Registered user login:

The difference between right and left

Ziauddin Sardar

Published 05 February 2007

What Indians get up to with their hands

In all the space and time devoted to Celebrity Big Brother, a fundamental question has been overlooked. It was asked by one of the housemates, Danielle Lloyd: "They eat with their hands in India, don't they - or is that China? You don't know where their hands have been." Many of you see this as a racist gibe. I see it as a natural inquiry.

Most white Britons, I suspect, have no idea what we Indians get up to with our hands. For us, the public and private use of hands can have rather esoteric meaning. Consider what the actress Shilpa Shetty did when she first met the uncouth Jade Goody in the house. She didn't wave her hands about and shout something meaningless like "Hi". Instead, she brought both hands up to her chest, palms touching, and bowed elegantly. Namaste! The gesture says I love and respect you, I greet the place where you and I are one, I rise above our differences. Now, I ask you, can hands communicate anything more profound?

Of course, we Indians also use our hands to eat. But Danielle's confusion between Indians and Chinese is not unusual. Britain seems to have an interminable problem with defining "Indians". We have been located in places as far off as the Americas ("Red Indians") and Indonesia ("Dutch Indians"). Nowadays, all Indians in Britain are seen as "Asians" and Pakistani and Bangladeshi restaurants are described as Indian. Hobson-Jobson, the bible of Anglo-Indian terms, says that a whole book can be written on the use and abuse of the word Indian. Indeed, quite a few have been written since Hobson-Jobson was first published in 1886. So let us not be too harsh on the poor denizens of Celebrity Big Brother.

It is not strictly correct to say Indians eat with their hands. In fact, we eat only with our right hand. It's a process that requires more grace and skill than holding a knife and fork. To see what I mean, try breaking a piece of nan or chapatti, scooping some generic curry up with it and placing the whole thing in your mouth without making a mess. You will appreciate something else: you are forced to give total attention to the food.

Moreover, it's a much more sensual experience that adds touch to sight, smell and taste. It is thoroughly ecological; and it breaks all social boundaries. That's why the human family has eaten with its fingers throughout history. Knives and forks were introduced for people who didn't realise that they had to wash their hands before eating. Cutlery also emerged to establish class distinction - and to place one culture above all others. So now we look down on the most natural, healthy and enjoyable way of eating.

However, no self-respecting Indian will ever eat with his left hand, because that hand is for another, equally natural function. It is used for washing the anal region after defecation. If eating with the right hand is a sophisticated skill, then washing one's evacuations with the left is a high art. The first thing to realise is that we Indians, unlike most of you, do not use paper. As a civilisation we pre-date the invention of the toilet roll and have continued to use the most natural of all materials - water. The second thing to understand is that water has to be carried to the right region. This task is performed by a special implement, totally Indian in its origins, called the lota. It looks like a teapot and is made of stainless steel, aluminium or plastic, but never ceramic.

Now, you can't wash yourself the Indian way if you are sitting comfortably on the throne. You have to squat. Imagine the dexterity required for you to balance while squatting, holding the lota in your right hand, pouring the exact amount of water on the correct area, and cleaning yourself with the left hand. I don't recommend this for faint-hearted non-Indians. But it does clarify the difference between us and white Britons. You may occasionally be able to eat like us using your fingers, but by God, you can never shit like us.

So I hope Danielle, Jade and the rest of you, working-class chavs and middle-class snots, can see that we do a lot more with our hands than just eat. You can appreciate why yoga comes so easily to us. But above all, you now understand why it is not a good idea to shake an Indian by the left hand. You know where it has been.

Ziauddin Sardar's "Balti Britain: the British Asian experience" will be published by Granta Books in the autumn

Post this article to

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • newsvine
  • NowPublic
  • Reddit

6 comments from readers

nd1234
01 February 2007 at 21:43

i think everyone who thinks that jade dannille and jo are rasict and bullys ARE SAD

sarfaraz
06 February 2007 at 10:03

The customs and cultures of nations are varied.Being called an "indian" or a 'paki' is only a statement of fact.

We feel inferior to white race hence we take it as derogatory.It is more to do with economics.

For defecation most indians use "health faucets",we do use water though and not paper.And we also use the western throne as opposed to the indian one.

There is fusion.

We continue to use hands to eat .

If we talk of popular perception then we indians think that the white race uses its hand and tongue for "fingering" and "licking" the anal and the other regions of its partners during sexual act.

This perception might be wrong but the surfeit of pornographic material on the web starring the white race is much to blame.

There is also a notion in India that white race does not wash its hands after defecation.This notion is prevalent since the british occupation of India.

Mark
25 April 2007 at 20:44

This too gross to be funny.

r
10 May 2007 at 16:24

Right, Hi is meaningless but namaste is a thousand words with a thousand well intentioned thoughts?

I'm Indian and I think the author is full of shit.

Sophia
07 December 2007 at 02:05

...eating with fingers is fine and it even makes it easy for certain dishes, like naan or chapatis. However I have observing Indians' table manners for a while. I do not think I would ever be able to handle liquids with my hand like they do sambar and rasam or curd, it is rather disgusting to see the way they mix it with rice using the whole hand, squeezing it in their fist and having it come out between digits...and then those slurpy noises when eating it...

It is also not correct to say that the white race uses finger and tongue to please the partner- I have a copy of the unabridged Kama Sutra for the ignorant- so who did it first?- Indians of course.

I assume washing the "hole" with water is fine and hygienic, but please give me a piece of paper to pat dry my crouch, and also give me a piece of soap and a nail brush to get the crap out of my hands, before I sit on and eat with my hands. i have been married to an Indian for a long time, so have seen a lot of paradoxes

about Indian hygiene. Please give me a break with the white race porno quote"the surfeit of pornographic material on the web starring the white race is much to blame." If the Red Light District hookers in India were a bit more literate, there would be no domain names left.

I have all respects for the Indian culture and heritage, but when someone fingers at me, I have a bucket full of shit to throw back.

aneesh84
23 February 2008 at 02:16

Sofia, i am an indian currently at portugal. Firstly, washing your hole with water makes it definitely much cleaner than wiping it with dry tissue. Secondly, after the act, indians always wash their hands with soap. I agree south indian eating can get quite disgusting.....but not true about all indians. But it is their custom and if you were aware of that why did you marry one! Anyways do send your reply to aneesh84@gmail.com because i am not a regular visitor to this blog

Post your comment

Please note: you will need to login or register before your comment is displayed on the website

We want to encourage people to comment on our content and to exchange views with other readers and hope this will be done on a courteous basis. However, if you encounter posts which are offensive please let us know by emailing comments@newstatesman.co.uk and we will take swift action where necessary.

About the writer

Ziauddin Sardar, writer and broadcaster, describes himself as a ‘critical polymath’. He is the author of over 40 books, including the highly acclaimed ‘Desperately Seeking Paradise’. He is Visiting Professor, School of Arts, the City University, London and editor of ‘Futures’, the monthly journal of planning, policy and futures studies.

Read More

Vote!

Now we're all bankers should bank charges be dropped?