Angela Merkel’s mania for austerity is destroying Europe
The German Chancellor is terminating growth and pushing us towards a new Depression.
By Mehdi Hasan Published 20 June 2012
Which world leader poses the biggest threat to global order and prosperity? The Iranian president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad? Wrong. Israel’s prime minister, Binyamin Netanyahu? Nope. North Korea’s Kim Jong-un? Wrong again.
The answer is a mild-mannered opera fan and former chemist who has been in office for seven years. Yes, step forward, Chancellor Angela Merkel of Germany, whose solution to Europe’s financial crisis – or lack thereof – has brought the continent, and perhaps the world, to the edge of a second Great Depression. “World Bank warns that euro collapse could spark global crisis”, read the headline on the front of the Observer on 17 June.
With apologies to Mike Godwin and his eponymous law, Merkel is the most dangerous German leader since Hitler. Her eight predecessors – from Konrad Adenauer to Gerhard Schröder – presided over a manufacturing miracle at home and the rehabilitation of Germany’s reputation abroad. Under Merkel, however, the country finds itself isolated once again, loathed and feared in equal measure.
Cartoons in the newspapers of Germany’s neighbours have depicted the chancellor with a Hitler moustache or wearing a spiked, Bismarck-era military helmet. Commenting on the phenomenon, the columnist Jakob Augstein observed: “Her abrasive pro-austerity policies threaten everything that previous German governments had accomplished since World War II.” Merkel, Augstein rightly noted, is “a radical politician, not a conservative one”.
Neighbourhood bully
Merkel did not cause the financial crisis; that (dis)honour still belongs to the world’s “top” bankers. But her deficit fetishism and obsession with spending cuts are exacerbating the continent-wide debt-and-growth crises that threaten to upset more than six decades of pan-European unity and stability.
Then there is her bullying tendency. The majority of Greeks voted on 17 June either to delay or to cancel the EU-imposed austerity plan; up popped Merkel the next day to warn: “No departures can be made from the reform measures . . . We have to count on Greece sticking to its commitments” – and to slap down her foreign minister, who had suggested that the EU might give Greece more time to do cuts.
Merkel prefers to fiddle as Athens burns – and Madrid and Rome, too. Youth unemployment in Spain and Greece is hovering around 50 per cent; in Italy, a third of 15-to-24-year-olds are out of work. Riots beckon as Europe’s far right attracts new supporters. It is ironic that the leader of a nation paranoid about and offended by any mention of its Nazi period seems so relaxed about the rise of anti-austerity, neo-Nazi parties across the EU, from Marine Le Pen’s National Front in France to Greece’s black-shirted Golden Dawn to the fascists of Jobbik, now the third-largest party in Hungary’s parliament.
Merkel’s supporters argue that this is unfair. She is, they say, standing up for hard-working Germans who are weary of bailing out their feckless southern European neighbours. This is nonsense. First, figures released by the OECD show that the “lazy” Greek worker labours for 2,017 hours per year, which is more than the average in any other EU nation – and more than 40 per cent longer than the average German works. So a little less Schadenfreude, please.
Second, it isn’t just southern Europeans who are revolting against fiscal sadism. In May, Merkel’s Christian Democrats suffered a humiliating defeat in an election in Germany’s most populous state, North Rhine-Westphalia. It was the party’s worst result in the state since the Second World War. Ordinary Germans are starting to acknowledge that austerity isn’t working.
But Merkel won’t budge. She is a purveyor of the conventional wisdom which says that the economy is like a household that can’t borrow or spend more than it earns. But economies are not households – or credit cards! – and common sense tells us that the solution to a downturn caused by a prolonged drought in demand is not to reduce demand further (by slashing spending). History teaches us that the Great Depression wasn’t helped by Herbert Hoover’s cuts in the US and, in pre-war Germany, it was mass unemployment, not hyperinflation, that propelled Hitler to power in 1933.
Fiscal self-flagellation
In a study published in 2010, analysts at the International Monetary Fund found just two cases, out of 170 examples across 15 advanced economies between 1980 and 2009, in which cuts in government spending turned out to be expansionary for the economy overall. They concluded: “Fiscal consolidation typically has a contractionary effect on output.”
