Hurricane Sarah

Andrew Stephen

Published 04 September 2008

McCain's new partnership with a telegenic mother-of-five has dramatically shifted the dynamics and direction of the election

John McCain with Sarah Palin

Hurricanes Gustav and Hanna may have brought hell to the people of America's Gulf Coast, but they came like manna from heaven for Senator John McCain, his brand-new running mate Sarah Palin, and the Republicans. First, McCain was quicker off the mark than Barack Obama by taking the decision to abandon political rallies, and he toured the affected areas instead - getting priceless footage on to the nation's television screens of a would-be president looking and acting just like a president should, receiving briefings and talking knowledgeably about the situation in press conferences and interviews. Obama, meanwhile, was stuck looking helpless in Lima, Ohio - 1,000km north.

Second, Hurricane Gustav made landfall in the early hours of 1 September, the day the Republican convention, destined to crown McCain and Palin, was due to begin in St Paul, Minnesota. You would have thought, four days after the Democratic convention in Denver reached a televised climax with Senator Obama's acceptance speech, fireworks and balloons at his $6m extravaganza in the Denver Broncos stad ium, that McCainites would have wanted every minute of live, coast-to-coast television they could get.

But a convention on Monday night would have been their nightmare: the scheduled speakers were none other than George W Bush and Dick Cheney - the last thing McCain would have wanted the nation to see was those two passing their mantle to him. Bush, mindful of his ineffable performance when Hurricane Katrina struck in 2005, stayed at the White House and immediately cancelled his appointment at the convention. So did Cheney, who was off - phew! - to Georgia, Ukraine and Azerbaijan the next day, making any appearance by him impossible.

Third, besides creating the illusion that he was taking charge of hurricane preparedness, McCain - emboldened, I suspect, by at last having a running mate of his own - seized the opportunity to make himself appear to be a thoroughly responsible decision-maker by selflessly cancelling the razzmatazz planned for Monday night. "This is a time when we have to do away with our party politics and we have to act as Americans," McCain said in an oh-so-respon sible broadcast that, had he been reading more fluently from an autocue and with the presidential seal in front of him, could have been coming from the White House itself. "We take off our Republican hats and put on our American hats," he went on. What a statesman!

Fourth, and in what may prove to be the most valuable of all the unlikely benefits Gustav and Hanna bring to the Republicans, the storms took much of the immediate public pressure off McCain's vice-presidential running-mate. I understand that the 44-year-old governor of Alaska, Sarah Palin - whose name McCain announced to a stunned world the day after Obama's fireworks - spent the hours closeted, out of the limelight, with party apparatchiks in St Paul, frantically trying to get up to speed on national and foreign policy issues for the hustings and, above all, for the much-awaited evening when she comes face-to-face with Senator Joe Biden at the vice-presidential debate in St Louis, Missouri, on 2 October.

At a stroke, McCain has seized much of the “change” territory

for himself

Inevitably, the dirt about Governor Palin was already flying. First came the national airing of "Troopergate," a saga that has already received wide publicity in Alaska: Palin has been accused of sacking the state's public safety commissioner because he refused to dismiss a policeman named Mike Wooten - Palin's former brother-in-law, who had divorced her sister and Tasered her 12-year-old nephew. Wooten has been reprimanded a dozen or so times since 2001, but because Palin herself has acquired a reputation for being incorruptible in a state that is notoriously corrupt, the story took off.

A calculated risk

Then, last Monday, came the "bombshell" that Palin's 17-year-old, unmarried daughter Bristol was five months pregnant - and was going to marry her high-school boyfriend, the baby's father. But in this peculiarly nasty campaign, the furore did not stop there. Blogs such as http://www.barackoblogger.com, as well as some in the mainstream media, starting putting out untrue allegations that Palin's own five-month-old son, Trig - who has Down's syndrome - is, in fact, the child of Bristol.

I wrote recently that Obama is taking a "colossal" risk in having Senator Joe Biden as his running mate, but it is nothing compared to that of McCain's risk when it comes to Palin. The two had never even met until February, when they had a 15-minute chat at a meeting of the National Governors Association in Washington.

But, despite the legions of Democratic and Republican operatives heading for Anchorage as I write, the McCain campaign insists that Palin's background had been carefully vetted, and that they already knew about Trooper- and Babygate; they say privately that they wanted both supposed scandals to come out early, so that manufactured furores in the final two months before polling day could be avoided.

