Registered user login:

Glasgow bombs: the doctor I knew

Shiraz Maher

Published 05 July 2007

How did Dr Bilal Abdulla, a medic from Paisley hospital, come to be one of Britain's prime terror suspects? Here is the testimony of a former Islamic radical who knew him well, written exclusively for the NS

When I saw Bilal Abdulla's name in the news, I recognised it immediately, though it took me a while to be completely sure it was the man I remembered. It wasn't long before I was certain. This was the same Bilal whom I had known closely when I was a student at Cambridge.

I was born in Birmingham, although my parents were originally from Pakistan. When I was three months old my family moved to Saudi Arabia, where my dad had got a job as an accountant, but when I was 14 they sent me back to Britain to give me a better education. I attended Solihull School and lived with my grandparents.

In September 2000 I went to Leeds University to study history. I was a pretty sociable student and I enjoyed life. Then some of my friends began encouraging me to attend mosque, at least on Fridays. When 9/11 happened I had already started praying and going to mosque more regularly, rediscovering my faith. I remember thinking about the attacks: "This changes everything." I was confused about it. I didn't know what Islam made of it. Part of me thought they must be justified.

Nobody was offering me direction. I already knew about Hizb ut-Tahrir, so I talked to one of their guys at Leeds Grand Mosque who was in charge of the area. He took me back to his house where, I remember, we drank mint tea. He said America would use these events to colonise the Muslim world, to humiliate us, to attack Islam. I was convinced there would be war in Afghanistan. He brought me into the organisation within days. He was my cell leader and I rose through the ranks swiftly. By the end of my second year at university, I was looking after the whole area stretching from Leeds to Newcastle and Durham, and sat on the regional committee for the north of England. Our job was to liaise with cell leaders, to pressurise them to recruit more people. They were breathing down our necks. There was so much pressure on us to recruit.

After graduating I moved to Cambridge in September 2004 to start a PhD in history. I was living in a rented house on Milton Road and I had been in Cambridge only a matter of hours when the local rep of Hizb ut-Tahrir arrived at the house. He gave me a hand unpacking boxes and settling in. Once we'd done this it was a case of getting down to business. The guy was a friend. All of us in the party, as we called the organisation, knew each other well. Over a cup of tea he filled me in on the situation in my new town, regarding the dawah, the strategy. We went through a list of people identified as potential recruits. One of these was Bilal Abdulla.

Bilal struck me as very warm and affable. He was someone who knew about Islam. Even though he wore western clothes, he was very religious. His recitation of the Quran was very good. If he attended, he would always lead prayers.

Bilal had grown up in Baghdad. He told me how he hated Saddam Hussein, how even after the American invasion his extended family stayed there. All were of the same ideological persuasion. All believed in Wahhabi ideology. He didn't see himself as being radical: he saw himself as following Islam. He developed a vitriolic hatred for the Shias after one of his closest friends at university in Iraq was killed by a Shia militiaman. He would say they needed to be massacred. He called them kafirs, disbelievers who insulted the Prophet.

Bilal said he had come to Britain to better his life, but did speak about returning home. When I first met him he was preparing to take the medical conversion course that would have allowed him to work as a doctor here. In the meantime, he worked behind the till at the local Staples stationery store.

I remember one incident well. Bilal lived above a Bengali restaurant. The other guy in his flat used to sing and play guitar, diabolically out of tune. I went round one day to Bilal's and heard this guy singing and wailing. I said, "What's this?" Bilal called him a "waster" and boasted to me that a few days earlier he had brought the guy into his bedroom. He sat him down and told him he needed to pray. He told him: "If you ever play again I'm going to smash the guitar." He then put on a video of al-Zarqawi beheading one of the hostages in Iraq. "If you think I'm messing about, this is what we do. This is what our people do - we slaughter." Bilal laughed when he recounted the story. I laughed with him, although I remember thinking the word slaughter was a bit disproportionate.

Hard hearts for non-believers

Bilal didn't have a TV and kept his distance from people he considered were not true Muslims. He refused to frequent the local halal takeaway in Cambridge because the Turkish guys there didn't attend mosque. He used to say to me: "We should have soft hearts for the believers and hard hearts for the non-believers." He epitomised this. He was very humble and polite and had an endearing and distinctive belly laugh. He spent his time reading the Quran and looking at Arabic-language or jihadi websites. I remember during Ramadan that year, 2004, on the 27th and most holy night, we all went down to London to the Regent's Park Mosque. It happened that was the night the Americans launched the massive assault on Fallujah. Bilal spent the whole night on his prayer mat. His stamina was something to behold.

By the end we would link up once a week. Some of the time he would come round to my place. Mostly we met in the cultural centre, the Islamic Academy on Gilbert Road. It was within walking distance of where both Bilal and I lived. It had a prayer hall downstairs and three bedrooms upstairs. One of those rooms was rented by the Hizb guy and, because of its location and Islamic setting, this became the main focal point where we would socialise, meet and discuss things. You could say all our activities in Cambridge orbited around the Islamic Academy.

