out, the UFO phenomenon is far from on the decline.

http://www.beamsinvestigations.org.uk/ufo-reports.html

Please, next time you wish to belittle something of such significance, at least have the audacity to put in some hard, well founded research, instead of writing a last minute, 'coffee-shop' article like this one.

In Disgust.

Tony Jackson

inexplicata
30 August 2007 at 15:46

Amazing...for a moment I thought that I was reading something from The Sceptic Magazine. Ziauddin Sardar knows nothing whatsoever about the subject of Unidentified Flying Objects.... He has written, what I consider to be one of the most biased and inaccurate pieces of journalism that it has been my misfortune to read.

Here at BEAMS - The British Earth and Aerial Mysteries Society, we are receiving reports and footage of UFO's on an almost daily basis.

UFO activity is increasing at an alarming rate and is a very REAL phenomenon indeed.

Make no mistake though, here, I am not claiming that we are dealing with nuts and bolts spaceships, as the media love to portray the subject: But there are some pretty strange things flying about in our skies that are not the work of human design. It is also my opinion that these objects may pose a serious danger to commercial air traffic as well.

New Statesman, you should be ashamed of yourselves..what are you hiding? why do you fear the truth so much?

Kenneth John Parsons

http://www.beamsinvestigations.org.uk/

http://www.beamsinvestigations.org.uk/

carlhcarl
30 August 2007 at 15:56

Saved by your articulate, more informed readers!

Sir, your readers have posted more accurate, thoughtful and informed comments than you did in your inaccurate column.

What is you rdefinition of a "real" UFO and why is the April 2007 Guernsey sighting not a "real" UFO?"

Where did your data come from where you state that "the United States accounts for more than 99 per cent of all UFO sightings?" or that "UFO sightings in the US have almost disappeared?"

There is a difference between a factual, scientific approach to the UFO phenomina and the fictional or speculative entertainment approach. When you mix the two, you do a disservice to both.

You are entitle to the most ridiculous opinions about the UFO issue as anyone. Just don't dishonestly claim any sort of scientific backing for your opinion unless you document it.

Philip Mantle
30 August 2007 at 15:57

Utter twaddle. What a waste of dead trees printing this kind of garbage. My colleagues and I at UFO DATA magazine (www.ufodata.co.uk) have a constant flow of UFO information sent to us from around the world. Has this chap been living in a cave somewhere ?

Philip Mantle.

gnuneo
30 August 2007 at 20:19

wow.

that has to rank as the most comprehensive stomping of any NS article *ever*!

i personally rather got the feeling he was saying it somewhat tongue-in-cheek, not particularly having any strong opinions one way or the other myself, but he clearly pressed a LOT of wrong buttons with this one. :)

ziauddin, can you remember the message of your last article, the about "saying sorry"...

LOL, peace.

Nobody Knows
30 August 2007 at 23:51

Yet another example of how being educated gives one the confidence to overlook the need for gaining a specific education on the subject matter. I suppose that you are now qualified to comment on all things because you went to school.

Almost everything in this article is nonsense and incorrect. Perhaps you could take some time to research the topic before you put your unfounded commentary in print.

The Guernsey incident is not resolved, so how you could claim that you know anything about it is beyond me. Further, UFO reports arise from all over the world, but you are in good company. Carl Sagan who also thought he knew so much about it that he didn't need to do any research on the topic. That didn't keep him or you from uttering drivel about it.

Science often confronts "Ufology" for making unfounded commentary, but science does it also....

Thanks for demonstrating the fact that science is suffering pernicious and rampant bias and that its objectivity needs to be questioned at every turn.

incantations
31 August 2007 at 03:13

Having read probably thousands of articles of a skeptical bent, and having read all the retorts and snorts of the faithful, this is just more of the same. Year after year it goes on, and nothing ever changes. No smoking gun, no evidence that is beyond any dispute. The same old tired lines that were laid down years ago by Hynek, or the Lorenzens, or whoever, parroted back yet one more time. Ostensible expert shows up, plugs his book, but he knows, as I know, that it's mostly about making a living.

That there is an ostensibly "thriving" UFO subculture, comprising hordes of the wide-eyed at the feet of the hucksters means nothing. It's all medicine show, largely of American vintage, and if the Brits follow on our heels, it's only because we're "children of a common mother."

And someone will pound out yet another diatribe in answer to this, and hear it will all sit on some dark corner of the internet until it goes away with an administrator's mouseclick....and then somewhere else, the process will repeat again, and again, and another year will pass with no smoking gun, and no incontestable evidence, and more html pages filled with diatribes and retorts....