The truth, though, is that McCain needed to do something dramatic to light fire to his campaign. Although he was holding his own against Obama to a degree many found surprising for a Republican in George W Bush's America of 2008, his campaign was not gaining traction. The problem facing him was that nearly all the obvious possible running mates were white men on the wrong side of middle age, such as former governors Mitt Romney (the choice until the last moment) or Tom Ridge - or even Senator Joe Lieberman, Al Gore's Democratic running mate in 2000 who has been drifting rightwards ever since and is now an Independent. The one remaining alternative was 47-year-old Tim Pawlenty, governor of Minnesota, but he is not especially telegenic.

So a woman it had to be. McCain seriously considered Meg Whitman, the 58-year-old founder and former chief executive of eBay, and Carly Fiorina, 53, the former boss of Hewlett-Packard, but neither had the necessary political instincts. He also needed somebody as young as possible to offset his own biggest liability - his age, now 72- and finally came up with Palin, 44, whose popularity ratings in Alaska have just soared to an unprecedented 80 per cent. By choosing her, the McCain ticket magically morphed into one that was, on average, only two years older than Obama.

McCain's announcement, which came the day after Obama's acceptance speech and stole much of his thunder, changed the entire dynamics of the race. The Obama team had prepared McCain-Romney, McCain-Lieberman, and McCain-Pawlenty attack ads, ready to be broadcasted across the nation the moment the Republican nominee made his announcement. But even they, the fastest-moving and most efficient campaign organisation since Bill Clinton's took President George Bush Sr by surprise in 1992, were not at all prepared for Governor Palin.

In one single strike, therefore, McCain had altered the thrust and direction meticulously planned by both sides. The Obama campaign had settled on a strategy of hammering away until election day on 4 November with the insistence that a McCain presidency would merely be a continuation of George W Bush's, constantly using the slogan "McCain the Same" in their two-month blitz of ads.

Suddenly, though, that argument weakened when Obama found himself facing an opponent whose running mate - rather than the stodgy old Romney or Ridge figure he had expected - was a self-described "hockey mom" and mother-of-five from Alaska, known to her basketball teammates in school as "Sarah Barracuda". The argument that the Obama-Biden ticket alone represented "change" also suddenly weakened; arguably, the McCain-Palin ticket now represented an even more seismic change.

For his part, McCain largely sacrificed his "experience" and "not ready to lead" arguments against the Democrats by choosing Palin. She, after all, did not even have a passport until she recently applied for one to visit Alaskan National Guard troops in Germany and Kuwait, so McCain could hardly continue to campaign against Obama by citing his foreign policy inexperience.

At a stroke, though, McCain had seized much of the "change" territory for himself: instead of two men in jackets and ties taking over the White House in 20 January as usual, he could argue that he is offering the prospect of a man and a mother-of-five in a skirt doing so instead. He had also positioned himself to steal a chunk of the non-ideological female supporters of Hillary Clinton, who are still chafing bitterly at the way Obama treated the Clintons; the database of Hillary donors would be like Alaskan gold-dust should it somehow mysteriously find its way into the McCain camp.

McCain's decision has also made life much more difficult for Biden, Obama's designated attack dog: at 65, he is from a generation still not comfortable with the notion of gender equality, and the possibility that he could bully and/or patronise Palin in the vice-presidential debate is a very real one. That alone would badly damage Obama, especially with female voters.

All of which is to say that we now have a new 2008 election on our hands, its dynamics and directions dramatically shifted. The supreme irony in the debate about Palin's lack of "experience" is that, compared with Hillary Clinton, McCain or Obama, she is the only one to have had actual executive experience of running anything: two years as governor of the nation's sixth most affluent state which is twice the size of Texas. This is the reason Americans have traditionally looked to governors, rather than senators or congressmen, to be their presidents; either McCain or Obama will be only the third president in history to have gone from the Senate to the White House (the others being Warren Harding in 1921 and JFK in 1961).

It is too early to say what Palin's arrival has done to the persistently close poll figures; Obama's extravaganza appeared to have given him little or no bounce until 1 September, when CBS found him five points up from before the Democratic convention. That gave him an overall lead of eight points, the largest so far.

