Registered user login:

Dope's policy?

David Matthews

Published 12 February 2008

Millions of Britons smoke cannabis occasionally, and manage to function. It has been part of the cultural landscape for over 40 years, argues David Matthews

Last week the body charged with advising the government on the re-reclassification of cannabis from Class C back to Class B met to consider the latest diktat that Britain needs to get tough on soft drugs.

The Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs (ACMD), an independent expert body that advises the government on drug related issues in the UK, has previously maintained that cannabis should remain a Class C drug.

But if the government gets its way and the ACMD sanctions a policy U-turn on its behalf nothing will change. All the evidence shows that tightening the law on cannabis has no effect on consumption rates. In fact, reclassification has led to a decrease in dope use.

Cannabis was downgraded in 2004, and for many smokers and abstainers alike, this looked like a liberal New Labour move, particularly when viewed against other very illiberal government policies aimed at curtailing personal freedom.

A year later, following a request from the then Home Secretary, Charles Clarke the Advisory Council reviewed its position on the classification of cannabis, examining in particular the effects of cannabis on mental health, and claims of increased prevalence of dope with high levels of tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), i.e. “skunk”.

The ACMD listened to testimony from scientists to police officers and concluded that cannabis should remain a Class C drug. But the lobbyists are back on the attack.

The Association of Chief Police Officers has a simple twofold argument for reclassification. It says: “… a rise in cannabis farms, and an undercurrent in the market which suggests more harmful health effects,” means that the dope laws need to be tweaked.

Some 2000 domestic cannabis farms have been raided in the last 12 months, many of which are run by Southeast Asian criminal gangs. So much home grown skunk is now being produced that Britain is on the brink of becoming a net exporter of dope.

The police want to send out clear message: Britain is not in the business of cultivating marijuana. But coming on the back of changes to stop and search policy, reclassification will make it easier for the police to “profile” and search youths. All of a sudden, finding a couple of spliffs in a kid’s back pocket will be the end that justifies the means.

As for Jacqui Smith, she knows which way the wind is blowing. She is the fourth Home Secretary to oversee the reclassification issue in as many years.

Since reclassification there has been an increasing focus on feral youths, teenage delinquency and juvenile violence. Add to this growing youth unemployment, teen pregnancies and of course drug and alcohol abuse and Ms Smith must react. Something must be to blame. And that something is drugs.

In her letter of July 2007 to the ACMD, in which she invited them to carry out this latest dope study, Ms Smith admitted, “… statistics show that cannabis use has fallen significantly”. But she added the caveat, “… there is a real public concern about the potential mental health effects of cannabis use, in particular the use of stronger forms of the drug, commonly known as skunk”.

Is there really public concern about the use of dope; or is it concern about the social factors that nurture dope smoking? For a government struggling to come to terms with the causes of drug abuse, it is much easier, in PR terms at least to concentrate on effect.

On the mental health issue both Ms Smith and the police have a point. More and more health and counselling agencies are seeing young people presenting with mental health problems that stem from chronic dope smoking. Some research suggests that up to 75 per cent of drug-induced mental health problems relate to cannabis use.

But the government’s flip flopping over cannabis classification, like that with stop and search, is doomed to failure.

It is the frequency and amount of dope smoked that is the issue. As Morgan Spurlock illustrated in Super Size Me, living on Big Macs is not conducive to healthy living.

The overuse and abuse of weed by often unemployed, idle, bored, poorly educated and despondent youths, who spend every waking hour getting wasted has tightened the relationship between dope and mental health issues.

The fact that skunk is relatively cheap and is often used in combination with other drugs or cheap alcohol, and is a useful commodity for teenagers to trade (whether as career criminals or part-time dope dealers to supplement their meagre wages or benefits) has also made dope the drug of choice for Britain’s youth.

Millions of Britons smoke dope occasionally, and manage to function. It has been part of the cultural landscape for more than 40 years. Those that make it their vice will always find the ways and means to smoke, and evade the law.

