The ten must-read comment pieces from this morning's papers.
By New Statesman [1] Published 07 January 2013 8:27The ten must-read comment pieces from this morning's papers.
1. Cameron's absurd behaviour over EU membership [2] (Guardian)
Placing a question mark over Britain's European Union membership and its benefits is economically disastrous, says Peter Mandelson
2. US joins misguided pursuit of austerity [3](Financial Times)
Governments have pushed themselves into a corner where austerity is the default choice, writes Wolfgang Münchau.
3. The PM should have more respect for Ukip [4] (Daily Telegraph)
It is counterproductive for Cameron to mock voters who don’t want a Miliband government, argues Paul Goodman.
4. The Tories intend going on and on. Labour needs a radical alternative [5] (Independent)
A Tory government at a time of economic crisis is a national tragedy, says Owen Jones. Cameron’s hopes of another term must be destroyed.
5. Tea Party’s moment of maximum leverage [6] (Financial Times)
The question is whether they dive into their own political abyss in unison or in pieces, says Edward Luce.
6. What a relief! The madness of child benefit for all ends today [7] (Daily Telegraph)
It makes no sense for the affluent middle classes to be showered with taxpayers’ cash, says Boris Johnson.
7. There is no soft option for our leaders now [8] (Times) (£)
Cameron and Clegg should tell us that austerity is a necessary evil, writes Tim Montgomerie. Just look at the French ‘alternative’.
8. The Tory crisis that's keeping Balls smirking [9] (Daily Mail)
The Conservatives can’t find a candidate to stand against Ed Balls at the next election, writes Andrew Pierce.
9. Westminster and welfare: the politics of 'them and us' [10] (Guardian)
Over the second half of this parliament, ministers will have a hard time keeping up an increasingly false distinction, says a Guardian editorial.
10. We are wallowing in Labour’s debt so why is Ed blocking cuts? [11] (Sun)
As long as Miliband continues to stay silent on how to cut his government’s debt, he has no right to suggest voters must spend more, writes Trevor Kavanagh.