Daily tracking polls, though, still showed Obama with statistically insignificant leads, ranging from one to six points. These polls mean little, in any case, until each party has had its convention enthroning its candidate and his running mate, and the real, post-Labor Day battle has commenced. Which means that next week we will have an altogether better idea of just how much the unexpected advent on the scene of Sarah Barracuda is affecting this most bizarre of US presidential elections.

Post this article to

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • newsvine
  • Reddit

33 comments from readers

Gideon Polya
04 September 2008 at 11:22

The article and the American political process suffer from the Fawlty Towers prescription of "don't mention the war" - yet the Bush War on Asian, Arab, Muslim, non-European and ethnically and/or culturally Semitic Women and Children in which John McCain and Sarah Palin are complicit has so far been associated with post-invasion excess deaths in Occupied Iraq and Occupied Afghanistan of 2 million and 3-6 million, respectively; post-invasion under-5 infant deaths of 0.6 million and 2.1 million, respectively; and refugees totalling 4.5 million and 4 million, respectively; an Iraqi Genocide and an Afghan Genocide as defined by Article 2 of the UN Genocide Convention (see: http://www.edwebproject.org/sideshow/genocide/convention.htm... ).

Sarah Palin's record has been utterly appalling as has that of child-bombing "war hero" John McCain.

Racist Religious Right Republican (R4), pro-Gun, anti-Science, anti-Asian, anti-Polar Bear, anti-Wolf, pro-War, pro-Zionist (pro-invasion, occupation and ethnic cleansing of foreign countries) , anti-Gay, anti-Environment, pro-Oil, pro-Coal, pro-Nuclear Terrorism, climate criminal, terracidal Bush-ite warmongers John McCain and Sarah Palin together represent a major threat not just to the Conquered Subjects of the American Empire but also to India, South Asia, Africa, Humanity and the Biosphere.

Sarah Palin has an utterly appalling record that is summarized by the following detailed and documented analyses:

“Sarah Palin - an awful record. Why Sarah Palin is unfit to be Vice President”: http://mwcnews.net/content/view/24987/42/ .

“Top Ten most disturbing facts and impressions about Sarah Palin”: http://www.alternet.org/election08/97198/top_ten_most_distur... .

“Sarah Palin’s awful environmental record”: http://www.green-blog.org/2008/09/01/sarah-palins-awful-envi... .

“20 reasons why Sarah Palin is unfit to be vice president of US”: http://gpolya.newsvine.com/_news/2008/08/31/1810314-20-reaso... ).

“US nuclear terrorism, Global Warming, Genocide – Why Sarah Palin is UNFIT for office”: http://bellaciao.org/en/spip.php?article17291 .

McCain & Palin unfit to rule & threaten India with Poverty, Death, Global Warming & US state terrorism: http://gideon.sulekha.com/blog/post/2008/09/mccain-palin-unf... .

The most serious complaint by far against Sarah Palin is that she is complicit in the Bush War on Terror that in horrible reality is a cowardly and racist War on Asian, Arab, Muslim and non-European Women and Children and which in Iraq (1990-2008) and Afghanistan (2001-2008) alone has been associated with about 4 million under-5 year old infant deaths (1.8 million in Iraq, 1990-2008 and 2.1 million in Occupied Afghanistan; calculated as of September 2008 from the the latest UN Population Division data: http://esa.un.org/unpp/ ) – 4 million reasons why Sarah Palin is utterly unfit to be Vice President of the US and indeed is unfit to hold any public office.

Outstanding Jewish British writer and Nobel Laureate Harold Pinter has demanded that Bush and Blair be arraigned for war crimes before the International Criminal Court (see: http://www.countercurrents.org/arts-pinter081205.htm) - Palin and McCain should be arraigned there also as minor players who have supported the ongoing Iraqi Holocaust, Iraqi Genocide, Afghan Holocaust and Afghan Genocide.

Europhobe
04 September 2008 at 13:14

ack - Veeps traditionally have little impact unless like Eagleton they turn out to be bonkers and have been hooked up to the mains at some point. The "Palin-storm" will die away....

ikotubo
04 September 2008 at 14:37

I'm just beginning to realize that when Americans speak of "values," they mean turning hypocrisy into a virtue - quite literally. Here, for example, is a woman who represents the so-called "Christian Right" - a dangerous, fanatical pack of wannabe puritans whom Jesus Christ himself spent much time denouncing; a group which never stops condemning the rest of humanity using the venomous rhetoric of eternal damnation for "crimes" such as extra-marital sex. They are even known to wield a veto over government policies in many areas of national life. Yet, because it is her own child (and I have nothing whatsoever against the latter) that has become pregnant outside of wedlock, it has all suddenly become "a personal matter." She is even being praised for this shameless hypocrisy.

