Return to: Home | Politics

Give them shelter

Harriet Grant and Rachel Stevenson

Published 16 October 2008

Christians are defying the law to help asylum-seekers

Give them shelter

In every major city, Christians of all deno minations - Anglicans, Catholics, Methodists and Quakers - are going to great lengths to support asylum-seekers threatened with deportation.

When asylum-seekers come to the end of the application process and have exhausted all appeals, their benefits are stopped, they lose their accommodation and they are told to accept a free flight home or face being forcibly removed.

But thousands stay, afraid or unwilling to return to their home countries. Faced with overwhelming numbers of destitute asylum-seekers in their parishes, churches have responded by creating an informal support network that stretches across Britain.

The role of the church as a force for social justice is not one that gets much attention these days and it is often perceived as out of touch with issues that concern modern Britain. But, under the radar of the public eye, churches and Christian groups are becoming increasingly involved in subversive activities over asylum, one of the most controversial issues in politics.

Some church groups have bought up houses in which refused asylum-seekers may live rent-free after they have been evicted. For example, in Manchester, the Boaz Trust, a Christian charity for asylum-seekers, has eight houses, some donated by church members, which are specifically used as long-term accommodation for those the Home Office has refused leave to stay in Britain.

In other towns, disused presbyteries and vicarages are housing those the government says have no right to be here. Some churches are simply opening up at night, letting people sleep on the floor of their church hall.

In Sheffield, hundreds of destitute asylum-seekers go once a week to the Methodist Victoria Hall in the centre of town, where volunteers swap their supermarket vouchers for cash, and hand out bus tickets and bags of food to get the asylum-seekers through the week. Similar drop-ins are being established in churches in every major city in the country.

Notre Dame de France Church in London's Leicester Square is a vital source of support for many Africans who have been refused asylum but still do not want to return to trouble spots in countries such as Congo or Ethiopia. Only yards from the hordes of tourists and ticket touts, the church offers a comforting chat with a priest and a meal. Many who go there are homeless, sleeping rough or on friends' floors.

Drop-in centres and "safe" houses add up to a subversive network, helping families to stay in Britain against the wishes of the government. The church networks are raising considerable sums for this work, often via the collection plate, passed from pew to pew during services. In Liverpool, the Catholic diocese currently gives the local asylum group Asylum Link every penny it receives from collections during Lent - some £25,000 a year.

Around the country hundreds of thousands of pounds are being raised to support people the government says have no right to refugee status. Giving alms and shelter to the needy is a central tenet of almost all organised religions, but questions are being raised as to whether the churches should be taking such a strong line over what is essentially a political issue.

The Home Office argues that all asylum cases are dealt with fairly and humanely, and that those who "play by the rules" will not become destitute. Those turned down have had a fair chance to prove they are in danger and now must leave, says the Home Office.

However, one senior Anglican bishop believes that, as more church members become involved in challenging the government's asylum policy, churches could find themselves on a collision course with the Home Office.

"Christians know there might come a time when they have to put the law of God above the civil laws of the society they live in," says John Packer, Bishop of Ripon and Leeds.

The bishop believes that the procedures governing the treatment of asylum-seekers are inhumane, and says that Christians are prepared to challenge asylum policy head-on. It is fundamental to the Christian faith to speak out when it believes government policy is denying people basic human rights, he argues.

Just over the road from the Houses of Parliament, Nicholas Sagovsky, Canon of Westminster Abbey, takes a similar position. "We must be in a critical dialogue with public servants who operate in ways that need public criticism," he told us.

Anger at the asylum system is uniting high-ranking clergy, local lay preachers and ordinary churchgoers as well as denominations across the Christian spectrum, from Quakers and Catholics to Anglicans and Evangelicals.

As he drops off tins of soup and packets of spaghetti to one of the small terraced houses in Manchester in which four refused asylum-seekers are living, Dave Smith, who runs the Boaz Trust, describes the trust's determination to expand the operation and step up levels of support.

"We are linking up with groups in more and more cities across Britain, which all want to do similar things to what we're doing here. We want to get more houses on board so we can help more people - we are going to flood the nation with this."

The work of these church groups may already be starting to have an impact within government. The Home Office has said that it plans to launch a consultation on support for refused asylum-seekers shortly.

