Why the Tories’ knives are out for Chris Patten
There's quite a lot of settling old scores going on, says Tristram Hunt.
By Tristram Hunt Published 15 November 2012
Here’s something the Tory party certainly has not learned from this month’s American elections. George Osborne might have thought it was all about gay marriage, modernity and minority votes, but any decent psephologist will tell you it was Big Bird wot won it.
Mitt Romney’s determination to close down the public service broadcaster PBS and cancel Sesame Street must have cost him those swing states. And now the Tories want to do the same. The ongoing implosion of BBC News has given the Conservative right another opportunity to urge the elimination of the licence fee. Romney hoped to finish off Big Bird; today’s Tory party wants to immolate Igglepiggle.
Of course, there are other agendas at play. If the media industry is, as Tony Blair infamously put it, a “feral beast”, it is one with an unhealthy predilection for cannibalism. Its favourite dish is itself and it is impossible to understate the cynical and macabre flavour that pre-Leveson report realpolitiking is giving to much that passes for commentary.
With 425,320 hours of TV and radio output last year, the BBC’s encroachment on the market is an important debate, as is its eternally bloated management structure. But with those managerially responsible having departed or, in Reithian terms, “stood aside”, that debate bears only passing relevance to a scandal that is ultimately about shoddy standards of journalism at one current affairs programme.
Yet for the Tory party it is a golden opportunity to eliminate a state-funded broadcaster. Enoch Powell once said that “for a politician to complain about the press is like a ship’s captain complaining about the sea”. However, his advice is little heeded by his descendants when it comes to the Beeb. For Conservatives, BBC-bashing is every bit as populist as Murdoch-taunting on the left, arguably more so. No ConservativeHome blog post is complete without a comment decrying its perceived left-wing bias.
Indeed, at times the level of paranoia is not so far removed from the “mainstream media” conspiracy theories propagated by Fox News and the Tea Party movement in the US. So, it was no surprise to see renowned gallery pleasers such as John Redwood and (naturally) Boris Johnson wade in to level implicit accusations of an anti-Tory plot at the BBC.
In the chamber, the backbench minions followed their lead. One after another, they rose to demand the disbandment of the BBC. David Nuttall, the MP for Bury North, hoped the Newsnight debacle would “bring forward the day when the British public will have the freedom to decide whether to pay to watch the BBC, rather than being forced to pay for it by the criminal law”. Swindon’s Justin Tomlinson wanted to know why his constituents had to pay the licence fee. “When will that change?” What was so disturbing was the manner in which the ineffectual and insubstantial new Culture Secretary, Maria Miller, refused to slap them down. Instead, she seemed to give implicit licence to this Beeb-bashing.
But besides the CBBC all-stars of In the Night Garden, the Tory right has an equally symbolic target in its sights. “Tristram, what you have to realise is that the 20th anniversary of the Maastricht rebellion is upon us,” one troublemaking MP informed me. The moon is out and the Eurosceptics are after a blood sacrifice. And the man they really want is the lead regicist of 1990.
Many Tories still blame Chris Patten for the fall of the blessed Margaret, and not without reason; he had deep reservations about her increasingly strident Euroscepticism and outright rejection of Britain entering the single currency. Thatcher herself was in no doubt about the role of Patten, then her environment secretary. As Alan Clark’s diary records: “Her sense of betrayal is absolute, overrides everything. Lamont had been scheming; Patten plotted the whole thing; Kenneth Clarke had led the rout from the Cabinet Room. [Malcolm] Rifkind was a weasel. Even John Major is by no means cloud-free.”
On the anniversary of the Maastricht rebellion, the Tories are after Patten’s scalp. “Has not the problem at the BBC been going on for a long time, and has not the wrong person been forced out? Should it not have been the chairman of the trust?” thundered the right-winger Peter Bone. Philip Davies wanted the secretary of state, like a Soviet commissar, to move the chairman of the state broadcaster aside. And Philip Hollobone wanted Patten – “a clearly unsuitable person” – sacked as soon as possible.
Revenge is what the Tory party is after, as the festering sore of Europe reopens with pleasing regularity. Everything, but everything, can be framed through the prism of the Tory Wars on Europe, and this squall is no different.
