Registered user login:

How Palin caught Obama off-guard

Andrew Stephen

Published 18 September 2008

Because she is a mum who shops at Wal-Mart and disembowels moose many Americans, suspicious of intellectuals or elitism, have granted her celebrity status

The Democrats have finally chosen their woman. The stand-in for Sarah Palin who will tussle with Joe Biden in closed-door rehearsals for the vice-presidential debate on 2 October will be 49-year-old Governor Jennifer Granholm of Michigan - a brilliant Democrat who would undoubtedly be a presidential contender herself, had she not been born in Canada and thus constitutionally ineligible to occupy the White House. She will undoubtedly give Biden a hard time, but will Palin?

Three weeks ago, just the thought of this year's vice-presidential debate would have made most Americans yawn. But the sudden emergence of Governor Palin on the world stage on 29 August has electrified this election and turned just about every previous assumption upside down. Biden's little finger, for example, probably knows more about foreign policy than Palin. However, I can easily visualise him patronising or bullying her - which would be catastrophic. Palin, just as easily, could reveal her ignorance or extremism in some equally disastrous way.

The very fact that it is the vice-presidential debate that is suddenly the hottest ticket in America - far more so than any of the three presidential confrontations between Barack Obama and John McCain - is indicative of the disaster that Palin has been for the Democrats so far.

The polls, which now show McCain and Palin ahead, tell their own story. The celebritydom market that Obama had cornered for himself was suddenly hijacked by a brand new political celebrity, spawning more media coverage, gossip and excitement than either Obama or McCain. Picking Palin to be his running mate was a high-risk gamble for McCain, but there are now only six weeks left in which she must maintain rigid discipline and avoid gaffes.

If she and McCain can pull that off, I suspect they will win on 4 November. It is certainly a very big if. But, precisely because it was so very unexpected, even by those close to McCain, Palin's emergence flummoxed and panicked Obama. Faced with a competing political celeb rity suddenly hurling invective and jokes at his expense to vast rallies of people roaring with laughter - an experience to which he had never been subjected - Obama visibly wilted and made the error of responding to her attacks rather than concentrating his fire steadily on McCain, a much more vulnerable and important target.

Michael Dukakis, the former governor of Massachusetts, made the same mistake in 1988 by campaigning against poor Dan Quayle, George H W Bush's running mate, rather than Bush himself. The result was that Bush and the blatantly inadequate Quayle won by a 40-state landslide. Adlai Stevenson had done exactly the same in 1952, handing two presidential terms to the Republicans.

So, if Obama does not speedily change course, and McCain-Palin do not present him with any gifts, he could well be heading for the same fate. His "change" theme was snatched from him in a single strike by the Republicans - but, at least so far, Obama has failed to adapt to the drastically changed political landscape. He seems unable to confront the inconvenient reality that rather than being the small-town mayor she once was, Palin is now the highly popular governor of a state with 29,000 full- and part-time employees and an annual budget of $12bn, and thus has more executive experience than Obama himself, McCain and Hillary Clinton put together.

The Sarah Palin/Alaska phenomenon is one, I suspect, that will never be properly understood in Britain. It is because she is a mum who shops at Wal-Mart, runs marathons and disembowels moose that so many Americans, ever suspicious of intellectuals or elitism, have granted her instant celebrity status. Alaska, a state I know well, still has more than a whiff of the frontier mentality. "We don't give a damn how they do it Outside" is an ever-popular bumper sticker, "Outside" being the rest of mainland America.

That kind of defiance, personified by Palin, is widely admired by Americans. The Democrats underestimate her at their peril. I would guess that Granholm, Palin's fellow governor from Michigan, is politically astute enough to know that the Democrats must now reserve most of their fire for McCain, and that when they attack Palin the target should be her extreme right-wing views rather than her celebrityhood.

Yet she also knows that the Democrats have selected a previously little-known male celeb rity to be their presidential candidate, who in turn chose a 65-year-old man to be his running mate, rather than the woman who finished in a virtual dead heat with him in the Democratic primaries.