Harriet Grant and Rachel Stevenson's film on the work of churches supporting asylum-seekers can be seen on More4 News at 8pm on Friday 17 October

Post this article to

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • newsvine
  • Reddit

15 comments from readers

maliksohaib
16 October 2008 at 16:25

I am a muslim and never been to church before but i can imagine that they must be a home of Jesus where people get shelter . Hats Off too all who are working on this critical issue and it feels great to see this example of humanity and unity. I wish if our bishops and fathers were running our country istead of these greedy ministers. Atleast we would be looking God's rules in here instead of man made stupidity.

sweety
17 October 2008 at 03:21

Jolly good and I am sure Jesus loves you very much.

The only problem is that if people circumvent our laws with their narrow aims no matter how justified, it gives other people the excuse to use extra means to carry out their beliefs. Enter all the troubled spots in the world today!

icthus
17 October 2008 at 13:49

To sweetie: Yes, Jesus loves me, and by His example He teaches me to protect the oppressed and the destitute. This is not a "narrow aim".The government circumvents the law by returning refugees in handcuffs to their country of origin if they fail a grossly unfair asylum process, and starves the rest into submission by withdrawing benefits and denying them the right to work. All that is necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing...

Ewan
17 October 2008 at 17:22

The effects of destitution are horrific - if you've never met anyone in this situation it's difficult to imagine the despair and desperation it brings. When an Asylum Seeker is refused, all support and housing, along with permission to work if people are lucky enough to get it, are terminated. Then after 21 days they are simply turfed out of their accommodation.

When this happens, the Home Office loose all track of them and they effectively disappear. Administratively this is maddness and from a humanitarian standpoint it is a disaster. Once you have left the system there is virtually no way back in. In 3 years of working with over 4 hundred destitute people, we only know of 8 who went back voluntarily.

On offer was a £3000 re-integration package, replacement travel documentation and free flights. In some countries that is a significant amount of help and I was surprised more people did not accept it, until you realise that they are still terrified of return home despite our Government telling them it's ok. They would rather be on the street here than at risk in their home country.

Our goal is not just to assist refused asylum seekers but to get them back into the system which has let them down and find them a way to make progress.

Destitution is defined as being without friends, money or prospects - what kind of a life is that?

Sue
17 October 2008 at 18:08

At last we have some good publicity about the terrible situation some failed asylum seekers find themselves in, through no fault of their own. I have been working in this field for 21 years and have an asylum seeker living in my home - his other option was the streets. I raise awareness in my church and we have an 'asylum seekers fund' in order to help people faced with destitution. Dave at Boaz is doing a great job and similar work is being done all over. Well done !

heatherpinchen
18 October 2008 at 04:06

It is clear that asylum law in the UK is both cruel and inhumane.

Our REMAND prisons are also stuffed with women - particulalry those from Zimbabwe - who are costing the tax payer £1000 per person per week. Why? because they have been criminalised for being caught working to try and support themselves! Ludicrous and wrong.

Our Law is outdated, sexist , very often just plain wrong and does not appear to serve the higher principles of JUSTICE in anyway whatsoever.

When it is so it deserves to be ignored and ultimately reworked.

Christians helping those refusing asylum are doing a darn good job.

spaniel-lover
19 October 2008 at 12:20

The government is failing in it's DUTY to deport all failed asylum seekers. Furthermore, the situation would be a lot easier to handle if asylum seekers were kept in detention centres whilst their claims are being processed. Their claims should be processed much more quickly, & then depotation by force if necessary must happen immediately. In addition to this, we are accepting too many asylum seekers in the first place, if we had less of them then the situation would be more manageable.

If anyone is known to be aiding & abetting an ILLEGAL immigrant, then they must be prosecuted - whether they be Joe Bloggs or the Archbishop of Canterbury himself.

Ewan
19 October 2008 at 19:00

UNHCR stats 2007 www.unhcr.org/basics/BASICS/4034b6a34.pdf

9.9 million refugees

12.8 million internally displaced people

5.8 million stateless people

2.6 million returned refugees

0.75 million asylum seekers

1 million 'others of concern'

In the same year the UK had 23,000 applications for Asylum - not many people make it this far.

Something to ponder - just where do you return a stateless person to anyway?

Karen
20 October 2008 at 10:15

'we are accepting too many asylum seekers in the first place'... Are we indeed Mr Spaniel-Lover? Maybe if more people loved other people and not dogs we wouldn't be in this situation.

