Polls  in Greece show the far-right Golden Dawn party would come third were an election held tomorrow. The party’s policies  include putting landmines on the Greek border to kill illegal immigrants, and its logo is a Hellenised swastika . The country’s Prime Minister and BBC journalists alike have drawn  chilling parallels between the rise of Golden Dawn and the rise of the Nazis in the 1930s.
There’s no doubt that Golden Dawn’s mere presence in the Greek Parliament is a worrying development. But the “Golden Dawn is in third place” headline – which has now spread like wildfire through commentary about the situation in Greece – doesn’t quite capture the full picture.
The party may be in third place, but not as a result of any huge growth in support since the last election: in the 2012 elections Golden Dawn ended up with 6.9 per cent and came fifth. Since the election, they have only seen a modest increase of about 3 per cent on that figure, to 9.2 per cent.
The party is only third because of the collapse of others around it. PASOK, which won 43.9 per cent of the vote and a majority in 2009  under George Papandreou, is now on 7.2 per cent after betting the farm on the Trokia’s austerity. Its votes are now mainly split between Syriza and New Democracy.
The story is similar with the Greek Communist Party (KKE): after pursuing a disastrous anti-coalition strategy in 2012, the KKE, recently third-placed itself, has lost most of its votes to Syriza. Likewise, the centre-right, anti-bailout Independent Greeks, which beat Golden Dawn in 2012, has seen its vote drain away both to New Democracy’s promised renegotiation of austerity and Syriza's anti-bailout pole of attraction.
Is it worrying that Golden Dawn has got to where it is? Absolutely. But third place is a lot less impressive than it used to be in Greece.
The party’s poll position also fails to capture the disappearance of the old main far-right party, Popular Orthodox Rally  (LAOS). LAOS were the main anti-immigration party before they joined the pro-bailout coalition government in November 2011, a decision which wiped them off the map politically.
To be sure, Golden Dawn are much nastier than LAOS: where Golden Dawn want to put landmines on the border, LAOS wanted to end all migration  from outside the EU and deport many immigrants who were already in Greece – familiar demands from far-right parties across Europe.
But the disappearance of LAOS, which took 5.6 per cent in the 2009 elections , and the sudden emergence of Golden Dawn on 6.9 per cent in 2012, suggests a fairly direct transfer of votes between the two parties.
The number of voters willing to vote for a party of the far-right has gradually crept up as Greek society disintegrates, but an increase from 5.6 per cent to a notional 9.2 per cent over three years of human catastrophe is hardly meteoric, and should be viewed in perspective.
This analysis isn’t meant to denigrate those who repeat that Golden Dawn are now in third place without explaining its context. With  honourable  exceptions , the human tragedy that is unfolding in Greece is horrendously under-reported: an eye catching headline or two to draw attention to the folly of what is being imposed on the Greeks can only be a good thing.