Have the Republicans outwitted the Democrats again, this time by finding a little-known female celebrity as a supposed riposte to sexist hubris? Time, I fear, will tell.

Post this article to

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • newsvine
  • Reddit

42 comments from readers

nawawimohamad
18 September 2008 at 10:50

Sarah Palin has not been honest and naive on things other than Alaska. If she had not been telegenic, she is a nobody unless of course the American voters are stupid.

martha
18 September 2008 at 11:02

Attacking Palin is not at all belittling the millions of ordinary Americans like I am. These ordinary Americans are smart enough to realize that we do not qualify to take over a high level VP job just like that. Only Palin has the blind ambition not to blink when accepting such a job she is plainly not (yet) qualified for. To get America out of the financial mess, the mess in Iraq and all the other problems brewing, we need someone a lot more intelligent and a lot better than just "ordinary".

rozz62
18 September 2008 at 12:07

Barack Obama privately tried to persuade Iraqi political leaders to stall an agreement on scaling back American troops in Iraq while publicly campaigning for a speedy withdrawal, Obama’s campaign is not a train wreck; it’s Chernobyl.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bKqHFk-3yQM

rozz62
18 September 2008 at 12:07

One of CNN's leading Obama sychophants, Candy Crowley, let the cat out of the Obama bag, when she told viewers that the Obama campaign had wanted horrific Wall Street headlines to help their campaign. Crowley, and fellow Obama sychophant David Gergen, were extolling the virtues of bad economic news for the Obama campaign.

Of course, no one would expect CNN to actually deal with the issue of who or what party is responsible for the economy. No, their template is the economy is horrible, we are going to blame Bush and McCain and Obama will benefit.

The Drudge Report had this story on its site this morning, it had been pulled. Drudge realized how bad this would look for the Obama campaign.

It's beyond audacious that we have one candidate for President who is full of hope. Hope that the economy is so bad, that he can win an election because of it. The conservative internet has its work cut out for it for the next 53 days.

Camus
18 September 2008 at 12:53

The only hope is that the US electorate are not so dumb as some of these 'comments' indicate! They elected Bush - twice, once legally, but aren't we supposed to learn from our mistakes?

antileft
18 September 2008 at 12:58

Oh bugger off rozz. I hate the left more than anyone- but cant you tell youre just backing yet another moron? I suppose youre little more than another of those idiotic republicans who're so provincial and uneducated that you actually buy all that rural simpleton nonsense "we want a state that leaves us alone so we can carry guns but we want the state to ban abortion!" "We support the lowering of taxes and the raising of spending!" "We believe in freedom and a government that leaves us alone but we support the use of torture on anyone who the government deems a threat!" "We dont like the idea of state handouts but we support the biggest handout of all- inheritance!"

Youre such a damn embarrassment to people on the right everywhere. Totally idiotic and illogical. Take your boneheaded culture and shove it.

Sugarplum
18 September 2008 at 14:08

I am an American living abroad. I have been listening to what others thinks of America these days>after 8 years ofGeorge Brush, it is very embrassassing to say that I am an American. When Bush won the last election, I was asked why are American so stupid? A question which was very difficult to answer when you look at what Bush has done.

We need a change and McCain will give us the same redirick as Bush .

America is in real mess at the moment. It is felt that the rest of the world cannot take another 4 years of Republican rule.

antileft
18 September 2008 at 14:27

"When Bush won the last election, I was asked why are American so stupid?"

Youll get a lot of that here. Especially from posters like the incredibly moronic Cybertiger. They seem to be unable to grasp the issues- or that America has, on the one hand, some of the most intelligent, moderate people in the world, but unfortunately on the other hand a very high percentage of moronic country folk. In a way, it's their success (because of their intelligence) which was their undoing. They got so rich that all the morons from all over the country were able to breed like cockroaches and have them survive to breed again and again. It's a shame, really... It's a shame also that the political system wasnt able to weed these people out of power. In Britain, our system is more stale and full of career politicians to allow anyone as moronic as Bush to take over. And as a result, they tend to talk more about issues- which turns off the morons like Cybertiger who then dont bother to vote.