ASYLUM IS AN INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHT. WE BRITONS EXPECT TO GO AND LIVE OUT OUR RETIREMENTS IN SPAIN, TO TRAVEL TO AUSTRAILIA AND INDIA FOR NO REASON OTHER THAN LEISURE... YET YOU WOULD DENY SOMEBODY ESCAPING THEIR HOME COUNTRY WITH ONLY THEIR LIFE, THE RIGHT TO ASK FOR PROTECTION FROM US, ONE OF THE RICHEST COUNTRIES IN THE WORLD? SICK.

Karen
20 October 2008 at 10:26

PS. An asylum seeker can not be correctly described as an illegal immigrant. Even someone who has been refused. Many such people languish in the UK, refused but given no 'removal directions' (aka. Home Office instructions for a very unpleasant and unnecessary forced and often violent removal from the country. One friend was beaten so badly by British immigration officials on her return to Cameroon, that the Cameroonaise authorities sent her back to the UK so that no-one could say that they had caused such heinous injuries. She was kicked several times in the groin whilst on the floor, punched in the head. She is a peaceful lady and a strict Christian.)

the only means by which to get home is to sign up with the IOM for voluntary return. This however means agreeing that you were a liar all along, that you feel safe to return home. This is not the case for the great majority of asylum seekers whom I have met through my own work over the last 6 years. You can not criminalise somebody for telling the truth and desperately clinging to safety.

Jo at Boaz
20 October 2008 at 10:29

Interesting....if the average Brit's spaniel was kept in the average detention centre, there'd be a massive outcry. Once you have become personally acquainted with someone whose case has been summarily refused, your attitude changes...as can be seen by most of the comments here.One way to meet a destitute asylum seeker is to take them [lawfully] into your own home.

sweety
21 October 2008 at 02:23

One friend was beaten so badly by British immigration officials on her return to Cameroon, that the Cameroonaise authorities sent her back to the UK so that no-one could say that they had caused such heinous injuries.

Pure Kafka! What a cross the ordinary British Immigration and attendant Officials have to bear! We should not blame the immigrants. We need to hold our Judges and Politicans personally responsible this next election. We should be allowed to formulate the questions ourselves. It is illegal to destroy ones travel documents on several counts just about everywhere in the wordl!

Chadwick
21 October 2008 at 16:24

Sweety, you must get into the real world!!!!

spaniel-lover
21 October 2008 at 20:25

Ok ,that's MISS Spaniel-Lover thank you very much, & my dog has got more right to be in this country than any failed asylum seeker.

I've been on my local council's housing waiting list for 14 years, so I'm not like all you do-gooding liberals who, surprise surprise, usually own their own homes - bloody hypocrites; think because THEY are comfortably off, they can waffle on about Britain 'being a rich country', stuck away in their middle-class homes at their [yawn] dinner parties - shock horror you people - there are poor white British people - we do exist! Oh and what's more, we don't appreciate hoardes of foreigners pushing in infront of us in housing queues, personally I'm fed up with brand spanking new developments getting built, & hey presto the immigrants move in en masse, whilst I'm freezing my butt off in my damp/draughty flat. Charity begins at home! Hope you choke on your olives!

non-homeowning working class liberal
04 November 2008 at 21:02

I've got to admit that I don't usually contribute to blogs such as these however have been compelled to do so by the sheer ignorance highlighted in some of the previous comments.

I am not as one poster insinuated 'a hypocrite', but from working class family of 6, I don't own a house and never will. However, irrespective of my situation, I find the lack of human compassion displayed absolutely breathtaking.

There are certain things that we should all remember. Firstly if you have a local authority home, be glad you live in safe country where we have a social security system that can raise enough revenue from taxes that it can afford to provide it, secondly if it's damp it's not the fault of asylum seekers but the council, so take it up with them and stop blaming the most vulnerable for your problems - they have their own. But more importantly if you are alive and healthy and not living day by day in fear of persecution, rape, torture, be grateful for your life.

Post your comment

Please note: you will need to login or register before you can comment on the website

Read More

Newsletter

Enter your email address here to receive updates from the team

Vote!

Will the next election produce a hung parliament?

Suggest a question

View comments

© New Statesman 1913 - 2009

Tracker