As for John McCain himself, well, it's good to know that he now recognizes the importance of human life, just as he needs some votes. Where was he when his fellow Americans were allowed to perish during Katrina? Where was he when the streets of New Orleans were strewn with countless corpses? And, is this so-called "war hero" the same individual responsible for atrocious crimes in vietnam? And the same man who continues to "justify" the slaughter of millions of innocent civilians in Iraq and Afghanistan?

Lord have mercy!

writeon
04 September 2008 at 16:12

Looking at her poitical background and views is rather unnerving. It's a heady mix of both political and religious extremism.

The Republicans love her because she seems like a wonderous amalgam of Reagan and Thatcher, a rightist wetdream.

Politically her roots are in the ideology of the ultra-right. Her former and formative church is 'crazy'. She has Christian Zionist sympathies and seems to believe we are living in the 'end times'. Not only that, she has stated that America's war is a reflection of God's will. Palin sits on the tip of dark, dark, iceberg of reactionary politics. Scratch under the surface of this dark mass and you'll find a cross buried with a swastika.

Cutting to the quick, and this may sound over dramatic, or paranoid, but I believe she represents the acceptable face of American political/religious fascism. When she 'joked' and compared herself to a pitbull I believe Sarah Palin was actually revealing the truth about herself.

What this means is that political and religious extremists are moving closer and closer to real power in the United States, a fact that should concern us all.

ahfairley
04 September 2008 at 18:04

I find the idea that Palin is supposed to snare diaffected Hillary supporters rather amusing. Given Palin's increasingly well-documented far right (dare I say fringe?) views, about the only thing she has in common with Hillary is that she is a woman.

However, given the abysmal stupidity the majority of Americans have displayed in voting for someone who was plainly their class enemy in the last two elections, and their stunning inability to distinguish lies from truth, I suppose it could work . . . .

gcarth
04 September 2008 at 18:27

writeon says:

"When she 'joked' and compared herself to a pitbull I believe Sarah Palin was actually revealing the truth about herself."

Of course, she's a lot better looking than a pitbull but ...her strident voice and brash aggressive style is very ugly. In her case, beauty really is only skin deep.

However, let's not dwell on getting personal - the whole of the Big Business/Media/Political machine in the US (and the UK) is an ugly obscenity.

Republicans/Democrats; Tories/New Labour - they're one and the same. All the piffle that Charles Clarke has written in the NS this week, further reinforces my disrespect for most leading politicians and old has-beens who are full of their own self-importance and complete disregard for ordinary decent people.

Sadly, I don't see how anything can improve much under Obama in the US or Cameron in the UK until big business ties with politicians are broken - and that's not going to happen.

Douglas Chalmers
04 September 2008 at 20:46

Obviously, McCain and the Republicans understand "The Art of War" far better than the poofy trendy but still fundamentally sexist liberal left in the USA. The question that remains, though, is whether they will be able to understand "The Art of Peace" once they are in office, uhh?

But if there is one thing unusual with Sarah Palin, it is that she has married a man of native American Eskimo extraction. That gives her a much less narrow view on white-is-right Anglo global hegemony as well as a more interesting view on religion than many have assumed.

Quote from "The Art of Peace":-

"All things, material and spiritual, originate from one source and are related as if they were one family. The past, present, and future are all contained in the life force. The universe emerged and developed from one source, and we evolved through the optimal process of unification and harmonization.....

The Art of Peace is medicine for a sick world. There is evil and disorder in the world because people have forgotten that all things emanate from one source. Return to that source and leave behind all self-centered thoughts, petty desires, and anger. Those who are possessed by nothing possess everything.....

The Art of Peace functions everywhere on earth, in realms ranging from the vastness of space down to the tiniest plants and animals. The life force is all-pervasive and its strength boundless. The Art of Peace allows us to perceive and tap into that tremendous reserve of universal energy..." http://www.aikidonj.com/pages/ueshiba.html

Cybertiger
04 September 2008 at 22:46

"Republicans/Democrats; Tories/New Labour - they're one and the same."