Audrey
18 September 2008 at 15:14

Dear Sugarplum,

You invectives might carry more weight if you learn to spell "rhetoric."

antileft
18 September 2008 at 15:20

Oh very mature- let's pick on each other's spelling, grammar, and typos. That'll save us having to articulate any kind of intelligent debate.

Phil
18 September 2008 at 17:43

Don't know who "antileft" is, but you are neither mature nor very intelligent. You equate inheritance with a handout? How stupid is that? So your money belongs to the government when you die, not your family? How in the world can it be a "handout" if left for your family, but not a "handout" if given to everyone else? And you say you hate the left, yet you support the person who is probably more left that McGovern? You expect anyone to take you seriously? So, unlike Audrey, I won't take issue with any of your spelling, just with your ignorant and unbelievable stupidity.

Phil
18 September 2008 at 17:45

And as for Sugarplum, when you say " are an American living abroad", ... well, that kind of says it all, doesn't it. Exactly what do you know?

spanishgirl75
18 September 2008 at 17:57

Sugarplum

Shame on you for admitting to being embarassed to admit that you're an American. Who cares what most of the rest of the world thinks? Who do they come to when they need help for any large disaster or war? Last time I checked it sure wasn't France or Russia or Germany, or any other country. Sure Bush hasn't been perfect but I shudder to think where we'd be if Algore or Kerry had been office the last 8 years.

You're an American, embrace it!

michae1c
18 September 2008 at 18:14

antileft is left, he is just too stupid to know it. It is typical for the left to blame everything on Bush including the weather. The picture is much larger than his pea brain can handle. What about our Democratic congress their ratings are lower than Bush’s?

nepeebles
18 September 2008 at 18:23

Palin is about to crash and burn. John McCain is digging his own grave with his lies. With the stock market saggin, McCain continues to believe that everything is just peaches and cream.

McCain, the man that was all for deregulation and tax breaks for the wealthy, is now claiming to be injured, angry

Why? Because he and his croonies got caught with their hands in the cookie jar.

Aren't these the same people who wanted welfare reforms and voted to stop government handouts. And, now the bums want the US TAXPAYERS to bail them out.

Not a dime, I say. Not until you hand over the billions of dollars you've siphoned off in foreign bank accounts. NOt until you give back the plush mansions, and second and third homes, not until you give up the beach house and the ski lodge, and the yachts, and private planes

Oh, and the golden parachute attached to your contract, that has to go too

John McCain insulted American women when he chose Palin. He literally spit in the face of every American with his talks on the economy

Throw the bums out

Mr Fnortner
18 September 2008 at 19:02

I love the choice of Sarah Palin. I love how it has removed Hillary Clinton from the threat of national office for twelve years. I love the whimsy of the Republican party--imagine that! Above all, I love how the Democrats and Republicans are fighting over which side of the Titanic they want to line up on as the ship of state sails out to sea.

antileft
19 September 2008 at 04:23

"It is typical for the left to blame everything on Bush including the weather."

I blame Bush for a dumb war, and for raising spending while idiotically cutting taxes, hence ruining the dollar. And yes, your democratic congress is also a piece of crap. I didnt say it wasnt.

"You equate inheritance with a handout?"

It IS a handout!!! How is it any different to a socialist state handout?! Think about it, idiot! Both enourage laziness and both involve one person gaining for doing NOTHING. Why is it different just because it's your parents instead of the state? You think the state doesnt pay?! If they dont take your money when you die THEY TAKE IT SOMEWHERE ELSE. That's how the economy works.

"So your money belongs to the government when you die, not your family?"