Merkel’s insistence on fiscal self-flagellation, her unwillingness to countenance any fiscal stimulus by Germany or an easy-money policy by the European Central Bank, have pushed depressed countries such as Greece further into depression. The recent announcement at the G20 summit in Mexico that Merkel may now be willing to allow eurozone institutions to buy up the debt of crisis-hit member countries is too little, too late.
This isn’t just about geopolitics or macroeconomics. Europe’s austerians have blood on their hands. Suicide rates are up by 40 per cent in Greece; the birthplace of western democracy is being remorselessly reduced to the status of a developing country. Meanwhile, Merkel, as the US economist Robert Kuttner wrote earlier this month, “continues to pursue Germany’s narrow self-interest . . . [because] Germany benefits from the rest of Europe’s suffering in two ways – expanded exports and dirt-cheap money”.
In denial and bent on austerity über alles, Merkel is destroying the European project, pauperising Germany’s neighbours and risking a new global depression.
She must be stopped.
Mehdi Hasan is the author of the ebook “The Debt Delusion” (Vintage Digital, £3.74). For the New Statesman's position on the Eurozone crisis, read our leader here.
Latest tweets
More from New Statesman
- Online writers:
- Steven Baxter
- Rowenna Davis
- David Allen Green
- Mehdi Hasan
- Nelson Jones
- Gavin Kelly
- Helen Lewis
- Laurie Penny
- The V Spot
- Alex Hern
- Martha Gill
- Alan White
- Samira Shackle
- Alex Andreou
- Nicky Woolf in America
- Bim Adewunmi
- Glosswitch
- Kate Mossman on pop
- Ryan Gilbey on Film
- Martin Robbins
- Rafael Behr
- Eleanor Margolis
- Tools and services:
- Polls
- Predictions
- Archive
- Magazine
- PDF edition
- RSS feeds
- Advertising
- Subscribe
- Special supplements
- Stockists


916 comments
She needs to be stopped, but with all due respect, I don't think you understand what you are talking about here.
1) She is not isolating Germany. She speaks for a group of self-righteous Northern European countries: the Netherlands, Austria, Finland, Belgium, Luxembourg, and - until recently - France.
2) She just doesn't care about Europe and has no time for European ideals, probably because the grew up on the other side of the Iron Curtain (no criticism intended, just a fact). Finance Minister Schaeuble is an old West German Europhile, and there is a big difference between the two. So all she cares about, really, is Germany. That's also electorally prudent. Her approval rates are at an all-time high, most Germans are happy with austerity elsewhere and don't want to pay for what they see as lazy, stupid Southern Europeans. North-Rhine Westphalia was an aberration caused by a weak candidate, a strong FDP and SPD and other domestic political issues such as nuclear energy. It had nothing to do with austerity.
3) German ordoliberal economic theory, to which her advisers, most of the German elite and the conservative commentariat adhere, provides a sound (as sound as any economic theory) theoretical underpinning to austerity, statism and the whole German way of thinking about the economy. The parable of the household is just a metaphor for public debate - or do you really think that a woman with a PhD in physics doesn't understand economics? Germany's current economic success, though it is little more than a bubble, vindicates the ordoliberals.
Nice Picture...:-) yes but this article is absolutly wrong! I never read so much shit in one article!
First how can you compare a democratically elected presidents as Benjamin Netanyahu with the dictators in North Kora or Iran.
Its a cheap anti-German rhetoric to say the germans are nazis because they can not defend against this...!
But you really think the crisis can be solved only if Germany pays enough money?
how can you say that Germany does not do anything against the crisis, although they have gone with more than 700 billion € to the risk?
No matter who caused the crisis. And no matter that also the germans have high debt and rapidly aging...it is always easiest way to blame them!
This is not only criticism of this article, it is critic on the general opinion in europe!
http://www.welt.de/politik/ausland/article108116472/Time-Magazine-vertei...
"First how can you compare a democratically elected presidents as Benjamin Netanyahu with the dictators in North Kora or Iran?"
