Getty Images.
Show Hide image

Donald Trump's intelligence leaks show Republicans won't put the brakes on his chaotic presidency

The idea that the US president would "govern like a moderate" is deader than disco.

Spying's not what it used to be. In the old days you had to use wiretaps, honeytraps, and god knows what else. Now you just have to let Donald Trump brag a little bit.

At least, according to current and former US officials, who have told the Washington Post that the President revealed codeword-level intelligence to the Russian ambassador and foreign minister at  a meeting in the White House. "I get great intel. I have people brief me on great intel every day," the President is said to have bragged, before sharing details on the Islamic State, obtained with the help of one of the United States' security partners. Another official, speaking to BuzzFeed, says that the story is "far worse" than what has already been reported.

As Trump is President, he can declassify intelligence as and when he sees fit, and in any case the administration has denied the claims. As Politico's eye-popping account of life inside the Trump White House shows, it's merely the latest example of the chaos and impulsive behaviour of the Commander-in-Chief.

It's a reminder of two things. Firstly that the idea that Donald Trump would "govern like a moderate" is deader than disco. The difficulty is that Trump doesn't "govern like" anything - he just reacts in unpredictable and irrational ways.

The second is the idea that the so-called "moderate Republicans" would act as a brake upon Trump. In practice, that's meant that a few Senators in blue states have made concerned noises before falling in line, even as Trump's own unpopularity puts many Republican legislators in danger of losing their jobs in 2018.  Opposition to the Democrats, fear of being defeated in the primaries, and the need to have a Republican in the White House signing Paul Ryan's laws are all reasons for Republican support for Trump. But they all add up to one conclusion: the best-case scenario, despite everything, is that Trump will remain President until 2020, and the only plausible control on what he'll do is a Democratic victory in the midterm elections in 2018.

Does Donald Trump Threaten The World? Join the New Statesman for a live event on Tuesday 22 May in central London. Tickets here.

Stephen Bush is special correspondent at the New Statesman. His daily briefing, Morning Call, provides a quick and essential guide to domestic and global politics.

Show Hide image

The deafening killer - why noise will be the next great pollution scandal

A growing body of evidence shows that noise can have serious health impacts too. 

Our cities are being poisoned by a toxin that surrounds us day and night. It eats away at our brains, hurts our hearts, clutches at our sleep, and gnaws at the quality of our daily lives.

Hardly a silent killer, it gets short shrift compared to the well-publicised terrors of air pollution and sugars food. It is the dull, thumping, stultifying drum-beat of perpetual noise.

The score that accompanies city life is brutal and constant. It disrupts the everyday: The coffee break ruined by the screech of a line of double decker buses braking at the lights. The lawyer’s conference call broken by drilling as she makes her way to the office. The writer’s struggle to find a quiet corner to pen his latest article.

For city-dwellers, it’s all-consuming and impossible to avoid. Construction, traffic, the whirring of machinery, the neighbour’s stereo. Even at home, the beeps and buzzes made by washing machines, fridges, and phones all serve to distract and unsettle.

But the never-ending noisiness of city life is far more than a problem of aesthetics. A growing body of evidence shows that noise can have serious health impacts too. Recent studies have linked noise pollution to hearing loss, sleep deprivation, hypertension, heart disease, brain development, and even increased risk of dementia.

One research team compared families living on different stories of the same building in Manhattan to isolate the impact of noise on health and education. They found children in lower, noisier floors were worse at reading than their higher-up peers, an effect that was most pronounced for children who had lived in the building for longest.

Those studies have been replicated for the impact of aircraft noise with similar results. Not only does noise cause higher blood pressure and worsens quality of sleep, it also stymies pupils trying to concentrate in class.

As with many forms of pollution, the poorest are typically the hardest hit. The worst-off in any city often live by busy roads in poorly-insulated houses or flats, cheek by jowl with packed-in neighbours.

The US Department of Transport recently mapped road and aircraft noise across the United States. Predictably, the loudest areas overlapped with some of the country’s most deprived. Those included the south side of Atlanta and the lowest-income areas of LA and Seattle.

Yet as noise pollution grows in line with road and air traffic and rising urban density, public policy has turned a blind eye.

Council noise response services, formally a 24-hour defence against neighbourly disputes, have fallen victim to local government cuts. Decisions on airport expansion and road development pay scant regard to their audible impact. Political platforms remain silent on the loudest poison.

This is odd at a time when we have never had more tools at our disposal to deal with the issue. Electric Vehicles are practically noise-less, yet noise rarely features in the arguments for their adoption. Just replacing today’s bus fleet would transform city centres; doing the same for taxis and trucks would amount to a revolution.

Vehicles are just the start. Millions were spent on a programme of “Warm Homes”; what about “Quiet Homes”? How did we value the noise impact in the decision to build a third runway at Heathrow, and how do we compensate people now that it’s going ahead?

Construction is a major driver of decibels. Should builders compensate “noise victims” for over-drilling? Or could regulation push equipment manufacturers to find new ways to dampen the sound of their kit?

Of course, none of this addresses the noise pollution we impose on ourselves. The bars and clubs we choose to visit or the music we stick in our ears. Whether pumping dance tracks in spin classes or indie rock in trendy coffee shops, people’s desire to compensate for bad noise out there by playing louder noise in here is hard to control for.

The Clean Air Act of 1956 heralded a new era of city life, one where smog and grime gave way to clear skies and clearer lungs. That fight still goes on today.

But some day, we will turn our attention to our clogged-up airwaves. The decibels will fall. #Twitter will give way to twitter. And every now and again, as we step from our homes into city life, we may just hear the sweetest sound of all. Silence.

Adam Swersky is a councillor in Harrow and is cabinet member for finance. He writes in a personal capacity.