Here's a question for a dumbass who clearly doesnt understand how the economy works. Would you rather pay taxes when you die or when you are alive? Because it's not "either you pay inheritance tax or you dont", it's "either you pay tax as inheritance or you pay somewhere else." The government will get it's money. When do you want to pay? Think about it. Honestly, American's are completely unable to understand the basic math. YOU WILL PAY FOR YOUR GOVERNMENT. There is no way around it. Doesnt matter where. Lower taxes and you pay in debt so you pay later. Remove inheritance tax and you pay somewhere else. You will pay. You need to learn that- it really is very simple.

andres
19 September 2008 at 09:39

with Palin no change for USA,we need new leader can make peace for everybody ,for Repulican just make war and bancrupt ,collaps in all over the like now.Sarah cannot change ,she is just a doll of Mc Cain. Obama for President of USA 2008 -2012.

ikotubo
19 September 2008 at 12:47

I can't be sure who it was that said "he whom the gods wish to destoy, they first make mad." This seems to be the case with the United States, which, like the long-forgotten empires of old, seems to be sowing the seeds for its own decline.

It was not only George Bush, for example, who took America to a war it could not afford economically (leaving aside the illegality and the human cost, both to Americans and raqis alike). It was his fellow "patriots" who willingly swallowed his manifest lies and villified anyone who dared even to urge caution. Now, they seem determined to elect a woman who (her equally simplistic worldview and zealous hypocrisy aside) has stated her desire to instigate a war with Russia. And I'm in no doubt that before long, anyone who dares to urge caution will be labelled "unpatriotic."

And, while I would shed no tear for the inevitable demise of both powers in the event of such a confrontation, the idea of living under Chinese hegemony fills me with much dread.

kevnsheri
19 September 2008 at 13:43

Really she said she would wage war with Russia? That is a pretty overly simplistic account of her statement. Typical democrat. Freeing Iraq from a horrible dictator who murdered thousands of his own people was an illegal action? Really... Wow... I thought attempting genocide would be illegal but hey it's not in our country so leave it alone.

Second earning money to pass down to your kids is every american's god given right and having the government take away the money you earned when you die is just plain retarded. I earned the money and if I choose to give it to my son so he can have a better shot at improving his life so be it. As most people seem to agree the government isn't quite so good at managing money so let me manage the money i earned and have the government stay out of it...

Before you spout off about Mccain and the economy do a little research about Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and the democrat push to give loans to subprime borrowers... Then come talk to me about this all being bush's fault.

Douglas Chalmers
20 September 2008 at 06:28

"Palin, just as easily, could reveal her ignorance or extremism in some equally disastrous way...."

Arrgh, Andrew Stephen, you' don't take long to reveal your own sexism just as the swathe of pro-Obama/anti Hillary Clinton journalists did in the USA. Sad for them, too, that they were wrong-footed by a woman from Alsaka, ha ha.

But the "The Sarah Palin phenomenon" is nothing to do with Alaska, alas for you and your simplistic ideologies. It is an entirely new religion and it is feminism-based, again something far outside your comprehension, uhh. It also has a Nature-based element as she is married to a man of Eskimo/native American ethnicity. That is more significant than you might want to assume. See Alaskan Palintology http://palintology.com/

You also erroneously assume that Sarah Palin's right-wing views are "extreme". Actually, they are not and neither is her Christian evangelism that far out, either. If you were at all honest with your journalist opportunistic self, you would see that a little more clearly.

Cal
20 September 2008 at 07:21

I am a Scot and I think that America does get bad press – like ourselves here in the UK. Thing is though, both our countries spend so much time sorting out other countries problems and not paying enough attention to issues closer to home. We can see where it all goes wrong, but politicians don’t. Here in Scotland, we export Oil, Gas, Petrol and Diesel and we have no shortage of supply, but we pay well over £5 (9$) per gallon and the refinery’s are on our doorsteps, they don’t even have to transport it far so there is no excuse. It is just plain greed by our Government. Now, our utilities bills are going up – doubling in fact, but get this, All of these organisations are making huge profits and add to that, that our food has doubled in price and the fact that our spending on arms is just out of control and you can see why people at home are thinking that the politicians have lost touch with reality. Problem is, once politicians are in, it is very difficult to get them out and here in the UK we have a very sophisticated system of party membership which makes sure that independents get know where fast. They even tried passing a law by the back door to hide their expense from the public? And we pay their salaries! As they say here in the UK – You can’t beat the system! I think you experienced that also with Bush in Florida one time, but you know what you can try. Charity begins at home. Put the power in people’s pocket, by sorting out the economy - not sorting out other rebel countries. Good luck in your forth coming elections. I do hope it falls in favour of the democrats and they have they the common sense to realise that current foreign policy, is just costing far too much in both young lives and money. Lets educate our kids, support, family values and lets rejuvenate our economies through sensible taxation and spending on revised foreign policy. All the best from Scotland.