And can you tell the difference between Coke and Pepsi?

Claddach
05 September 2008 at 04:09

The sane amongs us will be relieved Gideon Polya has added Sarah Palin to his sideline in conspiracy theorising about Zionist power, and how Mossad and the CIA carried out the acts of mass murder on 9/11.

Here’s a devastating take down of this right wing nut job's constant disregard for facts. courtesy of Harry's Place. To begin with a quote from Polya that has been widely used in extreme right wing web sites from the KKK to Hamas and David Duke and 9/11 Truthers. This quote just about catches the essence of everything Polya has written and explains his popularity with the extreme Right and conspiracy cranks.

"However the real problems of the World have got catastrophically worse for the World in the last few years while the West has been obsessed with the dishonest, racist, murderous, Zionist-inspired War on Terror (indeed according to former president of Italy, law professor and intelligence intimate Francesco Cossiga the initiating 9/11 atrocity was actually committed by the US CIA and Israeli Mossad in the interests of US and Zionist hegemony: http://mwcnews.net/content/view/18569/26/).

Now to Harry's Place response:

There is one problem with Polya’s thesis. Cossiga, the former President of Italy was being sarcastic, and parodying the views of anti-Berlusconi conspiracy nuts. He made it very clear that he was not a conspiracy theorist at all in a later interview.

The notion that Cossiga was affirming the 9/11 Troof thesis is pushed by Polya, because he is a credulous fool whose mind is bubbling over with feverish thoughts of Zionist plots. And it was circulated to British academics on the UCU Activists List because this is her mindset as well.

antileft
05 September 2008 at 11:21

"And can you tell the difference between Coke and Pepsi?"

Was that supposed to be a joke? Try Yahoo chat.

Jonty Stang
05 September 2008 at 12:02

For the record, I can tell the difference, and Coke tastes better.

Douglas Chalmers
05 September 2008 at 15:59

# Gideon Polya, 04 Sept: "...she is complicit in the Bush War on Terror that in horrible reality is a cowardly and racist War on Asian, Arab, Muslim and non-European Women and Children..."

Its a wonder you didn't wait until the 9th of this month to post all that covertly sexist tripe, Gideon Polya, as a kind of commemoration of your own jingoistic agenda.

In actual fact, you sound exactly the same as the Hillary Clinton detractors at the beginning who generously and so hypocritically blamed the entire Gulf War 1 and Gulf War 2 and everthing else since the US civil war on Hillary for having the temerity of being a WOMAN in US federal politics.

# ahfairley, 04 Sept: "Given Palin's increasingly well-documented far right (dare I say fringe?) views, about the only thing she has in common with Hillary is that she is a woman..."

That's darn right, #ahfairley, she's a WOMAN and the plain fact of it all is that SEX is right there on the agenda now. Its not about color and poofy political correctness at all any more.

Of course, the good boys in the MSM don't like it and wanna have a real ol' cry..... after all, they worked SO hard to get rid of Hillary, uhh.

# Andrew Stephen: "At a stroke, McCain has seized much of the “change” territory for himself..."

Its a done job, ha ha! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d-QevraCQUc&feature=related (has colorful American language...).

antileft
05 September 2008 at 17:52

"That's darn right, #ahfairley, she's a WOMAN and the plain fact of it all is that SEX is right there on the agenda now. Its not about color and poofy political correctness at all any more."

Yes, and it's not even about policies, is it? Whats the matter with you, douglas? If you want to read about girls and sex, read FHM or cosmopolitan. This is about politics. As I said to you before- you shouldnt vote. It dilutes the vote of people who vote for policies instead of dick/lack of dick.

writeon
05 September 2008 at 19:27

Politics has very little to do with the modern electoral process. Modern elections are primarily about 'values' and personalities who symbolically express or embody these values.

Essentially elections, especially in the United States are about culture, 'selling' a cultural narrative or fairytale about who we are as a people and how we live and interact.

Criticizing the accepted fairytale is often labelled as unpatriotic and therefor, bad.

What seems to happen with all empires towards the end, is that the myth or ideology, comes to displace reality, pragmatism and realism. One moves into a kind of utopian dream state, whilst outside grubby reality is undermining the very foundations of imperial rule.