Flabbeytoad
31 August 2007 at 08:05

"UFO subculture" excuse me for not understanding what this means. Speaking for myself ,firstly I am a human being and belong to no religious sect , or culture , though I realize that folks will always categorize and subdivide, partition and so on.

Smoking gun? Who needs authority to give us the go ahead to know what we know, to make it official. If I have actually seen a what is called UFO on the ground at very close proximity, then that is that ,I need no Authority to tell me that I am mistaken because their stance is that its all baloney.

What I have witnessed can not be altered because their are folks who get very personal with name calling , and derogatory verbal abuse of people who have seen ,have witnessed.

Visitations didnt start in the 1940s or 50s , the term flying saucer was coined , but history is full of reports of our visitors.

I understand that there are those who choose not to believe, and I agree with the stance , Im not to fond of the human belief system, especially in religious terms.

One need only recognize that Yahweh is the monotheistic God of all the major religions today , and as he is a violent god who demanded blood and worship, then he mustnt be much of a god at all.

I am not a subculture , nor a believer sir, in this particular subject I am a knower ,and only because I have seen.

"Truth is the daughter of time ,not authority" (Brecht)

mitchy
31 August 2007 at 14:23

I have to say, while I have seen things over my life which I cannot explain, I am unwilling to settle for one explanation or another. However, I do think that there is more than enough room out there, in our Galaxy alone, for there to be highly advanced intelligent life capable of visiting this solar system from afar. Sure, we cant explain how that would be accomplished yet, but by science's own admission, it is constantly evolving and updating its understanding of reality. I'm sure electricity would have been considered pretty improbable a few centuries ago, just as we consider UFO's to be now (assuming of course, by UFO's we mean aliens).

I reckon that if there are any alien civilisations out there observing us, they'll have had the good sense to keep their distance until we, as a species, grow up a bit, stop squabbling over resources, shitting where we eat and buggering up our only home.

We'd probably only dissect them if they landed anyway.

Can you blame them for not providing a 'smoking gun'?

openminds
31 August 2007 at 18:09

The supposed 'DIA6' are currently firing lots of 'shots' , how much is 'smoke' and how much is 'mirrors' - is a whole can of worms. But at least there seems to be some agreement about such incredible disclosures such as the 'Gate 3 Incident'.

http://www.americanchronicle.com/articles/viewArticle.asp?ar...

JeffB
31 August 2007 at 19:37

On which ground(s), the channel islands observation is discarded here ? I suppose a serious investigation has been conducted (as any professional journalists do) and conclusive elements have been found. What are they ?

Gordon Dungavel
02 September 2007 at 10:25

Gordon Dungavel

Mr. Sadar as you are a writer of some distinction I would have thought at least you would have the decency to your readership to have investigated something about the subject you protest to know so much about. Gratuitous debunking of a subject all too easy to be the target of ridicule is a cheap shot. It's like ignorant aitheists who blaspheme the word of Christianity to try to attract attention to themselves, yet end out discovering this bitter hostility arises from not having been breast feed as a baby enough. The UFO phenomenon is so vast in it's variants that one can't possibly comprehend or correctly speculate on what's really happening. Even baffled eye witnesses or abductee's still come away with more questions than answers to what has been a profound experience for them. To suggest that UFO sightings have reduced around the world is one of complete ignorance. In fact with the public now with access to cheaper and more powerful recording equipment we are seeing more footage which is just the tip of the iceberg. The unreported sightings must be colossal. Of course there is a new breed of CGI hoaxer out there, smarmy students with nothing better to do with there tallents like yourself Mr. Sandar who try to belittle a subject they have no personal experience off. Even if you don't believe in the subject which is your prerogative Sir your bigoted opinions should stay quiet until you have studied the facts first. Only then have you have a right to express your doubts.

incantations
04 September 2007 at 20:28

Pathetic.

loobzaria
07 September 2007 at 23:41

What a fine projection of the author's irrationality, anxiety and fear. Logical: the amount of time spent coming up with clever ways to couch Christophobia and anti-American innuendo in the guise of a psuedo-intellectual article must be in inverse proportion to the amount of time available to actually research facts.

There are some good facts in the above comments however, and here's a few more:

1. Fence-building has yet to start on the US-Mexican border. Small wonder it has failed to staunch the flow of illegal immigration.

2. People develop virtual communities and use chat rooms to communicate with other people because people desire human interaction and are social creatures. The author may be the first person to take part in these activities with the intent of seeking to 'explain the unexplainable'.