antileft
20 September 2008 at 15:27

"Second earning money to pass down to your kids is every american's god given right and having the government take away the money you earned when you die is just plain retarded."

Yes, very intellectual, but you failed to answer my question, didnt you? Try again:

Would you rather pay taxes when you die or when you are alive? Because it's not "either you pay inheritance tax or you dont", it's "either you pay tax as inheritance or you pay somewhere else." The government will get it's money. The state costs x dollars. When will you pay? When youre alive or when you die? Answer the question. God given right, my ass.

antileft
20 September 2008 at 15:51

"Freeing Iraq from a horrible dictator who murdered thousands of his own people was an illegal action? Really... Wow... I thought attempting genocide would be illegal but hey it's not in our country so leave it alone."

This is such an overused fox news line it's just a bore. Yes he was a dictator. Yes, he killed lots of people to stay in power (as ALL dictators do). But the question is: What makes this dictator different from ALL THE OTHER dictators that America supports?

On a different subject, here's a list of dictators, savages, and crappy regimes America has given money to before they used that money to murder Americans and supporters of America:

The Viet Cong (before the war)

The Khmer Rouge (during the world's worst communist massacre)

Bin Laden (before he bombed America)

The taliban (before they allowed bin laden to bomb America)

Saddam Hussein (before he bombed Kuwait).

WHOOPS!!!

fairplay
21 September 2008 at 08:30

AL

what is your capitalist take on the FEds buyout this week? come on mr know it all. your seemingly right wing capitalist mates on the other side of the atlantic who you revere sooooooo much have socialised the banking system!!!

and the best of it yet is mccain the no brain asking for an investigation. oh, how his bosses in the banking families must be laughing at that one!

over to palin. a perfect example of american values, and the qualifications needed to be in politics over there. i see her fiscal policies and the credentials someone in her position should need in this current financial turmoil are sadly lacking. she would be better running a school fete.

and how do you americans feel knowing your futures have been traded off to give the FED (privately owned by the banking families) more power over you and enslaving you to higher taxes for the rest of your lives?

al qaeda? i think you should be more upset with al the banker. youve been sold down the river and you just sit there and take it like sheep. enjoy the ride

antileft
21 September 2008 at 11:29

Oh fairplay, you dont get it at all, do you? Im not pro-America. I dont have to answer for anything that happens there. Im right wing- thats very different from pro-America.

"what is your capitalist take on the FEds buyout this week? come on mr know it all. your seemingly right wing capitalist mates on the other side of the atlantic who you revere sooooooo much have socialised the banking system!!!"

Of course they have! Its a mess! What does this have to do with me!? Unless you think that this somehow writes off the capitalist system? Because that would be dumb. I dont see left wing countries doing any better.

"and the best of it yet is mccain the no brain asking for an investigation. oh, how his bosses in the banking families must be laughing at that one!"

Yes, so what?! Did I say McCain has a brain? No I didnt.

"over to palin. a perfect example of american values, and the qualifications needed to be in politics over there. i see her fiscal policies and the credentials someone in her position should need in this current financial turmoil are sadly lacking. she would be better running a school fete."

What?! Look- on another thread I called Palin a moron-Bush with tits. Where did you get the impression I supported her?! Quit making assumptions about my beliefs!

"and how do you americans feel knowing your futures have been traded off to give the FED (privately owned by the banking families) more power over you and enslaving you to higher taxes for the rest of your lives?"

Im not American- why would you assume I was?!

