Obama comes out fighting

Andrew Stephen

Published 29 August 2008

The now official Democratic candidate passes his penultimate hurdle with flying colours but the real fight is only just beginning, says Andrew Stephen. Plus Thad Williamson reports on the doorstep battle for votes

Obama's acceptance speech in front of 80,000 people capped the biggest political extravaganza the US has ever seen.

So it’s now official, and 80,000 packed into the Denver Broncos’ football stadium in Denver on Thursday were there to see it: Barack Obama is now indisputably the Democratic candidate for the 2008 presidential election campaign, and the first bi-racial man in American history to win the nomination of a major party. The unlikely campaign that began 19 months ago in the freezing winter of Springfield, Illinois had reached and passed its penultimate hurdle.

Senator Obama himself, revelling in the biggest political extravaganza the US has ever seen, seized the opportunity on prime-time, coast-to-coast television to switch gears in campaign strategy - and the nation witnessed non-confrontational Obama morph into combative Obama.

"If John McCain wants to have a debate about who has the temperament and judgment to serve as the next commander-in-chief, that's a debate I'm ready to have," he roared with the characteristically brilliant, soaring oratory that has stirred so much enthusiasm across the world. "I've got news for you, John McCain. We all put our country first... John McCain likes to say that he'll follow bin Laden to the gates of hell, but he won't even go to the cave where he lives."

McCain, meanwhile, also took advantage of the evening to spring a surprise, one-upmanship campaign ad on the nation’s television screens. Oozing supposed sincerity, McCain looked straight into the camera and congratulated his opponent: "Senator Obama, this is truly a good day for America," he said. "Too often, the achievements of our opponents go unnoticed." Minutes later, viewers saw an Obama campaign ad featuring a negative personal attack on McCain - all with the overall effect that Mr Nice Guy seemed to have transformed into an attack dog during the course of the evening, while the veteran old toughie McCain had changed into the warm and fuzzy of the two candidates.

All of which is to say it was a thoroughly political, highly calculated evening. To make certain the 80,000 seats in the stadium were filled, the Obama campaign had distributed 20,000 more tickets to supporters than there were seats - leaving many who had waited for hours to get through secret service security fuming that they were unable to get into the stadium for the big moment.

In fact, they had already missed a monumentally choreographed event in which entertainment and politics became inextricably intertwined: the likes of Sheryl Crow or Stevie Wonder were entertaining the teeming thousands in the so-called "mile-high" stadium one minute, Al Gore and Joe Biden thundering away the next.

No longer was there any pretence that American politics has not merged imperceptibly with entertainment and showbiz, sometimes making it hard to distinguish between them. I gather it will be somewhat similar at the Republican convention in St Paul, Minnesota that begins on 1 September - except that it will be country music entertaining the Republican masses, and the convention will intentionally and conspicuously be much less of a spectacle.

That is why the dramatic final day of the Democratic convention, perfectly timed to co-incide with the 45th anniversary of Martin Luther King’s "I Have A Dream" speech, was something of a risk for Obama - that it could re-enforce Republican attacks that he is all show and no substance. His speech, partly a shopping list of all the positive things an Obama administration would do - delivered, as ever, in spectacular fashion - was intended to pre-empt such charges.

Inside the stadium, though, there was much genuine emotion. Journalists abandoned any show of impartiality by joining in the party, with CNN’s main anchorman getting up and dancing (off-camera) with an Obama strategist to the strains of Stevie Wonder. More touchingly, the likes of 68-year-old Representative John Lewis - the only surviving, still-active member of Martin Luther King’s inner circle - repeated remarks by many African-Americans during the evening, that they never thought they would live to see the day when a black man was nominated by a major party to be president.

I wonder. I just hope they’re right that a major racial rubicon has been crossed with Obama’s nomination, and that it is not wishful thinking that African Americans have now gained political equality with whites. But would America be ready to nominate a younger John Lewis, say, whose skin is much darker and whose ancestors were slaves - like nearly all African Americans? Because Obama is half-white, did not have ancestors who were slaves, and did not have an economically underprivileged upbringing, he is far from being an ideal representative of America’s still-repressed black population - and a man whose style and manner is very different from the likes of Lewis and other highly respected African-American politicians of all ages who have never come remotely close to being seen as potential US presidents.