3. Humanity's self-absorption did not start with the internet. It has always existed and is part of human nature.

What would we do without arrogant academics to tell us what we are really thinking?

Eideard
08 September 2007 at 05:04

Sardar, you poor bugger. Looks like the UK Branch of the Wingy-Dingy's-of-the-World have all emailed each other to drop by and justify their hustle.

I liked your brief article - did hope there might be something mysterious residing in MySpace that drew Rupert Murdoch to spend his moldy dollars. And you have my sympathy. We have the same thing happen Stateside after saying the magic words, "gun control".

The best chuckle - for me - is that I live just across a valley from the "Official UFO Landing Site" our county provides, here in New Mexico - just in case. No one's dropped by in the 21 years I've lived here though.

Elma
08 September 2007 at 21:39

Internet usage or cultural reference may or may not correlate with UFO sightings reports. In either direction - science is at ease with Zia’s hypothesis. Only dogmatic doctrines debunk antagonistic hypothesis on spot. Ufology, a subculture or a religion?

You may google ‘UFOevidence’ and easily detect regional variations there. Only 4 cases photo-reported for Middle East versus 129 North America, 70 Europe, etc. Could this be due to Middle Easterners still dealing with bottled Jinn? Or cannot distinguish spaceships from military aircrafts? It wouldn’t matter; Saddam’s pact with aliens during Operation Desert Storm did not prove helpful anyway. Ironically, the only two cases photo-reported for the whole African continent happened where else but in South Africa! I guess the northern areas have not yet heard of Erich von Daniken’s contribution in enlightening their tribal ‘inexplicables’. Also majority of Asia& Pacific cases end up with Australia and New Zealand.

All in all, Zia may be anything but a puritanist expressing his haunting fear that someone somewhere may be happily believing in UFO’s. We in clinical setting have to unconditionally regard the clients’ cultural motives in order to connect to them. A columnist not necessarily so.

One Eyed Jack
10 September 2007 at 22:00

Its time for full disclosure of all things UFO related by all governments of the world

http://www.ufo-reports.com

Admin
11 September 2007 at 12:36

From letters to the editor:

Sent via email by Timothy Good

Dear Sir:

Ziauddin Sardar evidently knows nothing about UFOs ("Close encounters of the fourth kind", 3rd September).

The sighting reported by airline pilots near Guernsey in April, for example, has not been explained, as the case file on the Ministry of Defence website makes clear, and neither was it "the last UFO sighting in Britain". In fact, there has been an increase in reports this summer, and not just in the UK.

It is unfortunate that the acronym UFO ("unidentified flying object" ) has become synonymous with "alien spaceship". That up to 95% of UFO reports can be explained in conventional terms is not disputed, but that still leaves tens of thousands of unexplained cases, including radar-confirmed encounters reported by military and civilian pilots, naval officers and astronauts.

In addition, numerous previously secret intelligence papers prove how seriously the subject is taken by major governments behind the scenes, as revealed in my latest book, "Need to Know: UFOs, the Military and Intelligence" (Pan Books).

hahasaidthecar
13 September 2007 at 23:32

So the Guernsey UFO was not a "real" one? What were they then? If you have the answer please share it with us. The last thing I read was that the MoD were investigating...and no outcome has yet been published. This was the most credible sighting yet..after O' Hare.

johnsmith1111
26 September 2007 at 02:59

The Guernsey UFO has not been identified yet, so how can you determine whether it is real or not when we don't know what it was. Assuming 'not real' means that is identified as an object such as anything man made or otherwise known, which there is no proof for that conclusion whatsoever. Whoever wrote this article is a complete plank, and the person that authorised this article to be uploaded is even more misinformed, and putting it mildly is just plain ignorant.

Post your comment

Please note: you will need to login or register before your comment is displayed on the website

You may enter up to 2000 characters (about 300-350 words)

Characters left:

We want to encourage people to comment on our content and to exchange views with other readers and hope this will be done on a courteous basis. However, if you encounter posts which are offensive please let us know by emailing comments@newstatesman.co.uk and we will take swift action where necessary.

About the writer

Ziauddin Sardar

Ziauddin Sardar, writer and broadcaster, describes himself as a ‘critical polymath’. He is the author of over 40 books, including the highly acclaimed ‘Desperately Seeking Paradise’. He is Visiting Professor, School of Arts, the City University, London and editor of ‘Futures’, the monthly journal of planning, policy and futures studies.

Read More

Vote!

Should Darling have been bolder with the 45% tax rate?