"al qaeda? i think you should be more upset with al the banker. youve been sold down the river and you just sit there and take it like sheep. enjoy the ride"

Yeah sure- Ill enjoy the ride. Im in a better boat than you, dumbass! My wage comes from the internet so Im currently in South East Asia (havent lived in the west for 5 years), whereas you probably live in the west and have to stew in the mess theyve made. Am I right?! I thought so. Learn to swim.

Mr Fnortner
21 September 2008 at 15:09

What makes the military action in Iraq patently illegal, kevnsheri, is the Constitutional requirement that the Congress declare war. While the president may be the commander-in-chief, that authority gives him civilian control over the military, which prevents the military from becoming a fourth branch of government, and allows him to direct their actions in times of war, and in general. The authority as commander-in-chief does not permit the president to take on military adventures that look like wars yet simply don't have the name (or why restrict war-declaring to Congress?).

Second, wars require countries against which they are to be fought. The US is not fighting a war against Iraq. We are not even fighting a war against al Qaeda (not a country, by the way). This military action is referred to as the "war in Iraq," a nice way of saying "we don't know whom we are fighting." There is no country available against which the Congress could declare war if it wanted to. The US military is actually conducting an illegal occupation, following an illegal invasion of a sovereign nation. Plus it is shooting up the place.

What is, or should be, going on is a police action--an effort by law enforcement personnel to run to ground one Osama bin Laden--not a military action. As for the late Saddam Hussein, until his belligerence reached the level of a truly critical international threat, he should have been allowed to be a murderous tyrant. That is the nature of sovereigns. The United Nations, regardless of one's opinion of them, is the forum for dealing with out of control national leaders, not the Pentagon or the Oval Office. It should have been blue helmeted troops that entered Iraq for the purpose of removing Hussein, had that been the world's consensus.

fairplay
21 September 2008 at 17:02

AL

stop bragging and get with your own agenda. youve pummeled us with right wing rhetoric for months. just because the going's not good for your goons at the moment dont start passing the buck. youve lauded everything american for months and dont deny it.

by the way, i am on the social, drink 12 pints a day and sell bootleg cigs on the side

lol

ct
21 September 2008 at 18:38

Somebody please fire Andrew Stephen. He has given out the same drivelling article every week for months now. Every week, another topical reason for his sneaking suspicion Obama will lose, and how everybody actually hates him really but somehow we all think everybody loves him.

For example, this paragraph, 18 sep.:

"She also knows that the Democrats have selected a previously little-known male celebrity [oxymoron] to be their presidential candidate, who in turn chose a 65-year-old man to be his running mate, rather than the woman who finished in a virtual dead heat with him in the Democratic primaries."

And in the article 'The Joe and Hillary Show' in the issue dated 1 sep.:

"Giuliani dropped by in Denver and said it was a 'no-brainer' that Obama should have chosen Clinton, given that their primary season tussle ended in a virtual dead-heat."

I thought this was a socialist magazine. Why is your US reporter a Giuliani clone?

He reiterates McCain/Clinton attack ads and sounds like a spokesman for their campaigns. I'm glad he's gotten over his love affair with Hillary Clinton (or am I just a sexist) though that will probably reappear next week.

I'm hardly an Obama fan and those critical of him are encouraged, but whining about how the primaries ending in a 'virtual dead heat' and how more people voted for Clinton, 'probably' (a lie by the way), gets boring by September. It's over. Deal with it.

There is also no stories whatsoever about the Republican debacle, except relative to how Obama has no hope whatsoever, and not even a mention whatsoever of any of the third party candidates.

I repeat, fire this hack. I am cancelling my subscription.

antileft
22 September 2008 at 14:17

"youve pummeled us with right wing rhetoric for months. just because the going's not good for your goons at the moment dont start passing the buck. youve lauded everything american for months and dont deny it."