Douglas Chalmers
05 September 2008 at 23:14

#antileft: "Yes, and it's not even about policies, is it..."

"Palintology" - the science dealing with Alaska's first female governor + US VP nominee..... http://palintology.com/ (check the ComedyCentral video)

antileft
06 September 2008 at 07:52

"What seems to happen with all empires towards the end, is that the myth or ideology, comes to displace reality, pragmatism and realism. One moves into a kind of utopian dream state, whilst outside grubby reality is undermining the very foundations of imperial rule."

See what I mean writeon? Some parts of your posts are ok- you actually say something. But then you start rambling and rambling and it all becomes a rather self-indulgent process of drivel and verbal masturbation. You need to learn to edit your thoughts.

Douglas Chalmers
06 September 2008 at 16:06

antileft, You really "need to learn to edit your thoughts....." http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TWaL1XnUPN0&feature=iv

antileft
06 September 2008 at 17:14

Hilarious doug. Here's a link for you:

http://www.fhm.com

You can read about girls, sex, movies, and things like that. No need to worry about politics anymore. And no need to vote either- leave it to people who dont choose based on dick or lack of.

writeon
06 September 2008 at 18:13

After the rampant euphoria surrounding Obama's campaign for nomination, it seems many people are coming back to reality with a bump, namely that the Democrats could lose again and for the same reasons they have the last few times. We'll set aside electoral irregularities for now.

It just seems that the Republicans tell a better and more emotionally engaging and energizing story than the Democrats. Appeal to the heart, not the head. It's like creating a 'love affair' with the voters, seducing them into a kind of honey-trap version of politics, and when they realize what's happened it's too late because the election is over!

Steelsil
06 September 2008 at 22:21

-John Birchers 'pale in' comparison-

In the hills and hollows, up crick and down dale

Throwback revenants gnash teeth and send up a hail

The hicks from the sticks each one and each pair of

with a frenzied howl cry out for darlin’ Ms. Sarah

With a beating of drums and a blare of brass horns

The hillbillies and trailer trash are wailin’ for Palin!

antileft
07 September 2008 at 06:07

"It's like creating a 'love affair' with the voters, seducing them into a kind of honey-trap version of politics, and when they realize what's happened it's too late because the election is over!"

There it is! The verbal masturbation.

Douglas Chalmers
07 September 2008 at 15:39

Sarah Palin Gender Card - http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article20704.htm (I'm posting this embedded link as ther was a problem with the direct link)

antileft
07 September 2008 at 16:50

I'm not interested, Doug. Quit posting links- Ive already told you where you can find FHM. That's all you need to know. Go there and quit trying to be political. It's dick/pussy that youre interested in- not politics. Try FHM.

writeon
07 September 2008 at 17:41

The Democrats are going to have hard time dealing with Palin. Firstly every time the bring up the issue of lack of experience, it risks rebounding on them as Obama isn't exactly spectacularly experienced himself.

Also Palin is riminds me of the warrior princess - Zena, or even Diana the Huntress. I think she taps into an incredibly powerful archetype in our culture.

One would be foolish to underestimate the symbolic importance of her obvious fecundity. There's a kind of feral quality about her, which matches well with McCain's maverick image. Republicans aren't boring, their smokin'!

Obama appears stilted and effete in comparison. Does he look like he could kill anything, even a fly? Palin actually comes from the last American frontier. She is almost a throwback to the myth of the west. She's Annie Oakley and Obama's a genteel houseslave let loose in the master's library.

There's always been this contrast and friction between the frontier and back east in American culture and the arts. Palin seems 'authentic' whilst Obama seems 'manufactured'. In reality they are both manufactured and experts at playing a culturally significant role.

But what arbout there politics? I'm not sure that stuff really matters that much in a post-political world. Ideology is really dead in the mainstream. What matters is personality, image, character and symbolism, wrapped in hyperbole and emotion.

Palin is an extraordinarily potent and effective symbol. While Obama appeals to the world and not just the United States, which was the idea after the disaster of the Bush years, Palin pushes so many hot buttons in domestic American politics it's ridiculous.

Providing she doesn't completely implode, she's an incredibly advantage for the McCain campaign, the differnece between winning and losing. If McCain wins he'll owe to Palin and her obvious and profound sexual power.