Instead of tinkering with classification, the government should think more creatively about how it can give a growing number of feckless youths something meaningful to do with their lives rather than get wasted day in day out.

Post this article to

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • newsvine
  • Reddit

9 comments from readers

alunb3
12 February 2008 at 17:07

what a sensible article.

if there is no victim, then there ought be no crime

cannabis users, unless they harm others, ought to be given the protection of the law, not be persecuted and punished by it.

Colonel Blimp
12 February 2008 at 17:38

I once smoked a cannabis cigarillo and then, with some of my friends, embarked on what became known as the Crimean War. No victims indeed. I assure you sir there were!

Jellytoke
12 February 2008 at 22:17

Between three and six billion pounds of taxable income being spent each year on illegal drugs, regulation would provide a much needed income stream to the treasury, and at one sixteenth of the problems of alcohol

freespeechoneeach
13 February 2008 at 08:40

We do have serious drug problems in the UK. They are caused by two legal substances: nicotine and alcohol.

Cigarette smoking is in decline because of harm reduction strategies adopted by Government in the 70's and continued since.

But alcohol use is officially encouraged. Every Labour budget has cut the cost of drink. Unlike any other drug, the Government actually tells us it's good to take the killer drug alcohol, up to a bogus "safe level" every week.

Most MPs take alcohol and a good few are alcoholics. The same goes for those who work in the media. The State Broadcaster (aka BBC) promotes alcohol at all hours of the day.

The Office for National Statistics says 8,500 people die every year in the UK from drink. The true figure is many times higher, because what the ONS refers to are solely deaths from liver disease. Here we can see alcohol's harm being deliberately obscured by an act of Government.

Cannabis prohibition is simply Government's way of protecting the dealers of the killer drug alcohol from competition. The War on Drugs is an interference with the free market, as well as an insult to liberties.

roger
13 February 2008 at 08:51

The police argument for re-classification is flawed on two counts;

the sentences for producers, traffickers and dealers are exactly the same for Class C drugs (cannabis) as they are for Class B drugs (eg amphetamines ) . So why in heavens name will organised criminals change their actions?

Second,if re-classification had caused the growth of cannabis farms, why are similar trends found in North America, Australia and across Europe?

Im afraid the police stand accused of poor analysis and partial use of evidence.

Roger

ingo
13 February 2008 at 09:21

Does Hemp provide the future for agriculture?

I would like to congratulate David Mathews his well researched points on prohibition and how it is damaging society more than the drug itself, further I would like to extend the debate, showing that Hemp would provide a viable alternative for hard pressed farmers.

Hemp would not only revolutionise agriculture, it would seriously change public sector costs under a decriminalised/legalised regime. Over 50.000 different products, most of them derived through environmentally friendly processes, all from one hemp plant, paints, fuel, nutritious foods, oil and superior paper, not to talk of ultra light tough plastics, mouldings for cars and many other engineering solutions, products that can help farmers, currently under the kosh of large retailers, it can reverse the negative trend in agriculture and provide a base for farmers to become sustainable end producers of goods, should they so wish, by diversifying, possibly together with other small farmers growing hemp.

There is a remarkable history of using this most versatile plant going back thousands of years. With today’s technologies farmers could have hundreds of avenues to choose, just by simple friendly processing they can produce their own bio diesel, or alternatively, press the seeds, bottle the nutritious oil and sell it at farmers markets, a relatively new product which consumers like.

Our need for sustainable, affordable and low CO2 housing makes Hemp one of the best materials to utilise, it can revolutionise the building industry, together with straw it could provide the mayor building materials for the warmest housing we ever had.

Off course there is the option to grow in green houses, for scientific purposes and medicinal oils, mainly, but in a regulated world this could as well provide a controlled environment for the growing of commercially graded cannabis, given the right fiscal incentives, hemp farming could as well benefit the exchequer in the multiple billions.

