Labour has a choice - cosy up to the Lib Dems, or attack the coalition

Ed Miliband can't have his yellow cake and eat it.

Ed Miliband with David Cameron
Ed Miliband with David Cameron. Photograph: Getty Images

There are times when even I feel sorry for Ed Miliband. Since his election as Labour leader, he’s followed a clear, if misguided, strategy of love-bombing the Liberal Democrats. He backed them on AV. He’s embraced all sorts of madcap, tree-hugging causes such as the Occupy movement, the St Paul’s protest and 38 Degrees. He’s wooed them with love letters, videos and even started dropping Vince Cable the odd risqué text.

And he’s been widely praised, with many in Labour’s ranks welcoming his new liberalism, and the new members and boost in the polls that have accompanied it. But then Ed made a mistake. A couple of weeks ago, he began floating the prospect of leveraging this strategy into some sort of Lab-Lib coalition.

Suddenly, the new Bobby Kennedy has found himself caricatured as the new Ramsay MacDonald. Or even worse, the new Tony Blair. “I don’t think we should fall into that trap,” Dave Prentis, the general secretary of Unison told the Telegraph. “We will not do what we did in 1997, which is that we were so pleased to get into power we let them [the Labour leadership] do anything.”

“A Lab-Lib coalition is a nonstarter,” intoned the ultraloyalist LabourList website. “A huge proportion of Labour supporters find the notion of going into coalition with the Lib Dems a fairly gruesome thought.”

So what would Labour members prefer? Another five gruesome years of a Tory-Liberal coalition?

Once again, the Labour left is learning the hard way that it can’t have its cake and nationalise it. For the past two years, Miliband has been press-ganging every Lib Dem he can find into the service of the people’s party; he’s been cheered all the way by unions and radical young Labour Turks. Then the moment he talks of taking that operation to its logical confusion, they cry foul.

All of a sudden, Prentis and others have woken up to the prospect of “a kind of right-wing coalition with Labour and the Liberal Democrats, maybe to the exclusion of the unions”. No shit, Sherlock. What did you think was going to happen when Miliband, at your insistence, started ditching policies that could make Labour attractive to Tory voters and began courting disaffected Lib Dems?

We can work it out

Labour has a choice. Either it tries to make inroads into Cameron’s support, which means making some unpalatable choices on law and order, immigration, welfare and the economy (and thereby giving itself the best chance of an overall majority). Or it can come over all lefty and liberal, and try and hoover up Nick Clegg’s refugees while in the process making coalition the most likely of the best-case outcomes. If the latter happens, Dave, right near the top of Vince Cable’s coalition shopping list will be party funding reform.

What does the Labour left really want Miliband to do? Storm No 10 on the back of a new general strike, platitudes about the squeezed middle and a bit of how’s your father? Miliband has been pursuing a Lib Dem first strategy. And, until recently, that was the left’s strategy as well. If they now don’t like it, that’s fine. But they’d better stop moaning and say what they do want him to do. Fast.

14 comments

treborc's picture

By the look of the photo, maybe Labour will cosy up to the Tories.

Coleslaw 's picture

Very very strange reference about 38 Degrees. What is Hodges on about? Does he know who they are?

TLMorris's picture

The Labour party needs to attack. The "leaders" in power now want to take away even more of the people of Britian human rights. Watch the video on YouTube called Keep Families Together - UFFFL. It will show how currently any EEU citizen living in the UK has more human rights than British born nationals. Any EEU citizen in the UK can bring it's family with no finacial requirement yet my Welsh husband cannot bring his Candian wife to live in the UK because he makes under 24,800 annually. How is this right that my British born husband has less rights and is treated as a second class citizen in his own country?

Herbert's picture

'Labour has a choice. Either it tries to make inroads into Cameron’s support, which means making some unpalatable choices on law and order, immigration, welfare and the economy (and thereby giving itself the best chance of an overall majority).'

Be Tory, you mean? Why, when there already is a Tory party?

Cyclo's picture

Labour became a Tory party when the "New Labour" project began, and they haven't changed. The LibDems became a Tory party when Nick Clegg was elected leader. Fortunately, there are other parties to choose from.

matthew fox's picture

Dan talks about making unpalatable choices of the economy. Really, like Osborne did with Plan A, that killed the recovery then plunged the economy in recession.

Does Dan really agree with Osborne's policies of taking away £3 Billion in tax credits from 200,000 low income households?

The last thing we need is to follow the failed judgement of Osborne, this is a man who made sure Stephen Hester was paid a bonus, eventhough Hester knew RBS was involved in the LIBOR scandal.

Dick's picture

"So what would Labour members prefer? Another five gruesome years of a Tory-Liberal coalition?"

But his isn't really on the cards, for a start there will be next door to no LibDems after the next election. Good thing too. You seem to be approaching the the question of 'how can I discredit Ed Miliband' from a new angle though, so credit where it is due. But your "Labour has a choice." ultimatum seems to anticipate the last election, not the next. Or perhaps we are to supplant LibDem with UKiP (or even BNP) to make sense of it.

Tosh Posh's picture

Hold the political rallies in the next election whilst nurses are striking - make sure that it is not near a rally the nurses need Mr Ed at.

Problem solved, more like European Tories tied to Liberals, more of Mr Ed tied to his families back home.

Works well for them, and he gets to see free football and has donations of sponsors at the executive suite.

Michael dixon's picture

A comment here complains about the author of this piece stating the obvious so why bother publishing. Truth is that for any writer from the Left there is precious little for them to go on. Miliband has said nothing worthwhile about the deficit since 2010 and has given few, if any, clues as to future policy on housing, immigration and foreign affairs, apart from the Hollande love-in ( avery crowded place to be).

I used to read the work of Miliband's father when studying my degree in the 1980's and it was tough going. Trying to plough through his interview with your magazine, as shown on your website, was not much easier.

Hence most of your articles are taken up with analysing and mostly criticising the Conservatives/Coalition. So give Dan Hodges his due. He is trying to widen the net a bit and psuh Labour into action and out of their current slumber and self-satisfaction, for which they could pay a later heavy price.

Indu Pendent's picture

yes but...

Labour needs to decide what it stands for (what actually does Labour stand for except spin and chasing short term opinion polls? Is it Plan A or B? Is it cuts or borrow and spend? Is it tough exams or free GCSEs? Is it jobs or pay?).

Once the party transforms itself and begins to mean something then it will attract Tory and Liberal voters.

Latest tweets