Obama is unquestionably one of America’s greatest-ever political orators, though, and Thursday night’s speech encompassed a touch of JFK here, a dab of MLK there, with bits of Lincoln thrown in for good measure. Fireworks exploded from a mock Roman coliseum to mark the end of his acceptance speech as Michelle Obama and their two daughters, aged 7 and 10, joined Obama on stage and dodged the confetti raining down on them.

But now it’s straight back to politics as usual. Polls still show Obama only very slightly ahead of McCain, worryingly for the Democrats; Rasmussen's Thursday daily tracking poll, taken before the extravaganza from which Obama should be able to expect a bounce, had them tied. The presumptive Republican candidate will unveil his running-mate on Friday, hoping to upstage Obama’s acceptance speech coverage and steal some of his spectacular thunder. In the words of McCain’s Thursday night’s surprise lovey-dovey ad, “Tomorrow, we'll be back at it.” He can say that again: by the time McCain is officially enthroned by the Republicans at their convention next Thursday, real battle will have commenced. And much blood, I predict, will then be spilled.

Post this article to

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • newsvine
  • Reddit

20 comments from readers

kayembaro
29 August 2008 at 12:15

"But would America be ready to nominate a younger John Lewis, say, whose skin is much darker and whose ancestors were slaves - like nearly all African Americans? Because Obama is half-white, did not have ancestors who were slaves"

kayembaro
29 August 2008 at 12:35

"But would America be ready to nominate a younger John Lewis, say, whose skin is much darker and whose ancestors were slaves - like nearly all African Americans? Because Obama is half-white, did not have ancestors who were slaves" I would like to tell you that you're a little ignorant when you make this kind of statement. Obama ancestors were slaves in their own continent Africa as were mine. Maybe his missed the boats that brought my ancestors out of Africa but Obama's ancestors were slaves of the British Empire. They called it colonialism. Do you remember 1885 conference? Also you may call Obama half white-half black BUT you should remember the American' one drop rule? Today he is called half white-half black because of what he has accomplished. They always want to denie the black accomplishments. Why don't They call Malcom X or Jesse Jackson quater white-3 quater-black...There is no such a thing in America as half white half black...ONE DROP RULE. If you don't know he one drop rule, google it and learn

kevingan
30 August 2008 at 04:09

I admire Andrew Stephens' commentary on the presidential race, especially his refusal to admire Obama uncritically.

In this case, though, his point that Americans would have a harder time accepting a more genuinely American black person like John Lewis, while true, is presented here with the wrong emphasis. The fact is, the majority of people accept radical changes only gradually--most women in politics had to be spouses or daughters of political men in order to gain entree--and that is the case here too with Obama. Stephens can't criticize Obama here; only human nature.

What I don't like about Obama is that he has, I think, cynically taken advantage of that fact about human nature in order to beat a much more qualified candidate, Hillary Clinton, and his campaign's accusations of racism against Bill Clinton are really unforgivable (since all of Bill Clinton's suffering was at the hands of vicious racists whom he always resisted); but the fact that Obama is surfing upon the way majorities accept change is not, in general, a point for criticizing him.

kevingan
30 August 2008 at 04:10

I admire Andrew Stephens' commentary on the presidential race, especially his refusal to admire Obama uncritically.

In this case, though, his point that Americans would have a harder time accepting a more genuinely American black person like John Lewis, while true, is presented here with the wrong emphasis. The fact is, the majority of people accept radical changes only gradually--most women in politics had to be spouses or daughters of political men in order to gain entree--and that is the case here too with Obama. Stephens can't criticize Obama here; only human nature.

