If you're desperate to torture Nadine Dorries on TV, what does that say about you?
Why we should feel sorry for the Conservative MP.
By Caron Lindsay Published 12 November 2012 11:42
Feeling sorry for Nadine Dorries is not going to be popular view, but I suspect the next week is going to showcase some not very attractive facets of the mob mentality that sometimes arises around these reality TV shows. Almost 10 years ago, Channel 4 had to get in extra security when Adele left Big Brother. Why? Because people thought that she had been a bit two-faced and there was such over-the-top hatred towards her, fuelled by the tabloid press.Then the same papers fuelled hatred towards Jade Goody by depicting her as a pig, starting off the rollercoaster that saw them make her, break her and finally raise her to virtual sainthood before her premature death from cancer in 2009.
I do watch I'm a Celebrity. It can be quite compelling. It actually changed my opinion of Liberal Democrat Brian Paddick. His series was a classic, though, with George Takei, Martina Navratilova and Esther Rantzen providing much amusement and quality banter. Brian was not in my good books because he'd criticised his 2008 London mayoral campaign team, led by my friend Andrew Reeves, in the press. He later learned his lesson, recognised that he had been a bit of a diva and went on to fight a very good campaign in the same role this year. However, in 2008, I have to admit, not to my credit, that a huge motivation for tuning in was to see him get covered in beasties and eat unmentionables.
Now, there comes a point, though, if a person is showing real distress, that enjoying their discomfort goes from being not very nice to inappropriate or even unacceptable. In the first week, viewers can choose who does the bush tucker trials, where a celebrity goes through an extremely unpleasant experience, usually involving bugs and beasties, to earn meals for everyone else. The viewers inevitably choose the people who are most scared. Last year it was Sinitta, or occasionally Antony Cotton. It's been Jordan and Gillian McKeith in the past. If someone has had to have oxygen because they are so scared, then it would never occur to me to pick up the phone to put them through it again. There comes a time when, however much they're being paid, however self-inflicted it all is, putting them through actual suffering is not nice.
I think we can guess who'll be voted to do all the trials this week. Nadine Dorries, the controversial Tory MP who's abandoned her constituents so she can lecture us all about abortion from around the camp fire, has, in my view, no redeeming features. The one bad consequence of the Liberal Democrats voting against the boundary changes is that her constituency will remain in existence. She has therefore had a pretty major reward for her bad behaviour in voting against Lords reform.
In my view, Nadine should not have agreed to take part in this programme. For an MP to be out of the country and uncontactable for three weeks purely to take part in a TV show is not on. There are obviously times when MPs have to take extended spells out of Westminster. They're human beings and subject to the same crises in terms of illness or caring for sick relatives that we all go through and we'd take time off for. People have sympathy with that. They are less likely to understand an indulgent ego trip, done without consulting anyone, which will benefit nobody but Nadine. I'm sure she sees a future for herself as a Christine Hamilton type, rehabilitated by reality TV almost to national treasure status. Well, that worked so well for Lembit when he did it after losing his seat in 2010. And as Chief Whip Alistair Carmichael pointed out in his inimitable style this week:
If Nadine struggles in the jungle, I won't be wasting too much of my energy feeling sorry for her, but I don't think it is to anyone's credit if they take pleasure in actual suffering of another human being, no matter how self indulgent, self inflicted or insignificant in the scheme of things it is.
I am maybe being a bit soft here - but then I can't imagine that, had I lived in an earlier time, that I'd have had much truck with throwing things at people who'd been put in the stocks. These reality shows can sometimes be the modern day equivalent.
Caron Lindsay is a Lib Dem activist and blogger. This post originally appeared on her blog here. You can find her on Twitter as @caronmlindsay
Latest tweets
More from New Statesman
- Online writers:
- Steven Baxter
- Rowenna Davis
- David Allen Green
- Mehdi Hasan
- Nelson Jones
- Gavin Kelly
- Helen Lewis
- Laurie Penny
- The V Spot
- Alex Hern
- Martha Gill
- Alan White
- Samira Shackle
- Alex Andreou
- Nicky Woolf in America
- Bim Adewunmi
- Glosswitch
- Kate Mossman on pop
- Ryan Gilbey on Film
- Martin Robbins
- Rafael Behr
- Eleanor Margolis
- Tools and services:
- Polls
- Predictions
- Archive
- Magazine
- PDF edition
- RSS feeds
- Advertising
- Subscribe
- Special supplements
- Stockists





















8 comments
You appear to have departed from reality.
Nadine is not being forced to do anything, she's choosing to eat a kangaroos a-hole, or whatever, so she can get her mug on TV for a few hours.
Only a Lib Dem could miss the point so spectacularly x2
There is no point to this ridiculas article you fool. Oh pick on the bankers and the thief from the public purse and this makes you a bully. Ohhhh please don't I'm filling up, I know that she's doing it for the love of the people she represents, what a wonderful human being who says it how it is. Yes and her tory friends call her a rebel because she often doesn't do as she's told and she knows the plight and suffering of the disabled and poor. Yes, I've missed the point completly, now what does this say about me? I'm mrs bad, I stole from the public purse, I drool at the sight of money for nothing culture.
It's thinkers like you and the author that makes todays society what it is...........fool.
There is no point to this ridiculas article you fool. Oh pick on the bankers and the thief from the public purse and this makes you a bully. Ohhhh please don't I'm filling up, I know that she's doing it for the love of the people she represents, what a wonderful human being who says it how it is. Yes and her tory friends call her a rebel because she often doesn't do as she's told and she knows the plight and suffering of the disabled and poor. Yes, I've missed the point completly, now what does this say about me? I'm mrs bad, I stole from the public purse, I drool at the sight of money for nothing culture.
It's thinkers like you and the author that makes todays society what it is...........fool.
So she didn't do it for the money regardless of being paid aswell as an MP, and it would be terrible for her to eat grubs and other nasties? Hmmmm.
I agree with the author and will vote to keep the woman where she wants to be while being paid. I think that I'll get my monies worth.
Only a Lib Dem could miss the point so spectacularly.
So she has gone on a show!! WOW, loads of people jumping on the bandwagon, well I like the woman YES she is silly BUT no crook, the MP's I have a problem with is the one's connected to, and getting paid by, health care companies, MP's claiming crazy amounts in expenses, we have lords ! Turning up and falling straight to sleep and getting paid, and that's if they turn up, get real people, there are far worse mp's in the big house. She say's it as it is, right or wrong, to me that's better than the other lying bunch.
Ah yes, says it as it is...
"My blog is 70% fiction and 30% fact. It is written as a tool to enable my constituents to know me better and to reassure them of my commitment to Mid Bedfordshire. I rely heavily on poetic licence and frequently replace one place name/event/fact with another." - Nadine Dorries
Not like one of those dodgy MPs just in it for the money...
"...she had claimed around £10,000 for an annual report in 2007 on her performance as an MP, but that her former Commons researcher had never seen the report or worked on it. Dorries insisted that she had indeed published the report, placing a photograph of it on her blog. She subsequently told the Biggleswade Advertiser that the report was never printed and a credit note issued with refund on September 13, 2008"