Bilal talked about the validity of jihad, about expelling American and British troops. He described jihad as the highest pinnacle of Islam. He worked to the same endgame that we were all working to. There was no difference between us at the time. He would laugh when we talked about a particular bomb attack in Iraq. We all rejoiced then. And yet even I didn't think that he would take action himself.

Like myself, Bilal didn't have any non-Muslim friends and the circle of Muslims he chose to socialise with was small and selective. But he certainly trusted and respected us. I think this was solely because he recognised that we shared the same ultimate vision as him for Iraq and the wider Muslim world. In that sense our views were virtually identical. We only differed over our choice of method.

And so it was through my involvement with Hizb ut-Tahrir and its ideology of extremist political Islam that I came to befriend Bilal, the would-be bomber. That's why I believe it's wrong to distinguish between "extremism" and "violent extremism" as the government has been doing in recent months. The two are inextricably intertwined. Without movements such as Hizb creating the moral imperatives to justify terror, people like Bilal wouldn't have the support of an ideological infrastructure cheering them on. And, I believe, it's a fallacy to suggest that the culpability of agitators and cheerleaders is any less than for those who actually carry out acts of terror.

I didn't complete my PhD, as I didn't get funding. In July 2005 I left Cambridge and moved back to Birmingham. That was a few days before 7/7. Bilal and I lost touch. I left Hizb ut- Tahrir and had never heard of him since - until last week.

Next week Shiraz Maher writes about why he left radical Islam behind him

Timeline

Friday 29 June
Two car bombs fail to detonate in central London in the early hours of the morning; one outside a nightclub in Haymarket, the other towed away from Cockspur Street

Saturday 30, 3.15pm
Two arrested after burning car driven into Glasgow Airport terminal building. Suspects later named as Dr Bilal Abdulla and Dr Khalid Ahmed, who is still being treated for burns

Saturday 30, 9pm
Police arrest Dr Mohammed Asha and his wife, Marwah Dana Asha, a lab technician, on the M6

Sunday 1 July
Two non-British trainee doctors at Royal Alexandra Hospital, where Dr Abdulla worked, arrested. Another 26-year-old man is arrested in Liverpool, near Lime Street Station, later named as Sabeel Ahmed

Monday 2
Names of suspects confirmed to media and Dr Mohammed Haneef detained at Brisbane Airport in Australia. A second doctor in Australia also interviewed but later released

Tuesday 3
Six of the eight suspects, including Dr Abdulla, transferred to Paddington Green Police Station to consolidate investigation

Post this article to

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • newsvine
  • NowPublic
  • Reddit

13 comments from readers

RoyalDoulton
05 July 2007 at 10:35

'We only differed over our choice of method'

Shiraz's conclusions are way off the mark, the fact that he admits the Hizb have tried to counter arguments about method through engagement shows that it neither encourages violence nor is a cheerleader for it. Shiraz has an axe to grind, the New Statesman should be aware of that.

JamesBate
05 July 2007 at 10:44

I think funding for your PHD is on its way. Few more articles like this and you are sorted.

Charles Foster
05 July 2007 at 12:41

Dear Shiraz,

I note your previous views at http://shirazmaher.blogspot.com/

You previously said that HuT "has never engaged in violence against any regime. Rather our struggle is intellectual and political."

Had you recruited Abdullah to HuT one wonders whether he would have gone on to be a terrorist suspect given their long record of non-violence.

In addition, I am sceptical about the band of self righteous ex-Islamists we see of late. Ali Eteraz was right to suggest that the media's reliance on people like you is a "joke"

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/ali-eteraz/media-reliance-on-f...

If you were concerned about Mr Abdulla, why were you concerns not reported to the authorities at the time, or at least after you turned your back on radicalism in July 2005?

am
05 July 2007 at 12:51

what sort of conclusion was that. It seems as though you just want to somehow attatch the name hizb ut-tahrir to the bombers even though there is absolutely no link.

Even like you said he held all his views way before he met you or any hizb member. So how on earth can you conclude that it was the hizb who gave him the ideological backbone especially as the hizb catagorically regects violence as a means for change.

Its seems convinient that this article has been written a day after calls for a ban on the hizb were discussed in the commons............ i agree with JamesBate that Phd funding must be on its way

Sajid W
05 July 2007 at 13:00

Brother Shiraz why are you dishonest over the one matter you should know best.

I note that in this article you have tried to avoid the lies in your previous accounts of your "recruitment". You have now admitted that when you moved to Leeds you "already knew about Hizb ut-Tahrir".

However that is not what you wrote in the Times Higher Education Supplement [3 February 2006] when you said that you first met HT at Leeds University where you were "recruited".

Did we not attend HT study circles in Birmingham Central Mosque together for several years when you were at Solihull School and I was at King Edward's?

