John Pilger: How the Chosen Ones ended Australia’s sporting prowess and revealed its secret past
Australia’s sports administration and Olympian “stars”, from Nick D’Arcy to John Booth, are sad relics of a racially biased past that produced Shane Gould, Evonne Goolagong and Cathy Freeman.
By John Pilger Published 08 August 2012
The ferries that ply the river west of Sydney Harbour bear the names of Australia’s world champion sportswomen. They include the Olympic swimming gold medallists Dawn Fraser and Shane Gould and the runners Betty Cuthbert and Marjorie Jackson. As you board, there’s a photo of the athlete in her prime, and a record of her achievements.
This is vintage Australia. Often shy and never rich, sporting heroes were nourished by a society that, long before most other countries, won victories for ordinary people: the first 35-hour working week, comprehensive child benefits and pensions, secret ballots and the vote for women. By the 1960s, Australians had the most equitable spread of personal income in the world. In modern-day corporate Australia, this is long forgotten. “We are the chosen ones,” sang a choir promoting the 2000 Sydney Olympics.
Freedom rides
One of the ferries is named after Evonne Goolagong, the tennis star who won Wimbledon. She is Aboriginal, like Cathy Freeman, who won a gold medal in the 400 metres at Sydney. For all their talent, both fit into a carefully constructed façade, behind which Australia’s secret indigenous history is suppressed and denied.
The late Charlie Perkins, an Aboriginal leader who played First Division football in England, told me: “There’s an ambivalence that consumes many of us. I was so pleased to be back home, seeing that wonderful light, hearing the birds, seeing my mates, but I felt the racism more than ever. For one thing, no white person ever invited me home for a meal, for anything. Blacks weren’t even allowed in the grandstands, not even in the blacks-only sections.” In the 1960s, Charlie led “freedom rides” into the north-west of New South Wales, where “nigger hunts” were still not uncommon. Abused and spat at, he stood at the turnstiles of swimming pools and sports fields and demanded that the race bar be lifted. “In South Africa, at least you knew where you stood,” he said. “In Australia, you can have a friend and an enemy all in one person, especially if you’re like me, of mixed blood. Someone will call you his mate one minute, then before you know it, you feel an indifference, a coldness you can’t explain. It’s what drove my brother to kill himself.”
Wally McArthur was one of the “stolen generation”, the victim of a eugenics-inspired campaign to “breed out the black”, Wally was taken from his mother as a small boy and was destined to become a servant in white society. His gift was speed. Running without shoes, he was the Usain Bolt of his day. Wally was never selected for a state or national team.
Eddie Gilbert’s story is similar. A dazzling fast bowler, he was given special permission to play outside his Queensland “reserve” and took five wickets for 65 runs against the West Indies. He later faced Donald Bradman, the world’s greatest batsman, and bowled him for a duck. Thereafter the secretary of the Queensland Cricket Association wrote to the Protector of Aborigines: “The matter of Eddie Gilbert has been fully discussed by my executive committee and it was decided, with your concurrence, to return Gilbert to the settlement.” The letter noted that his cricketing whites “should be laundered and returned”. Eddie was committed to an asylum where he was mistreated and died.
The great Aboriginal boxer Ron Richards died a prisoner on Palm Island off the Queensland coast. He had won most Australian titles in the 1930s, and when he became the British empire middleweight champion, the Chief Protector stepped in. “Like many other crossbreeds,” he wrote, “he is unstable of character and inclined to be gullible.”
On 30 July in London, the Aboriginal light-heavyweight Damien Hooper stepped into the ring for his Olympic bout wearing a T-shirt emblazoned with the Aboriginal flag: the same flag now approved to fly on public buildings in Australia. The Australian Olympic Committee did not share his pride and demanded that he make a public apology – a profanity in keeping with the enduring humiliation of Aboriginal people. Wearing the shirt was said to have breached the Olympic Charter; Coca-Cola would have been acceptable. A sports writer for the Sydney Morning Herald called it a “stunt” by an opportunist. “I’m representing my culture, not only my country,” he said. “I’m very proud of what I did.”
Obstacle race
In his 1995 book Obstacle Race, Professor Colin Tatz, who has charted Australia’s genocidal history, says that, of the 1,200 Aboriginal sportsmen and women he studied, only six – 0.5 per cent – had access to the same opportunities and sporting facilities as whites. I asked him what had changed since then. “A few things are better,” he wrote. “The figure now is about 1 per cent.”
On the day Hooper was forced to apologise, the Australian swimmer Nick D’Arcy failed to make the final of the 200 metres butterfly. Few in the crowd were aware that this “chosen one” was a thug convicted of smashing the face of his fellow swimmer Simon Cowley in an unprovoked assault in 2008. Ordered to pay his victim A$180,000 (£120,000) in damages, D’Arcy declared himself bankrupt and paid not a cent, nor showed any remorse. Yet the Australian swimming authorities duly lifted his ban and allowed him to compete in London. After all, said a Liberal MP, “ Nick has paid a terrible price for his indiscretions.”
Josh Booth rowed in Australia’s eight that came last in the final. To a Chosen One, last is unacceptable, so Booth went on a rampage in Egham in Surrey, smashing windows. He later described it as an “emotional outburst”. The Sydney Morning Herald shed a tear for “the pain of a young man who lost an event that only comes along every four years”.
Unlike those original Australians, who are forced to defend their rights and apologise for their distinctiveness, both D’Arcy and Booth have enjoyed every advantage and privilege. Their “indiscretions” and victimhood are the other side of a sense of entitlement that has shredded the national myth of “fair go”, not to mention an Olympic prowess of which we all were once proud.