Already one is seeing the NRA throwing open its coffers to support McCain, the evangelical base is galvenized by her presence on the ticket, and some believe McCain will receive 10% or even 15% more votes because of her.

I think the Left continually underestimates the power and significance of symbolism in American politics and how many people are ready to chose a hero of a mere mortal.

Gideon Polya
07 September 2008 at 22:06

So, to a Palin supporter in this thread my REPORTING of horrendous Indigenous infant deaths in Occupations and Wars that Sarah Palin SUPPORTS is "sexist tripe" and pleading for cessation of war criminal Western violence to Asian Women and Children in the Bush Wars somehow reflects a "jingoistic agenda" (see above) . Rubbish - if anything is "sexist tripe and jingoism" it is the continuing racist mass murder of Asian, Arab, Muslim, South Asian, non-European Women and Children for the glory of "democratic Nazi" Bush Amerika.

Consult the UN Population Division (see: http://www.un.org/esa/population/unpop.htm

) and you will find that 412,000 under-5 year old infants die each year in the Occupied Iraqi and Afghan Territories, 90% avoidably and over 1,000 DAILY due to war criminal refusal of Occupiers to provide life-sustaining requisites demanded by the Geneva Convention.

One can well understand from the horrendous UN statistics (over 1,000 Iraqi and Afghan infants actively or passively murdered by the US Alliance EVERY DAY) why outstanding Hungarian Jewish American investor, author, philanthropist, Holocaust hero and Holocaust survivor George Soros has called for the "de-Nazification" of Bush America (see: http://mwcnews.net/content/view/12714/26/ ) .

Child-bombing, child-killing coward McCain was killing children in Vietnam by dropping bombs and napalm on them and today, together with his running mate, evil, warmonger Sarah Palin, is complicit in the horrendous mass infanticide of the ongoing Iraqi Genocide and the Afghan Genocide.

Remorseless, war criminal, racist killers of Asian children like McCain cannot be heroes - they are evil, yellow, child-killing cowards and the same goes for their colleagues and their "Patriaut" Bush-ite US voters involved in the most evil, genocidal Patriautism since the Nazi Holocaust of 30 million Slaves, Jews and Roma in World War 2..

In considering the immense numbers of civilian deaths in high technology US wars it is germane to consider the following comment by US General Curtis LeMay, commander of the 1945 Tokyo fire bombing operation, as quoted in Rogue State: A Guide to the World's Only Superpower, by William Blum: “I suppose if I had lost the war, I would have been tried as a war criminal. Fortunately, we were on the winning side.”

Someone should tell war criminal, child-killing coward McCain and his evil running mate, warmonger Palin, that "thou shalt not kill children" (see MWC News: http://mwcnews.net/content/view/19454/42/ - but unfortunately this advice won't come from the racist, lying, holocaust-complicit, holocaust-ignoring Mainstream media of the Western Murdochracies.

Decent people successfully applied Sanctions and Boycotts against the UK-, US-, Apartheid Israel- and White Australia-supported Nazi Apartheid regime in South Africa for the denial of one-man-one-vote to African and Indians. Accordingly , Sanctions and Boycotts are urgently required against Amerika and its "democratic Nazi" allies (most notably the new democratic Nazi Germany) for the continuing denial of LIFE to BORN infants in the Occupied Iraqi and Afghan Territories - the "annual death rate" is 2.3% (under-5 year old Occupied Iraqi infants), 6.2% (under-5 year old Occupied Afghanistan infants) as compared to 10.2% (Australian prisoners of war of the Japanese in World War 2) and 17% (Jews in Nazi-occupied Europe, 1941-1945).

Claddach
08 September 2008 at 07:30

Here's Gideon Polya on the Alaskan Governor. Sarah Palin is a remorseless, war criminal, a racist killer of Asian children, a backer of apartheid Israel and a supporter of the White Australia-supported Nazi Apartheid regime, condoning Western violence to Asian Women and Children. Palin backs child-bombing, child-killing coward McCain and is herself an evil, warmonger complicit in the horrendous mass infanticide of the ongoing Iraqi Genocide and the Afghan Genocide.

Considering Governor Palin managed all of this without ever owning a passport, she's going to be a real bitch for Gideon to keep up with once she starts getting out and about.