What I don't like about Obama is that he has, I think, cynically taken advantage of that fact about human nature in order to beat a much more qualified candidate, Hillary Clinton, and his campaign's accusations of racism against Bill Clinton are really unforgivable (since all of Bill Clinton's suffering was at the hands of vicious racists, whom he always resisted); but the fact that Obama is surfing upon the way majorities accept change is not, in general, a point for criticizing him, except to say that he is a completely typical politician, though more skillful than most.

vruz
30 August 2008 at 11:12

Dear @kevingan,

You seem to contradict yourself when you say "most women in politics had to be spouses or daughters of political men in order to gain entree", and ditch Obama saying he's less qualified than Hillary Clinton.

It's a well known fact that Hillary Clinton is the wife of former President Bill Clinton, so your rationale seems to run against the argument you try to support.

Roland Baker
30 August 2008 at 12:08

Andrew Stephen does a shallow whinge on spin over substance. He gets away with ignoring Michelle Obama's innate racism and lack of skills via which, by cynically exploiting her children, she has vicariously lived her husband's acclaim. She seems to have taken the role of Commander in Chief which is not her job.

So let's get to the DNC 2008 with Breaking News of what Madeleine Albright says:

"Senator Obama speaks to our hopes, to our belief in ourselves, to the future and to the better angels of our nature.

"With his superb choice for vice president, Senator Joe Biden, he will keep our country secure while returning it to its rightful place as the world's most respected champion of law, prosperity and peace."

Champion of LAW. Is that International Law? Obama ought to know. He studied law. Was he President of the Harvard Law Review in 1990? So what do we want? Guantanamo shut. When do we want it? NOW! NOW! NOW!

What do we want? Jurisdiction over the USA for War Crimes at the Hague. When do we want it? NOW! NOW! NOW!

Can I hold you to your word on that? Which word is that? That America is not guilty on all charges. We shall see Mr Bush. It depends on whether Ms Albright, Joe Biden and Barack Obama understand the phrase "respected champion of law".

kevingan
30 August 2008 at 16:04

Dear Vruz,

no contradiction--Hillary and Barack are *both* transitional figures taking the particular route that's available to them as non-majority candidates. (The military is another, and Colin Powell could have ridden that route to the Presidency, perhaps.)

But of the two, Hillary has a lot more experience of various kinds: working as counsel on the Watergate Committee, on education and children's issues in Arkansas, being First Adviser as First Lady, surviving unremitting right wing attacks and the Lewinski scandal, and even in failing at health care--you learn a lot when you fail on that scale!

She also showed in the debates that she has an enormously detailed grasp of issues; as James Fallows pointed out in his analysis of all the debates, she flubbed just one question out of many hundreds, even though she received by far the toughest grilling overall. She really knows her brief, in other words.

Both Barack and Obama remind me of what used to be the case for women and minority physicians: they had to be twice as knowledgeable and competent as their white male colleagues to be taken seriously. But their double skills--eloquence in his case, policy knowledge in hers--are still of a different order from each other's.

Or so it seems to me! Thanks for your comment.

Douglas Chalmers
30 August 2008 at 16:52

"If John McCain wants to have a debate about who has the temperament and judgment to serve as the next commander-in-chief, that's a debate I'm ready to have..."

Such a strange combination of bedfellows we are now facing...... and the two parties' nominees could best be described as the two who perhaps should have actually been the VP's.

Instead of a winning ticket, the Democrats shot themselves in the foot - twice. As if setting their two best candidates against each other wasn't bad enough, they have chosen a small man as VP in an age when it should have been a male/female (or female/male partnership). They have screwed up badly.

But McCain, merely a small man in stature, at least has experience and a long history on his side. That is around 25 years more in age and 22 years more in politics. BO isn't even old enough to fully grasp what that means.

Most of the Republicans supporters probably preferred Romney or some male person as VP if not as the presidential nominee but got Sarah Palin for VP instead. At least the GOP was clever enough to capitalize on the Dems' bad decisions. And Palin, although labeled "young", is a middle-aged mother of five children.

