You're all suspects now . . .

Now that the US is at permanent war with the rest of the world, we are all in the firing line. So wh

Home Secretary Theresa May
Home Secretary Theresa May: planning to snoop on your emails. Photo: Getty Images

You are all potential terrorists. It matters not that you live in Britain, the United States, Australia or the Middle East. Citizenship is effectively abolished. Turn on your computer and the US department of homeland security’s national operations centre may monitor whether you are typing not merely “al-Qaeda” but “exercise”, “drill”, “wave”, “initiative” or “organisation”: all proscribed words. The British government’s announcement that it intends to spy on every email and phone call is old hat. The satellite vacuum cleaner known as Echelon has been doing this for years. What has changed is that a state of permanent war has been launched by the US and a police state that is consuming western democracy.

What are you going to do about it?

Through the looking glass

In Britain, on instructions from the CIA, secret courts are to deal with “terror suspects”. Hab­eas corpus is dying. The European Court of Human Rights has ruled that five men, including three British citizens, can be extradited to the US even though just one of them has been charged with a crime. All have been imprisoned for years under the 2003 US/UK Extradition Treaty, which was signed a month after the criminal invasion of Iraq.

The European Court had condemned the treaty as likely to lead to “cruel and unusual punishment”. One of the men, Babar Ahmad, was awarded £63,000 compensation for 73 recorded injuries he sustained in the custody of the Metropolitan Police. Sexual abuse, the signature of fascism, was high on the list. Another man is a schizophrenic who has suffered a complete mental collapse and is in Broadmoor secure hospital; another is a suicide
risk. To the Land of the Free, they go – along with young Richard O’Dwyer, who faces ten years in shackles and an orange jumpsuit because he allegedly infringed US copyright on the internet.

As the law is politicised and Americanised, these travesties are not untypical. In upholding the conviction of a London university student, Mohammed Gul, for disseminating “terrorism” on the internet, Appeal Court judges in London ruled that “acts . . . against the armed forces of a state anywhere in the world which sought to influence a government and were made for political purposes” were now crimes. Call to the dock Thomas Paine, Aung San Suu Kyi, Nelson Mandela.

What are you going to do about it?

The prognosis is clear: the malignancy that Norman Mailer called “pre-fascist” has metastasised. The US attorney general, Eric Holder, defends the “right” of his government to assassinate US citizens. Israel, the protégé, is allowed to aim its nukes at nukeless Iran. In this looking-glass world, the lying is panoramic. The massacre of 17 Afghan civilians on 11 March, including at least nine children and four women, is attributed to a “rogue” US soldier. The “authenticity” of this is vouched by President Obama, who had “seen a video” and regards it as “conclusive proof”. An independent Afghan parliamentary investigation produces eyewitnesses who give detailed evidence of as many as 20 soldiers, aided by a helicopter, ravaging their villages, killing and raping: a standard, if marginally more murderous, US special forces “night raid”.

Take away the video game technology of kill­ing – America’s contribution to modernity – and the behaviour is traditional. Immersed in comic-book righteousness, poorly or brutally trained, frequently racist, obese and led by a corrupt officer class, US forces transfer the homicide of home to faraway places whose impoverished struggles they cannot comprehend. A nation founded on the genocide of the native population never quite kicks the habit. Vietnam was “Indian country” and its “slits” and “gooks” were to be “blown away”.

The blowing away of hundreds of mostly women and children in the Vietnamese village of My Lai in 1968 was also a “rogue” incident and, profanely, an “American tragedy” (the cover headline of Newsweek). Only one of 26 men prosecuted was convicted and he was let go by Richard Nixon. My Lai is in Quang Ngai Province where, as I learned as a reporter, an estimated 50,000 people were killed by US troops, mostly in what they called “free-fire zones”. This was the model of modern warfare: industrial murder.

Like Iraq and Libya, Afghanistan is a theme park for the beneficiaries of America’s new permanent war: Nato, the armaments and hi-tech companies, the media and a “security” industry whose lucrative contamination is a contagion on everyday life. The conquest or “paci­fication” of territory is unimportant. What matters is the pacification of you, the cultivation of your indifference.

What are you going to do about it?

True mates

The descent into totalitarianism has landmarks. Any day now, the Supreme Court in London will decide whether the WikiLeaks editor, Julian Assange, is to be extradited to Sweden. Should this final appeal fail, the facilitator of truth-telling on an epic scale, who is charged with no crime, faces solitary confinement and interrogation on ludicrous sex al­legations. Thanks to a secret deal between the US and Sweden, he can be “rendered” to the American gulag at any time.