Oh here we go- black and white thinking. Typical of a leftie. Im right wing, hence... I must be pro-American. Ill tell you what- if Ive been doing it for months- find one single post which contradicts anything Ive said here. Go ahead! (Enjoy wasting valuable beer time, slob)

"by the way, i am on the social, drink 12 pints a day and sell bootleg cigs on the side lol"

LOL indeed! Enjoy learning to swim- its losers like you that are the first to suffer when the economy goes down.

fairplay
22 September 2008 at 20:17

i wont suffer matey. recession are times to make money. you are and always have been pro american

fortunately most of us on here see right through you. spoilt kid, bullied at boarding school, battling with your sexuality and definitely peering down your nose at us little people.

AL the rides nearly over. buy your che t-shirt baby and get with the revolution. its coming my friend and there will be no hiding place for the lunatics and thieves you covet

antileft
23 September 2008 at 05:54

"i wont suffer matey. recession are times to make money."

I just love this, fairplay! I think its great!!! By "making money", you mean... Flogging cigarettes for a few bucks!!! Hahaha oh yes very entrepreneurial!!!! Im sure youll make a fortune!!! People are bound to buy more cigarettes during a recession, arent they?! Imagine- you could charge an extra 50 cents!!! This is so funny... What a pathetic loser! Love it!!! How many ciggies did you sell today? Enough to rent a movie later?! Hahahaha maybe it you try really hard youll be able to afford a bicycle!!!

fairplay
23 September 2008 at 06:25

i was being sarcastic you complete clown. i have just shown you for what you really really are though. totally naive, no streetwise skills. easily wound up. in fact, an absolute donkey, in life and political thought (i apologise to any donkeys reading this who may be offended).

how you fell for that one has made my day. my week. even my year. i take the chubby brown remarks back AL. you are the mr bean of the new statesman.

getting back to sarah palin, did you two go to school together? neither one of you is the sharpest knife in the drawer after all!

fairplay
23 September 2008 at 13:50

this is a current affairs blog AL. not somewhere to launch your personal crusade against all things good in this world. grow up mr bean!

FYO i am in the travel business. unfortunately we do not provide one way tickets to nowhere. tell me, where do you, george bush and the rest of your right wing mates buy yours from?

proudlyleft
23 September 2008 at 19:35

Palin factor or no Palin factor, the deeply-seated racism of at least 50 percent of American whites was going to come to the fore sooner or later, and it is just convenient for racist DEMOCRATS that they can excuse their (inevitable) turn away from Obama by giving it a 'gender' or anti-elite explanation.

dc
24 September 2008 at 07:18

"Drudge realized how bad this would look for the Obama campaign."

Don't be absurd. The Drudge report is Republican. Well known fact. Do your homework. Wiki is your friend:

"During the 2008 US Presidential campaign, the Drudge Report showed bias against Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama, while supporting the Republican candidate John McCain.[28]"

fairplay
24 September 2008 at 11:01

and wiki isnt biased to anyone???

gino
24 September 2008 at 11:02

bleeding jayus this woman is a nutter the michael jackson of politics the only state in america where no wildlife is safe yet she spent 200 million dollrs on a bridge to nowhere praise the lord america u need it

montrell
27 September 2008 at 10:47

Martha's comment is the most relevant here I think.

No one is going to deny that Palin has some rough edges, but attacking her personally only really plays into the hands

of the millions of Republician looking for an excuse - any excuse - to vote for her and/or her boss.

The way to attack Sarah Palin is not through the guns or the pork or the bad soap-opera family life. Its by pointing

out again and again that saying "Im just a hockey mom who stumbled into politics" is not a credible basis for an

application for the job of Deputy Commander in Chief. That kind of hustle will certainly play to the crowds at GOP

rallies, but I suspect the generals in the War Room (if she tried it on them) might take a different view of her

understanding of America's problems and the level of her commitment to solving them.

Palin's a lightweight punching above her weight. Thats no crime and she's been doing that all her life and cleverly

too, so good luck to her on that. But even in an election such as this where both leading candidates are so much less

qualified than their predecessors and both have qualities that the other needs and lacks, she stands out.

