Registered user login:

In with the in-crowd

Alec MacGillis

Published 13 November 2008

The appointment of a pro-Israel hawk has, to some, undermined Obama's call for a new politics. Or maybe he just doesn't want to seem soft

Obama likes nothing more than to surround himself with smart people. This was not the case under Bush.

A year ago, Barack Obama's campaign organised a rather unusual event. Undecided New Hampshire voters were invited to a hotel for a gathering of a half dozen of Obama's foreign policy advisers, an illustrious and eclectic bunch that included a former secretary of the navy and Samantha Power, the Irish journalist and authority on genocide who would later exile herself from the campaign after calling Hillary Clinton a "monster" in an interview with The Scotsman. One by one, they talked about Obama and his plans for the world. Finally, the candidate himself appeared and held forth on his own. It was a cross between a graduate seminar and a travelling roadshow - Come Behold Barack Obama and his Astute Advisers Who Can Attest to His Judgement Even in the Absence of Much Experience!

The scene was meant to assure voters worried about the rookie senator's grasp on world affairs, but it also reflected something fundamental about Obama: he likes to surround himself with very smart people. This might not seem so remarkable, except that it hasn't really been the case for this past decade in Washington, where George W Bush mixed unquestionably sharp-minded figures such as Dick Cheney and Karl Rove with obvious cronies. Obama, by contrast, fetishises expertise in a way reminiscent of Franklin D Roosevelt's New Deal and John F Kennedy's "best and brightest". Obama has said that what he enjoyed more than almost anything about his promotion to the US Senate was the ability to call up authorities of all kinds for their insight. Debates within his staff tend to consist of him sitting or stretched out on his office couch, listening intently and pressing those in the room in Socratic fashion before making his decision. Running for president, Obama aimed even higher. After meeting the former Federal Reserve Board chairman Paul Volcker last year, Obama began reaching out to the 81-year-old economics giant (he's 6ft 7in) for advice, a resource that came in handy as the markets crumbled. When Obama appeared at his first press conference as President-elect last week, flanked by his 17-member "Transition Economic Advisory Board," there was Volcker towering over a group that also included the Google CEO Eric Schmidt, the former Treasury secretary and Harvard president Larry Summers, and, looped in by conference call for the preceding meeting, the mega-investor Warren Buffett.

The challenge for Obama is that there is only room in the inner sanctum for so many people. The most influential can be grouped into a few categories - there are the veterans of his tight-knit campaign team who will follow him to Washington, including the laconic southerner likely to be his press secretary, Robert Gibbs, and the mustachioed Chicago newsman-turned-political guru, David Axelrod. There are other Chicago confidantes who acted as travelling companions and gatekeepers during the campaign and will likely play an equivalent role in the White House, most notably Valerie Jarrett, a lawyer, businesswoman and fixture of Chicago's African-American elite. There are longtime denizens of DC's Democratic establishment who embraced Obama early on, including Tom Daschle, the soft-spoken former Senate majority leader from South Dakota, from whom Obama has absorbed some of his best Senate and campaign aides, and Greg Craig, a lawyer who defended Bill Clinton during his impeachment and also issued a damning indictment of Hillary's foreign policy embellishments during the primaries. There are governors who share Obama's conciliatory and earnest manner and could well end up in key cabinet posts, such as Kathleen Sebelius of Kansas and Tim Kaine of Virginia.

And presiding over it all, for now, are two heavyweights from the Clinton era. Leading the transition process is John Podesta, who served as Bill Clinton's final chief of staff and has since headed a liberal think tank that was a kind of Democratic government in waiting; and, assigned as Obama's chief of staff, is Rahm Emanuel, a young Turk in the Clinton White House who, after making millions in finance, was elected to Congress from Illinois. Emanuel is uncommonly colourful by the standards of today's capital, a former ballet dancer and civilian volunteer in the Israeli Defense Forces who is notorious for his profanity and pugnacity. (In a 2005 tribute, Obama joked that the teenaged accident that cost Emanuel part of his middle finger had "rendered him practically mute" and that Emanuel had composed a ballet based on Machiavelli's The Prince, with a lot of "kicks below the waist".)

Emanuel would seem in some ways to undercut Obama's call for a "new politics" - a Clinton holdover whose flair for the dramatic strays from the Obama team's buttoned-down tendencies. But his selection is a sign that, for all of the President-elect's high-mindedness, he knows how good it is to have people like Emanuel in your corner.

I observed this most recently at the convention in Denver, where a colleague asked Emanuel what he made of Obama's acceptance speech. In characteristically profane fashion, Emanuel praised the speech for its tough retorts to John McCain's attacks. And for emphasis, as he spoke, he tapped my colleague in the chest repeatedly and with perhaps more force than strictly necessary. Emanuel assures that for all its intellectualism, Obama's White House will not go soft.

Post this article to

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • newsvine
  • Reddit

5 comments from readers

subprimate
13 November 2008 at 15:11

Well, either it's business as usual with US support for Israel, or this is a devious move to prepare the ground for a real peace effort with the Palestinians.

swatantra nandanwar
14 November 2008 at 19:53

Big mistake. Looks like the Obama Administration is going to be in the pocket of Israel as previous Administrations. We were looking for some imagination and a distinct change in policy, against Israel and pro-peace, not more of the same.

Danielle
18 November 2008 at 16:36

subprimate - With Obama as president it must be business as usual with Kenya and Indonesia too, right?

swatantra - In the politics of the ME being against Israel is viewed as pro-Arab. Why would that bring peace?

Danielle
18 November 2008 at 16:39

subprimate & swatantra:

Obama and Emmanuel are 'old boys' of the Chicago political machine. Why wouldn't he use him at the White House?

Why don't you go live in the US and fight your corner there?

gnuneo
19 November 2008 at 00:33

the crucial question is will we see that fleet positioned of Iran moving away, or will the World remain on a knife-edge?

Israel is already in a losing corner, in a very few years its long-term regional ally Turkey will break its relations, and there is already a groundswell - and growing - backlash against continued Israeli military and economic support within the US. We can already see that the more AIPAC tries to throw its weight around politically, the more the next generation and everyday voters will demand they be limited in their influence over US politics.

the right-wing Xionists know this of course, they have no intention of supporting Israel forever, only until they are assured that without further support, Israel can and will be swamped and destroyed, and the Final Solution finally solved.

Obama will do as he's told, and as that is unlikely to be along the lines of supporting Palestinian right of self-determination and nationhood, it is in the Israelis hands themselves to choose whether they will have a future, or a self-inspired New Holocaust.

Post your comment

Please note: you will need to login or register before your comment is displayed on the website

You may enter up to 2000 characters (about 300-350 words)

Characters left:

We want to encourage people to comment on our content and to exchange views with other readers and hope this will be done on a courteous basis. However, if you encounter posts which are offensive please let us know by emailing comments@newstatesman.co.uk and we will take swift action where necessary.

Read More

Vote!

Should the international community intervene in Gaza?