Yes, but it might not buy you a good policy.
“The Bank has put in place extensive contingency plans.”
In short: no. And agricultural subsidies, development funding for poorer areas and scientific research wouldn’t disappear in the event of Brexit, so the UK government would still bear those costs.
Labour needs to focus on the economic cost of Brexit, not make promises they can't keep.
The Brexit proposal springs from panic and would certainly be terrible news for Britain’s economy – but it carries a threat even greater than that.
Either you accept the costs of Brexit and absolute border control or you find a way to win support for immigration. It's not hard.
The benefits of growth are more unfairly distributed than ever, says Neil James.
Andrew Harrop plots a path from here to there.
I believe we are in a position not dissimilar to Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid: do we jump and hope it doesn’t kill us, or stay put and hope to dodge the bullets.
For a second time, this prize - a collaboration between the New Statesman and Sheffield University - will recognise the most exciting scholarship in the field of political economy.
Financiers Greybull Capital have promised to resurrect the name “British Steel” in their takeover of parts of Tata Steel UK. What does this mean for the golden age of British industrial design?
For the best analysis of the 8th of June General Election, subscribe today.
Be well informed. Be a New Statesman reader