And at least Palin has a voice and a set of opinions instead of simply being a walking advertisement for fawning upon AIPAC. Biden's now familiar quote: "You don't have to be Jewish to be a Zionist, and I'm a Zionist." Perhaps the Republicans are a little more clever after all, though, as backing an organization which has leaked state secrets to foreign governments will come back to bite everyone still connected with them soon, uhh. http://www.jewishjournal.com/articles/item/analysis_sarah_pa...

antileft
30 August 2008 at 18:21

I didnt say that I like his policies, doug. I said that its his policies that count- not whether he has a dick or not. So why are you complaining that he has a dick, instead of complaining about his lack of policies?

Douglas Chalmers
30 August 2008 at 18:38

Oh, antileft, the USA has so many inspiring smiling politicians yet they are all bought and sold and they all toe the party line. Even GWB has his good days - when they shoot him up with monkey-gland extract, duh. No wonder the world is a mess.

Now they want to start a war with Russia - or, more likely, they want NATO to start a war with Russia - thus dragging Britain and others into the conflict as Neocon puppets, again!

Douglas Chalmers
30 August 2008 at 18:53

#kayembaro: "Obama ancestors were slaves in their own continent Africa as were mine..."

The American "one drop rule" might ahve helped put their most overt racism in the past but it is still an issue in the minds of black people in the USA, kayembaro. Unlike black Africans, they have a long-ingrained inferiority complex that they must battle with as a result. I think even Condi Rice would admit that.

BO doesn't have so much of an issue with color as he was raised outside the mainland USA and for much of the time in very Asian Indonesia. It certainly doesn't give him a pro-white bias but it doesn't wear him out, either. That kind of thinking is a big advantage for a man of color in the effectively still-racist USA.

Having both he and Hillary Clinton in the contest for so long has done a lot for America, though, as they have had to afce up to their remaining issues with racism and with African-Americans in particular. But what did they do? They just diverted their prejudices into attacking Latino Mexican legal and illegal migrant workers and also raging against China for supposedly stealing all their factories, duh.

Thus nothing much has changed really in that respect but sexism and age-ism have been put squarely on the table as well this time. It was obvious that Hillary was being targeted and even McCain had a hard time getting momentum. But now that Hillary is out of the race, Obama has nothing going for him except hot air. He is quite alone without her.

Douglas Chalmers
31 August 2008 at 08:42

#antileft: "...leave the voting to people who are aware that dick isnt the issue..."

Just maybe McCain's choice of VP is more experienced and more qualified than Barack Obama for the top job, too.....

CV of Sarah Palin:-

Foreign Relations experience - Governor of state that borders two foreign countries, Canada and Russia (Barack Obama - Chaired Senate subcommittee on Europe but never called it into session)

Executive Experience - Governor for 2 years; Mayor for 10 years (Barack Obama - none)

Military Affairs experience - Commander in Chief of Alaska National Guard; Son is enlisted Infantryman in U.S. Army (Barack Obama - none)

http://www.redstate.com/diaries/redstate/2008/aug/30/tale-of...

Douglas Chalmers
31 August 2008 at 12:28

Now, what to do about you, #antileft, you're obviously not bright enough to post here, duh. But just like the USA's pundits, you haven't a clue what has hit you. http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0808/12997.html

I don't think you understand that BO's race is over. The winning team has only one dick between them. That is so-ooo natural...... and they even have poliices, or at least, Palin does. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-_vaH2BjVeA

But what impresses me the most is that neither her nor McCain are lawyers. The age of legalism must come to an end or we will all be ruled by totalitarian states - and the pNAC is no exception.

Douglas Chalmers
31 August 2008 at 15:54

"The Riflewoman" will shoot it off for you, antileft, ha ha! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mEPOSlt6UQg

Sarah Palin visits a rifle training session in Kuwait http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yn7UzxXv8p4

And Obama "comes out fighting..."???

Douglas Chalmers
31 August 2008 at 16:08

"...there was much genuine emotion. Journalists abandoned any show of impartiality by joining in the party, with CNN’s main anchorman getting up and dancing..."

I think that there is a problem with US reporters (with dicks, antileft) who have made their careers out of fawning over Barack Obama. Now, a woman has been chosen in what they thought was conclusively back to their precious all-male football game excuse for politics.