The medicinal benefits of cannabis are potentially very large, the clinical applications are so varied and awesome, possibly providing a natural breakthrough against cancer, that it could save the NHS billions. With far less seriously dangerous side effects than that encountered from some prescription drugs it could rejuvenate the NHS and drugs prescription as it exists. Sadly, to small amount of people, who have an underlying tendency to mental instability, some 00125% of those who currently

use cannabis, this is an area were education and debate could reduce harm in future, but sadly not under an expensive prohibitive regime that clearly has provided us with the mess we are in now. No reclassification can provide an alternative or reduce harm.

Hemcore, a company that manufactures Hemp products has made the start, they have build the largest Hemp processing factory in the world, here in Halesworth, there is much scope for those who want to be pioneers and be more sustainable on their farm.

Hemp is growing with a minimum of input, it is a plant that can grow almost anywhere and we would do good to debate this widely, ideally the NFU should carry it further.

Sincerely

Ingo Wagenknecht

LCA environmental spokesperson

Norfolk

Steve Rolles
13 February 2008 at 10:26

In an otherwise sensible piece Mathews makes a small error when he says that 'reclassification has led to a decrease in dope use'. Infact according the BCS and DoH surveys overall cannabis use has been falling slowly since 2001. This would suggest not that reclassification is the cause of the fall but that it is entirely irrelevant.

If the Government wants to send out messages to young people then mass criminalisation is clearly not the way to do it. Sensible targeted public health education, combined with (as Mathews suggests), investment in social capital, effective prevention and harm reduction strategies is surely the way forward.

Mathews also fails to tackle the central problem of cannabis use being criminal and its supply in the hands of unregulated criminal markets. The solution to these problems is obviously effective legal market regulation and licenced outlets along with decriminalisation of consenting adult use - for which ample evidence exists to demonstrate practicalities and efficacy.

Smokey McPot
13 February 2008 at 16:59

It seems there are currently anomalies within general perceptions of cannabis. Skunk is not a new super strong breed of cannabis. The word skunk is a generic slang term to describe sensimilia or feminised cannabis plants. Skunk is actually a specific hybrid plant bred in Holland in the 70’s and based on Afghan, Columbian and Mexican genetics so called because of it's potent smell.

The ACMD in their report quotes that the average THC content of the so called "skunk" is currently 14% and this is deemed to be extremely high for street cannabis. I do agree that cannabis bud is getting stronger but hash was tested in the late 70's and early 80's from various police acquisitions. Some samples were shown to have a THC content of well over 20% with certain samples having a THC content of 26% (see Baker et al 1980). Has cannabis really got stronger or has cannabis resin got weaker and more contaminated and cannabis bud got stronger due to growing techniques?

I do agree that children are smoking cannabis from a younger age and this is not healthy for a developing brain. The obvious answer to this is to legalize and regulate the product as they do in Holland. Incidentally in Holland they have less cannabis smokers (% per capita) than we do in Britain. Surely this should be indicative to the government that legalization can work and can work effectively. Why not legalize cannabis and kill a two birds with one stone, take away the organized crime aspect while regulating the age of the potential smoker?

I also think that Ingo Wagenknecht's comment on hemp is an excellent point.

organic man
07 May 2008 at 13:03

Whether its called "Skunk" or not, what we are referring to here is the prevalence of genetically modified, augmented marijuana which delivers a more potent kick than ever before.

I believe marijuana should be legalized and regulated and as a first step, all GM, chemically treated, hydroponic augmented dope should be taken off the streets.

If marijuana is consumed, as it has since the neolithic age in its natural, organic, unaltered form, the drug would pose far less of a threat to the user. It was never meant to be so strong and we are seeing the consequences today.

Bring back the natural bud!

p.s. Pity about the Crimea

Post your comment

Please note: you will need to login or register before your comment is displayed on the website

You may enter up to 2000 characters (about 300-350 words)

Characters left:

We want to encourage people to comment on our content and to exchange views with other readers and hope this will be done on a courteous basis. However, if you encounter posts which are offensive please let us know by emailing comments@newstatesman.co.uk and we will take swift action where necessary.

Also by David Matthews

Read More

Vote!

Should Darling have been bolder with the 45% tax rate?