Latest tweets
More from New Statesman
- Online writers:
- Steven Baxter
- Rowenna Davis
- David Allen Green
- Mehdi Hasan
- Nelson Jones
- Gavin Kelly
- Helen Lewis
- Laurie Penny
- The V Spot
- Alex Hern
- Martha Gill
- Alan White
- Samira Shackle
- Alex Andreou
- Nicky Woolf in America
- Bim Adewunmi
- Glosswitch
- Kate Mossman on pop
- Ryan Gilbey on Film
- Martin Robbins
- Rafael Behr
- Eleanor Margolis
- Tools and services:
- Polls
- Predictions
- Archive
- Magazine
- PDF edition
- RSS feeds
- Advertising
- Subscribe
- Special supplements
- Stockists


42 comments
mm
John,
A fine piece, which I will no doubt read for a second (or even a third) time.
'Eddie Gilbert’s story is similar. A dazzling fast bowler, he was given special permission to play outside his Queensland “reserve”...'
Although entirely tangential to what you have written, that word - "reserve" - has reminded me of something that I wished to raise with you. Namely, why do we hear so little about, or from, the native inhabitants of North America? I have never read an article about them, nor seen a television history about them on the BBC, nor seen any documentary about their situation now and their attitute towards the 'white settlers' in their own country. I am at something of a loss to know why this is, but it does smack of deliberate suppression - as though there were a 'conspiracy of silence' around the subject. I realise that you are not short of subjects for your journalism, but I really would like to read a good piece from you on precisely this subject.
By the way, I've bought a copy of your book, 'The New Rulers of The World', which I am currently reading.
I am an Australian and while I will defend Mr Pilger's right to free speech and am grateful for many of the issues he has raised over the years I find I no longer trust him.
Not only does John Pilger uses statistics selectively but he deliberately misleads through omission or innuendo. I've seen him talk about an Aboriginal friend as if they were close until I realized he hadn't spoken to this person for probably 30 years.
He also has a very selective memory. Cathy Freeman, when she won the 400 metres sprint in the Sydney Olympics in 2000, ran a victory lap carrying both the Australian and Aboriginal flag and was given what was the longest standing ovation in history. She also had the honour of lighting the Olympic flame. Evonne Goolagong was, and remains to this day, the darling of Australian tennis with a special place in not only the history books, but the memories and hearts of many Australians. The history of Aboriginal athletes embraced by Australia is long if you actually care to look.
When did Pilger interview Colin Tatz, who I know personally, and was given those statistics? I would guess in 1995. So lets get them updated shall we, Mr Pilger? If you are going to use statistics make sure they are current. When did he interview Charlie Perkins? I would guess in the 1960s, but in any event, Charlie Perkins died nearly 13 years ago. Ooops, did he forget to mention that? What happened to Eddie Gilbert was in the 1930s. Yes it was terrible and shameful for Australians, but we are a little different to the 1930s and Australians have moved on Mr Pilger. It seems you have not, or at least anything for a good story.
Yes, John Pilger is correct in all he says about Nick D'Arcy, but many, if not most Australians agree that he should not have been included in the Olympic team and no one applauds his behaviour beforehand. His inclusion was hotly debated in Australia. As you say the Australian flag does fly proudly on Australian buildings and I don't say I have Aboriginal friends, like Mr Pilger does, because I never care, or indeed think, about whether a friend is Aboriginal or not. I don't use them as a statistic or to prove a point. Sad when you have been left behind.
So what about the flag? Why wasn't he allowed to wear it?
Perhaps you should ask an aborigine...
A well written response with real insight. Thank you.
Dear John
Well you have been away a long time. Either that or you are blind to the elephant in the other corner of the room that also contains your myopia. No discussion of contemporary Koori sport can leave out the huge contribution Koori sports people make to OTHER sports you haven't mentioned - particulary Australian Rules and [another oval ball game the play in your "home" state - I cannot quite remember what it is called] and say - boxing. I reckon it must be a very very long time since you stood in a crowd of decent fair minded people who appreciate their sports heroes for their acheivement on the field and not for their colour or lack thereof. You belong in another time John - the past - I am sorry to say. AND note if you are expressing mock surprise at the AOC or the IOC as expected to be rational about things then you really are a dinosaur. Kind Regards Jonny B
My sentiments exactly.
Pilger has no problem identifying 'racist' American's, Australians, Brits and of course Israelis (in fact Jews). Odd how he refuses to condemn Islamists for being racists. Doesn't the ethnic cleansing of 900,000 Jews from Moslem states constitute racism? Doesn't article 7 of the Hamas Charter which openly calls for all Jews to be killed amount to racism? Why does pilfer support Hamas? Doesn't the fact that the hosting of a Holocaust - Denial Confereence in Tehran addressed by the Iranian Foreign Minister in December 2006 where the invitees included European neo-nazis and the KKK amount to racism? Why does Pilger support the islamofascist Iranian regime that stones its women to death and hangs Gays in public squares?
Pilger is just a senile apologist for Islamism and obsessed with a hatred for the democratic west. He makes me want to vomit.
Pilger is a Nobel Prize Winner - one of the best journalists of our day. He doesn't applaud Islamist extremism- but he does point out the apartheid rogue state of Israel's crimes against the Palestinians very honestly. He is to be applauded.
@marcus Bessner
'...the apartheid rogue state of Israel's crimes' !! What a way to describe the only liberal democracy in the region. I suspect that you must be an Islamist fanatic from the racist illegal apartheid state of Pakistan.