Ed Miliband: the patriotism of a refugee
The Labour leader recalls how he imbibed Jewish history from his mother and father.
By Ed Miliband Published 23 May 2012
“The first Jewish leader of the Labour Party.” It says something about me and about Britain that I am rarely described as such.
I am not religious. But I am Jewish. My relationship with my Jewishness is complex. But whose isn’t?
My family history often feels distant and far away. Yet the pain of this history is such that I feel a duty to remember, understand and discuss it – a duty that grows, rather than diminishes, over time.
As children we were only dimly aware of it but we caught glimpses. When I was seven, my family went to visit my grandmother in Tel Aviv. Pointing at a black-and-white photograph, I demanded to know who was “that man in the picture”. I remember being taken swiftly out of the room and then being told quietly that he was my grandfather David, who had died in Poland long before I was born. It was only some years later that I realised my mum’s father had died in a concentration camp, murdered by the Nazis for being Jewish.
Intertwined heritage
Before she arrived in Britain in 1947, my mother had spent the war under an assumed name, being sheltered by heroic people who took her in.
My dad came here in 1940. He would happily talk about his time in the Royal Navy during the war but, for a man who could discuss almost anything, he generally steered clear of the events that brought him here.
As a 16-year-old he caught one of the last boats from Ostend to Britain. The family had decided, with German soldiers closing in, that Jewish men were most at risk, so his mother and sister were left behind. He did not see either of them again until after the war was over.
Like many others from Holocaust families, I have a paradoxical relationship with this history. On one level I feel intimately connected with it – this happened to my parents and grandparents. On another, it feels like a totally different world.
When I was in my late twenties, I went back to Poland with my mother to visit the town of Czestochowa, where she had spent so much of her childhood. As we left a house in which she once sheltered, a man pointed at us, shouting: “The Jews are coming to take back their property.” That was another glimpse of the world she had come from and an echo of the ancient hatreds that propelled my family to Britain 70 years ago.
So how can my Jewishness not be part of me? It defines how my family was treated. It explains why we came to Britain. I would not be leader of the Labour Party without the trauma of my family history.
For me, my Jewishness and my Britishness are intertwined. My parents defined themselves not by their Jewishness but by their politics. They assimilated into British life outside the Jewish community. There was no bar mitzvah, no Jewish youth group; sometimes I feel I missed out.
And yet, I did not miss out on many other aspects of Jewishness: my mum got me into Woody Allen; my dad taught me Yiddish phrases (there is no better language for idiomatic expressions, some of them unrepeatable). And my grandmother cooked me chicken soup and matzo balls.
Although my wife Justine is not Jewish, my Jewishness is part of me, so when we got married last year, we broke a glass at our wedding, an old Jewish ritual. I will explain our heritage and the connection to my boys. I will encourage them to identify with it and, when they have got past CBeebies, I will sit down and watch Woody Allen with them.
But what about being leader of the Labour Party? At an event organised recently by the Jewish charity Norwood, a member asked me whether being Jewish complicated my approach to Israel or the Middle East.
My answer was an emphatic “no”. I support a two-state solution because I long for the peace that both Palestinians and Israelis need so badly. And if that says something about me, it also says a lot about Britain that I know I will be judged not for my background but for what I believe.
I also get to do things as leader of the Labour Party which I might not have had the chance to do before. One night, I went to a dinner with Jonathan Sacks, the Chief Rabbi, where we sang a traditional prayer. I remember thinking my grandparents – their grandparents, too – would have said the same words.
A better place
I have seen the huge contribution the Jewish community makes to our national life, in business, in charities, in arts and culture. It is a strong and confident community, proud of its Jewishness and proud, too, of Britain.
In a way that I would never have realised when I was growing up, the patriotism of the Jewish community, the patriotism of the refugee, is something I now see existed in my dad, even though he might have denied it.
He preferred coming back to going on holiday. He revelled in the spirit he had seen in the navy. He was grateful to Britain for saving him from terror, for providing us with the security of a home.
Above all, what I see in so many parts of the Jewish community is a desire to leave the world a better place than you found it. Whatever people’s politics, that is so familiar from the upbringing my parents gave me.
I was not indoctrinated with Marxism. Nor was I brought up with religion. But I was given a sense that the world could be a better, fairer and different place. And we all have a duty in our own way and our own time to seek to make it so.
Ed Miliband is the MP for Doncaster North and leader of the Labour Party.
This article appears exclusively in print in the New Statesman special issue on the British Jewish experience. To read the full contents of the magazine - on newsstands from Thursday 24 May - click here. Single issue copies of the magazine can also be ordered online.
