Show Hide image Feminism 9 July 2015 Government cries "common sense" as it refuses to debate Budget plan that could require women to prove rape Leader of the House Chris Grayling has dismissed MPs' calls to set aside time to debate what has been described as an "incredibly distasteful" policy. Print HTML Following George Osborne's Budget announcements about limiting benefits and tax credits to two children, the SNP MP Alison Thewliss noticed a proposal that made her "utterly furious". It is the idea that women who have had a third child from having been raped will have to inform the government (DWP or HMRC) so as to avoid losing their benefits and tax credits for that child. I am utterly furious that Tories will make women who've had a child after being raped justify that for tax credits. pic.twitter.com/Ai4SKBOHaQ — Alison Thewliss (@alisonthewliss) July 8, 2015 According to Thewliss, this is tantamount to rape victims having to "justify" having a third child and prove to the government that they have been raped. Here is the offending passage from the Summer Budget document: Click to enlarge. The problem here is that, although the government is claiming "protections" for women who have had a third child through rape, the onus is on the woman to claim this circumstance in order to avoid being hit by the benefits and tax credits cuts. This would put women in the distressing position of having to tell the authorities about having been raped, and would also introduce another level of potentially damaging intrusion from government departments into the lives of welfare claimants. As quoted in the Guardian, the Women Against Rape campaigner Lisa Longstaff highlights this: Asking women to disclose very difficult information and expecting them to be able to prove it – in what is frankly a very hostile environment when the DWP is trying to take your money away – will have appalling consequences. Thewliss' colleague, Kirsten Oswald MP, brought this up during Commons Business Questions (watch from 39.20), the day following the Budget. She challenged the government to set time aside for a debate on the “incredibly distasteful” proposal. Chris Grayling, Leader of the House of Commons, dismissed her call for a debate, saying the policy would be carried out sensitively. Here is the full exchange: Kirsten Oswald: Can I ask the Leader of the House for a debate in government time on the incredibly distasteful statement in yesterday's Budget, which will mean that a woman who has a third child as a result of rape will need to prove this to DWP in order to be eligible for tax credits? Chris Grayling: This is an issue she has the opportunity to raise in the Budget debate. The Chancellor was very clear yesterday that this provision will be designed in a way to handle difficult cases in the most sensitive possible way. But she must also understand the necessity of putting in place a system of welfare that is grounded in common sense, that is designed to help people back into the workplace, and she will know that there have been many, many examples of people with very large families who are absolutely overt in their statements that they have had large families in order to take advantage of the welfare system. That shouldn't happen; we want those people to have fulfilling lives in work as well as in their families. Afterwards, Oswald was "appalled" by Grayling's response to her proposal to debate what she describes as a "disgraceful plan". › India's Second World War: the history you don't hear about Anoosh Chakelian is deputy web editor at the New Statesman. Subscribe More Related articles How Labour risks becoming a party without a country PMQs review: George Osborne is improving but Angela Eagle gives Labour MPs cause for cheer "She wore a USB cord instead of a necklace": whatever happened to Cyberfeminism?