Angela Merkel’s mania for austerity is destroying Europe

The German Chancellor is terminating growth and pushing us towards a new Depression.

German Chancellor Angela Merkel.
German Chancellor Angela Merkel.

Which world leader poses the biggest threat to global order and prosperity? The Iranian president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad? Wrong. Israel’s prime minister, Binyamin Netanyahu? Nope. North Korea’s Kim Jong-un? Wrong again.

The answer is a mild-mannered opera fan and former chemist who has been in office for seven years. Yes, step forward, Chancellor Angela Merkel of Germany, whose solution to Europe’s financial crisis – or lack thereof – has brought the continent, and perhaps the world, to the edge of a second Great Depression. “World Bank warns that euro collapse could spark global crisis”, read the headline on the front of the Observer on 17 June.

With apologies to Mike Godwin and his eponymous law, Merkel is the most dangerous German leader since Hitler. Her eight predecessors – from Konrad Adenauer to Gerhard Schröder – presided over a manufacturing miracle at home and the rehabilitation of Germany’s reputation abroad. Under Merkel, however, the country finds itself isolated once again, loathed and feared in equal measure.

Cartoons in the newspapers of Germany’s neighbours have depicted the chancellor with a Hitler moustache or wearing a spiked, Bismarck-era military helmet. Commenting on the phenomenon, the columnist Jakob Augstein observed: “Her abrasive pro-austerity policies threaten everything that previous German governments had accomplished since World War II.” Merkel, Augstein rightly noted, is “a radical politician, not a conservative one”.

Neighbourhood bully

Merkel did not cause the financial crisis; that (dis)honour still belongs to the world’s “top” bankers. But her deficit fetishism and obsession with spending cuts are exacerbating the continent-wide debt-and-growth crises that threaten to upset more than six decades of pan-European unity and stability.

Then there is her bullying tendency. The majority of Greeks voted on 17 June either to delay or to cancel the EU-imposed austerity plan; up popped Merkel the next day to warn: “No departures can be made from the reform measures . . . We have to count on Greece sticking to its commitments” – and to slap down her foreign minister, who had suggested that the EU might give Greece more time to do cuts.

Merkel prefers to fiddle as Athens burns – and Madrid and Rome, too. Youth unemployment in Spain and Greece is hovering around 50 per cent; in Italy, a third of 15-to-24-year-olds are out of work. Riots beckon as Europe’s far right attracts new supporters. It is ironic that the leader of a nation paranoid about and offended by any mention of its Nazi period seems so relaxed about the rise of anti-austerity, neo-Nazi parties across the EU, from Marine Le Pen’s National Front in France to Greece’s black-shirted Golden Dawn to the fascists of Jobbik, now the third-largest party in Hungary’s parliament.

Merkel’s supporters argue that this is unfair. She is, they say, standing up for hard-working Germans who are weary of bailing out their feckless southern European neighbours. This is nonsense. First, figures released by the OECD show that the “lazy” Greek worker labours for 2,017 hours per year, which is more than the average in any other EU nation – and more than 40 per cent longer than the average German works. So a little less Schadenfreude, please.

Second, it isn’t just southern Europeans who are revolting against fiscal sadism. In May, Mer­kel’s Christian Democrats suffered a humiliating defeat in an election in Germany’s most populous state, North Rhine-Westphalia. It was the party’s worst result in the state since the Second World War. Ordinary Germans are starting to acknowledge that austerity isn’t working.

But Merkel won’t budge. She is a purveyor of the conventional wisdom which says that the economy is like a household that can’t borrow or spend more than it earns. But economies are not households – or credit cards! – and common sense tells us that the solution to a downturn caused by a prolonged drought in demand is not to reduce demand further (by slashing spending). History teaches us that the Great Depression wasn’t helped by Herbert Hoover’s cuts in the US and, in pre-war Germany, it was mass unemployment, not hyperinflation, that propelled Hitler to power in 1933.