Agreed. The Iranian and North Korean leaders haven't yet resorted to dropping napalm on hospitals, schools and UN food warehouses as the Israeli filth have, so they shouldn't be compared.
The CIA were always obsessed by the idea of a 'double agent' who could divert attention from the Soviets' real target and in the process bring down the West.
Any guesses?
Olga Klebb
The CIA were always obsessed by the idea of a 'double agent' who could divert attention from the Soviets' real target and in the process bring down the West.
Any guesses?
Olga Klebb
As an American living independently in Germany I have to completely disagree with this article. It is offensive, even to me, to place Merkel in the same "danger" tier as Hitler. She is nothing of his ilk and if anything is doing Germany and Europe a lot of good.
People must understand the German mentality. They are rule makers, yes but more importantly they follow these rules so it is only logical to me that Merkel look out for the EU in her fashion because that is one commitment the German government made to it's people and Europe. Is that so bad? Is Merkel calling for the genocide of a race and starting unprovoked foreign conflicts? No, this sounds more or less like the Americans and their #1 ally, Great Britain.
Like adults, these southern countries signed the bottom line on the contracts and so did Germany. They are to be held responsible by some entity and now the pity party comes out in parade because a regional power is demanding change in order to correct a problem. It is hit pieces such as this that misinform the public of a certain country or people and cause them to look away from their own problems.
Germany has treated me well, personally. It is a peaceful country with her problems but she has been through a lot. Some may call me a sympathizer these days, but I feel as if Germany is doing what is necessary to preserve her existence, no matter the outcome. It's people are not happy with the current affairs, however they continue to work for a better German future, which is something all countries could learn from these people.
By the way, hyperinflation was one of the top causes of Hitler's rise. This was an exacerbation of unemployment. High prices and no work meant people were starving. Trust me, no one is starving in South Europe unless they were starving before. It's all a staged show.
No one is starving? Think again! I am from Spain and volunteer at the Red Cross, we have university graduates coming to us for foodwith babies wrapped in newspapers because they cannot afford diapers. These people had a decent 9 to 7 job two years ago and now they have lost everything. In Spain we are not lazy, we worked really hard and now wonder where did all the money go. We do have a serious problem: our politicians. Nobody knows exactly how many they are but we know the system is flawed and we cannot get rid of them. They are leechers. Mariano Rajoy, for example has three salaries (one for being the president, another for being in Parliament, and yet another for owning a registry). We don't need money for the banks, we need help to get rid of our politicians.
That is factually incorrect. Germany was the first country to violate the 3% deficit rule, unlike Spain for example which did not violate it once in a decade but is now having trouble rolling over its public debt.
Furthermore contrary to popular belief it was Spain's large private debt levels, not public, which prompted the concerns which in turn led to increased borrowing costs. And the source of cheap money that led to southern Europe's private debt problem? Germany. Far from self-preservation, Germany lent herself into trouble by refusing to allow wages to grow in line with the rest of the economy and artificially raising exports to the rest of the Eurozone.
PS Much of the above applies to Greece, but I think Spain provides a clearer example because unlike Greece her national debt policy has been impeccable and thus debunks the austerity argument more neatly.
Today Germany is using fifths columns to infiltrate and systematically suppres any opposition in other countries on its way to world domination.This includes faking evidence to let people disappear in prison,cause them trouble and murder them.
My homepage gives information about the techniques being used today by German officials and snitchers.They are no longer fighting open battles because Germany failed twice. Today Germans are using all sort of dirty tricks if you dont collaborate with them.
Some of the murders by the German BND, the ex GESTAPO, known to the public:
Uwe Barschel (politician), Jürgen Möllemann (politician), Heiner Gehring (author), Martina Pflock (political activist), Tron (internet activist), Karl Koch (political/internet activist), Bernd Seiffert (human rights activist), Kirsten Heisig (author/judge), Fritz Bauer (persecutor of the Frankfurt Auschwitz processes), Markus Bott (human rights activist).
Google the names and check out my channel and homepage.
even if i don´t agree with mr. hassan, i have to say- great pic! angela never looked hotter! :)