Gideon Polya
08 September 2008 at 13:14

I am quite capable of articulating my own views - I do not need others to falsely assert or obfuscate what I think.

Sarah Palin wholeheartedly supports the Bush Wars that according to UN Population Division data (see: http://esa.un.org/unpp/ ) have been associated with 1.8 million under-5 infant deaths in Iraq (1990-2008) and 2.1 million under-5 infant deaths in Afghanistan (2001-1008).

Those like the Bush-ites, neo-Bush-ites and Zionists who knowingly ignore, deny, minimize, obfuscate, excuse, support, advocate or are otherwise complicit in sustained US Alliance actions involving the active or passive mass murder of children have parted company with Humanity as a whole which resolutely and overwhelmingly believes that "thou shalt not kill children" (see: http://mwcnews.net/content/view/19454/42/ ) .

Sarah Palin is fervent in her support of the "right to life" of the UNBORN even in cases of rape and incest but supports the Bush Wars that have been associated so far with about 4 million deaths of BORN "enemy" infants (90% avoidable and due to malignant deprivation by the US Alliance). Sarah Palin is accordingly unfit for any public office.

Claddach
08 September 2008 at 20:52

If I understand correctly this is Gideon Polya's partial response to the accusation that he is a credulous fool whose mind is bubbling over with feverish thoughts of Zionist plots.

"The Bush-ites, neo-Bush-ites and Zionists who knowingly ignore, deny, minimize, obfuscate, excuse, support, advocate or are otherwise complicit in sustained US Alliance actions involving the active or passive mass murder of children have parted company with Humanity as a whole."

Whew! That carefully considered geopolitical analysis I think deserves a response in a similar vein. And here it comes.

Will he have fries with that?

writeon
09 September 2008 at 19:10

If McCain wins, that's probably four years of rampant imperialism, then Palin will be well poised for her presidential bid and another four or even eight years of misery, by then we will have passed the point of environmetal no return.

edstetser
11 September 2008 at 22:53

Why do all the international leaders who oppose democracy support Obama? Can you imagine Obama standing up to Putin or Iran!?

LoachDriver
22 September 2008 at 18:39

Those here predicting that Sarh Palin's influence on the election is fleeting and of no consequence evidently haven't been paying attention to the news or they don't know America. For instance, yesterday Sarah addressed an enthusied crowd of 60,000, nearly all adults & voters, at Fort Myers, Florida.

When he wins this election, John McCain will owe Sarah bigtime.

Obama mocked and denigrated American small town folk. Unfortunately for his him there are nearly 100,000 small towns in America with populations of 10,000 or less. These people don't appreciate the condescending arrogance of a smart assed lawyer from Chicago, regardless his color. He defines himself as even more alien wherever he speaks to small town folk in urban black ghetto jive.

LoachDriver
22 September 2008 at 18:52

Fortunately, Gideon Polya & his ilk tdon't vote in U.S. elections. John & Saharh have this one won.

Whimperimg about child killing during a shooting war is a joke. What does he think happens in wars? Bad things happen. I a veteran of two tours as a soldier in Viet-Nam, Lieutenant, 1st Infantry & later a Captain in the 101st Airborne never observed any harm done to a non-combatant by an American G.I., let alone never harming a non-combatant myself.

LoachDriver
22 September 2008 at 19:14

Most Americans don't care what most foreignors think about us, perhaps excepting the Cousins, the British, & maybe the Irish & Aussies as well.

For one thing, our economy, the world's most efficient,

is not export driven For another, an ocean seperates us from most of our enemies. And we have the largest & most effective navy in the world.

If I had my way, we'd toss the United Nations out of the U.S.

Post your comment

Please note: you will need to login or register before you can comment on the website

About the writer

Andrew Stephen

Andrew Stephen was appointed US Editor of the New Statesman in 2001, having been its Washington correspondent and weekly columnist since 1998. He is a regular contributor to BBC news programs and to The Sunday Times Magazine. He has also written for a variety of US newspapers including The New York Times Op-Ed pages. He came to the US in 1989 to be Washington Bureau Chief of The Observer and in 1992 was made Foreign Correspondent of the Year by the American Overseas Press Club for his coverage.

Read More

Vote!

Will Baroness Ashton be an effective EU foreign minister?

Suggest a question

View comments

© New Statesman 1913 – 2009

Tracker