.jpg)
Latest tweets
More from New Statesman
- Online writers:
- Steven Baxter
- Rowenna Davis
- David Allen Green
- Mehdi Hasan
- Nelson Jones
- Gavin Kelly
- Helen Lewis
- Laurie Penny
- The V Spot
- Alex Hern
- Martha Gill
- Alan White
- Samira Shackle
- Alex Andreou
- Nicky Woolf in America
- Bim Adewunmi
- Glosswitch
- Kate Mossman on pop
- Ryan Gilbey on Film
- Martin Robbins
- Rafael Behr
- Eleanor Margolis
- Tools and services:
- Polls
- Predictions
- Archive
- Magazine
- PDF edition
- RSS feeds
- Advertising
- Subscribe
- Special supplements
- Stockists


34 comments
P.S.
You could at very least replaced Liam Byrne, for a start, if you were at all sincere and not a naked opportunist.
Your family suffered the evil, deadly brunt of demonisation and scapegoating simply for Jewish.
Yet, if your politics has been informed by this experience, how is it then that the vast majority of disabled people feel that far from opposing the "benefit-scrounging scum" narrative (that has seen an exponential increase in disabililty hate crime according to the police) you have, in fact, contributed to it with your "I met a man - he was on sickness benefit - but I knew he could work" statements and your "alarm-clock Britain" narrative that posits the idea that there exists an army of scroungers in Britain who would rather choose to lie in and live in abject poverty rather than go to work and have a life like everyone else.
The government's empirical evidence itself shows clearly that this is myth.
It was your party that introduced the DWP/AtoS 'Work Capability Assessment' which Britain's GPs voted for an end to with "immediate effect" last week. Yet your party remains unrepentant and unwilling to accept your wrongdoing and responsibility in bringing in fascist style "assessment" centres where sick and/or disabled peoples' grave illnesses are systematically and unlawfully denied and where their fundamental human rights are breached.
Sorry, Ed. I think it's a bit rich for you, of all people, to say that the experience of the Jewish people's suffering and persecution has informed your politics.
There are as many different kinds of Jews and Jewish opinions as there are Jewish people. Michael Howard and Michael Rifkind both hail from English and Scottish jewry and they are both Tories. Tony Greenstein is Jewish and anti-zionist. One room, two Jews and three opinions is a bit of a cliché but it's a good one.
All I am saying is - leave it out. To too many disabled people who are currently experiencing what can rightly be described as a modern-day pogrom, your words ring hollow, and that's putting it very mildly.
Think about it.
I couldn't care less if Ed Miliband is Jewish or the son of a refugee or not. The fact that he is the son of a Marxist is more important. That he is an immature, upper-middle-class socialist, student-union hack makes it revolting and perverse to see him call himself a "patriot". Student Grants like him always put their own country last.
Woody Allen, give me a break. To Jews who are actually Jews, and care about it. And don't see Israel has the center of satanic evil, ( which seems to be the prevailing view in merry old England, the England of the white paper and Bevin ) This guy is kind of nauseating.
Yes, because every British government is always bending over backwards to criticise Israel and take the Palestinians' part, isn't it?
Sure, England, or should I say Englandstan abounds with Pro-Jewish sentiment. Witness them bending over for the Libyans at every opportunity.
Woody Allen, give me a break. To Jews who are actually Jews, and care about it. And don't see Israel has the center of satanic evil, ( which seems to be the prevailing view in merry old England, the England of the white paper and Bevin ) This guy is kind of nauseating.
Woody Allen, give me a break. To Jews who are actually Jews, and care about it. And don't see Israel has the center of satanic evil, ( which seems to be the prevailing view in merry old England, the England of the white paper and Bevin ) This guy is kind of nauseating.
What if Milliband had a Palestinian background? Would people still vote for him as Prime Minister?
While everyone's entitled to their opinion, it's frankly kind of sad that you even have to have this.
NS says that Galloway is now a Muslim MP. He gets endless questions and lots of people have a go at him. He politely tries to say, it's a private matter. However, the MSM Hype Machine won't let it die.
How Milliband deals with being Jewish is up to him. But also, how come nobody's giving him the third degree on this? Is this an early Labour piece to position himself as the next Prime Minister? Is he trying to tap into Obamamania (Obama's the first black President. Milliband will be the first Jewish Prime Minister)? Romney might be the first Mormon President. So we'd better deal with the religious issue now?
Or maybe it's because if you do ask questions about this you'll be called "anti-semetic"?