The modernisers must be in despair. Bashing the Beeb, screaming about Europe, fretting over gay marriage: this is not the election-winning cultural politics that George Osborne is urging on his party. We, in the meantime, must do all we can to save Chris Patten, a decent public servant, and Igglepiggle – the saviour of many prebathtime toddler meltdowns.
Tristram Hunt is MP for Stoke-on-Trent Central (Labour)
Latest tweets
More from New Statesman
- Online writers:
- Steven Baxter
- Rowenna Davis
- David Allen Green
- Mehdi Hasan
- Nelson Jones
- Gavin Kelly
- Helen Lewis
- Laurie Penny
- The V Spot
- Alex Hern
- Martha Gill
- Alan White
- Samira Shackle
- Alex Andreou
- Nicky Woolf in America
- Bim Adewunmi
- Glosswitch
- Kate Mossman on pop
- Ryan Gilbey on Film
- Martin Robbins
- Rafael Behr
- Eleanor Margolis
- Tools and services:
- Polls
- Predictions
- Archive
- Magazine
- PDF edition
- RSS feeds
- Advertising
- Subscribe
- Special supplements
- Stockists


6 comments
Piggies by George Harrison. He got his cushy berth after Hong Kong via the old boy's club. He should pay for the BBC fiasco as well. Notice how quiet he got when things got really rough. Why not give all fee payers an opportunity to attend the BBC meetings? Not all will turn up. Why not have the Koowloon crowd in as well?
Crap people who lord over us.
"Many Tories still blame Chris Patten for the fall of the blessed Margaret, and not without reason; he had deep reservations about her increasingly strident Euroscepticism and outright rejection of Britain entering the single currency"
So, the author thinks we would be in a better place if we HAD gone into the Euro.
Deep down she liked the idea of a single currency. She never had a Eurosceptic Chancellor on her watch who really watches over the economic goings on in the country.
I think the Tories are mad when it comes to views about the BBC. They are paranoid. I’d say that the BBC is the most Conservative media organisation in the country.
The Murdoch press to me is more Libertarian old Tory cattle hustlers than Conservative of the Edmund Burke mould. If anything the Conservatives invented the State and it’s powers to look after the Capitalists and protect their interests, not to destroy it as many new so called Conservatives like to think themselves as.
Another article that, without intention of course, clearly underlines the correct decision of the Conservative leadership to play a very careful hand about the troubles of the BBC and Chris Patten.
Cameron, Hague, Osborne etc. have been very sensible and restrained
Apart from a fairly trite political comment about Maria Miller, the remainder of those mentioned in the piece, excluding the eccentric Boris Johnson, are the usual suspects on the Tory right, like Bone, Redwood, Davies etc. etc.
That said, taking into account everytime these people and their like would appear on the BBC with long-held views about Europe, (and those of about 40% of the country), and treated as though they were half-mad by a patronising interviewer-admitted by Mark Thompson-you can see why they are on the warpath.
But before Mr Hunt has us all in tears for the BBC and Chris Patten, truth be told they, (Newsnight), assisted, negligently and without intention respectively, in the character asssasination of Lord McAlpine. Indeed I found the author's reluctance to include the most-wronged Lord as being one of the chief exponents of the anti-Patten sentiments, that apparently goes back decades, totally mystifying.
Why not say it as it really is, bearing in mind the anti-Patten tendency was the thrust of your piece.
And the author's reference to the conservative home website further illustrates the feebleness of his article. Apart from some good hardy souls, this website is a forum for UKIP impostors, right wing fruitcakes, the life and times of Nadine Dorries, Boris for PM and anything bad that can be said about David Cameron and Kenneth Clarke, who are both looked upon as reincarnations of Arthur Scargill and Chairman Mao.
Tristram Hunt has just written a piece that portrays the Conservative leadership as good judges and mature politicans.
Were his own leader the same about Murdoch. Amid all his hysteria about Murdoch, Miliband employs as his political advisor, one Tom Baldwin, who worked for The Times, which I seem to recall supported Blair.
A good follow-up article for Mr Hunt-Labour and Murdoch-plenty of material there.
These Tories are not only bad, they are sad, and barking mad. I blame the English voters who are almost as stupid as their MPs.