Fiscal self-flagellation

In a study published in 2010, analysts at the International Monetary Fund found just two cases, out of 170 examples across 15 advanced economies between 1980 and 2009, in which cuts in government spending turned out to be expansionary for the economy overall. They concluded: “Fiscal consolidation typically has a contractionary effect on output.”

Merkel’s insistence on fiscal self-flagellation, her unwillingness to countenance any fiscal stimulus by Germany or an easy-money policy by the European Central Bank, have pushed depressed countries such as Greece further into depression. The recent announcement at the G20 summit in Mexico that Merkel may now be willing to allow eurozone institutions to buy up the debt of crisis-hit member countries is too little, too late.

This isn’t just about geopolitics or macro­economics. Europe’s austerians have blood on their hands. Suicide rates are up by 40 per cent in Greece; the birthplace of western democracy is being remorselessly reduced to the status of a developing country. Meanwhile, Merkel, as the US economist Robert Kuttner wrote earlier this month, “continues to pursue Germany’s narrow self-interest . . . [because] Germany benefits from the rest of Europe’s suf­fering in two ways – expanded exports and dirt-cheap money”.

In denial and bent on austerity über alles, Merkel is destroying the European project, pauperising Germany’s neighbours and risking a new global depression.

She must be stopped. 

Mehdi Hasan is the author of the ebook “The Debt Delusion” (Vintage Digital, £3.74). For the New Statesman's position on the Eurozone crisis, read our leader here.

916 comments

GraweSt's picture

Anglo-Saxons wants another world war! Don't believe them!

Re2baz's picture

Tom has a point although two wrongs don't make a right. Cameron does only look to protect British interests & look to gain rather then help vulnerable eu countries which is similar to Germany's stance (hence cosy merkal/Cameron relationship?). These vulnerable economies are a victim of flawed systems & helping them now doesn't equate to encouraging inefficiencies as this is clearly not the root cause of the problems . Working collectively rather than individualistically will benefit everyone in long run including Germany & Britain!

Britain is shit's picture

Worse Merkel - only Hitler
Merkel - the most dangerous German leader. Merkel is a greater threat to global stability and prosperity, than Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and North Korean leader Kim Jong Un.
Agree, this has not often read and hear that the Chancellor of the free and democratic Germany was called with the following words.
Who is so afraid of Angela Merkel? Who is it because the fire, on which was worth?
Who compares it with Adolf Hitler?
Reply unexpected: a free and democratic British press.
What is happening? Why do some "democrats" of the British attacked the spill on the other "democrats," but the German model?
Let's deal.

What is happening now in the world and especially in European politics is very interesting.
Everyone is smiling. All shake hands. They all say the same words on human rights, democracy and freedom. Meanwhile, the struggle between "talking" all the meaningless mantra for them by politicians and groups that are not life and death.
A. Today, it is obvious to everyone that the current model of financial-oriented world economy came to a standstill. A complete and irrevocable impasse.
Two. The best way out of this situation may change in the paradigm of the global economy. We must stop creating money out of thin air in any required quantity and start living within our means.
But this is just one in the "civilized world" do not want and did not intend.
Three. Therefore, to break the deadlock today's world elite has two outputs. Both imply the preservation of the system: going to treat the symptoms not the disease. These two ways I have described many times (http://nstarikov.ru/blog/9859 and http://nstarikov.ru/blog/18723). "Hawks" offer as a means of "treatment" big war "doves" offer to blow a bubble of consumption in the "golden billion" by the smooth decrease in the level of its life.
4. It is the struggle of the "two parties" the world's elite and explains the "strange" situation with Domenico, Strauss-Kahn and the "unexpected" debt crisis broke out.
Now let's look at what is happening in the eurozone.
The video Vesti:
 