They were sooooo wrong! This election IS going to be about SEX as well as and as much as color. After all, that IS another aspect of human rights issues long ignored in the USA and all that they could do to sweep it under the rug with Hillary has now blasted right back in their beery faces, uhh.

Get it right, sluggo (Craig, I mean, duh). The future of the male testosterone-grunting neanderthal ethic is coming to a "grisly" end. No, Sarah Plain is NOT just a "Naughty Alaskan librarian"..... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yh-lW2opLyQ

Cybertiger
01 September 2008 at 12:28

""The Riflewoman" will shoot it off for you, antileft, ha ha! "

Sarah Palin may have no prick but she's still a dick - and will be an old man's heart beat away from being the POTUS.

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/211769.php

God bless America! Only in the USA!

Douglas Chalmers
01 September 2008 at 18:09

"Sarah Palin on Native people"..... a new way of relating to people (its called "being normal", uhh) as oppoesed to the old white-is-right "settler society" paradigm.....

"I have known Sarah as a friend for 10 years and my husband's family has known her family for over 30 years so I can vouch for the fact that as long time Alaskans, Sarah and her family have great respect for Native people. So much so that Sarah is married to one! Her husband Todd is a Yupik Eskimo from Dillingham; a member of the Curyung tribe. Sarah is very close to Todd's grandmother Lena Andre who is a highly respected elder in the Bristol Bay region..." http://www.sitnews.us/1006Viewpoints/101106_karen_rhoades.ht...

Todd Palin unique among nation's 5 first husbands http://dwb.adn.com/news/politics/story/8924080p-8824177c.htm...

Zoetrope
02 September 2008 at 18:55

Sen. McLame's campaign bumpersticker should read:

"Viagra-Vagina 08" (anti-birth control, anti-choice). Sarah Palin is Hillary Clinton's gynecological twin, and that's about it. This is simply the Politics of Panic - the US Republican party has been hijacked by radical, conservative Christian Fundamentalists and Evangelicals who tend to be misogynists, racists, homophobes. Palin was a dangerous pick for VP and this latest gimmick by McLame handed the election to Obama (who is the real deal). Thank you Viagra!

Ari Rusila
02 September 2008 at 20:09

I have considered Mr.Obama as good alternative to McCain with hope to see some change with US Foreign policy. However when he selected Biden as his running mate based e.g. Biden's experience about foreign affairs I doubt his judgment. Selecting a man on the record for stating that “all Serbs should be placed in Nazi-style concentration camps” during Senatorial deliberations in 1999 over NATO aggression on Serbia, and that United States ought to conduct a fascist, “Japanese-German style occupation” of Serbia. For quotations above I do not have direct source. However Mr. Biden's acts and speeches have showed a such Serb hate that probably they are correct. Also his son has recent racist comments in TV. If Mr.Obama needs help of this kind of redneck with his foreign policy so bay bay change. My expectations are now below zero level - unfortunately.

More about US Foreign policy e.g. http://arirusila.wordpress.com

kcboy
02 September 2008 at 23:47

*sigh*

When Don Imus says the words "nappy" and "hos" together on radio he gets fired.

When Barack Hussein Obama gives thousands of dollars to fund, and actively supports, a hate teaching racist who follows and teaches a theology that says God commands that whites die . . . he gets chosen as the Dems presidential nominee.

Welcome to the world of liberalism.

Post your comment

Please note: you will need to login or register before you can comment on the website

About the writer

Andrew Stephen

Andrew Stephen was appointed US Editor of the New Statesman in 2001, having been its Washington correspondent and weekly columnist since 1998. He is a regular contributor to BBC news programs and to The Sunday Times Magazine. He has also written for a variety of US newspapers including The New York Times Op-Ed pages. He came to the US in 1989 to be Washington Bureau Chief of The Observer and in 1992 was made Foreign Correspondent of the Year by the American Overseas Press Club for his coverage.

Read More

Vote!

Will Baroness Ashton be an effective EU foreign minister?

Suggest a question

View comments

© New Statesman 1913 – 2009

Tracker