A direct attack on her rough edges willl only embolden her - you have to cut off her room to manouvre, ignore the soap

opera, stop her playing to the crowd the way she has been doing so far and test her on how seriously is she taking her

application for the job she is applying for - thats when you play the "hockey mom" card, not before. Setting her up so

she digs her own hole and falls in is easier said than done of course, but probably as good a way of taking her down as

any.

Secondly, Andrew's point about how Obama is misreading his opponent is a perceptive one. Personally I dont think

Obama-Clinton was ever going to happen, given Obama's nature and his limitations. Kennedy-Johnson only worked because

Kennedy was the boss, Kennedy was as qualified as Johnson for the job and had as much political throw weight as Johnson

and (although both needed each other), Johnson needed Kennedy more than the other way round. And both of them knew it.

Even if Obama had had the bottle to choose Clinton, I suspect they would have fallen out a year or so down the line and

he would have had to ask for her resignation. Kennedy only had to deal with one Johnson at a time after all.

That said, Im not sure Biden helps him in any way that matters. Its not hindsight to say that Obama should have known

that McCain would pick somebody "young" and given the presence and impact of Hilary, had to have known that a woman was

at least a possibility. More than anything, Last but not least, Obama had to think like McCain and by so doing, wonder

whether McCain would ever want to be shafted again the way he was in 2000. Those wounds still run deep despite the

presence of Karl Rove and other ex-Bushites on his team. McCain wants to win of course, but some things you dont

forget. He wasnt ever going to pick someone who didnt accept who was boss of the outfit.

So who would I have picked? Er, let me get back to you on that..............

Independent
23 October 2008 at 02:37

"the deeply-seated racism of at least 50 percent of American whites was going to come to the fore sooner or later"

Oh, for the love of God - why is it that if one does not agree with Barack Obama's policies or positions, one must be a racist? I don't agree with many of John McCain's positions, so does that make me ageist? Of course not! I wish people would just stop making these types of accusations already. Can't we just concentrate on what's really important and forget for just a while that one of the candidates is biracial? The issues matter, not the ages or ancestry of the candidates.

laurie
24 October 2008 at 21:56

Palin is drop-dead gorgeous.

PUMA08

gumchewer
18 November 2008 at 18:21

CT - Just read your comment and am astounded by your ignorance. Don't think Andrew Stephen ever hinted for one second that Obama wouldn't win, but warned us (with great foresight, as it turns out) what a charlatan he is. We're seeing this already in his appointments of lobbyists, his big-money donors, and Zionist extremists. Also don't see a single fact or word word in the paragraph you quote, namely, "She also knows that the Democrats have selected a previously little-known male celebrity [oxymoron] to be their presidential candidate, who in turn chose a 65-year-old man to be his running mate, rather than the woman who finished in a virtual dead heat with him in the Democratic primaries." Not an oxymoron at all: Obama was previously little-known but became a celebrity thanks to the media. Are you disputing Stephen's assertion that Clinton finised in "a virtual dead heat" with Obama in the Democratic primaries"? In the primary elections alone, in fact, Hillary Clinton easily BEAT Obama; Obama did better in the caucuses, that's all. Get over it, CT, and get a life.

Post your comment

Please note: you will need to login or register before your comment is displayed on the website

You may enter up to 2000 characters (about 300-350 words)

Characters left:

We want to encourage people to comment on our content and to exchange views with other readers and hope this will be done on a courteous basis. However, if you encounter posts which are offensive please let us know by emailing comments@newstatesman.co.uk and we will take swift action where necessary.

About the writer

Andrew Stephen

Andrew Stephen was appointed US Editor of the New Statesman in 2001, having been its Washington correspondent and weekly columnist since 1998. He is a regular contributor to BBC news programs and to The Sunday Times Magazine. He has also written for a variety of US newspapers including The New York Times Op-Ed pages. He came to the US in 1989 to be Washington Bureau Chief of The Observer and in 1992 was made Foreign Correspondent of the Year by the American Overseas Press Club for his coverage.

Read More

Vote!

Should Darling have been bolder with the 45% tax rate?