http://youtube.com/watch?v=AhioQ6GFigk
Thus, the German Chancellor somehow strongly against the introduction of Eurobonds. That is against the introduction of collective responsibility for all the countries of the Eurozone countries is debt that the eurozone itself.
What's the matter?
Why Angela Merkel does not use a simple "no", and quite emotional "as long as it will not be alive"?
Because the essence of what is happening is this. "Hawks" and proposed a simple from their point of view, a very effective plan.
In Europe, suffering from debt, issued some collective debt. Today, every country has its own euro area debt obligations, its credit rating. Each is responsible only for yourself. Therefore, the problem is not at all.
And then found a "way out" - if the overall issue Eurobond debt, then all will be for everyone. That is, all will be Germany. That it will form the debts of Greece, Ireland, Italy, etc. Then, after some time, the rating agencies to downgrade the German through the floor.
The consequence is the collapse of the Eurozone, the bankruptcy of the German economy. Chaos, the claims of each other. And end all - a great war.
Is that what you would like for your country? Of course not.
That's Angela Merkel does not want. Hence, it is a vocabulary - "over my dead body."
She knows that the end result will be the next innocent Eurobond global war.
And so Merkel is limited in every way.
What is proposed in Germany - to ascend the scaffold. And - voluntarily. In gratitude for the lack of resistance offered "prize". On this scaffold will kill all, and in gratitude to Germany only pokalechat.
And Germany is limited.
What is the reaction of the Anglo-Saxon press? You see it in the picture at the top of the article.
This is an original collage of articles of British Newstatesman.
Here is another article of the same publication.
Key articles is clear. Merkel - it's almost like Hitler. Well, maybe a little better.
Agree - a reaction to the decision and the words of the German chancellor, even for the British press, is clearly inadequate. In the end, what is so worried about the British and the Eurozone euro, which is at and have not entered?
Because this reaction is nervous that the government is at stake over the world. EuroSummit oktlonil idea of ​​Eurobonds, but tried to solve the debt problem in Europe in other ways. But "hawks" should not the answer, but instead of worsening, and in the finale - the war.
A war always begins when the bad. When all is well - no one wants to fight not.
Hence - the pressure on Germany should increase.
The bombing at a disco, a maniac, inject poison into the food, the excitement of the Turks and other immigrants. Neo-Nazi attacks, or anarchists. Corruption scandal with the "Mercedes", which (who would have thought?) Gives a bribe for the sale of its products.
The bankruptcy of one of the leading banks in Germany. The scandal over the nonpayment of taxes, or "a la Strauss-Kahn," who is of German politicians. Sally of the Afghan mujahideen with the victims of German soldiers.
There are many options. Just wait for developments.
Original: http://nstarikov.ru/blog/19020

Britain is shit's picture

Britain's high time to burn, suck dick, filthy devils!

peace1940's picture

The picture is tasteless, that is because is coming from the hypocrite Mehdi Hasan who describes non-Muslims as animals to his Muslim audience and deceitfully pretend to be a moderate British citizen in public. All Mahdi Hasan’s views are as worthless as his views about non-Muslims.

Tom Deker's picture

Why only whenever Germany focused on its national interest threatens the destruction of European project, but never par example if Britain makes this in 40 years as a permanent condition?
You Brits have concern for the European project? Since when? So far, we heard from you just rejection and anti-EU howling.
As your prime minister wanted his money back, there was nothing wrong. But if the German head of government stressed the same it hurts Europe and damages the economy?
Where is the logic?
Dont nag about Germany, just because your heads are stucked even in the age of your gone Empire...
Ask yourself what YOU could contribute to the European project. Compared with other nations, the "glorious" Britain does not show many efforts in this case - at least if one ignores the efforts to block and to prevent integration.

Why should the Germans pay for Greek debt? Because of the past?
Great idea - will the British, French, Dutch, Austrians, Czechs and Swedes then pay the debt of Germany e.g. because of the devastation in the 30-year war?
No?

Andy18041804's picture

I totally agree with you, well written!!!

Andy18041804's picture

I totally agree with you, well written!!!

AK AK's picture

great comment, I can only support that, Tom!!

Yanni's picture

Germany took a loan from Greece 65 years ago and never pay back we still wait for you to pay us .....we can't wait any more and probably the UN is the solution for that problem.You can't accuse Greece for bad payer since you never pay back Greece and your dept now is more than 400 billions.So shut the F@ck up till you pay back !!!

Latest tweets