In his own country, Australia, Prime Minister Julia Gillard has conspired with those in Washington she calls her “true mates” to ensure that her innocent fellow citizen is fitted for his orange jumpsuit just in case he should make it home. In February, her government wrote a “WikiLeaks amendment” to the extradition treaty between Australia and the US that makes it easier for her “mates” to get their hands on him. She has even given them the power of approval over Freedom of Information searches – so that the world outside can be lied to, as is customary.

What are you going to do about it?

30 comments

Ciaran Goggins's picture

The thing is, Al Que'da are not going to say on a mobile call "The explosives are at Khalil's place, see you later". So Echelon is going to get Yvonne's kinky phone call to her boyfriend. Look at the Civil Contingencies Act. Recent legislation has eroded freedom in the U.K. The DHS has my fingerprints because I was in transit at Newark "Liberty" Airport. That is the price one pays.

pilger hater's picture

What I'm gonna do is petrol bomb Pilger's nice house cos he is an apologist for Islamofascists: he lives at Hambalt Rd Clapham London SW

birtsampson 's picture

You're a sick fuck and comments like yours shouldn't be allowed on here

Mrs.Josephine Hyde-Hartley's picture

I should say we need to think of some good words to describe the current arrangements most objectively and then cast them on the proverbial waters.. What about eg predatory?

Some new words and a more hopeful narrative will help people build or even bring together, rapprochement style ( a la new French Pres.?), a more effective dialogue that might just affect real change, effectively.

I also think somebody should tell the POlice they shouldn't really be taking any notice of " blacklists", " "redlists/flags" or any other databases without proper regulation eg do these have a proper public interests, do these discriminate and /or are such lists more trouble than they are worth.

Personally, I think "constructive tension" is another positively diverse term mentioned recently by our outgoing CEO of the FSA - you know, instead of "aggressive protectionism".

New Stateswoman's picture

While the silent majority get on with their lives as best as they can, there seems to be a large number of manipulators set to undermine the confidence of the masses. I'm not talking about the terrorists organisations or presidents or prime ministers who make the decision to go to war, although they are part of it, but people in power who have become obsessed with holding their positions, no matter what, and are prepared to go to extreme dirty business, sometimes on a massive scale, to do so.
Those who are in a position to fight back are few, and there is the danger that they get paranoid with the evidence, and try to take extreme measures to counteract the dangers. It may lead to them getting their fingers burnt, or in the case of Theresa May, possible loss of position, as the masses remind her that democracy and freedom of the individual still means something, at least in this country. There's only so much people can take, without revolt. I think people would prefer to carry on regardless, and deal with criminality as and when it rears it's ugly head, as we've always done, and not be treated as children.

Fergus Pickering's picture

Start a revolution. Oh come. You lot couldn't start a car.

mbrecker's picture

First, Assange having the nerve to compare his case to the Madeline McCann one (and to trash everyone who wants a new 9/11 Investigation) didn't exactly help his cause. Now, if you dare to criticize him on other blogs(ex. Daniel Ellsberg's), you get censored. This from the "Champion for Free Speech"?

Having said that, what's more important than actual facts is celeb hype. Sarkozy is "Bling Bling". The new President is "Normal". The right wing still say lots of racist garbage about Obama. Back in the Reagan Era, it was "subtle" racism. Now, f**k that. It's all out in the open. What percentage of comments posted about Pilger are the same old "let's have a go at him" rubbish? Maybe 95%.

Now, to whoever's monitoring this:
Al Quaeda
drill
exercise
wave
initiative
organization
Obama is a war criminal
Afghanistan is an illegal and immoral war

anon3's picture

Good stuff, makes me want to go into politics. But surely I'm not the answer, we all are. What's the answer, I suppose my money is on the internet.

Fergus Pickering's picture

Good God, Pilger, are you still here. I thought you had passed away with the Brown debacle, but you obviously can't keep a good man down. It's deja vu all over again.

Philip Lee's picture

"You're all suspects now..." The refrain "What are you going to do about it?" goes unanswered in this highly provocative article. What can we do about it? That is not intended as defeatist rhetoric. Protest? Occupy? Start a a revolution? More investigative journalism? Political apathy and fear support this war on democratic values in which there are fewer and fewer voices of reason.

Latest tweets