Registered user login:

What Gordon should say next

Bryan Gould

Published 19 May 2008

Tackle inequality and slash spin. One-time Labour leadership contender Bryan Gould writes the speech that Gordon Brown now needs to deliver

“The local election results and the opinion polls convey a pointed message – that my government and I have for the time being lost the confidence of our supporters. We cannot deny the reality that the next election may be a step too far for a government completing its third term.

To accept this is oddly liberating. It means that, instead of focusing exclusively on trying to win an election, I can now concentrate on delivering – for the two years that remain of this term – the best government this country can have. History may judge that I failed as an election-winner; my term as prime minister might yet deliver the verdict that I did the job well.

To achieve this, I must first clear away the baggage that I inherited. I will, for example, lance the boil of the Iraq invasion by setting up an independent commission to establish how and why that came about. This will signal a return to the ethical foreign policy advocated by Robin Cook – we will, for example, finance the return to their homeland of those displaced when the US military base on Diego Garcia was established.

I will cut by half the number of media advisers employed by the government, with the intention of showing that our message is about real issues, rather than spin. And I have learnt and will apply the lesson that a government that ignores its supporters for the sake of pleasing its opponents will end up being disliked by everyone.

I will ensure that my government maintains unity and cohesion by taking careful account of what my MPs and those who elected them are telling me. I will recognise in advance those issues – such as the removal of the 10p tax band or the 42-day detention period – where a broad consensus looks impossible to achieve. Where there is a consensus, my colleagues will be expected to abide by it.

I will review those policies – even the sacred cows – that have failed to deliver. I am not convinced, for example, that academy schools have succeeded or that we have even applied the right criteria for evaluating them.

Because I believe that my government should be accountable for its own economic policy, I will reconsider whether it is right to contract that policy out to an “independent” central bank, and re-evaluate the advantages of restoring the main elements of economic policy to the arena of public debate and democratic process. My goal is a sustainable economy that delivers better standards of living, employment and public services to ordinary people, rather than inflated bonuses to those who create no new wealth but manipulate existing assets to their own advantage.

I will return to my basic political instincts – those that brought me into Labour politics in the first place. I regard as unacceptable the rapid growth in inequality in this country. We cannot expect people to take pride in their country and to work hard for its success if they do not share in the benefits that success will bring.

While I believe that a properly functioning market is irreplaceable, I do not accept that the market is infallible. It must be regulated and supplemented if it is to deliver acceptable outcomes to everyone. There is, in other words, an important role for public services in a modern economy. My government will give them priority over the next two years.

The next election is in the lap of the gods – or, more prosaically, in the hands of the voters, as it should be. Between now and then, you will see less, not more, of me on your television screens. I will be concentrating instead on leading a competent, caring and effective government.”

Post this article to

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • newsvine
  • Reddit

3 comments from readers

antileft
19 May 2008 at 13:58

"Because I believe that my government should be accountable for its own economic policy, I will reconsider whether it is right to contract that policy out to an “independent” central bank"

What an absolutely bone headed, moronic idea. Why on earth would he want to revearse the only sensible sizeable thing he ever did?! Baffling. Sounds like the kind of speech that he would deliver if he wanted you to vote for him- not the one that he would need to deliver to get the public to vote for him.

antileft
19 May 2008 at 13:59

and considering youre hardly likely to vote tory, I dont see why he'd bother.

Philip Hall
21 May 2008 at 04:15

Blair's departure provided a classic opportunity to achieve closure on the most poisoned aspects of the government's legacy: Iraq, erosion of civil liberties, unedifying authoritarianism, pandering to the rich, inadequate focus on the poor and a thinly veiled contempt for the values of core Labour supporters. Brown squandered that opportunity and didn't even have the guts to face the electorate during his all-too-brief honeymoon. Gould's ideas have some merit (though I totally disagree about taking away BoE independence), but it is too late now. The global economic situation is beyond the government's control and is worsening. This will simply exacerbate the government's already miserable standing in the run-up to inevitable defeat in 2010. The government will certainly lose the Crewe and Nantwich by-election tomorrow. Will labour MPs simply cringe or will open panic break-out, triggering a leadership election?

Post your comment

Please note: you will need to login or register before your comment is displayed on the website

We want to encourage people to comment on our content and to exchange views with other readers and hope this will be done on a courteous basis. However, if you encounter posts which are offensive please let us know by emailing comments@newstatesman.co.uk and we will take swift action where necessary.

Read More

Vote!

Is capitalism finished?