End the Iraq obscenity
Michael Ancram says Brown should pull troops out now
By Michael Ancram Published 07 June 2007It has been clear for the past year to many of us, not least to senior military figures, that the time had come for British forces to leave Iraq.
It has been equally clear that Tony Blair could not deliver this without losing face. He and George Bush were irrevocably committed to the mirage of creating a new liberal democratic order in the Middle East. For them, to get out now would have been an admission of failure.
The arrival of Gordon Brown at No 10 creates a valuable new situation. The web that ensnared Blair has left Brown unencumbered. Despite his support for the invasion, Brown has never been part of that neoconservative "democratisation movement", that pattern of distorted intelligence and ideological propaganda which has led to and continues to fuel the obscenity which is Iraq today.
As Brown takes over he has a narrow window of opportunity to use his unique authority to bring this nightmare to an end. He can demonstrate boldness and vision. He can jettison the rhetoric of bringing freedom and democracy to a grateful nation. He can admit the truth: that the British people don't want us to stay in Iraq a moment longer, nor do our soldiers fighting there and, most importantly, nor do the vast majority of the Iraqi people.
He can face the facts. The Shias, whom we originally went in to liberate, are the same Shias who are killing our soldiers. We are no longer keeping the peace; we are increasingly the target for its breach.
We are no longer saving Iraq from terrorism; indeed, we were complicit in the dismantling of Iraq's security apparatus, which created the vacuum which enticed al-Qaeda in. We are no longer delivering a democratic Iraq; we are, with the Americans, presiding over a sectarian government sliding into civil war. We are no longer the "welcome liberators", but rather the "evil occupiers" around whose bombed vehicles the locals dance in chilling celebration.
We have no place in Iraq any more. The only reason we are still there is an astonishing adherence to the agenda of a discredited US president. That surely is not worth dying for.
In pulling them out now, Brown would not be letting our troops down. They have been heroes. They have done everything that has been asked of them, and more. It is politicians - and I admit that originally I was one - who got it wrong. It is time we got it right by simply getting out. We don't need to set a timetable. We are within a few hours of the border by road, and even less by air. If we decide to get out, we can do so almost instantaneously.
There are those who continue to argue that such a withdrawal would be followed by internecine warfare. Conversely, it could actually serve to bring a degree of albeit uneasy stability to a situation where our continued presence is an aggravation and irritation rather than a palliative. It would certainly be in the interests of Iraq's immediate neighbours - Iran, Turkey, Syria and Saudi Arabia - to ensure that it did.
Gordon Brown has a short but golden chance to end Britain's pointless engagement in Iraq, but he will have to do so quickly and with determination. He should grasp that chance.
Michael Ancram MP was shadow foreign secretary (2001-2005)
Latest tweets
More from New Statesman
- Online writers:
- Steven Baxter
- Rowenna Davis
- David Allen Green
- Mehdi Hasan
- Nelson Jones
- Gavin Kelly
- Helen Lewis
- Laurie Penny
- The V Spot
- Alex Hern
- Martha Gill
- Alan White
- Samira Shackle
- Alex Andreou
- Nicky Woolf in America
- Bim Adewunmi
- Glosswitch
- Kate Mossman on pop
- Ryan Gilbey on Film
- Martin Robbins
- Rafael Behr
- Eleanor Margolis
- Tools and services:
- Polls
- Predictions
- Archive
- Magazine
- PDF edition
- RSS feeds
- Advertising
- Subscribe
- Special supplements
- Stockists


4 comments
Pulling out from what UK Nobel laureate Harold Pinter war describes as a war criminal enterprise in Iraq is just the start.
in 1945 the Germans followed a protocol summarized by the acronym C4A (CAAAA) - Cessation of the killing, Acknowledgement of the Crime, Apology, Amends (reparations) and Assertion of "never again to anyone".
Britain and its war criminal allies Australia and the US have not done ANY of C4A yet.
The Indigenous Iraqi human cost of the US Coalition invasion and occupation of Iraq is utterly appalling. As of March 2008, authoritative estimates from the world’s top Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, USA and the UK ORB organization are of 5-year violent deaths of 0.91 million and 1.36 million, respectively, and estimates from UN Population Division data are of 5-year non-violent excess deaths of 0.77 - 0.87 million.
Thus post-invasion violent plus non-violent excess deaths in Occupied Iraq total 1.7 - 2.2 million as of March 2008. In addition one can estimate 1.7 million Sanctions excess deaths (1990-2003), 1.2 million under-5 infant deaths under Sanctions, 0.2 million Iraqi Gulf War deaths, 0.6 million post-invasion infant deaths and 4.5 million refugees.
For detailed and documented analysis of the carnage in Occupied Iraq as of March 2008 see "Iraq invasion 5th anniversary, Iraqi Holocaust & Iraqi Genocide": http://www.newsvine.com/iraqi-genocide.
Harold Pinter is correct in demanding arraignment of Blair and Bush before the International Criminal Court.
I hope this is not the same Michael Ancram who once made himself one of the most vocal cheer-leaders of this odious enterprise - a man who, with Ian Duncan Smith as Opposition Leader (remember him?), wanted the invasion to happen much sooner than Tony Blair himself, and questioned the judgement of anyone who urged caution.
I do genuinely and sincerely hope I'm wrong about this, because his failure to accept any joint responsibility for it would be quite sickening indeed.
better that one sinner repents than that we only take notice of those people who were right at the time!
Very big of you to admit you were wrong, Michael, but its a little late for that, no?
Perhaps if the government of this country actually listened to the people who elected it (ie us), things like this could be avoided. Unfortunately, deluded self-certainty all too often seems to be the rule with politicians, rather than the exception.