You're all suspects now . . .

Now that the US is at permanent war with the rest of the world, we are all in the firing line. So wh

Home Secretary Theresa May
Home Secretary Theresa May: planning to snoop on your emails. Photo: Getty Images

You are all potential terrorists. It matters not that you live in Britain, the United States, Australia or the Middle East. Citizenship is effectively abolished. Turn on your computer and the US department of homeland security’s national operations centre may monitor whether you are typing not merely “al-Qaeda” but “exercise”, “drill”, “wave”, “initiative” or “organisation”: all proscribed words. The British government’s announcement that it intends to spy on every email and phone call is old hat. The satellite vacuum cleaner known as Echelon has been doing this for years. What has changed is that a state of permanent war has been launched by the US and a police state that is consuming western democracy.

What are you going to do about it?

Through the looking glass

In Britain, on instructions from the CIA, secret courts are to deal with “terror suspects”. Hab­eas corpus is dying. The European Court of Human Rights has ruled that five men, including three British citizens, can be extradited to the US even though just one of them has been charged with a crime. All have been imprisoned for years under the 2003 US/UK Extradition Treaty, which was signed a month after the criminal invasion of Iraq.

The European Court had condemned the treaty as likely to lead to “cruel and unusual punishment”. One of the men, Babar Ahmad, was awarded £63,000 compensation for 73 recorded injuries he sustained in the custody of the Metropolitan Police. Sexual abuse, the signature of fascism, was high on the list. Another man is a schizophrenic who has suffered a complete mental collapse and is in Broadmoor secure hospital; another is a suicide
risk. To the Land of the Free, they go – along with young Richard O’Dwyer, who faces ten years in shackles and an orange jumpsuit because he allegedly infringed US copyright on the internet.

As the law is politicised and Americanised, these travesties are not untypical. In upholding the conviction of a London university student, Mohammed Gul, for disseminating “terrorism” on the internet, Appeal Court judges in London ruled that “acts . . . against the armed forces of a state anywhere in the world which sought to influence a government and were made for political purposes” were now crimes. Call to the dock Thomas Paine, Aung San Suu Kyi, Nelson Mandela.

What are you going to do about it?

The prognosis is clear: the malignancy that Norman Mailer called “pre-fascist” has metastasised. The US attorney general, Eric Holder, defends the “right” of his government to assassinate US citizens. Israel, the protégé, is allowed to aim its nukes at nukeless Iran. In this looking-glass world, the lying is panoramic. The massacre of 17 Afghan civilians on 11 March, including at least nine children and four women, is attributed to a “rogue” US soldier. The “authenticity” of this is vouched by President Obama, who had “seen a video” and regards it as “conclusive proof”. An independent Afghan parliamentary investigation produces eyewitnesses who give detailed evidence of as many as 20 soldiers, aided by a helicopter, ravaging their villages, killing and raping: a standard, if marginally more murderous, US special forces “night raid”.

Take away the video game technology of kill­ing – America’s contribution to modernity – and the behaviour is traditional. Immersed in comic-book righteousness, poorly or brutally trained, frequently racist, obese and led by a corrupt officer class, US forces transfer the homicide of home to faraway places whose impoverished struggles they cannot comprehend. A nation founded on the genocide of the native population never quite kicks the habit. Vietnam was “Indian country” and its “slits” and “gooks” were to be “blown away”.

The blowing away of hundreds of mostly women and children in the Vietnamese village of My Lai in 1968 was also a “rogue” incident and, profanely, an “American tragedy” (the cover headline of Newsweek). Only one of 26 men prosecuted was convicted and he was let go by Richard Nixon. My Lai is in Quang Ngai Province where, as I learned as a reporter, an estimated 50,000 people were killed by US troops, mostly in what they called “free-fire zones”. This was the model of modern warfare: industrial murder.

Like Iraq and Libya, Afghanistan is a theme park for the beneficiaries of America’s new permanent war: Nato, the armaments and hi-tech companies, the media and a “security” industry whose lucrative contamination is a contagion on everyday life. The conquest or “paci­fication” of territory is unimportant. What matters is the pacification of you, the cultivation of your indifference.

What are you going to do about it?