You had first approached members of HT many years previously when you lived with your grandfather in Harborne in 1994. I remember that you asked to join HT at that time, but rather than ‘recruit’ you , HT merely explained its thoughts to you, and did not make any efforts to meet you again.

Many years later you again actively approached members of the party at a mosque in Leeds. In the article last year in THES you alleged that you had been approached at university - I am glad that you have now admitted in this article that your previous account was inaccurate.

With so much dishonesty why should anyone now believe your account?

asilentworld
05 July 2007 at 14:16

Mr Maher, it is so clear that you are an untrustworthy individual with no real principles. As for your Phd, id pursue it now before you get your P45 from your bossess. You are a shame to British values and every religion if you believe in one.

sorav jain
06 July 2007 at 04:43

hello Shiraj!

you have done a great job! your article kept me tied till the end. but, u have mentioned that both of your's view were almost same and so u both sahred a good chemistry. you cN PROVE OUT TO BE OF A GREAT HELP to the British cops!

Saghir
06 July 2007 at 17:44

Hello Shiraz

Isn't it strange that the likes of yourself and Mr Ed Hussain seem to get a lot of airtime these days. One way of achieving certain fame is to forward the government agenda. From the comments by Sajid ( Who seems to know you personally ) it seems highly likely that you sought recruitment to HT based on alterior motives. You are now endeavouring to link legitimate political expression with extremisim and thus violent extremism. Nice try, but i'm afraid the evidence you provide is quite non-sensical and self-dillusionary.

Its quite a tale you tell about this chap at cambridge, sounds like your jackanory skills have certainly been polished. For the future are we to expect Dr Shiraz or professer Shiraz or maybe even a government expert on islamic groups?

Truthseeker
06 July 2007 at 18:07

You must be joking with this article. Forget jumping on the bandwagon, you and your mates must be driving it!

Douglas Chalmers
07 July 2007 at 06:18

Just as Britain once had its empire, so too did Turkey and the Moslems were once one and ruled supreme. At least that is what is behind their romantic dreams of the past as they and the Arabs believe it to be today:-

".....where are you love

after you we became

the love that screams

we became the distances.

For the happy days we longed

the days of staying up on the road

the long walks

the rendezvous at the old restaurant.

O love of Beirut

O love of days

They will come back Beirut

the days will come back.

It is the second summer

the moon is broken

is it true you may forget me

my defeated love

I went back to my house

my house I didn't find

only smoke and twisted beams

no rose and no fence."

Hawa Bairut (The love of Beirut) - http://www.orientaldancer.net/arabic-song-lyrics/lyrics_of_F...

http://fairuzonline.com/ or songs at http://almashriq.hiof.no/lebanon/700/780/fairuz/miscaudio/in...

Mrs Hafezi
07 July 2007 at 10:08

Mr Maher, funding for your PHD? or rather your thesis was not good enough? Hmmmm!!! Take a reality check!

kash
07 July 2007 at 12:08

This article is a theological joke! If Mr Maher actually learnt anything about HuT it would have been that it's founder Nabhani was a Sunni lawyer, of the Shafi legal school, spiritually a sufi, and in creedal persuation an Ashari, all of which is considered heretical by the Jihadists and Wahabis that Bilal was. The fact that HuT is non-sectarian, i.e. accepts Shia Muslims as brothers, and has criticised the attacks on Shia in Iraq is also heretical in Wahabism and Jihadism, so it is impossible to assert that HuT's and Bilal's "views were virtually identical. We only differed over our choice of method" Either this is an ouright lie, or Shiraz may have been a wahabi sypathiser within the ranks of HuT at the time. When emotionaly unstable extremists join relatively more moderate groups like HuT, engage in extreme debates, and activities empowered by a sense of belonging to a structure, then have an emotional crisis of conscience to leave thier rigid mentality behind, the most sincere and healthy of these people would blame themselves, and attribute membership of any group as only occuring in parallel, some may even admit they subverted the essense of the organistion in their own zeal, rather than blame the group for their own extreme tendancies which pre-existed, and possible influenced members with. It is well known that HuT in England was subverted by the lunatic Omar Bakri Muhamad, can you imagine him blaming it for his own extremism, which he pushed within the group subverting it's true ideas? Oh, but he's not a well connected journalist looking to make a living out of it...

Jaymundo
09 August 2007 at 15:39

mr maher,

I am a relative of bilal. what bilal did was wrong- end of story. he deserves what he gets. Thank god no one was hurt otherwise this would be ten times worse. Every time i see you on tv or read an article, I think what a joke you are. You are milking this for your own benifit. Hmmmmmm i wonder what next on your agenda??? book??? film??? You make me sick.

Post your comment

Please note: you will need to login or register before your comment is displayed on the website

We want to encourage people to comment on our content and to exchange views with other readers and hope this will be done on a courteous basis. However, if you encounter posts which are offensive please let us know by emailing comments@newstatesman.co.uk and we will take swift action where necessary.

Read More

Vote!

Would you feed GM foods to your children?