True mates

The descent into totalitarianism has landmarks. Any day now, the Supreme Court in London will decide whether the WikiLeaks editor, Julian Assange, is to be extradited to Sweden. Should this final appeal fail, the facilitator of truth-telling on an epic scale, who is charged with no crime, faces solitary confinement and interrogation on ludicrous sex al­legations. Thanks to a secret deal between the US and Sweden, he can be “rendered” to the American gulag at any time.

In his own country, Australia, Prime Minister Julia Gillard has conspired with those in Washington she calls her “true mates” to ensure that her innocent fellow citizen is fitted for his orange jumpsuit just in case he should make it home. In February, her government wrote a “WikiLeaks amendment” to the extradition treaty between Australia and the US that makes it easier for her “mates” to get their hands on him. She has even given them the power of approval over Freedom of Information searches – so that the world outside can be lied to, as is customary.

What are you going to do about it?

30 comments

Bill23's picture

No reply from Dirkwalls. Pity, I wanted to explain how the word colleagues in the police force, in it's effect, creates the "biggest gang in town".
The fact is the police don't even have the respect of the President: when he invited that thug officer an professor to the While House, that was two professors and an uneducated officer shooting the breeze, in a clear and necessary attempt to belittle the ignoramus.

Barrie J's picture

'Pilger Hater', Remember this:

"Paul Chambers made the comment on January 6 after snowfall threatened to delay his plans to travel to Ireland on January 15.
"Robin Hood airport is closed," he wrote. "You've got a week and a bit to get your shit together, otherwise I'm blowing the airport sky high!!"
But while most of his friends enjoyed the joke, someone clearly didn't and alerted the police, who arrived on Mr Chambers' doorstep on January 13.
"My first thought upon hearing it was the police was that perhaps a member of my family had been in an accident," 26-year-old Mr Chambers told The Independent".
"Then they said I was being arrested under the Terrorism Act".

I'd get a bag packed ready for a time away from home, you might get a 'knock' anytime soon.

dirkwalls's picture

Great article, reading some of these comments is depressing though, but they're jut trolls

Bill23's picture

No we are not "jut trolls".
People have short memories; teachers wouldn't give any responsibilities to the stupid lad who goes around bulling people, (and these are the slobs who became officers) so what difference does a blue uniform make. If these people want respect they should have tried harder in school; officer Dirkwalls.

Bill23's picture

Although it's the sickest form of perversion, its not unknown for the police to create a problem which they can then pretend to solve. Anybody who thinks the police will not look at email content (which they will undoubtedly misunderstand or worse, twist to their own ends) doesn't understand technology or the police.

shaun ryder's picture

thought crimes coming soon. government sponsored scientists will come up with some new evidence of how they can map the brain and identify terrorists by their very thoughts and when that happens and they start taking your kids away dont start blubbering and pleading for clemency.

we must be the weakest and most stupid population in history for what we believe and how we actually stand for the BS

willoyen's picture

they already do - read thoughts, that is. Some of the latest CCTV cameras monitor your thoughts and eye-movements. Anything shifty, or untoward, like glancing at a boy or girl under 16 and a half, and you're straight on to the sex offenders' register; any unaccountable impulsive movement, and you're a terrorist.
So what are you going to do about it?

pilger hater's picture

THE PROPHET MOHAMMED HAD ANAL SEX WITH CAMELS. BURN EVERY MOSQUE IN EUROPE.

John Cheese's picture

Sour grapes. Wonder why the US hasn't taken over Egypt, Libya, Syria and/or Yemen?? Oh yeah, that wouldn't fit the article's spin. Privacy vs. security- how to balance it?? Take notes in London this summer. Jihad is another group "at war with the world". At least the US wears uniforms...

Bill23's picture

Putting information like this in the hands of the police will be a disaster for everybody Look at Manchester police today, we have them condemning organised sex gangs (quite rightly) at the "highest level", but who do they think they are. Does the chief mean the Pope; no they are all nonces. Could he have meant the police; no, almost without exception the police were cocks and bullies of the school - never prefects. Maybe he was talking about police chiefs; no, they have never been known to apologise to anybody when mistakes are made, so no moral high ground there. It's as if they were trying to purge their inner demons, just like catholic priests. Aren't these people payed enough, every time they do something they want a meddle just for doing their job.

Latest tweets